SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

34,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop configuration that delivers a solid 79th-percentile combined performance ranking, driven by a high-performing mobile processor and a capable entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing, with an 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile. For this analysis, it is critical to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor built on the Meteor Lake architecture, representing Intel's Core Ultra Series 1. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz, all within a 28 W TDP. This power envelope is indicative of a chip designed for thin-and-light laptops, yet the core configuration provides substantial parallel processing capability. The architecture is manufactured on Intel's 7 nm process node, and the cache hierarchy consists of 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is listed as DDR5, dependent on the motherboard, with a dual-channel bus providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads while maintaining respectable single-core performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 14,551 points in the multi-core test and 1,759 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score is particularly telling; it places the CPU in strong contention with desktop-class processors from previous generations. The data shows a PassMark multi-thread score of 25,933 and a single-thread score of 3,509. This suggests that the processor can handle both heavily-threaded tasks, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, and lighter, single-thread-dependent applications like office productivity or web browsing with ease.

Comparing to its nearest rivals from the benchmark database, the Core Ultra 7 165H is virtually tied with the AMD EPYC 4244P and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, both showing a delta of -0.5% and -0.4% respectively relative to the Intel chip's average score. It is also just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 34,083. This indicates that while it is not a performance outlier, it sits at the top of a performance tier shared with several strong contenders, making it a very safe and predictable choice for high-end mobile computing. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market today.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H's performance tier relative to other CPUs?

A: The processor ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34,083. This places it slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (0.3% delta) and slightly behind the AMD EPYC 4244P and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (both -0.4% and -0.5% delta respectively).

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. It is virtually tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (-0.1% delta) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (-0.1% delta), while being 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H features a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 lanes available from the CPU.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and provides a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the pixel rate of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Arc A370M has a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s, which contributes to its ability to handle display output and basic rasterization.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M still in production?

A: No, the production status for the Intel Arc A370M is listed as "End-of-life."

Q: What is the integrated graphics solution on the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H?

A: The CPU includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG with 128 execution units (128EU).

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically using the DG2-128 chip. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node, with a die size of 157 mm² and a transistor count of 7,200 million. The GPU features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster operations units (ROPs). It also includes 8 dedicated ray tracing (RT) cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. It is configured with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The benchmark scores for the Arc A370M are a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673. The average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This performance level puts it in a similar class to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which has a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD FirePro W8000, also at -0.1%. It is slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% delta). This indicates that the A370M is a competent entry-level to mid-range performer for 1080p gaming. The compute capabilities are defined by its 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, making it suitable for light content creation and AI-accelerated tasks that can leverage its hardware.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game titles and graphics APIs. With 8 RT cores, it offers hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature typically found in higher-end GPUs. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for its performance class, though the 64-bit bus and 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy workloads. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are indicative of its fill-rate capabilities. It is important to reiterate that the GPU is end-of-life, which means it is a legacy component, but its performance remains relevant for a specific segment of the market.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the 84th-percentile CPU and 74th-percentile GPU creates a configuration that is CPU-heavy in its performance profile. The data suggests that in most tasks, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H will have significant headroom, while the Intel Arc A370M will be the primary limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads. For example, in a game that is GPU-bound, the CPU's high multi-core score of 14,551 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25,933 would likely go underutilized, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become the bottlenecks for texture streaming and fill rate.

Conversely, in productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can assist with rendering, but the CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads will be the primary driver of physics calculations, scene graph processing, and code compilation. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking indicates that it is well above the average processor, meaning it is less likely to be the limiting factor in most real-world scenarios. The GPU, while ranking in the 74th percentile, is still a discrete part, and its performance will be sufficient for e-sports titles and older AAA games at 1080p, but it is not designed to push high frame rates at maximum settings in the most demanding modern titles.

The estimated FPS scaling, derived from the benchmark scores, suggests that the system will perform best when settings are tuned to reduce the load on the GPU. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,509 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing in games will be consistent, but the overall frame rate ceiling will be determined by the Arc A370M. In summary, the CPU is not a bottleneck; the GPU is the component that determines the upper limit of gaming performance, while the CPU provides a robust foundation for a wide range of other applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a mobile processor using the Intel BGA 2049 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with bandwidth up to 89.6 GB/s. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for high-speed NVMe storage. The system is designed as an integrated mobile solution, so the upgrade path is primarily limited to increasing the amount of RAM to the maximum supported by the motherboard and swapping out the storage drive for a faster PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD.

The GPU, being an "IGP" slot width component, is also not a user-replaceable part in most laptop designs. The TDP of the CPU is 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, which gives a combined thermal load that is manageable for a laptop cooling solution. The suggested PSU for the GPU is null, which is typical for mobile components that rely on the laptop's internal power delivery system. A sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be to invest in a high-capacity, high-bandwidth DDR5 RAM kit, as the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a shared resource between the CPU and GPU. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics on the CPU can also serve as a fallback for power-saving modes, though the discrete GPU is the primary renderer.

The platform is at the end of its lifecycle for the GPU, but the CPU's architecture is relatively recent, having been released in December 2023. For users looking for more graphics performance, the only path is to purchase a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as there is no way to upgrade the discrete GPU in this configuration. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that the platform is not a bottleneck for future storage devices, but the overall system performance is tethered to its original specifications.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a high level of CPU performance for productivity tasks but have modest graphics requirements. It is an ideal choice for software developers and data analysts who need to compile code, run virtual machines, or process large datasets, all of which benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads. The 84th-percentile CPU ranking ensures that these tasks will be handled swiftly. For students and small business workstations, the combination provides a responsive system for office applications, web development, and statistical analysis, where the GPU is less critical.

For gamers, the target audience is those playing at 1080p with medium to high settings in less demanding titles. The 74th-percentile GPU ranking means it can handle e-sports titles like League of Legends or Counter-Strike 2 with high frame rates, but it will struggle with the latest AAA titles at maximum settings. Content creators who work primarily with photo editing or light 1080p video editing will also find this system adequate, as the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,551 will accelerate export times, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for the GPU-accelerated effects in most editing software. This is not a system for high-end 3D rendering or heavy 4K video editing, as the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p in e-sports titles, the system is well-suited. The CPU's robust single-thread score of 3,509 and multi-thread score of 25,933 in PassMark ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the Arc A370M can deliver playable frame rates. However, in demanding AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance, requiring lower settings to achieve 60 FPS.

Streaming: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a strong streaming CPU. Its 16 cores and 22 threads can handle the encoding workload (via software x264) while simultaneously running a game. The 28 W TDP keeps thermals in check, but the GPU's performance will limit the in-game quality settings that can be used while streaming, as the GPU is already the primary bottleneck.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,551 is excellent for rendering and exporting timelines in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The Arc A370M provides hardware acceleration for effects and decoding, but the 4 GB VRAM may be limiting for complex projects with many layers or high-resolution proxies.

3D Rendering: The CPU will be the primary workhorse. With a PassMark floating-point math score of 66,273, it can handle ray-tracing calculations in CPU-based renderers (like Blender's Cycles). The GPU's 8 RT cores offer some acceleration, but its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so final renders will be slow compared to systems with higher-end GPUs.

Software Development: This configuration is ideal for developers. The 84th-percentile CPU ranking ensures fast compilation times, and the PassMark data encryption score of 17,169 indicates strong performance for secure coding tasks. The GPU is sufficient for running multiple virtual desktops or UI rendering, but the CPU is the star here for building large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The system is overqualified for these tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance of 1,759 in Cinebench R23 makes spreadsheet calculations and document processing instantaneous. The GPU is more than capable of driving multiple 4K external displays for research and writing, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H CPU with the Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake processor designed for high-performance mobile computing. The GPU is an entry-level discrete part from Intel's Arc Alchemist generation. The combined percentile ranking is 79, which places this system in the upper-middle tier of all benchmarked systems. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 74th percentile ranking is respectable but represents the main performance constraint for gaming. This pairing is best described as a productivity-first system with modest gaming capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H achieves an average benchmark score of 34,083, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a 0.3% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H and a 0.4% deficit against the AMD EPYC 4244P and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. It is statistically tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and the AMD FirePro W8000, while being 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,551 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 25,933 indicate that the CPU can handle demanding workloads with ease. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 confirm its position in the lower-mid range of graphics performance. In the absence of measured FPS data, the combined percentile of 79 suggests that this system will provide a smooth experience for general productivity and moderate gaming, but it will not be a high-end gaming machine. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a competent, if not exceptional, entry-level discrete solution.