SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

17,074 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor built on the Meteor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 7 nm process node. It carries a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a remarkably low 9W TDP that positions it firmly in the ultra-portable laptop segment. The chip's cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 12 MB shared L3 pool.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 7 164U delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 4488. The R15 multi-core result of 1304 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 13296 reinforce a picture of a processor that punches above its power envelope. Single-thread performance is equally notable: Cinebench R23 single-core reaches 1590, R20 single-core hits 633, and R15 single-core lands at 225. The PassMark single-thread score of 2996 further confirms the architecture's efficiency at modest clocks.

The processor's average benchmark score of 17074 places it in the 71st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7573X with an average score of 17070 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Core i5-11400 at 17067 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 17035 (0.2% ahead of the 164U). The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120, putting the 164U just 0.3% behind. This clustering shows that despite its tiny 9W TDP, the Core Ultra 7 164U competes with desktop-class processors from several generations ago.

Real-world workload analysis shows a processor that excels at bursty, latency-sensitive tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 137133 and encryption score of 8838 indicate strong throughput for archival and security workloads. Extended instructions score 7918, while floating-point math reaches 33581 and integer math hits 50387. The physics score of 918 and prime number finding score of 56 are lower, suggesting that heavily iterative, branch-heavy code is not this chip's strongest suit. Random string sorting at 15131 rounds out a profile that favors memory-bandwidth-friendly operations over compute-bound loops.

The 12 MB shared L3 cache is modest by modern standards, but the Meteor Lake architecture's hybrid design — combining performance and efficiency cores — helps the chip maintain responsiveness across mixed workloads. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support, with capacity depending on motherboard implementation, provides adequate bandwidth for the core count. The processor also integrates Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics, which adds GPU capability without requiring a discrete adapter for basic display tasks.

The 164U is unlocked in neither multiplier nor clock, so overclocking headroom is nil. It uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is a soldered mobile package rather than a socketed desktop part. The production status is listed as Active, with a release date of December 13, 2023. The launch MSRP is $448. The PCIe implementation offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives but not for multi-GPU configurations.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the Core Ultra 7 164U and the Intel Arc A550M targets 1080p gaming with high frame rates. The CPU's 71st percentile standing and the GPU's 86th percentile position suggest that at 1080p with reduced settings, frame rates can approach the 100+ FPS territory for esports titles. However, the lack of measured FPS data for this pair means these expectations are estimates derived from the underlying benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 2996 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics threads will not starve the GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming: The 164U's 12-core, 14-thread configuration provides enough parallel headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 13296 and data compression score of 137133 indicate that the CPU can handle the overhead of streaming software while maintaining playable frame rates. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics can also offload some display tasks, freeing the discrete GPU for rendering. The 14 Gbps effective memory speed on the A550M helps with frame buffer transfers during capture.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 positions the 164U as capable of handling 1080p and light 4K video editing timelines. The PassMark floating-point math score of 33581 supports smooth effects processing and color grading. The Arc A550M's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory for previewing multi-layer timelines, though very long 4K projects may cause the GPU to swap to system memory. The CPU's 71st percentile rank suggests that export times will be acceptable for a mobile workstation, though not class-leading.

3D rendering: Multi-core rendering in Blender or similar applications will rely heavily on the CPU's 8766 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. This places the 164U close to desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-11400, meaning render times will be reasonable for small to medium scenes. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which can dramatically speed up final-frame renders when using GPU-based engines. The 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) further aids in denoising and AI-accelerated render passes.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the 14 threads and the PassMark integer math score of 50387. The data encryption score of 8838 supports secure development workflows. The CPU's proximity to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 in average benchmark score (0.2% delta) means build times for C++ or Rust projects will feel similar to that older but respected desktop chip. The 12 MB L3 cache helps keep hot code paths in fast memory during incremental builds.

Student and office work: The 9W TDP makes the 164U ideal for fanless or near-silent laptops with exceptional battery life. The PassMark single-thread score of 2996 ensures that spreadsheet recalculation, document rendering, and web browsing feel snappy. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics handle 4K video playback and multiple external displays without taxing the discrete GPU, which can remain idle to save power. The 71st percentile CPU ranking means this laptop will outpace the majority of office machines in everyday tasks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Core Ultra 7 164U's 9W TDP and the Arc A550M's 60W TDP create a power imbalance that favors the GPU in sustained workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8766 is respectable, but it is the GPU's 86th percentile ranking that will dominate in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming at 1080p, the A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the primary constraint in modern titles with high texture detail, while the CPU's 14 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The CPU's 71st percentile position among all CPUs, contrasted with the GPU's 86th percentile, suggests that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or AI inference, the 164U's PassMark physics score of 918 and find prime numbers score of 56 indicate that heavily threaded, branch-heavy code will cause the CPU to lag behind the GPU's capabilities. Conversely, in GPU-bound rendering tasks, the A550M's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will keep the pipeline saturated.

FPS scaling in games will follow the GPU's performance curve more closely than the CPU's. The A550M's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, scores 49957 in Geekbench OpenCL against the A550M's 49894, a delta of -0.4% favoring the A550M. This suggests that at 1080p ultra settings, frame rates will be limited by the GPU's rasterization and memory bandwidth rather than the CPU's instruction throughput. At lower resolutions like 720p, the CPU's single-thread performance of 2996 in PassMark may become the limiting factor, as the GPU has spare capacity to render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls.

For content creation, the bottleneck shifts depending on the stage of the pipeline. During video encoding, the CPU's 13296 PassMark multithread score and 137133 data compression score will drive the encoder, but the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will constrain the transfer of raw frames. During 3D rendering, the GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units will dominate the workload, leaving the CPU to handle scene graph traversal and physics, where its 12 MB L3 cache and 14 threads are adequate but not exceptional.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop combination targets mobile professionals who need balanced CPU and GPU performance without desktop power draw. The 9W CPU TDP and 60W GPU TDP make this suitable for thin-and-light chassis that prioritize portability over maximum performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with high but not ultra settings will find the A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 86th percentile ranking sufficient for modern titles, while the CPU's 71st percentile ensures no major hiccups in game logic.

Content creators working with 1080p video or medium-complexity 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's 8766 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS. The 16 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing for realistic previews in DCC applications, though final renders may still be faster on CPU for certain engines. The 12 MB L3 cache and 14 threads handle multi-tasking between creative apps and background processes smoothly.

Developers compiling code and running virtual machines will appreciate the 14 threads and the 50387 PassMark integer math score. The 71st percentile CPU ranking means this laptop outperforms the majority of existing desktop PCs, making it viable as a primary development machine. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support ensures adequate bandwidth for containerized workloads and database operations.

Students and office workers will find the 164U's low 9W TDP translates to all-day battery life, while the 2996 PassMark single-thread score keeps productivity apps responsive. Small business workstations using this platform gain the flexibility of a discrete GPU for occasional CAD or visualization work without sacrificing the portability of an ultrabook form factor. The A550M's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for dual 4K display output, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU provides a fallback for power-saving modes.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is soldered to the Intel BGA 2551 socket, meaning CPU upgrades are not possible without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with capacity depending on the specific motherboard implementation, so upgrading RAM is the most straightforward memory improvement. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, which is sufficient for a single discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs; adding more storage or a capture card would require sharing bandwidth or using the chipset's lanes.

The Arc A550M is an integrated mobile GPU with a 60W TDP and uses the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. Since it is an IGP-class component (slot width listed as IGP), it is not user-upgradeable in the traditional sense; the entire laptop's motherboard would need replacement to swap GPUs. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, indicating that the Alchemist architecture is mature and no further driver optimizations are likely to yield significant gains.

The 9W CPU TDP and 60W GPU TDP suggest a total system power draw of under 100W for the core components, leaving ample headroom for the laptop's power adapter. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, but the low TDPs mean that a standard 65W to 100W USB-C adapter is likely sufficient, depending on the rest of the system's components. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase DDR5 memory capacity to maximize the dual-channel bandwidth, followed by adding a high-capacity NVMe SSD for storage-hungry workloads like video editing or large game libraries.

For users who outgrow this platform, the natural progression is to a laptop with a socketed CPU or a desktop build with a higher-core-count processor, since the 164U's 12-core, 14-thread configuration and 12 MB L3 cache will eventually become the limiting factor in heavily threaded workloads. The PCIe Gen 4 x8 CPU lane allocation also caps the bandwidth available for external GPU enclosures, making eGPU expansions less attractive than on platforms with Gen 5 or x16 lanes.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. It does not have a listed tensor core count, but the architecture supports AI acceleration through its Xe cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Pixel fill rate reaches 131.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate hits 262.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the A550M scores 49894, which places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its Vulkan score is 49580, showing consistent performance across different API implementations. The average benchmark score of 49737 puts it in close competition with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, -0.4% delta favoring the A550M), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, -2.4% delta). The A550M also leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477) by 2.6%.

For rendering workloads, the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides solid rasterization performance, while the 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and DCC applications. The 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance is particularly useful for AI-based features like DLSS-style upscaling or denoising, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means such features rely on the shader units. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become a constraint at 1440p with high-resolution textures.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad compatibility with modern games and professional applications. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting the mobile IGP form factor. With a 60W TDP, the A550M is power-efficient for its performance class, making it suitable for thin laptops where thermal headroom is limited.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U + Intel Arc A550M combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti in Geekbench OpenCL (delta of -0.4%), the A550M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. At 1080p ultra, the 8 GB VRAM may prove sufficient for games released before 2024, but titles with large texture packs could exceed this capacity, causing the GPU to fall back to system memory over PCIe and reduce frame rates. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p resolution with headroom, but 1440p ultra settings may see performance drop to the low 30s FPS in demanding titles.

In esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's 2996 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS should sustain 144+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking ensures minimal bottleneck in CPU-light games. For AAA single-player titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage, the A550M's 16 RT cores will enable ray-traced effects at reduced resolution or with DLSS-style upscaling, but native 1080p ultra with full RT is likely to run in the 30-45 FPS range.

The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are qualitative estimates. The GPU's 86th percentile and the CPU's 71st percentile together suggest a system that can handle 1080p gaming as its primary use case, with the GPU being the more capable component. At 720p, frame rates will be CPU-bound in many games, as the GPU will have spare capacity to render frames faster than the 164U can issue draw calls. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics provide a fallback for lightweight games when the discrete GPU is disabled for battery saving.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How does the Arc A550M compare to the RTX 5070 Ti in benchmark scores?

A: The A550M scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, a delta of -0.4% favoring the A550M.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect laptop design?

A: The 164U has a 9W TDP, which enables thin-and-light laptop designs with exceptional battery life and potentially fanless operation.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5, with capacity depending on the motherboard implementation.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A550M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes DXR support.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked false, and the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is a soldered mobile package.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U achieves an average benchmark score of 17074, placing it in the 71st percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7573X (17070, 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-11400 (17067, 0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (17035, 0.2% delta). The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120, putting the 164U just 0.3% behind. This tight clustering indicates that the 164U performs on par with several desktop processors from previous generations, despite its ultra-low 9W TDP.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 1304 in R15 multi-core and 225 in R15 single-core. The R20 results are 4488 multi-core and 633 single-core, while R23 results are 8766 multi-core and 1590 single-core. PassMark scores include 137133 for data compression, 8838 for data encryption, 7918 for extended instructions, 56 for find prime numbers, 33581 for floating-point math, 50387 for integer math, 13296 for multithread, 918 for physics, 15131 for random string sorting, and 2996 for single-thread.

The Intel Arc A550M delivers an average benchmark score of 49737, ranking in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL score is 49894, and Vulkan score is 49580. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, -0.4% delta), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.5% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, -2.4% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, +2.6% delta favoring the A550M).

Combined, this CPU-GPU pair achieves a combined percentile of 79, indicating that the system outperforms the majority of laptop configurations. The CPU's 71st percentile and GPU's 86th percentile create a reasonably balanced platform, with the GPU slightly ahead in relative performance. The combined picture is a laptop that excels at graphics-intensive workloads like gaming and GPU rendering, while still offering strong CPU performance for productivity tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means that real-world gaming performance must be inferred from these benchmark scores, which consistently place the system in the upper quartile of available hardware.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds