SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

21,174 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This laptop combination pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U with the Intel Arc A570M, targeting a mobile market segment where efficiency and discrete graphics meet. The data shows a platform designed for balanced performance in a thin-and-light chassis, with the CPU handling sustained productivity and the GPU providing a significant step up from integrated graphics. Benchmark results indicate a system that sits comfortably in the upper quartile of overall performance, though the specific strengths and weaknesses of each component define its character.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this platform is the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, built on the Meteor Lake architecture and utilizing an Intel BGA 2049 socket. This is a soldered, mobile-first design, meaning the CPU itself is not a user-upgradeable component in a traditional sense. The platform’s memory support is listed as DDR5, with the specific capacity and speed depending on the motherboard or system integrator's design. The memory bus is dual-channel, providing a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for the 12-core hybrid processor and the discrete GPU to communicate effectively with system memory.

For expansion and peripheral connectivity, the CPU provides a PCIe Gen 4 interface with 12 lanes available from the processor itself. This allocation is typical for a mobile platform, allowing for a primary GPU connection and a high-speed NVMe SSD. The discrete Intel Arc A570M GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is a standard configuration for mid-range mobile graphics and offers ample bandwidth for its 8 GB frame buffer. The system’s power envelope is notably modest, with the CPU having a 15 W TDP and the GPU a 75 W TDP. This combined thermal and power budget suggests the need for a relatively compact power adapter, and the lack of a suggested PSU in the data implies that the system’s total draw is well within the range of a typical laptop power brick, not a desktop-class PSU.

Given the BGA socket, a "sensible next upgrade" for this platform is not about swapping the processor. Instead, the data points toward memory and storage as the primary user-accessible upgrades. Assuming the motherboard supports it, increasing the DDR5 memory capacity would benefit multitasking and applications that consume large datasets. Similarly, adding or replacing an NVMe drive on the available PCIe Gen 4 lanes would improve load times and file transfer speeds. The platform is otherwise a closed, integrated package, meaning the laptop's display, battery, and cooling solution are the defining factors for its longevity. The architecture is efficient, but the upgrade path is limited to the peripherals and memory that the specific laptop model permits.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U and the Intel Arc A570M is interesting, as benchmark data shows a system where the GPU is the more dominant component in overall performance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 21174, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average score is 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that the graphics processor is relatively stronger compared to its peers than the central processor is compared to its own peers. The implication is that in many workloads, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor, especially in tasks that are heavily dependent on single-threaded performance or when the GPU is waiting for data.

The CPU’s single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 1666, while its multi-core score is 9674.5. This multi-core result represents a solid throughput for a 15 W part, but the GPU, which sits near the performance of an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL benchmarks, can generate frames faster than the CPU can feed it in certain gaming scenarios. In essence, the GPU has enough raw horsepower to outpace the CPU in frame generation at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphical settings. The bottleneck will shift depending on the workload. In lightly-threaded tasks like legacy software or basic office work, the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient. In heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be a limiting factor, though the GPU can assist in some offloading scenarios. For gaming, the balance suggests that at 1080p with high settings, the CPU may constrain the maximum frame rate, while at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU will become the primary bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is strong for a laptop platform. The system holds a combined percentile of 82, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of mobile configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 21174 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, a position that puts it in direct competition with several notable processors. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, with the Core Ultra 7 155U scoring a mere 0.2% higher. It also edges out the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V by 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G by 0.4%. Interestingly, the AMD EPYC 9454, a server-class chip, scores 0.2% higher, highlighting how far mobile efficiency has come. In specific CPU tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9674.5 points and a single-core score of 1666 points show a capable hybrid design. PassMark tests further detail the CPU’s character, with a strong integer math score of 57564 and a floating-point math score of 40256, indicating solid number-crunching ability for a 15 W part.

The Intel Arc A570M GPU is the performance star of this pairing. Its average benchmark score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, a remarkable position for a mobile Alchemist part. The data shows it is just 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a desktop flagship, and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 0.7%. This Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 suggests that the A570M offers compute performance in the field of high-end desktop cards from the previous generation, which is a significant asset for content creation on the go. The combined picture is of a laptop that is significantly stronger in graphics than in processing, making it a compelling option for GPU-accelerated tasks where the CPU is not the primary bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data suggests this system is a strong contender. The GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and its proximity to desktop-class rivals in compute benchmarks indicate it can push high frame rates at 1080p, though the CPU’s 75th percentile position may limit the absolute maximum FPS in esports titles. The presence of 8 GB of VRAM and modern architecture support helps future-proof it for upcoming titles.

Streaming is a viable workload, though it relies on the CPU and GPU working in tandem. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 16382 provides enough headroom for encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU can handle the game rendering. The system is not a dedicated streaming powerhouse, but it can handle a single-PC setup for most games.

Video editing is where this combination excels. The GPU’s high compute score (58239) will accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in applications that support OpenCL, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9674.5 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and export performance. The 8 GB of VRAM is beneficial for handling high-resolution footage and complex compositions.

In 3D rendering, the GPU is the primary workhorse. The Arc A570M’s FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS and its 16 ray tracing cores provide substantial acceleration for both rasterization and ray-traced workloads. The CPU will assist with scene setup and physics calculations, but the render times will be dominated by the GPU’s capabilities.

For software development, the CPU’s balanced architecture is the key. The 12 cores and 14 threads handle compilation and virtual machine workloads effectively, evidenced by its PassMark multi-thread score. The single-thread score of 3372 ensures responsive IDE performance and quick code navigation. The platform’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is adequate for most development tasks.

For student and office work, this system is significantly overpowered. The CPU’s single-core performance is more than sufficient for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks but provides headroom for any light creative work or casual gaming during downtime. The platform’s low TDP suggests good battery life, making it a portable option for campus use.

Gaming Performance

It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as such. The Intel Arc A570M’s compute performance, which rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL, suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, this system should deliver high frame rates in most modern titles. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1666 in Cinebench R23 may become the limiting factor, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU can produce.

At 1440p, the load shifts heavily to the GPU. The A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth should still provide playable frame rates in many AAA games, though ultra settings may require adjustments to maintain a smooth 60 FPS. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1440p textures, but it may be a constraint in the most demanding titles with high-resolution texture packs. At 4K, the system will struggle to maintain high frame rates on ultra settings, as the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute throughput are not sufficient for that resolution class. Gamers targeting 4K would need to significantly lower graphical settings or rely on upscaling technologies. The overall gaming picture is one of a capable 1080p machine with some 1440p potential, but the CPU will be the obvious bottleneck in less demanding scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. This chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory runs at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. In terms of compute resources, the GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores.

The benchmark data shows that the A570M performs exceptionally well in compute workloads, with its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 placing it in the 88th percentile. This score is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is a high-end desktop card. This suggests that for non-gaming compute tasks like machine learning inference or video processing, the A570M is a formidable mobile option. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, which are solid figures for a mid-range mobile GPU. The FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS is the key metric for traditional rasterized gaming. The 16 ray tracing cores will enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the performance will be modest compared to the rasterization throughput. The GPU’s API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate, which ensures compatibility with the latest gaming features.

Who Should Build It

This platform is tailored for users who need a laptop that can handle creative and gaming workloads without the bulk of a desktop-class machine. The target audience includes gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are willing to trade some ultra-settings headroom for a portable chassis. The GPU’s high percentile ranking ensures that this system will run modern titles smoothly at that resolution. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, are also a primary audience. The GPU’s compute performance, rivaling the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, will significantly accelerate rendering and effects tasks in OpenCL-compatible applications. The 8 GB of VRAM is suitable for 1080p and 1440p creative work.

Software developers who value a fast, responsive system for compilation and virtual machines will find the CPU’s 12 cores and 14 threads sufficient, though they are not the primary target. The system is also a viable option for students in STEM or design fields who need a single device for both productivity and entertainment. For small business workstations, this combination is overkill for standard office tasks, but it would be an excellent choice for roles that require occasional GPU acceleration, such as CAD or data visualization. The system is not suited for users who require maximum multi-core CPU performance for heavy simulation or server-like workloads, as the 15 W TDP limits sustained all-core throughput. Conversely, it is also not for users who need 4K gaming performance, as the GPU’s memory bus and bandwidth will be a limiting factor at that resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 82, indicating it outperforms 82% of all tracked configurations. The CPU is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U?

A: The data shows the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U has an average benchmark score of 21174, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U’s average score of 21133. They are effectively performance equals.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and configuration of this platform?

A: The platform uses a dual-channel memory bus with DDR5 memory, providing a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The exact memory capacity and speed depend on the laptop manufacturer.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M is equipped with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features. However, its performance in ray-traced workloads will be lower than its rasterization performance.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what does this mean for the system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W. This combined 90 W power budget is typical for a thin-and-light gaming or creator laptop, allowing for a compact power adapter and potentially longer battery life under light loads.

Q: What PCIe interface does the discrete GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A570M connects to the system via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and its compute capabilities.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: Based on the estimated performance, 4K gaming at high settings is not recommended. The GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are better suited for 1080p gaming, with some potential for 1440p. The CPU’s performance would also be a limiting factor at 4K.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a 12-core, 14-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 7 nm process. It features a hybrid core design, which is typical for modern mobile processors, balancing performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz, and it can boost up to 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed to deliver strong single-threaded performance for responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput for productivity tasks, all within a 15 W TDP.

The benchmark scores reflect this balanced design. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1666 is solid and indicates that day-to-day applications will feel snappy. The multi-core score of 9674.5 is respectable for the power envelope, showing that it can handle multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or code compilation without significant slowdown. The PassMark tests provide a more detailed view. The single-thread score of 3372 confirms its responsiveness, while the multi-thread score of 16382 shows good parallel scaling. The integer math score of 57564 and floating-point math score of 40256 suggest strong arithmetic capabilities, which is important for scientific and financial applications. The data compression score of 177122 and random string sorting score of 19767 are also high, indicating efficiency in data manipulation tasks.

In real-world workloads, this CPU is a capable all-rounder. Its 75th percentile ranking places it ahead of many older desktop processors and in line with modern mid-range mobile chips. It will not compete with high-core-count desktop CPUs in heavy rendering, but it offers a compelling balance of performance and efficiency. The lack of ECC memory support positions it firmly in the consumer and prosumer market rather than the server space. The launch MSRP is $490, which is a premium for the efficiency and features it offers. The processor’s performance, coupled with the Arc A570M, creates a system that is more than the sum of its parts, excelling in GPU-accelerated tasks while being limited more by its CPU throughput in CPU-bound scenarios.