SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

21,174 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Ultraportable Platform

This mobile platform pairs Intel's Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 155U processor with the entry-level Arc A350M discrete GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct gameplay testing. The data shows a system built around efficiency-first computing with a capable discrete graphics solution for its class, targeting a 15W processor TDP and a 25W GPU TDP within a laptop form factor.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming expectations must be derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's compute capabilities. The Arc A350M delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This positions it roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% behind in average score) and slightly ahead of an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. These results suggest 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in esports titles, with more demanding AAA games requiring reduced settings or lower resolutions.

The CPU side contributes meaningfully to gaming performance through its PassMark single-thread score of 3372 and multi-thread score of 16382. The Core Ultra 7 155U's single-core performance, boosted by a 4.80 GHz maximum clock, supports frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent performance in games that benefit from larger cache footprints. For competitive shooters and MOBAs, estimated frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings could reach triple digits in lighter titles, though the 4 GB GDDR6 memory capacity may limit texture quality in modern games. At 1440p, the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely constrain performance to lower settings for smooth gameplay.

The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT capability, but the modest 25W TDP limits sustained RT workloads. Games with heavy ray tracing effects will likely see significant performance drops, making RT a feature to use sparingly or disable entirely. The 70th percentile GPU ranking suggests this platform can handle most popular games at playable frame rates, but it is not designed for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform with no CPU upgrade path. The memory support is listed as DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, though the FACT PACK notes that memory depends on the motherboard, meaning laptop manufacturers determine final configuration. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, providing adequate bandwidth for the Arc A350M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status, released in March 2022, which means no future driver enhancements for new architectures are expected beyond the current 12 Ultimate DirectX support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility. The 15W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP together suggest a modest total system power draw, though no suggested PSU is listed. This indicates the platform is designed for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited rather than gaming machines with expandable power delivery.

A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a newer platform entirely, as neither the CPU nor GPU can be swapped in a typical laptop chassis. Users seeking more graphics performance would need to consider a system with a higher-TDP discrete GPU, while those wanting more CPU throughput would look at higher-core-count processors from newer generations. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity ensure the platform is not immediately obsolete, but the soldered nature of both components makes this a closed system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a reasonably balanced platform with the CPU and GPU occupying similar performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 21174, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647. This alignment means neither component dramatically outclasses the other in synthetic workloads, suggesting complementary performance in real-world tasks.

In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression, the PassMark score of 177122 indicates strong throughput that can feed the GPU adequately in gaming scenarios. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, has a 0.4% higher average score, while the CPU's closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, is 0.2% ahead. This parity suggests that bottlenecks will depend on specific workloads rather than a consistent imbalance.

For gaming, the GPU is likely the primary constraint in graphics-heavy titles, given its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus. The CPU's single-thread score of 3372 in PassMark is respectable and should not bottleneck most games at 1080p. However, in CPU-bound simulations or strategy games with heavy AI calculations, the 12-core, 14-thread configuration with a 15W TDP may limit sustained performance. The PassMark physics score of 1084 is modest, indicating that physics-heavy games could see CPU limitations.

The FPS scaling picture, estimated from synthetic scores, suggests that lowering resolution from 1080p to 720p would shift more load onto the CPU, where the 4.80 GHz boost clock helps maintain frame rates. Conversely, increasing resolution beyond 1080p would quickly saturate the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck at higher settings.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need a portable laptop for mixed productivity and light gaming without demanding high-end graphics performance. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking makes it suitable for students and office workers running productivity suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis, where the 12 cores and 14 threads handle multitasking efficiently. The PassMark data compression score of 177122 indicates strong file archiving capabilities, useful for users who frequently compress and decompress large datasets.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9674.5 adequate for rendering timelines, though the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and exports. Software developers compiling code will benefit from the multi-threaded performance, with the PassMark integer math score of 57564 supporting compilation tasks. The 7 nm process node from Intel suggests efficient power consumption, making this a good fit for students who need all-day battery life.

Small business workstations that require occasional 3D rendering or CAD work can leverage the Arc A350M's 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate for moderate visualization tasks. The 70th percentile GPU ranking means this platform is not suited for professional 3D artists or video editors working with 4K footage or complex scenes, where the 4 GB VRAM would quickly become insufficient.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a 12-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the Meteor Lake architecture using Intel's 7 nm process. The base clock runs at 1700 MHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and performance demands. The 15W TDP classifies this as an ultra-low-power mobile processor, designed for thin-and-light laptops where thermal constraints are significant.

The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the processor's dual personality: the L3 cache helps maintain data locality across cores, while the per-core L2 allocation ensures each core can access frequently used data without contention. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs well within its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9674.5 and single-core score of 1666 indicate strong performance for a 15W part, particularly in single-threaded tasks where the 4.80 GHz boost clock shines. The PassMark multi-thread score of 16382 and single-thread score of 3372 reinforce this picture, with the processor ranking at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 21174 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U and within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, showing competitive performance in its class.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with dual-channel DDR5 support ensures the CPU can feed its cores effectively, though the 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes limit expansion options. The processor supports no ECC memory and has a locked multiplier, indicating it is not intended for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $490, and the processor remains in active production.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units deliver a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate the GPU's compute capability for both gaming and light content creation.

The 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, though the modest 25W TDP limits sustained RT performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the 4 GB VRAM, and the display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning laptop manufacturers determine the actual ports.

Benchmark results place the Arc A350M at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747. The average benchmark score of 24647 is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. This positions the GPU as an entry-level discrete solution that outperforms integrated graphics while remaining below mid-range discrete GPUs in performance. The production status is end-of-life, released in March 2022, with no successor listed.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and the CPU's 3372 PassMark single-thread score suggest this platform can drive 1080p esports titles at high refresh rates, with estimated frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for lighter games. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in newer titles, preventing consistent high-refresh gameplay in AAA releases.

Streaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9674.5 provides enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p, while the GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance can assist with hardware encoding tasks. The 12 cores and 14 threads handle concurrent gaming and streaming workloads, though the 15W TDP may cause thermal throttling during extended sessions.

Video editing: The PassMark data encryption score of 11333 and floating-point math score of 40256 indicate capable handling of video processing tasks. Editing 1080p footage with effects will be smooth, but 4K editing will strain the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU's multi-threaded performance accelerates rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5765 supporting timeline operations.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide entry-level rendering capability for simple scenes. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 16382 contributes to CPU-based rendering workloads, though complex scenes with high polygon counts will exceed the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 57564 and data compression score of 177122 make this platform suitable for code compilation and version control operations. The 12-core configuration with 14 threads handles parallel builds efficiently, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded build steps. The 75th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsive development environments.

Student and office work: The 15W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics provide efficient performance for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis. The PassMark single-thread score of 3372 ensures responsive application launches, while the multi-thread score of 16382 handles background tasks without slowdown. The 12 MB L3 cache supports multitasking across multiple office applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU ranking at the 75th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155U has an average benchmark score of 21174, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U's score of 21133.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocks at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this platform support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though the 25W TDP limits sustained RT performance.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155U boosts to 4.80 GHz from a 1700 MHz base clock, with a TDP of 15W.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630's score of 24277.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the processor uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent performance profile across different testing methodologies. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score of 1585 and single-core score of 238.5 establish a baseline for older workloads. The R20 scores of 5765 multi-core and 813 single-core show scaling, while the R23 scores of 9674.5 multi-core and 1666 single-core represent the most recent Cinebench results. These scores place the CPU at the 75th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 21174 that is within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G.

The PassMark suite provides additional insights into specific workload performance. The data compression score of 177122 and encryption score of 11333 indicate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 9903 and prime number finding score of 65 show moderate performance in specialized workloads. The floating-point math score of 40256 and integer math score of 57564 demonstrate balanced compute capabilities, while the multi-thread score of 16382 and single-thread score of 3372 confirm the CPU's overall performance positioning.

The GPU's benchmark results are limited to Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, with scores of 24546 and 24747 respectively, yielding an average of 24647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile, within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The combined picture shows a platform where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but both components perform within a similar band. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this alignment, indicating a balanced system for its intended ultraportable laptop segment.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds