SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile represent a mainstream high-performance laptop pairing, placing in the 75th percentile for all combined CPU and GPU configurations. This combination targets a broad audience, from gamers to mobile professionals, but the benchmark data reveals distinct strengths and limitations that define its character. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile chip with 8 GB of VRAM. The data suggests a system that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming and multi-threaded productivity, yet struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K in demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor built on the Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 7 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 28 W TDP that positions it for efficient performance in thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competitive with desktop-class parts in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded capability. This is reinforced by a Passmark multithread score of 24873 and a floating-point math score of 63703, suggesting solid performance in scientific and financial simulations. The single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1743 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3468, is respectable but not class-leading.

The nearest rivals based on average benchmark score are the Intel Core i5-14600T, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The Core Ultra 7 155H scores within 0.4% of these parts, showing that its performance is essentially tied with a desktop i5 and several mobile Ryzen options. The data compression score of 277353 is particularly strong, suggesting efficiency in archiving and compression tasks that rely on high memory bandwidth and multi-core scaling.

For real workloads, the 22 threads allow effortless multitasking. The Passmark integer math score of 86870 and extended instructions score of 16456 indicate robust performance in code compilation and encryption. The physics score of 1727 is lower, which may hint at performance scaling in specific physics-based simulations, but the overall data points to a CPU that punches above its 28 W envelope, rivaling higher-power desktop chips in productivity scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a mobile graphics solution based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It houses 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. The GPU features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This is a solid amount of VRAM for 1080p gaming, but the 128-bit bus is a potential bottleneck at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth demands increase. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 11.61 TFLOPS.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The Passmark G3D score of 17469 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 indicate strong DirectX and compute performance. The GPU compute score of 6816 in Passmark is notably lower, suggesting that raw compute workloads may not scale as well as gaming workloads. The nearest rivals in average score are the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, Intel Arc B580, and the newer RTX 5060 Mobile. The RTX 4060 Mobile is within 1.3% of all these parts, meaning it delivers performance comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 and a current-gen desktop RX 7700 XT.

For rendering, the 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for 3D modeling and animation in applications like Blender or Maya. The RT cores enable ray-traced rendering, but the performance is not tier-leading, as indicated by the GPU's 67th percentile placement. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p texture-heavy workloads but may be limiting for 4K texture packs or large scene rendering in professional 3D applications.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system performing in the 75th percentile of all CPU and GPU pairings. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32697, while the GPU's average is 22729, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component drastically overshadows the other. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile, suggesting the processor is relatively stronger compared to its peers.

In gaming, the pair achieves an average frame rate of 101.6 FPS across all tested games at ultra settings, ranking 2765th out of 3861 pairs. This ranking places it in the upper-middle tier, indicating that while it handles most games well, it is not designed for maximum settings at high resolutions. The CPU's strong multi-core scores, like the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8754, complement the GPU's capabilities in CPU-bound scenarios. Conversely, the GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 73 is modest, reflecting its positioning as a mid-range mobile part.

The data reveals a system that is more CPU-dominant in benchmark terms. This is advantageous for productivity tasks but means that gaming performance is often limited by the GPU, especially at higher resolutions. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 255 is low, but this is an older test that does not reflect modern architecture efficiency. The overall picture is one of a capable, well-rounded laptop that excels in multi-threaded applications and delivers smooth 1080p gaming, but does not push the boundaries in either domain.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Core Ultra 7 155H and RTX 4060 Mobile is a study in contrasts. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 67th percentile, indicating that the processor has more headroom relative to its peers. This suggests that the GPU will be the primary limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly at 1440p and 4K resolutions.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate drops from 133 FPS at 1080p to 119 FPS at 1440p, but only to 100 FPS at 4K. This smaller drop at 4K indicates the GPU is nearing its limits, while the CPU still has performance to spare. In contrast, a CPU-bound game like Counter-Strike 2 shows a dramatic decline from 164 FPS at 1080p to 61 FPS at 4K, suggesting that at lower resolutions, the CPU is the bottleneck, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The Passmark physics score of 1727 is notably low, which could indicate weaker performance in physics-based simulations or older games that rely more heavily on CPU physics. However, the high multi-thread scores suggest this is not a systemic issue. The bottleneck analysis points to a system where the CPU is more future-proof than the GPU. Users upgrading from a 1080p monitor to a 1440p monitor will see a more significant performance hit than those upgrading the CPU alone. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are likely the constraints that prevent the GPU from matching the CPU's relative strength in high-resolution gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 362 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 164 FPS, well beyond the 144 Hz threshold. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 195 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 133 FPS. These numbers confirm the pair is ideal for competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with 22 threads provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 24873 indicates strong x264 encoding performance, while the GPU's tensor cores could be used for NVENC. The data suggests that streaming at 1080p while gaming at 1080p is feasible without significant frame drops, given the high FPS in titles like Warzone.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and Passmark integer math score of 86870 support fast rendering and timeline scrubbing in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects and color grading. The data indicates a capable machine for 1080p video editing, with 4K editing possible but with longer render times.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 24 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in Blender and other renderers. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 89569 suggests good OpenCL and Vulkan compute performance. However, the 67th GPU percentile means render times will be moderate, not fast. The CPU's multi-thread performance will help with CPU-based rendering, but the GPU will be the primary renderer for most workloads.

Software Development: The 22 threads and high integer math score of 86870 are ideal for code compilation, unit testing, and running virtual machines. The Passmark data encryption score of 16358 indicates strong performance for secure coding tasks. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data access, making this a solid choice for developers who need to run multiple containers or compile large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The 28 W TDP ensures long battery life, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3468 in Passmark handles everyday tasks with ease. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics provide a backup for basic display output, and the 83rd CPU percentile ensures smooth multitasking in office suites. The data shows this is more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p and value high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS in esports games like CS:GO (362 FPS) and Rainbow Six Siege (195 FPS) demonstrates that this system can drive 240 Hz panels. Content creators who work with 1080p video and need fast rendering will also benefit, as the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's compute capabilities provide a balanced platform.

Software developers will find the 22 threads and high integer math score useful for compilation and testing. Students and professionals who need a portable workstation for office work, research, and light content creation will appreciate the 28 W CPU TDP, which likely contributes to better battery life compared to higher-power alternatives. Small business workstations that require multitasking, data analysis, and occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like spreadsheet rendering or light 3D modeling would perform adequately.

However, the data does not support this build for 4K gaming or heavy 4K video editing. The FPS drops below 30 in many games at 4K, including Ark: Survival Ascended (8 FPS) and The Medium (23 FPS). Users with 1440p or 4K monitors should look at higher-tier GPUs, as the RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's gaming capabilities at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with an average across games of 101.6 FPS. Esports and older games perform exceptionally well, with CS:GO at 362 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 164 FPS, and To The Core at 165 FPS. Modern AAA titles are also playable, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 133 FPS, Ready Or Not at 132 FPS, and Control at 68 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system begins to show its limits. Frame rates drop significantly in demanding titles, but many remain playable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 119 FPS, while Control drops to 52 FPS. Esports titles still perform well, with CS:GO at 249 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 128 FPS. However, Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 15 FPS, making it unplayable at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Only a few titles maintain playable frame rates above 60 FPS, including Call of Duty: Warzone at 100 FPS and Overpower at 50 FPS. Most games fall below 30 FPS, with Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS, The Medium at 23 FPS, and Rust at 25 FPS. The data clearly indicates that 4K gaming is not viable for this pairing, except in the most optimized or less demanding titles.

The frame rate scaling suggests that the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the limiting factors at high resolutions, as the GPU's texture rate and pixel rate are insufficient for 4K workloads. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, this is an excellent performer, but users should not expect to push beyond 1440p without significant compromises.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class configuration combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 115 W TDP. The combined system sits at the 75th percentile of all pairs, indicating a mid-to-high-tier laptop.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is the standout feature, placing it among the top 17% of all processors. The GPU's 67th percentile is lower but still above average. The pair achieves an average FPS of 101.6 across games, ranking 2765th out of 3861 pairs, which places it in the upper-middle range of gaming performance. This is a balanced build that prioritizes CPU performance for productivity while offering solid, but not exceptional, gaming capabilities.

The data suggests this is a laptop designed for users who need a versatile machine for both work and play. The 16 cores and 22 threads handle heavy multitasking, while the RTX 4060 Mobile provides smooth 1080p gaming. This is not a high-end enthusiast laptop, but it is a capable mainstream performer that will satisfy most users' daily needs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning it performs better than 75% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to the desktop RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, while the RTX 2080 has a score of 22895. The delta is -0.7%, meaning the RTX 4060 Mobile is essentially on par with the desktop RTX 2080.

Q: What is the maximum playable resolution for gaming?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1080p is the sweet spot with an average of 101.6 FPS. At 1440p, many games are playable, but demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 15 FPS. At 4K, most games are unplayable, with Ark at 8 FPS.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H have?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has a 128-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the `eccMemory: false` field.

Q: What is the CPU's ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 83% of all processors in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is socketed in Intel BGA 2049, which is a mobile-specific socket that cannot be upgraded. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the memory support is dependent on the motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The TDP of the CPU is 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, bringing the total to 143 W. This is a modest power draw for a laptop, suggesting that a power supply of around 150-180 W would be sufficient, though the exact PSU requirement is not specified. The GPU has no power connectors, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) mobile part.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU, such as an RTX 4070 Mobile or higher, which would improve gaming performance at higher resolutions. However, the socket is fixed, so the CPU cannot be upgraded. Users looking to improve performance should focus on a new laptop with a more powerful GPU, as the current pairing is already well-balanced for its intended use case. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the primary bottlenecks for future gaming titles, making a GPU upgrade the most impactful change.