Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 40 | 45 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 59 | 67 | 94 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 79 | 88 | 124 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis
Control, the 2019 action-adventure from Remedy, is a demanding title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile delivers a solid, if not spectacular, experience. The benchmark data shows this combo ranks in the 61st percentile among all tested configurations, placing it firmly in the upper-middle tier, but the real story is how the system scales across resolutions and settings, revealing a clear sweet spot for playable performance.
FAQ
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems in Control?
A: This combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks 2278 out of 3720 tested combos. This places it in the top 61% of all configurations, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it performs competently above the majority of systems tested for this game.
Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this hardware?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 with High settings delivers an average of 59 FPS, which is right at the edge of smooth gameplay. For a consistently better experience, 1920x1080 with High settings is the optimal choice, as it produces an average of 79 FPS, providing a significant performance buffer without a major visual compromise.
Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution in Control?
A: Yes, but with significant caveats. At 3840x2160, the system only achieves playable frame rates on Low settings, with an average of 64 FPS. On High settings, the average drops to 40 FPS, and on Ultra it falls to 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable play for most users.
Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile's benchmark performance compare to its rivals?
A: According to the data, the RTX 4060 Mobile's average benchmark score of 22729 is very close to its nearest rivals. It is 0.7% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, and 1.3% slower than the Intel Arc B580, indicating that its raw compute performance is highly competitive within its class.
Q: What are the CPU's key specifications that matter for gaming?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H features 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This multi-core configuration is well-suited for modern games that can utilize multiple threads for physics, AI, and game logic.
Q: Is there a significant performance jump between Medium and High settings?
A: The performance cost is substantial. At 1920x1080, moving from Medium (88 FPS) to High (79 FPS) results in a 9 FPS drop. At 2560x1440, the drop from Medium (67 FPS) to High (59 FPS) is 8 FPS. The visual upgrade may not be worth the performance hit at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination holds a rank of 2278 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This percentile placement is crucial because it contextualizes the system's performance within the broader landscape of hardware configurations. It is not a top performer, but it is also far from the bottom. This rank suggests that the combo is capable of delivering a playable experience in most scenarios, but it will require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions.
The data positions this combo in the upper-middle class of systems. It is neither a cut-down entry-level setup nor a high-end desktop replacement. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU, while not the most powerful in its class, is adequately supported by the CPU to avoid major bottlenecks. For a game like Control, which is known for its physics-heavy gameplay and detailed environments, this balance is more important than raw clock speeds. The system has enough horsepower to handle the game's demands, but it will not run at maximum settings in 4K. This ranking is a clear indicator that the user should target 1080p or 1440p resolutions for the best experience, as pushing to 4K will place the system in a performance tier where it is clearly outclassed.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the primary driver for rendering in Control. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory running at an effective speed of 16 Gbps. This configuration is central to the benchmark results, as the game's visual complexity—from particle effects to dynamic lighting—heavily taxes the graphics processor.
The RTX 4060 Mobile's performance characteristics are evident in the measured frame rates. Its average benchmark score of 22729 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is nearly identical in performance to the desktop RTX 2080, being only 0.7% slower. This is a significant point, as it indicates that the mobile chip is capable of performance that was once reserved for high-end desktop parts. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is a key factor; at 3840x2160, the game's high-resolution textures and effects can consume a large amount of memory, and the data suggests that this becomes a limiting factor at that resolution, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS on all settings except Low.
The GPU's role is clear: it is a highly capable mid-range part that excels at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, its limitations become apparent, as the pixel throughput demands exceed its capabilities. The benchmark data for Control reflects this, with the most dramatic performance drops occurring at 3840x2160, where the GPU's raw compute power and memory bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how the combo performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 124 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium settings yield 88 FPS, with a minimum of 75 and maximum of 102 FPS, indicating stable performance. High settings produce an average of 79 FPS, and even Ultra settings manage a respectable 68 FPS. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for this hardware, offering high frame rates even at maximum visual fidelity.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance takes a noticeable hit. Low settings still deliver a very playable 94 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 67 FPS (min 57, max 77), which is still smooth. High settings drop to 59 FPS, which is acceptable but approaches the threshold where some users may notice slight stuttering. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS, which is on the edge of playability. This resolution requires a trade-off between visual quality and smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 64 FPS. Medium settings drop to 45 FPS (min 38, max 52), which is below the ideal range for a smooth experience. High settings yield 40 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 35 FPS. These numbers confirm that the RTX 4060 Mobile is not suited for 4K gaming in Control without significant compromises to visual fidelity. The data shows a clear trend: the system is optimized for 1080p and can handle 1440p with some adjustments, but 4K is not viable for a consistent, high-quality experience.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience is achieved by prioritizing resolution and settings that maintain a frame rate above 60 FPS. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the High preset is the recommended starting point, as it provides an average of 79 FPS with a clear visual upgrade over Medium. This offers a perfect balance of smoothness and graphical detail. If a higher frame rate is desired, the Medium preset at 88 FPS is also an excellent choice, providing a significant boost in speed with only a minor reduction in visual quality.
For users with a 2560x1440 display, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 59 FPS, which is just at the edge of playable. However, to ensure a more consistent experience, the Medium preset is the safer option, with an average of 67 FPS and a minimum of 57 FPS, ensuring that the game remains smooth even in demanding scenes. The Ultra preset is not recommended at this resolution, as the 52 FPS average is below the ideal threshold.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only recommended option, as it is the sole setting that achieves an average above 60 FPS (64 FPS). The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below this threshold, making them unsuitable for a comfortable gaming experience. For 4K users, it is advised to either lower the resolution to 2560x1440 or accept the significant visual compromises of the Low preset. The data clearly shows that the system's performance sweet spot is at 1080p with High settings, followed by 1440p with Medium settings.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H plays a crucial supporting role in the system's performance. With 16 cores and 22 threads, it provides substantial multi-threaded processing power that is essential for Control's complex game logic, physics simulations, and AI routines. The CPU's base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensure that it can maintain high single-threaded performance when needed, which is critical for game engine tasks that are not easily parallelized.
The CPU's benchmark scores show that it is a strong performer. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and single-core score of 1743 indicate that it can handle both multi-threaded workloads and tasks that rely on a single core. In the context of Control, this means the CPU can efficiently manage the game's various systems without becoming a bottleneck. The data shows that the combo ranks in the 83rd percentile for CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 32697 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.1% delta). This indicates that the CPU's performance is well within the expected range for its class.
In practice, the CPU's role is to ensure that the GPU is fed with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor, as the system's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, which are primarily GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and support for high-speed memory (DDR5) contribute to its ability to quickly access and process game data, further reducing the potential for bottlenecks. Overall, the Core Ultra 7 155H provides a solid foundation that allows the RTX 4060 Mobile to perform to its full potential in Control.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 94.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 124.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 88.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 79.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.0 |
Control with iUltra 7 155H + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 4060 Mobile + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 155H + RTX 4060 Mobile
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.