SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32,697 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + Intel Arc A530M: A Balanced Mobile Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H pairs with the Intel Arc A530M to form a laptop-class build that sits at the 84th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU alone achieves an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU reaches an 85th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination targets mobile users who need strong multi-threaded compute for content creation alongside capable 1080p gaming, though the data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmarks since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a Meteor Lake architecture processor built on Intel's 7 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 22 threads. This hybrid configuration explains the thread count exceeding the core count, indicating a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock runs at 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, allowing the chip to scale from power-efficient background tasks to bursty single-threaded workloads. The 28 W TDP classifies this as a mainstream mobile processor, not an ultra-low-power part nor a desktop replacement monster.

Cache hierarchy follows a per-core structure with 112 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides ample fast storage for frequently accessed data, which shows up in the benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15,028 points multi-core and 1,743 points single-core. The multi-core figure represents strong sustained throughput for a 28 W part, while the single-core score indicates responsive everyday performance. The R20 results (8,754 multi-core, 1,235 single-core) and R15 results (2,450 multi-core, 255 single-core) follow the expected scaling curve.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths. The multithread score of 24,873 places this chip well above average, and the integer math score of 86,870 shows robust general-purpose arithmetic capability. Floating-point math reaches 63,703, indicating solid scientific and engineering compute. Data compression hits 277,353, which benefits file archiving and database workloads. The encryption score of 16,358 suggests hardware-accelerated cryptography, while extended instructions at 16,456 point to modern SIMD support. The physics score of 1,727 and prime number finding at 113 are lower, reflecting the power constraints of mobile operation.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,697 places it within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662) and essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707). The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H reaches 32,812 (0.4% higher). These deltas are negligible — the Ultra 7 155H trades blows with these desktop and mobile rivals within a fraction of a percent. For real workloads, this means the chip offers comparable multi-threaded performance to those alternatives, with the mobile form factor being the primary differentiator.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 represents the headline compute figure, placing it in the upper tier of mobile processors. The single-core score of 1,743 confirms that lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications will feel snappy. In PassMark, the single-thread score of 3,468 aligns with the R23 single-core result, showing consistency across testing methodologies.

The GPU, Intel Arc A530M, delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,735 and a Vulkan score of 43,492, averaging 46,614 overall. This places the GPU at the 85th percentile, with an average benchmark score that essentially matches the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601, 0% delta) and sits within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702). The NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043 (1.2% lower) and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972 (1.4% lower). The Arc A530M effectively sits in a performance cluster with these rivals, neither dominating nor trailing by any meaningful margin.

The combined picture shows a balanced system: the CPU at the 83rd percentile and GPU at 85th percentile together produce an 84th combined percentile. This alignment means neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which typically translates to consistent frame pacing in games and predictable render times in creative applications. The data indicates this pairing is well-matched for its intended mobile class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses an Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile interface — this is not a user-upgradeable desktop platform. The memory support is DDR5 with capacity depending on the motherboard, running dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth access for NVMe storage or other peripherals.

The GPU is integrated as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 65 W TDP, connected via PCIe 4.0 x8. The suggested PSU field is null, which is typical for laptop components where the power delivery is handled by the system's internal power brick rather than a user-selectable PSU. The CPU's 28 W TDP combined with the GPU's 65 W TDP gives an approximate 93 W combined power draw for these two components, though the full system will consume additional power for memory, storage, and display.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the entire platform being the limiting factor — since the CPU is soldered and the GPU is integrated, users cannot swap individual components. The upgrade path would be a new laptop entirely. Within the current system, the most impactful improvements would be maximizing DDR5 memory capacity and speed (subject to motherboard limits) and ensuring storage uses the PCIe Gen 5 lanes available from the CPU.

Who Should Build It

The 84th combined percentile positions this build for users who need solid performance across both CPU and GPU workloads without extreme specialization. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh play will find the GPU's performance level appropriate, as the Arc A530M's benchmark scores align with other mobile GPUs known for 1080p gaming. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded Cinebench scores.

Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 16 cores and 22 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 86,870 indicating efficient handling of build processes. Students and small business users building workstations will find the balance of CPU and GPU performance sufficient for coursework, productivity apps, and light creative work. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 85th percentile suggest no single workload type is severely underserved.

The mobile form factor means this is not aimed at users building desktop towers — it targets laptop buyers who need portable performance. The 28 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP indicate a system that can be cooled in a mainstream laptop chassis, not an oversized gaming brick.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697 on average, within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662) and 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32,750).

Q: How does the GPU compare to similar mobile graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A530M averages 46,614, matching the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601) exactly and trailing the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702) by just 0.2%.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with capacity depending on the motherboard.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU uses a soldered Intel BGA 2049 socket, which prevents user-level overclocking or replacement.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves an 84th combined percentile, with the CPU at 83rd and GPU at 85th percentile individually.

Q: What are the GPU's API capabilities?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern gaming and compute APIs.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The CPU has 112 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the GPU's 85th percentile performance and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggest this pairing can drive 1080p displays at competitive frame rates, though the data is estimated since no measured FPS exists. The GPU's Geekbench scores of 49,735 (OpenCL) and 43,492 (Vulkan) indicate solid compute throughput that translates to playable settings in modern titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 providing headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 24,873 supports simultaneous gameplay and broadcast workloads without severe contention.

Video editing workloads will leverage the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance — the R23 multi-core score of 15,028 handles timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or similar tools will use both components: the CPU's floating-point math score of 63,703 handles CPU-based renders, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 49,735 accelerates GPU render engines. The 12 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support for compatible workloads.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high integer math score of 86,870, which speeds up compilation and code analysis. The 22 threads allow parallel builds, and the data compression score of 277,353 accelerates package management and version control operations.

Student and office work requires only a fraction of this system's capability. The single-thread scores of 1,743 (Cinebench R23) and 3,468 (PassMark) ensure responsive document editing and web browsing, while the efficiency of the 28 W CPU TDP extends battery life during light usage.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M uses the DG2-256 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The Xe-HPG architecture represents Intel's discrete-class graphics design, here implemented as an IGP. The GPU runs at a base clock of 900 MHz with a boost of 1300 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming with high texture quality and for GPU compute tasks that fit within the memory budget. The 1536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs provide the core rendering pipeline, with pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s.

Compute performance measures 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The 12 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though the overall FP32 throughput places this in the mid-range mobile tier. The GPU's benchmark scores — 49,735 OpenCL and 43,492 Vulkan — represent a 6.6% gap between the two APIs, suggesting the Vulkan driver path has some overhead relative to OpenCL. The 85th percentile ranking confirms this is a capable mobile GPU, matching the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and RX 6550M within 0.2%.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H CPU with the Intel Arc A530M GPU. Both components come from Intel, creating a unified ecosystem with shared driver and optimization frameworks. The build class of "laptop" means this targets portable systems rather than desktop towers, with power and thermal constraints dictated by mobile chassis design.

The overall tier from the percentiles is solidly upper-mid-range: 84th combined percentile places this above the majority of laptop configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 85th percentile indicate balanced performance where neither component drags the system down. This is not a flagship gaming laptop nor an ultraportable — it sits in the performance mainstream, capable of handling demanding workloads while remaining accessible in terms of power requirements (28 W CPU, 65 W GPU).

Balance and Bottleneck

The near-identical percentile rankings (CPU 83rd, GPU 85th) suggest a well-balanced pairing. In CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression (277,353 score), or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU's higher percentile means it will not bottleneck these tasks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 provides ample compute for such workloads.

In GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A530M's 85th percentile performance takes the lead. The CPU's 83rd percentile ensures it can feed the GPU adequately in most game scenarios, though at lower resolutions or with very high frame rates, the CPU could become the limiting factor given its mobile power envelope.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s for the CPU and 224.0 GB/s for the GPU represent separate pools — the CPU accesses system memory, while the GPU has dedicated VRAM. This discrete memory architecture avoids contention. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but could limit ultra-high texture settings in some titles. Overall, the bottleneck analysis shows a system where either component can become the constraint depending on workload, but neither dramatically exceeds the other.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the GPU's position relative to known-performance rivals.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 46,614 matching the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601) and AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702), the Arc A530M should deliver comparable 1080p gaming performance. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports modern game textures at 1080p ultra settings, though VRAM-intensive titles may require high rather than ultra presets.

The CPU's single-thread score of 1,743 (Cinebench R23) and 3,468 (PassMark) ensures adequate frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. In esports titles that favor high frame rates, the CPU's 83rd percentile should support 144 Hz class displays, while the GPU's 85th percentile handles the render load. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests playable frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range depending on the title's optimization, though this is an estimate. The 12 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the overall compute budget means ray-traced effects will significantly impact frame rates.

At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and compute would likely struggle with ultra settings, making 1080p the practical sweet spot for this pairing. The estimated nature of these figures means actual performance could vary by 10-15% depending on driver maturity and game-specific optimizations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds