SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

34,485 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This configuration pairs Intel’s latest Panther Lake mobile silicon with a dedicated Alchemist-generation Arc GPU. The data shows a laptop-class platform aimed at balanced performance, but with distinct strengths and limitations that buyers should weigh carefully. Below is a breakdown based strictly on the benchmark records.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel’s 3 nm Panther Lake architecture. It runs in the Core Ultra Series 3 family, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU’s thermal design power is 25 W, which is low for a 16-core part, indicating that sustained multi-core workloads may be power-limited in thin chassis. The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. That L3 capacity is modest for a modern high-core-count chip, but it is sufficient for most mobile workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 84th percentile of all tested CPUs, which is a strong showing for a mobile processor. Its average benchmark score is 34485, sitting just 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-13700HX (34554) and 0.4% above the Intel Core i5-13450HX (34333). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 by 0.8%. In practical terms, this CPU trades blows with last-generation high-end mobile HX parts and even some desktop CPUs, making it a very capable multi-threaded performer for its class.

Looking at specific workloads, Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23991, which is a strong result for a 25 W part, while the single-core score of 3387 indicates excellent per-thread performance, likely due to the high 4.60 GHz boost. Cinebench R20 shows 10076 multi-core and 1422 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 2418 multi-core and 341 single-core. PassMark results reinforce the picture: multithread score of 28545, single-thread score of 4013, floating-point math at 82415, integer math at 62070, and data compression at 280340. These numbers suggest the CPU excels at productivity tasks that use many threads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The low TDP means that peak performance may not be sustained indefinitely, but the short-burst scores are excellent.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This is a solid memory configuration for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, with enough VRAM for modern titles.

The GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores, though the architecture is first-generation Alchemist, so ray tracing performance is not its primary strength. The FP32 throughput is 12.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers all modern gaming APIs. Its TDP is 80 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark scores place the A730M in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 45592. It sits 0.5% above the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384), 1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), and is 0.8% below the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972) and 1% below the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043). This is a notable result: the A730M is competitive with professional workstation GPUs in raw compute benchmarks, though gaming drivers and ray tracing efficiency may differ. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1732, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. Geekbench OpenCL score is 70352, and Vulkan score is 64693. These figures indicate strong compute performance for rendering and GPGPU tasks, but gaming frame rates depend heavily on driver optimization, which historically has been a weakness for Intel Arc in older titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the processor is not user-upgradeable; you are locked into the CPU that comes with the laptop. The GPU is also integrated into the system (slot width is listed as "IGP" for the A730M, which is unusual for a discrete part, but the data indicates it is a mobile component). Neither component can be swapped in a typical laptop chassis.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is 115.2 GB/s, which is modest compared to the GPU’s 336.0 GB/s, but it is adequate for the CPU’s 16 cores. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This is a fast interconnect for the GPU, though PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU side are mostly useful for future NVMe storage.

The CPU TDP is 25 W, and the GPU TDP is 80 W. Combined, that is 105 W of silicon power, which is manageable for a mid-size laptop power adapter. There is no suggested PSU listed, but given the mobile form factor, you are constrained by the laptop’s internal power delivery. A sensible next upgrade path is not available for the CPU or GPU, but you can upgrade storage and memory if the laptop allows it. For most users, the platform is a sealed unit, so the only practical "upgrade" is choosing a higher-tier model at purchase time. The data shows that the CPU and GPU are well-matched for their respective performance tiers, so there is no obvious bottleneck that a future upgrade would fix without replacing the entire laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 84, which indicates a well-balanced system for its class. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile, and the GPU also sits at the 84th percentile. This symmetry suggests that neither component dramatically outclasses the other in overall benchmark terms. However, workload-specific analysis reveals where each component leads.

In CPU-heavy tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core (23991) and PassMark multithread (28545), the CPU is clearly the dominant performer. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios because the CPU’s single-core performance (4013 PassMark single-thread) is strong enough to feed the GPU at 1080p and even 1440p. The GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for high-refresh 1080p gaming, but not for 4K ultra settings. In ray tracing workloads, the 24 RT cores are present but the first-gen Alchemist architecture is not as efficient as newer competitors, so expect lower frame rates in RT-enabled titles.

The CPU’s low 25 W TDP means that in sustained all-core loads, it may throttle below its peak boost, which could bottleneck the GPU in CPU-intensive games that use many threads. However, most games rely on fewer threads, and the CPU’s 4.60 GHz boost and strong single-core score (3387 in R23 single-core) are sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks. The GPU’s 80 W TDP is also modest for a 3072-shader part, so it will not sustain maximum clocks indefinitely under heavy load. Overall, the balance is good for mixed workloads: productivity tasks leverage the CPU, and gaming leverages the GPU, with neither component holding the other back significantly in typical use.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 60-100 FPS in most titles on high settings, though ultra settings may push it lower. The CPU’s single-core strength (4013 PassMark single-thread) ensures that frame pacing is stable. For 1440p, expect 40-60 FPS on high settings, depending on the game. The 12 GB VRAM is a plus for texture-heavy titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 25 W TDP are adequate for software encoding at 1080p60, but the GPU also supports hardware encoding (via Intel Quick Sync, though not explicitly listed, the Xe-HPG architecture includes media engines). The CPU’s multithread score of 28545 indicates it can handle encoding overhead while gaming, though simultaneous heavy loads may cause frame drops. The GPU’s 80 W TDP means power draw is manageable during streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 and PassMark data compression score of 280340 make it excellent for timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and effects rendering. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 70352 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with moderate effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 threads are well-suited for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (though Blender is not in the benchmark list, the Cinebench scores are a proxy). The GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS FP16 are strong for GPU rendering in Blender or Octane, provided the software supports Intel Arc. The Vulkan score of 64693 indicates good compute performance for real-time viewports.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 62070 and multithread score of 28545 are excellent for compiling large codebases. The 16 cores handle parallel builds well, and the 4.60 GHz boost speeds up single-threaded compilation steps. The 18 MB L3 cache is adequate for most workloads. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capabilities can accelerate machine learning inference.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 3387 (R23) and PassMark single-thread of 4013 ensure snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing. The 25 W TDP means long battery life potential, though the discrete GPU will draw power when active. The 12 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office tasks, but the integrated Xe3 Graphics (listed as integrated graphics) can handle basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU’s 84th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732, this system is positioned for 1080p gaming. In esports titles like CS2 or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (4013 PassMark single-thread) and the GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS should deliver 144+ FPS at 1080p with low settings. In AAA titles at 1080p ultra, expect 50-70 FPS in games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, assuming drivers are mature. The 12 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in at 1080p ultra, which is a plus.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 336.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. Expect 35-50 FPS in AAA titles on high settings, and 60+ FPS in lighter games. Ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates due to the 24 RT cores being first-generation; expect 20-30 FPS at 1080p with RT enabled in demanding titles. The CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, given its single-core strength. For 4K gaming, this system is not suitable beyond 30 FPS in older or less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is a strong fit for gamers who play at 1080p and are willing to accept high (not ultra) settings for smooth frame rates. The 84th percentile GPU ranking and 12 GB VRAM make it future-proof for 1080p over the next few years. It is also suitable for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes on the go, thanks to the CPU’s 23991 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 70352 OpenCL score. The 16-core CPU is a boon for software developers who compile code regularly, as the PassMark integer math score of 62070 indicates strong throughput.

Students and office workers will find the CPU’s single-core performance (3387 R23) more than adequate for daily tasks, and the 25 W TDP suggests good battery life for all-day use. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded productivity suites will benefit from the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking. However, this is not the right system for 4K gaming enthusiasts or professionals who rely on NVIDIA CUDA-accelerated software, as the Intel Arc GPU does not support CUDA. The build class is explicitly laptop, so it is a mobile solution, not a desktop replacement.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 34485 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-13700HX’s 34554. The difference is negligible, so performance is essentially identical in most workloads.

Q: Is the GPU good for 1440p gaming?

A: The Arc A730M has 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, but its FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS suggests it is better suited for 1080p. At 1440p, expect 35-50 FPS in AAA titles on high settings, based on its 84th percentile ranking.

Q: Can the CPU handle video editing?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 and PassMark data compression score of 280340 indicate strong performance for export encoding and timeline processing. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 70352 also accelerates effects.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: No. The CPU lists ECC memory support as false, so only non-ECC DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory is compatible.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The CPU and GPU pair has a combined percentile of 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of all tested laptop configurations in the database.

Q: Is the GPU faster than the NVIDIA RTX A2000?

A: The Arc A730M scores 45592 on average, which is 1% lower than the RTX A2000’s 46043. The difference is small, so they are effectively peers in raw compute.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The boost clock is 4.60 GHz, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz. This high boost is reflected in the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3387.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13700HX at 34554, a delta of -0.2%, which is statistically a tie. The CPU is also 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13450HX (34333), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260), and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222). Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23991, single-core at 3387, PassMark multithread at 28545, and PassMark single-thread at 4013.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 45592, also placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972, a delta of -0.8%, meaning the Arc A730M is slightly slower. It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384), 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), and 1% below the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043). Specific GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 1732, Geekbench OpenCL at 70352, and Geekbench Vulkan at 64693.

The combined picture is a laptop with two components that are both in the 84th percentile, indicating a well-matched pair. The CPU’s strength in multi-threaded tasks (Cinebench R23 23991) complements the GPU’s compute capability (OpenCL 70352), making this a balanced system for gaming and productivity. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance must be inferred from these scores, but the 84th percentile ranking for both parts suggests that this configuration will handle 1080p gaming and demanding creative workloads without major bottlenecks.