SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

34,485 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + Intel Arc A550M: Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Panther Lake-H mobile processor with Intel's discrete Arc A550M GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, the GPU at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined platform lands at the 85th percentile. This is a laptop-class build aimed at balanced 1080p gaming and productivity work, with the data showing neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 336H compare to the Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485, which is just 0.2% behind the Core i7-13700HX's 34554. The two processors are effectively tied in overall performance, making them direct competitors in the mobile CPU space.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to desktop cards?

A: The Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49737 places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. It sits within 0.4% of the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and 0.5% of the Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), though it trails the RX 6900 XT by 2.4%.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU runs at a base clock of 1.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and users cannot adjust the multiplier to push beyond those figures.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 3 nm process (Panther Lake architecture), while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process with the DG2-512 chip. The GPU die measures 406 mm² and contains 21,700 million transistors.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Ultra 5 336H features 18 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core. This cache configuration supports the 16-core, 16-thread design.

Q: What API support does the Arc A550M offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 16 ray tracing cores and delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a well-balanced pairing with the CPU and GPU landing within two percentile points of each other (84th vs 86th). The CPU's average benchmark score of 34485 and the GPU's 49737 indicate that neither component will consistently dominate the other in mixed workloads. For gaming, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it will be the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23991) ensure it can feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 280340) and encryption (21291), the processor's 16 cores are fully utilized. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate it can handle graphics workloads, but the 128-bit memory bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes critical. The CPU's dual-channel memory support with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth aligns well with the GPU's needs, creating a balanced platform for 1080p gaming and content creation.

The PassMark single-thread score of 4013 shows strong per-core performance, meaning the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in lightly-threaded games. Conversely, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking means it can handle demanding titles, but the 8 GB GDDR6 memory may become a limiting factor in future games with large texture requirements. The data suggests a balanced system where the GPU becomes the bottleneck at 1440p and above, while the CPU handles multi-threaded productivity tasks without significant constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance position it for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 4013 single-thread score ensures frame pacing remains smooth, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy titles. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 8 GB memory capacity may require texture quality reductions in the most demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28545 indicates strong parallel processing capability, and the Xe3 integrated graphics could potentially offload some encoding tasks. The GPU's 2048 shading units deliver solid rasterization performance, making this a capable streaming platform for 1080p output.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 demonstrates strong rendering performance for video exports. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking places it ahead of the Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, 0.7% behind) and Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222, 0.8% behind). The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) accelerates compute tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit working with very large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R20 multi-core at 10076, R15 at 2418) indicate solid performance for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 406 mm² die and 21,700 million transistors suggest a mid-range part that will handle moderate workloads but not extreme scenes.

Software development: The 16-core, 16-thread design with 18 MB of L3 cache provides strong compilation performance. The PassMark integer math score of 62070 and extended instructions score of 24542 indicate good compute throughput for code compilation and testing. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large builds, and the 84th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness during multi-threaded builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4013 and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking handle productivity suites and web browsing effortlessly. The 25 W TDP for the CPU and 60 W for the GPU indicate efficient operation for all-day battery use in a laptop, while the 3 nm process node for the CPU and 6 nm for the GPU contribute to power efficiency.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets laptop users who need balanced performance across gaming and productivity. The 84th percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU make it suitable for gamers playing at 1080p with high settings, as the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ray tracing cores handle modern titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 23991 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 compute performance.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16-core design and 62070 integer math score, while students and office workers get a responsive system with a 4013 single-thread score. Small business workstations needing multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization can rely on the 28545 PassMark multi-thread score. The 8 GB GDDR6 GPU memory suits 1080p gaming and moderate creative work, but users needing more VRAM for 1440p gaming or large AI models should look elsewhere. The combined 85th percentile ranking makes this a high-mid-range laptop platform, suitable for users who want one machine for work and play without sacrificing either.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 34485 places it at the 84th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival is the Core i7-13700HX at 34554 (0.2% faster), followed by the Core i5-13450HX at 34333 (0.4% slower), the Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260 (0.7% slower), and the Ryzen AI 7 350 at 34222 (0.8% slower). This clustering shows the Ultra 5 336H sits in a tightly contested performance band where a few points separate competitors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 places it at the 86th percentile. It trails the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) by 0.4% and the Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001) by 0.5%, while leading the Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477) by 2.6%. The Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) leads the Arc A550M by 2.4%. These deltas indicate the A550M performs at a level comparable to high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, despite being a mobile part.

The combined percentile of 85 reflects a platform where both components are closely matched in their respective markets. The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores (23991 multi-core, 3387 single-core) and the GPU's Geekbench scores (49894 OpenCL, 49580 Vulkan) combine to create a system that handles both compute and graphics workloads with similar proficiency. This balance is rare in laptop builds, where one component typically outclasses the other.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, this platform is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles. The 16 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but performance will vary depending on the game's implementation. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures but may require reductions in games with very large texture packs.

The CPU's 4013 PassMark single-thread score ensures that CPU-bound games will not be limited by the processor. The 16-core design provides headroom for background tasks while gaming, and the 4.60 GHz boost clock handles lightly-threaded titles well. At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus may become a limiting factor, and users should expect to lower settings for smoother frame rates. The 86th percentile GPU ranking suggests it performs between the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT in rasterization, making 1080p high-refresh gaming the sweet spot for this platform.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on Intel's 3 nm Panther Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 25 W. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth.

The 84th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top tier of mobile processors. Its average benchmark score of 34485 is within 0.2% of the Core i7-13700HX, a desktop-class mobile chip. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 indicates strong sustained performance for multi-threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 3387 shows capable per-thread performance. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, as evidenced by the PassMark data compression score of 280340.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 12 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and storage. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics offers a fallback display output and potential for light GPU tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed. The production status is Active, and the release date is January 2026. The 16 cores without hyperthreading (16 threads total) is an interesting design choice, meaning the processor relies on physical cores rather than simultaneous multithreading, which can be advantageous for power efficiency in a 25 W TDP envelope.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Core Ultra 5 336H CPU with the Intel Arc A550M GPU. The platform achieves a combined percentile of 85, indicating it outperforms 85% of all systems in the database. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, creating a balanced system.

The Arc A550M is based on the DG2-512 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Its production status is End-of-life, indicating this is a mature platform that has been superseded by newer designs.

The CPU's 25 W TDP and GPU's 60 W TDP combine for a total of 85 W of power draw for the core components, making this a relatively efficient laptop platform. The CPU's 3 nm process and GPU's 6 nm process contribute to this efficiency. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), which may indicate a compact design suitable for thinner laptops. The display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the available ports vary by laptop manufacturer.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded independently. The GPU is also a mobile part with its slot width listed as IGP, indicating it may be soldered to the motherboard as well. This means the primary upgrade path is the entire laptop, not individual components.

The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The memory is likely upgradeable in most laptop designs, allowing users to increase capacity or speed. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 12 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU's TDP of 60 W and the CPU's TDP of 25 W together suggest a power supply in the 100-150 W range for the whole laptop, though no suggested PSU is provided in the data. The GPU's production status of End-of-life means no driver updates or performance improvements are likely in the future, so users should not expect significant performance gains over time. A sensible next upgrade would be a new laptop with a newer GPU generation, as the CPU and GPU are both soldered and not individually replaceable. The platform's DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure it remains relevant for storage and memory upgrades, but the core compute components are fixed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 336H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds