SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and how does it fit into the product stack?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. It has 18 cores and 18 threads, a base clock of 4.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs based on average benchmark scores, placing it near the top of the desktop mainstream segment.

Q: What graphics card is paired with this CPU in this build?

A: The GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 from the GeForce 40-series, based on the AD104 chip and Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, 5888 shading units, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The card achieves an 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs, with a boost clock of 2475 MHz and a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in benchmark performance?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66159, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66099, 0.1% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (65914, 0.4% ahead). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (66855) by 1% and the AMD EPYC 4465P (66925) by 1.1%. This places it in a tightly contested performance band.

Q: What are the key memory specifications for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class reliability. The platform uses Intel Socket 1851 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4070 is marked as end-of-life in the production status. Its predecessor is the GeForce 30-series and its successor is the GeForce 50-series. Despite being end-of-life, it remains a competitive option based on its benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 87 out of 100, meaning it outperforms roughly 87% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This reflects a well-balanced pairing where both components are above average in their respective categories.

Q: Are there any measured FPS values for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this pairing.

---

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and the RTX 4070 is characterized by a CPU that ranks in the 93rd percentile of all processors and a GPU that ranks in the 81st percentile of all graphics cards. The 12-percentage-point gap between these two percentiles suggests the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in most workloads, but the difference is not so large that the GPU becomes a severe bottleneck in typical use.

For gaming at high refresh rates, benchmark results indicate that the CPU's single-threaded performance is the primary driver of frame pacing. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4698 are strong figures that support high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's 81st percentile ranking means that at higher resolutions—where pixel throughput dominates—the RTX 4070 will become the limiting factor. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s define its raw ceiling for rasterization work.

In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU's 18 cores and 18 threads provide substantial parallel compute capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and PassMark multithread score of 50146 indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in most content creation scenarios. The PassMark data compression score of 553155 and data encryption score of 41292 further confirm strong integer throughput for general compute.

The memory subsystem presents a potential bottleneck for both components. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional, and the GPU's 504.2 GB/s bandwidth over a 192-bit bus is mid-range for its class. In memory-intensive workloads—such as large dataset manipulation or high-resolution texture streaming—both components may stall waiting for data. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate this, while the GPU relies on its 12 GB of GDDR6X to hold working sets.

The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 connection, so interface bandwidth is not a bottleneck. The TDP figures—125 W for the CPU and 200 W for the GPU—suggest a combined thermal envelope that requires capable cooling but is manageable in a standard desktop chassis. The suggested PSU rating of 550 W provides adequate headroom for transient power spikes without being excessive.

---

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 66159 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. This is a strong result that puts it alongside much more expensive processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and single-core score of 6030 both reflect competitive performance: the multi-core figure demonstrates the benefit of 18 physical cores, while the single-core figure shows strong per-thread efficiency. The PassMark single-thread score of 4698 corroborates the single-core strength, while the PassMark multithread score of 50146 confirms that scaling across cores is effective.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 37648 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 is a modern DirectX 12 gaming metric that reflects strong rasterization performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 indicate robust compute capability across different API environments. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and GPU compute score of 14720 provide additional confirmation of solid graphics and compute performance respectively.

When comparing to rivals, the CPU's nearest competitor is the Intel Core 9 273PQE, which scores 66099—a 0.1% difference that is effectively a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, putting it 0.4% behind the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855 (1% ahead) and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925 (1.1% ahead). This cluster of results within a 1.2% spread indicates that the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is competitively positioned among high-end desktop and entry workstation processors.

For the GPU, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628 (0.1% behind), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37507 (0.4% behind). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 (1.3% ahead), while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157 (1.3% behind). The RTX 4070 sits in a narrow band where small score differences translate to meaningful performance deltas in real workloads.

The combined picture shows a build where the CPU outperforms the GPU in percentile terms. This means the system will handle CPU-intensive tasks—compilation, physics simulation, data processing—more comfortably than GPU-bound workloads. The combined percentile of 87 reflects a system that is above average overall, with the CPU providing a stronger foundation than the GPU.

---

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 6030, PassMark single-thread 4698) will keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 indicate it can drive high frame rates at these resolutions. At 4K, the GPU's 81st percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor, and users should expect lower frame rates relative to 1080p.

Streaming: The CPU has 18 cores and 18 threads, which provides headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. The PassMark extended instructions score of 42880 and integer math score of 123030 suggest solid performance for software encoding. The GPU's tensor cores and NVENC support (implied by Ada Lovelace architecture) offer an alternative hardware encoding path that offloads work from the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 and PassMark multithread score of 50146 indicate strong performance for video encoding and rendering timelines. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth support large project files and GPU-accelerated effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 shows that the GPU can accelerate compute-heavy video filters.

3D rendering: The CPU's 18 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench scores. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS and RT cores (46) make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering with ray tracing. The PassMark GPU compute score of 14720 confirms solid compute throughput for rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score (6030 in R23) accelerates compilation of single translation units, while the 18 cores speed up parallel builds. The PassMark data compression score of 553155 helps with source archive operations. The ECC memory support is an advantage for long-running build servers where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4698 in PassMark single-thread) ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM handles multiple high-resolution displays (up to 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) without strain. The 3 nm process node and 125 W TDP keep power consumption reasonable for a desktop that may run all day.

---

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename within the Core Ultra Series 2 family. It is manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The process node is notably advanced for a desktop CPU, contributing to the 125 W TDP despite the high core count.

The base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz are strong frequencies for modern desktop processors. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to push beyond factory settings. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is designed to feed the 18 cores efficiently, with the shared L3 providing a large pool for frequently accessed data.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage directly from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R15 scores of 4305 (multi-core) and 607 (single-core) establish a baseline, while the R20 scores of 17941 (multi-core) and 2532 (single-core) show strong scaling. The R23 scores of 42718 (multi-core) and 6030 (single-core) are the most modern metrics and indicate that this CPU competes with much more expensive options.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workloads. The integer math score of 123030 and floating point math score of 159824 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. The data encryption score of 41292 and extended instructions score of 42880 indicate strong throughput for cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The random string sorting score of 67209 and data compression score of 553155 demonstrate efficient memory access patterns for data-heavy tasks.

The nearest rival comparison shows the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus trading blows with the Core 9 273PQE and Ryzen 9 7950X3D within a 0.4% margin, while trailing the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and EPYC 4465P by about 1%. This places it in a performance tier where architectural differences matter less than cooling and memory configuration in real-world results.

---

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the AD104 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². This density enables the GPU to pack 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units into a 240 mm dual-slot card.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) and a resulting bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This configuration is adequate for 1440p gaming and light 4K workloads, but the 192-bit bus width is narrower than higher-tier cards, which can limit performance in bandwidth-hungry scenarios like high-resolution texture streaming.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 1920 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz. The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s define the card's rasterization throughput. The FP32 compute rating of 29.15 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio) provides substantial compute horsepower for general-purpose GPU workloads.

The RT cores (46) and tensor cores (184) are dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and DLSS-style upscaling. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. Display output is handled through 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Benchmark results show the GPU performing at an 81st percentile level. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 is a modern gaming benchmark that reflects strong DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 indicate robust compute and graphics performance across different APIs. PassMark scores range from 26927 in G3D to 14720 in GPU compute, with lower scores in legacy DirectX 10 (139), DirectX 11 (244), and DirectX 9 (320) tests reflecting the card's focus on modern APIs.

The nearest rival comparisons show the RTX 4070 within 1.3% of the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) and leading the RX Vega 56 (37507) by 0.4%. This places it in a performance class where it competes with last-generation high-end cards and current-generation mid-range offerings. The TDP of 200 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W makes it manageable for most desktop power supplies.

---

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and want high refresh rates in modern titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (6030 in R23) and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 indicate the system can drive high frame rates in esports and AAA titles at these resolutions. Gamers at 4K should look at higher-tier GPUs, as the RTX 4070's 81st percentile ranking will become the bottleneck.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the 18-core CPU and 12 GB GPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 accelerates rendering timelines, while the GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles GPU-accelerated effects. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long rendering sessions where data corruption is costly.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 18 cores for parallel builds and the strong single-thread score (4698 in PassMark) for serial compilation steps. The PassMark data compression score of 553155 speeds up source archive operations. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast NVMe storage for large repositories.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find this build capable of handling simulation software (CPU's 18 cores), CAD tools (GPU's 12 GB VRAM), and general productivity. The 3 nm process node keeps power consumption at 125 W for the CPU, which may translate to lower electricity costs over a semester.

Small business workstations running financial modeling, database management, or scientific computing will benefit from the CPU's high percentile ranking (93rd) and ECC memory support. The GPU's compute capability (OpenCL 154858) can accelerate data analytics, while the 550 W PSU requirement keeps system costs reasonable.

---

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GPU. The CPU is a mainstream desktop processor with 18 cores and 18 threads, while the GPU is a mid-range to upper-mid-range graphics card with 12 GB of VRAM. Both components are designed for desktop use, confirming the build class designation.

The combined percentile of 87 out of 100 places this system in the upper tier of all recorded builds. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 81st percentile, creating a system that is CPU-dominant in terms of relative performance. This means the system will handle processor-intensive tasks exceptionally well, while GPU-bound workloads will be the limiting factor for overall performance.

The CPU was released in March 2026 and carries a launch MSRP of $184. The GPU was released in April 2023 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. Both components are from their respective manufacturers' current or recent product lines, with the CPU marked as active production and the GPU marked as end-of-life.

The overall tier of this build is best described as upper-mid-range to high-end desktop. The CPU competes with flagship processors from the previous generation (within 1.1% of the EPYC 4465P), while the GPU sits just below the top-tier cards of its generation. This creates a system that is well-suited for high-refresh gaming and productivity workloads, with the CPU providing more headroom than the GPU for future upgrades.

---

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing of this pairing. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning these are calculated expectations rather than empirical results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927, the RTX 4070 is expected to deliver strong performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most modern games. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth should handle high-resolution textures at these resolutions without exceeding memory capacity.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (6030 in R23) is likely to be the primary frame rate driver in CPU-bound titles. The 18 cores provide headroom for background tasks while gaming. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more significant, and the 81st percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be slightly lower than 1080p but still competitive with mid-range expectations.

At 4K, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit memory bus may become limiting factors. The 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput set a ceiling that will likely result in moderate frame rates at this resolution, particularly in demanding AAA titles. Users targeting 4K gaming should consider this an estimate and may need to adjust settings.

Ray tracing performance is supported through 46 RT cores, but the exact frame rate impact cannot be quantified without measured data. The tensor cores (184) enable DLSS-style upscaling, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. Vulkan performance (Geekbench 174152) suggests good compatibility with Vulkan-based games.

These estimates should be treated as directional guidance rather than precise predictions. Actual frame rates will vary based on game optimization, driver versions, cooling, and system configuration.

---

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking to extract additional performance. The 125 W TDP provides thermal headroom for moderate overclocks with adequate cooling. The GPU's 200 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP combine to a suggested PSU requirement of 550 W, which leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate. The RTX 4070 is marked as end-of-life, and its successor (GeForce 50-series) is already available. Upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant performance gain for gaming, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking indicates it has more headroom than the GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures compatibility with future GPUs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU itself has limited upgrade potential within the same socket, as the Core Ultra Series 2 represents the current generation. However, the 18 cores and 18 threads provide substantial future-proofing for productivity workloads. The 3 nm process node and 125 W TDP mean the CPU is unlikely to become a thermal bottleneck in most chassis.

Memory is another upgrade path. The dual-channel DDR5 configuration supports up to the maximum capacity allowed by the platform, and the 115.2 GB/s bandwidth can be improved with higher-speed DDR5 modules. ECC support is a differentiator for workstation use, and users requiring maximum reliability should consider ECC memory modules.

Storage expansion is supported through the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can accommodate the fastest NVMe SSDs currently available. The platform's 20 CPU lanes provide bandwidth for multiple high-speed devices without contention. Overall, the most impactful upgrade for this build is the GPU, followed by memory capacity and speed.