SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s newest desktop architecture with NVIDIA’s mainstream Ada Lovelace GPU, but buyers must understand that no measured frame rates exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK confirms this directly: the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this pairing.

The CPU, an Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, an RTX 4060, sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. This creates a significant performance delta that shapes every workload discussed in this analysis. The combined percentile for the build is 77, indicating a system that is strong for productivity but only mid-range for graphics-intensive tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop build. The `buildClass` field explicitly identifies it as "desktop," and both the CPU and GPU are listed as desktop-class components with socket and slot-based designs.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads. This is a unique configuration where thread count equals core count, meaning there is no Hyper-Threading or SMT enabled on this Arrow Lake Refresh part.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bus width?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2125 MHz with 17 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is $184. The GPU’s launch MSRP was 299 USD, but no current pricing information is provided in the data.

Q: What socket does the CPU use, and what memory does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is noteworthy for workstation use.

Q: What is the GPU’s PCIe interface?

A: The RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. This is half the lane width of a typical x16 slot, which can affect bandwidth in certain workloads, though the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4060 is marked as "End-of-life" in the FACT PACK. Its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data does not support a high-refresh 1440p or 4K recommendation. The GPU sits at the 61st percentile, and its closest rivals include integrated graphics like the AMD Radeon 780M and older workstation parts like the Radeon Pro 560. The CPU is strong, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will limit texture-heavy titles. Expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings to be the realistic target, but only based on the GPU’s 61st percentile and the CPU’s 93rd percentile, not on any measured FPS.

Streaming: The CPU has 18 threads and scores 42718 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is strong for encoding. The GPU supports NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which enables hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding. The data shows the GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 19545, indicating solid compute capability for encoding tasks, but the 8 GB VRAM may be tight if streaming and gaming simultaneously at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 50146 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42718 suggest excellent timeline performance for editing and rendering previews. The GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate will accelerate effects and color grading. However, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 4K timelines with heavy effects stacks, which is reflected in its 61st percentile position.

3D rendering: This workload is heavily CPU-bound, and the data shows the CPU excels here. The 18-core part scores 17941 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 4305 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. For GPU-based rendering, the RTX 4060’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and denoising, but the GPU’s overall 61st percentile suggests it will be a bottleneck compared to the CPU.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6030 in Cinebench R23 and 4698 in Passmark single-thread indicate fast compile times for single-threaded build steps. The Passmark data encryption score of 41292 and extended instructions score of 42880 show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, which benefits code signing and scientific computing. The 30 MB of L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: This is an overkill pairing for basic tasks, but the data supports it being flawlessly responsive. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures zero lag in spreadsheets, browsers, and document editing. The GPU’s 2D performance score of 1037 in Passmark G2D is adequate for desktop rendering, and the dual-slot, 240 mm length card will fit most standard cases, making it a practical if expensive choice for a student workstation.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, featuring 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The memory subsystem is the most constrained aspect: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus delivers 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards, and the GPU’s 61st percentile reflects this limitation. The base clock of 1830 MHz boosts to 2460 MHz, with a memory clock of 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

The shading units number 3072, with 96 TMUs and 48 ROPs. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. For ray tracing, the 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores support the Ada Lovelace architecture’s dedicated RT and AI acceleration. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning no separate FP16 boost path.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, which is low compared to the CPU’s capabilities. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057, while Vulkan scores 48643. Passmark G3D is 19545, but the GPU compute score is 9213, indicating that compute workloads perform at roughly half the rasterization level. The DirectX 12 score of 76 in Passmark is particularly weak, suggesting driver overhead or architectural inefficiencies in certain workloads. For rendering, the GPU will handle 1080p and light 1440p work, but the 128-bit bus and 8 GB VRAM will throttle texture-heavy scenes. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a delta of -0.2%, which is a much older part, indicating the RTX 4060’s performance is not competitive in its current price tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames. The estimated FPS scaling, based on the benchmark scores rather than measured data, suggests that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor at 1080p, but the GPU will cap performance at higher resolutions. For productivity, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU’s 61st percentile means it will lag behind in GPU-accelerated workloads.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core 9 273PQE (0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (0.4% delta), both of which are higher-end parts. This means the CPU is punching above its weight class. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% delta) and the Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% delta), which are integrated or older discrete parts. This means the GPU is underperforming relative to its expected tier. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this split: strong CPU, weak GPU.

In real terms, a user running a CPU-bound task like video encoding will see near-best-in-class performance. A user running a GPU-bound task like 4K gaming will see mid-range performance. The 18-thread CPU with 125W TDP will not bottleneck the GPU in most cases, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will bottleneck the system in VRAM-heavy workloads. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes is more than sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so no bandwidth bottleneck exists at the bus level.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It uses a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark performance is excellent. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 42718, which places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Single-core R23 is 6030, indicating strong per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, multi-core is 17941 and single-core is 2532. The R15 scores are 4305 multi-core and 607 single-core. Passmark tests show a multi-thread score of 50146, with integer math at 123030 and floating-point math at 159824. Data compression scores 553155, while encryption scores 41292. The extended instructions score is 42880, and random string sorting is 67209.

The CPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PQE with a 0.1% delta, meaning they are statistically identical. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is 1% faster. This places the 250KF Plus as a top-tier productivity chip, rivaling flagship parts from the previous generation. For real workloads, the 18 cores handle multi-threaded compilation, rendering, and batch processing with ease. The single-thread score of 6030 in R23 ensures snappy UI response and fast single-threaded legacy applications. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the dual-channel DDR5 support at 115.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the core count. ECC memory support further positions this CPU for workstation reliability.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This build targets esports and competitive titles where the CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures high minimum frame rates, and the GPU’s 61st percentile is sufficient for medium settings. Do not expect 1440p ultra or 4K gaming; the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will choke on modern AAA titles.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists who work primarily in CPU-bound applications will benefit from the 18-core CPU. The GPU’s 24 RT cores handle preview rendering and effects, but final renders will be CPU-dominated. The ECC memory support is a plus for long render sessions.

Software developers: The high single-thread score of 6030 in R23 and the encryption score of 41292 make this ideal for compiling, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The 18 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the unlocked multiplier allows tuning.

Students in STEM fields: The CPU handles MATLAB, simulation, and data analysis tasks, while the GPU accelerates CUDA-based workloads. The 3 nm process keeps power reasonable, and the 125W TDP fits in standard dorm-room power strips.

Small business workstations: For database servers, virtualization hosts, or heavy spreadsheet analysis, the CPU’s multi-thread score of 50146 in Passmark is overkill but future-proof. The GPU’s 61st percentile is adequate for office graphics and light CAD work.

Not suitable for: High-end 4K gaming, VR, or machine learning training. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile make these workloads impractical. Users in these fields should look at higher-tier GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PQE with an average score of 66099 and a delta of 0.1%, meaning the 250KF Plus is effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914 (0.4% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855 (1% faster). This is a tightly contested group at the top of the CPU charts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17639, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a score of 17666 and a delta of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4060 is slightly slower. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% slower), and the Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% slower). The GPU is statistically indistinguishable from these older or integrated parts, which is a damning assessment of its current standing.

The combined percentile for this build is 77. This is pulled down by the GPU, as the CPU alone would be in the top 7% of all processors. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 and the Passmark G3D score of 19545 confirm the GPU’s mid-range standing. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so all gaming estimates are derived from these benchmark scores. The CPU will not hold back the GPU in most titles, but the GPU will hold back the CPU in GPU-bound scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake Refresh part on the Core Ultra Series 2 platform, released in early 2026, while the GPU is an end-of-life Ada Lovelace part released in mid-2023. The CPU is actively produced, but the GPU is discontinued, which may affect availability.

The build class is "desktop," and the combined percentile is 77. This places the system in the upper-mid range of all desktop builds, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 93rd percentile. The GPU’s 61st percentile is below average for a discrete card, meaning the system is unbalanced. The CPU has 18 cores and 18 threads, a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 30 MB of L3 cache. The GPU has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, 3072 shading units, and 24 RT cores. The CPU’s TDP is 125W, and the GPU’s TDP is 115W, suggesting a total system draw that is moderate, but the exact wattage is not provided for the whole build.

This pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" desktop with gaming capability. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is entry-level for discrete graphics. Users building this should prioritize CPU-bound workloads and treat gaming as a secondary function.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for error-correcting workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is plenty of bandwidth headroom for future expansion. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300W, and the CPU TDP is 125W, so a standard 500-600W power supply would be sufficient, but the exact total system wattage is not in the FACT PACK.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU is already in the 93rd percentile, and its nearest rivals are flagship parts like the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Replacing the RTX 4060 with a higher-tier GPU would immediately lift the combined percentile from 77, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Any GPU with a higher benchmark score than 17639 would improve gaming performance. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support future GPUs that may use Gen 5 x16, so no platform upgrade is needed for that.

The motherboard must support Socket 1851 and DDR5. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows overclocking, provided the motherboard has a capable VRM. The CPU’s 125W TDP is moderate, so a standard air cooler should suffice, though the data does not specify cooler requirements. For memory, dual-channel DDR5 is required, and ECC support is available on compatible boards. The PCIe Gen 5 support is forward-looking, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means current performance is not limited by the bus. A future upgrade to a PCIe Gen 5 GPU would not be bottlenecked by the CPU’s lane count. The platform is solid for at least one more generation of GPU upgrades, and the CPU should remain competitive for several years given its 93rd percentile standing.