SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance envelope. The CPU holds a 93rd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 81. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc B580’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, which is competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (0.2% faster). For 1080p high-refresh gaming, this GPU class typically handles esports titles well, but the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must rely on the synthetic scores. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4698 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030 indicate strong per-core performance that should not bottleneck frame generation in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 18 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 50146, combined with a data encryption score of 41292, suggests the processor can handle concurrent game rendering and stream encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 20 RT cores and Xe2-HPG architecture also offer hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, though specific encoder performance metrics are not provided in the data.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42718 places this CPU within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and 1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. For timeline scrubbing and export tasks, the 30 MB shared L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth multi-track editing. The GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K preview rendering, while the FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS accelerates effects processing in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4305 and R20 multicore score of 17941. The PassMark floating-point math score of 159824 indicates strong computational throughput for physics simulations and ray-traced scene calculations. The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide complementary rasterization performance, though the 68th percentile GPU ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer for production-scale scenes.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 123030 and extended instructions score of 42880 reflect solid compile performance and encryption workloads. The 3 nm process node from TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors, contributes to efficient execution of parallel build tasks. For developers working with large codebases, the 18 native threads handle parallel compilation well, while the DDR5 dual-channel memory support with ECC capability ensures data integrity during long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4698 delivers responsive application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 709 handles 2D desktop composition and document rendering without strain. For typical productivity suites, the combination of 93rd percentile CPU and 68th percentile GPU vastly exceeds the requirements of word processing, web browsing, and presentation software, making this build overkill for purely academic tasks but future-proof for increasingly interactive educational content.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU operates at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile. This 25-percentage-point gap indicates the processor will frequently outpace the graphics card in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios like strategy games, physics simulations, or high-frame-rate esports titles, the Arc B580 becomes the limiting factor, as its PassMark G3D score of 15748 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 define the graphics ceiling.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming with maximum settings or complex 3D rendering, the CPU’s excess capacity goes unused. The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus delivers performance within 0.1% of the Intel Core 9 273PQE and 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, meaning it can drive frame rates that the B580 cannot always match at higher resolutions. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the CPU will often outpace the GPU in lighter titles, while at higher resolutions, the GPU’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM become the primary constraint.

The PassMark physics score of 3183 and data compression score of 553155 indicate the CPU handles background tasks and data streaming efficiently, which helps maintain consistent frame pacing. However, the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, rather than a full x16 connection, could slightly limit data transfer in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, though the 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth partially compensates for this.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 66159 positions it within 1% of its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which scored 66855. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D trails by 0.4% at 65914, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE is essentially tied at 66099 with a 0.1% delta. The AMD EPYC 4465P leads this group at 66925, outperforming the 250KF Plus by 1.1%.

In single-threaded tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 6030 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4698, placing it in the upper echelon for per-core performance. Multi-threaded results show a Cinebench R23 score of 42718 and a PassMark multithread score of 50146, confirming strong scaling across the 18 cores. The Cinebench R20 results further validate this: 2532 single-core and 17941 multicore.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23021 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, 0.2% faster). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms it by 0.7% at 23172, while the NVIDIA P106-100 leads by 1% at 23249. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 significantly exceeds the OpenCL score of 92821, suggesting strong Vulkan-optimized performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 and GPU compute score of 7729 complete the picture of a mid-range graphics solution.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its price-adjacent competitors while the GPU matches older high-end cards from previous generations. The combined percentile of 81 reflects a build that excels in processor-heavy workloads but remains mid-pack in graphics performance.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The Arc B580’s 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-texture gaming at these resolutions. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank ensures minimal frame drops in CPU-heavy titles. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking suggests compromises will be necessary on settings, as the RTX 2080-class performance indicates a 1080p-to-1440p sweet spot.

Content creators: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42718 and PassMark floating-point score of 159824 make this a strong choice for video editors and 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering. The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates AI-assisted editing tools.

Software developers: The 18-core configuration with 30 MB shared L3 cache handles parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 123030 and encryption score of 41292 support cryptography-heavy workloads and secure development environments. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation tasks.

Students and small business workstations: The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures responsive daily computing, while the GPU’s G2D score of 709 handles basic graphics tasks. The combination offers headroom for future software demands without requiring immediate upgrades, though the performance exceeds typical student needs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus features 18 cores and 18 threads, with no hyper-threading, running at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Arrow Lake Refresh architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process node packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the 125 W TDP provides thermal headroom for sustained boosting.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the PassMark data compression score of 553155 and random string sorting score of 67209, indicating strong data manipulation capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 452, while seemingly low, reflects the integer-heavy nature of that specific test rather than a weakness.

Real-world implications of the benchmark scores: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42718 places this CPU in the top 7% of all processors, competing directly with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The single-core score of 6030 ensures snappy application response and strong gaming performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The PassMark single-thread score of 4698 corroborates this, placing it in the upper tier for per-core throughput.

The memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 supports the high data throughput demanded by the 18 cores. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards. The absence of integrated graphics (N/A) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors across a 272 mm² die. The transistor density of 72.1M per mm² indicates efficient packing. The GPU operates at a fixed 2670 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for the GPU’s class. The 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations processors provide a balanced compute configuration. The 20 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s with texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s supports high-resolution rendering.

The FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and FP16 of 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU in the mid-range segment. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 suggests excellent Vulkan API utilization. The PassMark DirectX scores (76 for DX10, 128 for DX11, 76 for DX12) show varied API performance, with DirectX 11 being the strongest.

The GPU’s 190 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU requirement make it power-efficient for its performance class. The dual-slot design at 272 mm length fits standard ATX cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1a plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor setups. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while narrower than x16, provides sufficient bandwidth for the 12 GB frame buffer.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average benchmark score of 66159, which is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s 65914, making them effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance class relative to NVIDIA cards?

A: The Arc B580’s average benchmark score of 23021 places it 0.6% faster than the RTX 2080 and 0.7% slower than the RTX 3080, indicating performance between those two older-generation cards.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability and data integrity during long compute tasks.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this build?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while the GPU uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for ray tracing?

A: The Arc B580 includes 20 dedicated RT cores as part of its Xe2-HPG architecture, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 81, reflecting a CPU at the 93rd percentile and a GPU at the 68th percentile, resulting in a system that is stronger in processor-bound workloads.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP, so the system requires a power supply that can handle the combined load of both components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, with the 250KF Plus being an unlocked multiplier part for overclocking. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s is the current platform limit. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 20 CPU lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and expansion cards.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slots. The 190 W GPU TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU leaves headroom for additional components, though upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require reassessing the PSU. The 1x 8-pin power connector limits the GPU to its current 190 W envelope.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile performance can support significantly faster graphics cards. The 125 W CPU TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking headroom without changing the cooling solution. The platform supports future Arrow Lake Refresh CPUs, though the 250KF Plus already competes with the flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

The 12 GB VRAM on the B580 is sufficient for current games at 1440p, but 4K gaming would benefit from a GPU with more memory and bandwidth. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while not a bottleneck today, could limit future GPU upgrades that require x16 bandwidth, though the practical impact is minimal for most workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, an 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh processor on the Socket 1851 platform, with the Intel Arc B580, a Battlemage-generation GPU. The CPU represents the upper mid-range of Intel’s desktop lineup, while the GPU targets the mainstream segment. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper fifth of all desktop configurations.

The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, competitive with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and EPYC 4465P. The GPU’s 68th percentile places it in the middle of the graphics hierarchy, matching the RTX 2080 and RX 580 2048SP. This creates a system that is heavily weighted toward processor performance, making it ideal for CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, while gaming performance is solid but not exceptional at higher resolutions.

The build class is desktop, with both components in active production status. The CPU launched with an MSRP of $184, while the GPU launched at $249 USD, making this a mid-range configuration that prioritizes processing power over graphics performance. The data indicates a balanced system for productivity and mainstream gaming, with clear upgrade potential on the GPU side to better match the CPU’s capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds