SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that targets the mid-range performance tier. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. Their combined percentile is 79, indicating a system that is substantially stronger in computational tasks than in graphical rendering. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, with no measured frame rate data available for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It is manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 125 W. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data across cores. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself. It has an unlocked multiplier, making it suitable for overclocking, and was released on March 10, 2026.

Benchmark results show this processor is a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,718 in multi-core and 6,030 in single-core. The multi-core score is 7.1 times the single-core score, demonstrating excellent scaling across its 18 physical cores. Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 17,941 multi-core and 2,532 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 4,305 multi-core and 607 single-core.

PassMark tests provide additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The multithread score is 50,146, while the single-thread score is 4,698. Integer math scores 123,030, floating-point math scores 159,824, and extended instructions score 42,880. Data compression reaches 553,155, while data encryption hits 41,292. The physics test scores 3,183, and random string sorting scores 67,209. The find prime numbers test is notably weak at 452, suggesting this CPU may not excel at certain integer-heavy algorithmic tasks despite strong overall throughput.

The average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PQE, with an average score of 66,099, a delta of just 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914, which is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855, putting this 250KF variant 1% behind its sibling. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66,925, also 1.1% ahead. These margins are extremely tight, meaning real-world performance differences among these four processors will be negligible in most applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is based on the BMG-G21 chip using the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation. It is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It includes 18 ray tracing cores, though tensor core count is not specified in the data.

Memory configuration consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2,375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective. Both base and boost clocks are fixed at 2,500 MHz. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It offers display outputs of one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. The card is dual-slot, 272 mm long, and 115 mm tall, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested power supply is 450 W, and the GPU TDP is 150 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,649. Geekbench results show 83,514 in OpenCL and 96,844 in Vulkan. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 14,195, a G2D score of 661, and a GPU compute score of 7,281. Legacy DirectX tests show 65 for DX10, 118 for DX11, 72 for DX12, and 164 for DX9. These legacy scores are very low, suggesting the card prioritizes modern API performance.

The average benchmark score is 20,556, placing the GPU at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a score of 20,534, just 0.1% behind. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582, which is 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, 0.4% behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, 0.5% ahead. These deltas are all under one percent, meaning the Arc B570 performs essentially equivalently to these four rivals in aggregate benchmarks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 66,159 places it in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU's average score of 20,556 places it in the 65th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 79. This gap of 28 percentile points between CPU and GPU is significant, indicating that the processor is substantially more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own peers.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU's score of 42,718 is roughly 7.1 times its single-core score of 6,030, showing strong multi-threading efficiency. The PassMark multithread score of 50,146 versus a single-thread score of 4,698 yields a ratio of 10.7, reflecting even better scaling in integer-heavy workloads. This suggests the 18-core configuration is well-utilized across diverse threading patterns.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 is its most modern and relevant gaming benchmark. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844 is notably higher than its OpenCL score of 83,514, indicating that the card performs better under graphics-centric APIs than general compute APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 provides a broad measure of graphics performance, while the GPU compute score of 7,281 shows the card's computational capabilities are roughly half its graphics capabilities in PassMark's methodology.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is clearly the dominant component. Any gaming or rendering workload will be constrained by the GPU's lower relative standing. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or multitasking, the system will perform at a near-top-tier level. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the system will perform at a solid mid-range level.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. With the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile, there is a substantial capability mismatch. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will limit frame rates in most modern titles, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 380 GB/s memory bandwidth are mid-range figures that will constrain performance well before the CPU's 18 cores become a limiting factor.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or scientific computing, the GPU will not be the constraint. The CPU's 42,718 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 50,146 PassMark multithread score indicate that it can handle heavily threaded tasks without issue. The bottleneck in these scenarios would be the GPU only if the workload involves GPU acceleration, where its 65th percentile standing would limit acceleration potential.

The memory subsystem shows a similar imbalance. The CPU's 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is strong for a dual-channel configuration, while the GPU's 380 GB/s bandwidth is modest for a modern graphics card. In gaming, the GPU's memory bandwidth may limit texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. In compute tasks, the CPU's cache hierarchy can partially compensate for its lower bandwidth relative to the GPU.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from measured data, but the benchmark scores imply that at 1080p, the CPU can easily feed the GPU, making the GPU the limiting factor. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. For productivity applications that use the CPU heavily but the GPU lightly, the system will feel very responsive.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 65th percentile standing suggests it can handle 1080p gaming with high settings in many titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means precise expectations are uncertain. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures it will not bottleneck gameplay, so any frame rate limitations will come from the GPU alone.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 cores provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 50,146 indicates strong parallel performance, and the data encryption score of 41,292 suggests the CPU can handle encryption overhead for secure streams without compromising game performance.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 is well-suited for rendering timelines and exporting projects. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and previews, though its compute score of 7,281 indicates it is not a top-tier accelerator for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong given the 42,718 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and its 65th percentile ranking, which is comparable to older mid-range GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 18 threads and high single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 make it excellent for compiling code and running build servers. The 93rd percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of consumer CPUs in compilation throughput.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4,698 in PassMark ensures snappy response in productivity apps, while the GPU is more than sufficient for spreadsheet, document, and presentation workloads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU adequate for many titles, though those seeking maximum frame rates at 1440p or 4K will need a stronger GPU. Content creators who primarily use CPU-based rendering engines will benefit from the 18 cores and 93rd percentile CPU performance. Software developers will appreciate the compilation speed and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for fast NVMe storage. Students and small business workstations will find the system more than capable for all common tasks, with the ECC memory support providing an extra layer of reliability for important data.

The GPU's 65th percentile means users who need GPU compute for machine learning or GPU rendering should look elsewhere. However, for users who play games at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, or who use the GPU for occasional acceleration tasks, the Arc B570 is a reasonable match. The system is best described as a CPU-first workstation with gaming capability, rather than a gaming-first machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for future high-bandwidth peripherals. The 125 W TDP means most mid-range power supplies will suffice, though the GPU's suggested PSU of 450 W should be considered when selecting a power supply for the whole system.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU, given that the CPU is at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 65th. Replacing the Arc B570 with a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads without requiring any CPU change. The CPU's 18 cores and high multi-threaded performance will remain relevant for years, so a GPU upgrade would rebalance the system toward its CPU's level of performance.

Memory upgrades are also possible, as the CPU supports DDR5 and the dual-channel configuration can be populated with higher-capacity modules. Storage upgrades are straightforward given the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could extend the CPU's lifespan further, though the 125 W TDP suggests there is limited thermal headroom for significant clock increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B570 have?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus supports ECC memory in its dual-channel DDR5 configuration.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 150 W and the suggested PSU is 450 W, with a single 8-pin power connector required.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE?

A: The CPU scores 66,159 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PQE's average score of 66,099.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate expectations must be considered estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and its 65th percentile ranking suggest it is a mid-range graphics card. Based on its equivalence to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Intel Arc A750, both of which have average scores within 0.1% of the Arc B570, users can expect playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles with high settings.

At 1440p, the GPU's 380 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance will likely require reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates in demanding games. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles, and the GPU's 65th percentile standing indicates it is not designed for high-refresh 4K gaming. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures that frame generation and physics calculations will not be a bottleneck in any gaming scenario.

Since the data is not measured, these expectations are qualitative rather than quantitative. The GPU's performance relative to its rivals — all within 0.5% of its average score — suggests it will perform similarly to those cards in gaming workloads. Users seeking specific frame rate data should consult direct benchmarks for the Intel Arc B570 in their target games.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range card at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combination results in an overall percentile of 79, placing the system in the upper tier of desktop builds.

The CPU's strengths are its 18 cores, high clock speeds, and substantial cache, making it exceptional for multi-threaded productivity tasks. The GPU's strengths are its modern Xe2-HPG architecture and 10 GB of VRAM, though its raw performance metrics place it in the mid-range category. This is a system where the CPU clearly outclasses the GPU, making it ideal for users who prioritize processor-intensive work and accept mid-range gaming performance. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $184, and the GPU launched at 219 USD, though pricing is not a focus of this analysis. The system is well-suited as a workstation that can handle gaming as a secondary function.