SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

66,159 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing centered on a high-core-count CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 66th percentile, creating a system where compute-heavy workloads are clearly favored over graphics-bound tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all game performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It uses a 3 nm process from TSMC and packs 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip provides 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning there is no hyper-threading, yet the multi-threaded performance is substantial. Base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the CPU is multiplier-unlocked for overclocking. The 125 W TDP makes it a mainstream-power part, not an extreme one, but the core count suggests heavy parallel workloads are the primary design target.

Cache configuration is generous: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC support is enabled. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. There is no integrated graphics, so the Arc A750 is mandatory for display output.

Benchmark data shows a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,718 multi-core and 6,030 single-core. The multi-core figure is the standout: it places the chip in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and the nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 66,099 average with a delta of 0.1%, meaning the 250KF Plus is essentially neck-and-neck with that part. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 0.4% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is 1% ahead. This is a chip that trades blows with flagship-class processors from the previous generation.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 scores of 17,941 multi-core and 2,532 single-core indicate that both heavily threaded rendering and lightly threaded tasks are handled with ease. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score is 50,146, integer math is 123,030, floating-point math is 159,824, and data compression is 553,155. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,698 is competitive, though not class-leading. The data encryption score of 41,292 and extended instructions score of 42,880 show strong AES and SIMD throughput. The physics score of 3,183 is moderate, which is typical for a CPU without specialized gaming optimizations. The find prime numbers score of 452 is low, suggesting that pure integer brute-force loops are not this chip’s forte, but that is an outlier against the broader math results.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

A: The two are nearly identical in average benchmark score. The Intel chip has an average score of 66,159, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914, a delta of just 0.4% in favor of the Intel part. This means they are statistically equivalent, with the Intel chip holding a razor-thin edge in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Is the Arc A750 a better GPU than the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20,582, while the Arc B570 scores 20,556, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the A750. The two are effectively tied in performance, with the A750 holding a negligible lead that would not be noticeable in real-world use.

Q: What is the CPU’s strongest benchmark area?

A: The data shows the CPU excels in multi-threaded and math-heavy tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 and PassMark floating-point math score of 159,824 are both elite-level results, placing the chip in the 93rd percentile overall. Data compression at 553,155 is also a standout, indicating strong performance in archival and file-handling workloads.

Q: Can the CPU run without a dedicated GPU?

A: No. The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has no integrated graphics. The system requires the Intel Arc A750 (or another discrete GPU) to output video to a display. This is a critical distinction from CPUs with iGPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile rank?

A: The Arc A750 sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This places it above the median, but significantly lower than the CPU’s 93rd percentile. The GPU is a mid-range part, not a high-end one, based on this metric.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 versus DirectX 9?

A: The PassMark DirectX 12 score is 70, while the DirectX 9 score is 181. This indicates that the GPU is far more efficient in older DirectX 9 workloads, which is typical for modern architectures that prioritize newer APIs.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial figure for a mid-range card, supporting high-resolution textures without bottlenecking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy system. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank dwarfs the GPU’s 66th percentile rank, and the combined percentile is 80, which is dragged down by the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads—such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing—the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus will not be the limiting factor. The GPU will finish its part of the job and wait on the CPU to feed it data.

Conversely, in gaming scenarios, the Arc A750 is the bottleneck. With no measured FPS data, estimates from the GPU’s scores indicate that the A750 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could drive. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12,534 is mid-range, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is modest. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,698 is strong enough to handle game logic and physics without breaking a sweat, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in most game titles.

The balance is therefore workload-dependent. For productivity tasks that use all 18 cores, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting. For gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, meaning users would see performance gains from a GPU upgrade without needing to touch the CPU. The 125 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP suggest a combined thermal load that is manageable, but the GPU’s suggested PSU of 550 W indicates that power supply headroom is adequate for this pairing, not excessive.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional or enthusiast who spends most of their time in CPU-intensive applications and plays games only as a secondary activity. The 93rd percentile CPU rank makes this an ideal machine for 3D modelers using Cinebench-style rendering, data analysts running PassMark-style encryption and compression workloads, and software developers compiling large codebases. The 18 cores and 18 threads provide parallel throughput that rivals the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, making it a strong choice for multi-threaded content creation.

For gamers, this is a system for those who prioritize high CPU performance but are willing to accept mid-range graphics. The Arc A750’s 66th percentile means it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at moderate settings, but it will not push high-refresh 4K. The CPU’s single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound titles like strategy games or MMOs will be excellent, but the GPU will cap overall FPS.

Students and small business workstations are also a fit, provided the tasks are compute-heavy. The CPU’s ECC memory support makes it suitable for long-running scientific calculations or database servers, where data integrity is critical. The lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is required, so this is not a low-cost office build, but the CPU’s 93rd percentile rank justifies the investment for users who need serious compute power.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66,159, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, with the nearest rivals being the Intel Core 9 273PQE at 66,099 (0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914 (0.4% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at 66,855 (1% faster). The 250KF Plus is essentially tied with these parts, meaning it offers flagship-level multi-threaded performance without the flagship price tier.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570 at 20,556 (0.1% slower), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.2% slower) and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 (0.4% faster). The Arc A750 is a solid mid-range card, but it is not in the same league as the CPU.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The system has an 80th combined percentile, which reflects the GPU dragging down the overall score. In CPU benchmarks like Cinebench R23 (42,718 multi-core) and PassMark multi-thread (50,146), the system is elite. In GPU benchmarks like 3DMark Steel Nomad (2,612) and PassMark G3D (12,534), it is average. Users should expect exceptional performance in compute tasks and merely acceptable performance in graphics-heavy applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics are handled without stutter, but the GPU’s 66th percentile rank will cap FPS at mid-range levels. This is not a 240 Hz 1080p machine; it is a 60–100 Hz machine at 1440p with reduced settings.

Streaming: The 18 cores provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 553,155 indicates fast x264 encoding, and the CPU’s multi-thread score of 50,146 means simultaneous game and encode workloads will not cause frame drops on the CPU side. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware encoding is present but not class-leading.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,718 is a strong result for timeline rendering and export. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 159,824 supports complex color grading and effects. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 4K timelines may hit memory limits.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a 93rd percentile rank and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,941. Single-frame renders and final-frame exports will be fast, rivaling the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The GPU can assist with viewport acceleration, but its 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance is secondary to the CPU’s core count.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 123,030 and extended instructions score of 42,880 show strong compiler and code-analysis throughput. The 18 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases. This is a capable compile server in a desktop form.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s 93rd percentile rank means it will never feel slow, even with dozens of browser tabs and office documents open. The lack of integrated graphics requires a GPU, so this is not a low-power machine, but the ECC memory support makes it suitable for research data integrity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a strong figure for a mid-range card, supporting high-resolution textures without severe bottlenecks. Pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are respectable numbers for the class. FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating solid compute capability for AI and general-purpose workloads.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a competent but not exceptional GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612, which is a moderate result. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98,554 and Vulkan scores 85,631, showing that the GPU is more efficient in compute-heavy APIs than in pure rasterization. PassMark G3D score is 12,534, placing it in the 66th percentile. The DirectX 9 score of 181 is far higher than the DirectX 12 score of 70, indicating that the architecture favors older APIs, likely due to driver overhead in modern titles.

The GPU’s closest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% faster), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.4% slower). This places the A750 in the same performance tier as a previous-generation laptop flagship, which is a solid result for a desktop card. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooler require a 550 W PSU, and the 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors are standard for the class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Core Ultra Series 2. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and ECC is enabled, which is rare for a consumer desktop CPU. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for fast NVMe storage and a high-bandwidth GPU connection. The bus interface on the GPU is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, so there is no bottleneck on the bus side.

The TDP is 125 W for the CPU and 225 W for the GPU, totaling 350 W of component power. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, which leaves headroom for the CPU, motherboard, and drives. This is not a system that needs an oversized power supply; a quality 550–650 W unit is sufficient.

A sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank means it is not the limiting factor in any workload, and the combined 80th percentile is dragged down by the GPU’s 66th percentile. Replacing the Arc A750 with a higher-tier GPU would raise the system’s overall performance in graphics-bound tasks without any CPU bottleneck. The CPU’s socket and memory support are current-generation, so there is no need to upgrade the platform for several years. The 18 cores and 30 MB L3 cache will remain competitive for the lifespan of the socket.

Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus paired with the Intel Arc A750 is a desktop build that prioritizes CPU compute power over GPU graphics performance. The CPU is a top-tier part, scoring in the 93rd percentile of all processors and matching the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D within 0.4%. The GPU is a mid-range part, sitting in the 66th percentile and trading blows with the Intel Arc B570 and NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile.

The combined percentile is 80, which reflects the GPU’s relative weakness. This is a system for users who need serious multi-threaded compute—rendering, compilation, data analysis—and who play games as a secondary concern. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU makes the GPU mandatory, but the Arc A750 is a capable partner for 1080p and 1440p gaming at moderate settings. The build is well-suited for content creators, developers, and researchers who want flagship CPU performance without paying for a flagship GPU.