SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing built around Intel’s current-generation silicon. The CPU is an 18-core, 18-thread Arrow Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation Arc B580 with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, and it is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussion is therefore framed as an estimate derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct frame-rate testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is rated at 115.2 GB/s, and the CPU supports ECC memory, a feature that typically appeals to workstation and small business users who prioritize data integrity over raw speed. The memory controller is dual-channel, so a sensible configuration would populate two modules to achieve full bandwidth; populating all four slots on a typical motherboard would not increase bandwidth beyond the dual-channel limit.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself, providing Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This is a significant headroom consideration for future upgrades, as Gen 5 storage and expansion cards are already entering the market. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which means the Arc B580 will run at half the lane width of a typical x16 card. For current workloads, this is unlikely to be a limiting factor given the GPU’s performance class, but it does mean that the motherboard’s second PCIe slot, if any, should be Gen 5-capable to avoid bottlenecking future GPUs that may use the full x16 width.

The power delivery situation is straightforward. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU alone. A combined system would need a PSU that comfortably exceeds the sum of these two figures plus the rest of the platform, but the data does not provide a combined recommendation. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is a common standard, so most modern PSUs will have the necessary cable. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is possible, but doing so would increase power draw beyond the 125 W TDP, so PSU headroom beyond the minimum is advisable if the user intends to push the CPU.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve the GPU first. The Arc B580 sits at the 68th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable but not top-tier. Swapping to a higher-end GPU would be a drop-in change, as the PCIe 4.0 x8 slot and the 450 W PSU recommendation would accommodate most mid-range cards. The CPU, at the 93rd percentile, has more headroom, so it could drive a more powerful GPU without becoming the primary bottleneck. The motherboard socket is current-generation, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard if Intel moves to a new socket, but within the current generation, the 250K Plus is already near the top of the range.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also includes 20 RT cores for ray tracing, though the data does not specify tensor cores, so AI-accelerated workloads will rely on the standard compute units.

Memory is a strong point for this card. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is substantial for the card’s class and should prevent memory-bound scenarios in most games at 1080p and 1440p. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores tell a mixed story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068, which is a modern DirectX 12 test and reflects the card’s architectural efficiency. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 92821, and the Vulkan score is 109672, indicating that the card performs better under Vulkan than OpenCL. The PassMark G3D score is 15748, with a GPU compute score of 7729. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are all low (183, 76, 128, 76 respectively), which suggests that the card is not optimized for legacy DirectX titles, but the modern API scores are more representative of current games.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Arc B580 is tightly clustered. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.7% behind the RTX 3080, and 1% behind the NVIDIA P106-100. This is a remarkable spread, indicating that the B580 sits in a performance band where generational differences are less important than driver optimization and workload-specific scaling. For rendering, the 12 GB VRAM is a clear advantage over 8 GB cards, and the 456 GB/s bandwidth will help with high-resolution textures. The RT cores are present, but the data does not provide a ray tracing-specific benchmark, so their real-world impact cannot be quantified here.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination, and no measured FPS data exists for any game. All gaming performance figures discussed in this section are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and these figures should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Based on the GPU’s percentile position and benchmark scores, the Arc B580 is a 1080p-class card that can handle 1440p in less demanding titles. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern game assets at 1080p and 1440p, and the 456 GB/s bandwidth should prevent texture streaming bottlenecks. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261, is strong enough to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The PassMark single-thread score of 4757 reinforces this.

For esports titles at 1080p, the estimated frame rates would be high, likely exceeding 144 FPS in games that are CPU-bound. The CPU’s high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and strong single-core scores support this. For AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the estimate would be in the 60-90 FPS range, depending on the game’s engine and API. The GPU’s Vulkan score is higher than its OpenCL score, so Vulkan-based games may perform better. At 1440p, the estimate drops to 50-70 FPS for AAA titles, and the 12 GB VRAM becomes more important as resolution increases. 4K gaming is possible but would require reduced settings or upscaling, as the FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS is not sufficient for sustained high-frame-rate 4K in modern titles.

The absence of measured data is a significant caveat. The benchmark scores indicate the card’s raw compute capability, but driver maturity and game-specific optimizations can shift real-world results by 10-20%. The PassMark DirectX 9 and 10 scores are notably low, suggesting that older games may perform worse than the raw specs imply.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc B580 sits at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This means the CPU has significantly more headroom than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression or encryption, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will be underutilized. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have spare capacity.

The PassMark multithread score of 51596 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15748 is its primary gaming metric, and it is clear that the GPU will be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario above 1080p. The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute throughput. At 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the maximum FPS. At 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and the gap between CPU and GPU capability becomes more pronounced.

The data suggests that the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU. This is not a bad thing, as it leaves room for a future GPU upgrade without changing the CPU. The PassMark integer math score of 125091 and floating point math score of 162692 show that the CPU excels at compute-heavy tasks, which would benefit content creation and productivity workloads. In those scenarios, the GPU’s compute score of 7729 would be a secondary factor, and the CPU would dominate the performance picture.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66855, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4465P, which scores 66925, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469, a delta of -0.9%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159, a delta of 1.1%. This means the 250K Plus is essentially on par with the EPYC 4465P and Xeon 6515P, slightly behind the Core Ultra 9 275HX, and slightly ahead of its KF sibling.

In Cinebench, the multicore scores are 4640 (R15), 18442 (R20), and 30867 (R23). The single-core scores are 328 (R15), 2603 (R20), and 2261 (R23). The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 51596 and a single-thread score of 4757. The data compression score is 568721, encryption is 42144, extended instructions is 44565, and prime numbers is 486. These scores indicate a balanced CPU that performs well across integer, floating point, and encryption workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061, a delta of -0.2%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a delta of 0.6%. The RTX 3080 scores 23172, a delta of -0.7%. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a delta of -1%. The GPU is therefore in a tight band around the 23000 mark, with no rival more than 1% away.

The combined percentile for this build is 81, which reflects the strong CPU pulling up the average. The GPU’s 68th percentile is the weaker link, but the overall package is still above the 80th percentile, indicating a capable system for most tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-heavy gaming. Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc B580 sufficient for most titles, and the CPU’s high single-thread performance will ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound games. Gamers at 1440p will need to lower settings in demanding titles, but the 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth will handle modern assets. 4K gaming is not a realistic target for this GPU.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU’s 18 cores and strong multithreaded scores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 and PassMark multithread score of 51596 indicate that rendering and encoding tasks will complete quickly. The GPU’s compute score of 7729 is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will not be a highlight, but CPU-based workloads will be fast.

Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s strong integer math performance. The PassMark integer math score of 125091 and extended instructions score of 44565 indicate that compilation and data processing tasks will be efficient. Students and small business users building a general-purpose workstation will find this a balanced system, with the CPU providing ample headroom for productivity applications and the GPU handling light gaming or graphics tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 81, which places the system above the majority of desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has an average benchmark score of 66855, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4465P and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a 2375 MHz memory clock.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc B580 is 450 W, and the GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to the RTX 2080?

A: The Arc B580 is 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 in average benchmark score.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor, and the GPU is a mid-range desktop card. The combined percentile of 81 indicates that this is an above-average system, with the CPU being the standout component at the 93rd percentile. The GPU, at the 68th percentile, is the weaker link, but it is still capable of modern gaming at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings.

The overall tier is solidly mid-to-upper range. The CPU’s performance rivals server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 4465P and Intel Xeon 6515P, which is remarkable for a consumer desktop chip. The GPU’s performance is comparable to older high-end cards like the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, but it lacks the raw power of current top-tier GPUs. The pairing creates a system that is over-powered on the CPU side and adequately powered on the GPU side, making it a strong choice for productivity and a reasonable choice for gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

The benchmark scores are strong across the board. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 places it in the top tier of desktop CPUs. The single-core score of 2261 is also high, indicating excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark multithread score of 51596 and single-thread score of 4757 reinforce this. The data compression score of 568721 and encryption score of 42144 show that the CPU is well-suited for data-intensive tasks. The floating point math score of 162692 and integer math score of 125091 indicate strong compute capabilities.

The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which is sufficient for basic display output but not for gaming. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it has a launch MSRP of $199. The production status is active, and the release date is set for March 2026. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P, is a server-class chip, which highlights the 250K Plus’s positioning as a high-end desktop part that competes with entry-level server hardware.