SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc B570: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 18-core Core Ultra 5 250K Plus desktop processor with Intel's Arc B570 graphics card, built on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 79th percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows are available for this CPU+GPU pairing, frame-rate expectations must be inferred from the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and its PassMark G3D score of 14195. The Arc B570's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it performs at a mainstream level, comparable to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%) and the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1%). At 1080p ultra settings, this GPU should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, though the exact numbers cannot be stated without measured data.

The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 160-bit bus provides sufficient memory throughput for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate solid rasterization performance. The 18 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 65th percentile ranking suggests that ray-traced workloads at high resolutions may strain the GPU. At 1440p ultra, frame rates will likely be lower than at 1080p, and users should expect to adjust settings for demanding titles.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4757 and multi-thread score of 51596 indicate that the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus will not bottleneck the Arc B570 in gaming scenarios. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261 further confirms strong per-core performance for game logic and physics. The combined 79th percentile for the system suggests that at 1080p ultra, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates, with the CPU providing ample headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 4K, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking will likely limit frame rates more significantly.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus delivers an average benchmark score of 66855, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925 (deltaPct -0.1%), the Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006 (deltaPct -0.2%), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469 (deltaPct -0.9%). The only rival the 250K Plus outperforms in this group is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which scores 66159 (deltaPct 1.1%). This places the 250K Plus in enterprise-class territory despite its desktop market segment.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 30867 in multicore and 2261 in single-core tests. The R20 results show 18442 multicore and 2603 single-core, while R15 results are 4640 multicore and 328 single-core. These scores demonstrate strong scaling from single-core to multi-core workloads, with the 18 cores and 18 threads providing substantial parallel processing capability. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51596 and single-thread score of 4757 corroborate this balanced performance profile.

The Arc B570 achieves an average benchmark score of 20556, ranking in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 indicates modern DirectX 12 gaming capability. The Geekbench scores of 83514 for OpenCL and 96844 for Vulkan show strong compute performance for a GPU in this class. PassMark results include G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281, with DirectX 11 scoring 118 and DirectX 12 scoring 72. The combined system percentile of 79 reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and PassMark single-thread score of 4757 ensure that frame pacing and physics calculations will not bottleneck high-refresh monitors. The GPU's 65th percentile, however, suggests that achieving 144Hz or higher at ultra settings may require reducing graphical presets, especially in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 18-core CPU with 18 threads provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 indicates robust multi-tasking capability, allowing software encoding without significant frame-rate impact on the GPU.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 51596, accelerates video rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth support hardware-accelerated effects and playback of high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 positions it well for CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU's FP32 compute of 11.52 TFLOPS and 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 performance support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 65th percentile ranking suggests it will not lead its class.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 568721 and data encryption score of 42144 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth benefit large codebases and parallel build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile provide ample performance for productivity applications, web browsing, and document processing. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4757 ensures responsive application performance, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers a fallback for basic display tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p resolution who prioritize CPU performance for competitive titles. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures that gameplay remains smooth even in CPU-intensive scenarios, while the GPU's 65th percentile provides adequate graphics performance for most modern games at medium-to-high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores, though they may find the GPU limiting for GPU-accelerated workloads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 125091 and floating-point math score of 162692, which indicate strong computational throughput. Students and office workers seeking a responsive system for everyday tasks will find this pairing more than sufficient, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring snappy application launches. Small business workstations handling data processing or financial modeling can leverage the CPU's data compression score of 568721 and the system's overall 79th percentile ranking. The CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for professional workloads where data integrity is critical.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus features 18 cores and 18 threads, operating at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process, contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, along with ECC memory support for error correction.

The 93rd percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 7% of all processors. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 demonstrates strong parallel performance, while the single-core score of 2261 shows excellent per-thread capability. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 486 and extended instructions score of 44565 indicate robust integer and SIMD performance. The CPU's 125W TDP reflects its desktop performance focus, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides high frequency for latency-sensitive workloads, while the 18 cores handle multi-threaded tasks efficiently.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus supports ECC memory, providing error correction for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest competitor?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, deltaPct 0.1%) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, deltaPct -0.1%).

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus boosts up to 5.30 GHz, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B570 includes 18 RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851, which provides a path to future Arrow Lake Refresh processors within the same platform. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, and the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures compatibility with high-speed DDR5 kits. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes allows for high-bandwidth NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The Arc B570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for its performance class.

The suggested PSU for the Arc B570 is 450 W, with the GPU's TDP rated at 150 W and the CPU's TDP at 125 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, though users planning significant upgrades should consider a higher-capacity power supply. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 272 mm in length. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking provides substantial headroom for graphics improvements. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking to extract additional performance without platform changes.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core Ultra 5 250K Plus processor with the Intel Arc B570 graphics card. The CPU represents the upper tier of desktop processors with its 93rd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the mainstream level with its 65th percentile ranking. The combined system ranks at the 79th percentile overall, indicating a balanced configuration where the CPU exceeds the GPU's relative performance.

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 with Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, launched with an MSRP of $199. The Arc B570, based on the Battlemage Xe2-HPG architecture, launched with an MSRP of $219 USD. This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and gaming, with the GPU providing competent 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The system's overall tier, reflected in the 79th combined percentile, positions it as a solid mid-range desktop configuration suitable for a wide range of workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with its 93rd percentile ranking significantly exceeding the GPU's 65th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data processing, and video encoding, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus will perform at a high level without GPU intervention. Conversely, GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions and GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc B570's relative performance.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4757 and multi-thread score of 51596 ensure that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at typical gaming resolutions. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 indicates that the Arc B570 will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive titles. The 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth may become constraints in games with high-resolution textures or at 4K resolution. For productivity workloads, the CPU's strong multi-core performance will dominate, with the GPU contributing to acceleration where applicable. The overall bottleneck profile suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains in gaming, while CPU upgrades would benefit compute-heavy professional workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivers 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s.

The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) support compute-intensive workloads. The 18 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 indicate solid modern API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281 place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, making it a capable mid-range option. The 65th percentile ranking, matched closely by the RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%) and Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1%), indicates that this GPU delivers competitive performance for its class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds