SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc A770: A Desktop Powerhouse Pairing

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop-class combination that lands in the 92nd percentile overall among all builds, with the CPU sitting at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile. This pairing pairs an 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh processor with a 16 GB Alchemist-generation graphics card, creating a system that targets high-end productivity and demanding rendering workloads. The data indicates a balanced platform where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though specific workloads will favor one side over the other.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851, the mounting interface for the Core Ultra Series 2 family. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a dual-channel memory bus delivering a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature that matters for workstation users who need error correction during long compute jobs. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which gives ample headroom for a modern GPU and a Gen 5 NVMe drive; the Arc A770 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes will not be a bottleneck for the graphics card.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU carries a TDP of 225 W, which points to a system that will draw substantial power under load. Intel suggests a 550 W power supply for the Arc A770, and the CPU’s unlocked multiplier means overclocking is possible, which would increase power draw beyond the stock TDP. A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be moving to a higher-tier Core Ultra Series 2 processor, as the socket and memory support remain identical; the 18 threads of the 250K Plus are already substantial, but users who need more multi-threaded throughput can step up without changing the motherboard. The platform’s ECC support and dual-channel DDR5 also make it a candidate for small workstation builds, though the memory bandwidth figure of 115.2 GB/s is a ceiling that a future CPU on the same socket would not exceed without a memory overclock.

The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it is not a forward-looking component, but the CPU remains active, so a future GPU upgrade to a newer Intel Battlemage card or a competitor’s product would be straightforward given the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and the 550 W PSU headroom. The 6-pin and 8-pin power connectors on the A770 are standard, and the dual-slot cooler design should fit in most mid-tower cases. The platform’s release date for the CPU is March 2026, making this a current-generation build at the time of analysis, while the GPU dates to late 2022, so the pairing mixes a new processor with a mature graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-512, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It packs 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective. The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores; there are no dedicated tensor cores listed, which means AI acceleration relies on the shader array rather than specialized hardware.

Clock speeds are 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance doubles to 39.32 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the A770 in the 90th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 109175 in OpenCL and 94284 in Vulkan, while in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it reaches 2969. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at a 0.3% higher score, the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 0.4% lower, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 1.5% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 1.7% higher; all deltas are within roughly two percent, indicating the A770 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a major asset, as it allows large textures and complex scenes to reside entirely in GPU memory without spilling to system RAM. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming, and the 32 ray tracing cores handle ray-traced effects, though the absence of tensor cores means features like DLSS-style AI upscaling are not available; Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture relies on shader-based upscaling instead. The 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 rate is competitive for rasterized rendering, and the FP16 2:1 ratio gives a boost for workloads that can use mixed precision. The dual-slot cooler and 225 W TDP are reasonable for a card of this class, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A770 includes 32 ray tracing cores on the Xe-HPG architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the CPU’s thread count, and does it support simultaneous multithreading?

A: The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 18 cores and 18 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading; each core handles one thread.

Q: Can the system use ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and the memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: Intel suggests a 550 W power supply for the Arc A770, which draws 225 W TDP and uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66855, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 4465P and 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6515P, but 1.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is end-of-life, with a release date of October 2022, and its successor is Battlemage; the CPU is active and released in March 2026.

Q: What memory bus width does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A770 uses a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 92 suggests this pairing is well matched, but the benchmark data reveals where each component leads. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 51596 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 indicate strong parallel processing, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 show solid graphics throughput. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance—a PassMark single-thread score of 4757 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2261—will handle game logic and physics, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will manage texture streaming and frame rendering.

The balance tips toward the CPU in compute-heavy tasks: the Cinebench R15 multicore result of 4640 and PassMark integer math score of 125091 show the 18 cores pulling ahead, while the GPU’s FP32 of 19.66 TFLOPS is substantial but not class-leading, as the nearest rivals all score within 1.7% in average benchmarks. For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, as the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock provides ample headroom for frame generation, but the A770’s 90th percentile position means it will cap frame rates in demanding titles. Conversely, in productivity workloads like data compression (PassMark score 568721) or encryption (PassMark score 42144), the CPU will dominate, and the GPU may sit idle.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the data is estimated from benchmark scores. However, the percentile gap—93rd for CPU versus 90th for GPU—suggests the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming scenarios, while the CPU is the stronger component in multi-threaded applications. The 18 threads are enough to feed the GPU in most games, but the lack of SMT means heavy background tasks could compete for threads. The 125 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP together imply a system that needs robust cooling, and the 550 W suggested PSU leaves moderate headroom for overclocking the unlocked CPU multiplier.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is an 18-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, codenamed Arrow Lake Refresh, built on a 3 nm TSMC process. It packs 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 125 W, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory for error correction. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which can handle basic display output and light graphics tasks without a discrete GPU. The CPU is unlocked, the market segment is desktop, and the production status is active.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 4640 in R15 multicore, 328 in R15 single-core, 18442 in R20 multicore, 2603 in R20 single-core, 30867 in R23 multicore, and 2261 in R23 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 51596, a single-thread score of 4757, integer math at 125091, floating point math at 162692, data compression at 568721, data encryption at 42144, extended instructions at 44565, find prime numbers at 486, physics at 3494, and random string sorting at 69090. The average benchmark score is 66855, placing the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P, scores 66925 (0.1% higher), while the Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 67469 (0.9% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159 (1.1% lower).

For real workloads, the 18 cores with no SMT mean the CPU excels in parallel tasks that scale with physical cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 indicates strong multi-threaded rendering capability, while the single-core score of 2261 shows good responsiveness for everyday tasks. The high floating point math score of 162692 suggests scientific computing and physics simulations will run efficiently. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-thread performance in applications like spreadsheets or web browsing. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors indicate a modern, power-efficient design, though the 125 W TDP means it still requires a capable cooler.

Who Should Build It

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and Arc A770 pairing targets users who need both strong multi-threaded CPU performance and high VRAM capacity for graphics. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU, which handles large textures and high-resolution assets without running out of memory; the 90th percentile GPU score and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support smooth frame rates at these resolutions, though the absence of measured FPS data means expectations should be based on the benchmark scores. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will use the CPU’s 18 cores for export and encoding, while the GPU accelerates previews and effects; the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 and the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 provide a solid combination for Adobe Premiere or Blender workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the 30 MB L3 cache for compile times, while the PassMark integer math score of 125091 indicates strong performance in code compilation and data processing. Students in engineering or computer science fields can use the system for simulation and development, and the dual-channel DDR5 with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth handles memory-intensive applications. Small business workstations can leverage the CPU’s active production status and the platform’s longevity, though the GPU’s end-of-life status means it is not a future-proof choice for graphics upgrades. The build’s 92nd combined percentile places it above the vast majority of systems, making it suitable for power users who cannot afford a flagship CPU or GPU but still need high-end performance. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $199, which was noted once here for reference, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 329 USD, but the analysis avoids pricing discussions beyond those factual figures.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 66855, placing it in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 68809, placing it in the 90th percentile; the combined build lands in the 92nd percentile. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4465P, scores 66925 (0.1% higher), and the Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67006 (0.2% higher), showing the 250K Plus is competitive with server-class processors in average performance. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68562 (0.4% lower), indicating the A770 is within a small margin of its peers. In specific tests, the CPU’s strongest results are in PassMark data compression (568721) and floating point math (162692), while the GPU’s best result is in Geekbench OpenCL (109175). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 show the GPU’s graphics capabilities, though these are lower than the CPU’s relative standing, given the 3-point percentile gap.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outshines the GPU in relative terms, but both components are above the 90th percentile, making the build a high-end desktop configuration. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30867 is about 36% higher than the PassMark multithread score normalized per thread, though such cross-benchmark comparisons are not directly meaningful; instead, the data shows that the CPU handles parallel workloads exceptionally well, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are its standout features. The absence of measured FPS data means the gaming performance is estimated from these scores, and the pair’s 92nd percentile suggests it will outperform the majority of systems in both productivity and gaming, with the CPU leading in compute and the GPU leading in graphics memory capacity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, an 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh processor with a 125 W TDP, and the Intel Arc A770, a 225 W Xe-HPG graphics card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU is active and current, released in March 2026, while the GPU is end-of-life, released in October 2022, with Battlemage as its successor. The pairing occupies the 92nd combined percentile, which places it in the upper tier of all builds, with the CPU at 93rd percentile and the GPU at 90th percentile. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the platform supports DDR5 memory with ECC, PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, and a 550 W suggested PSU for the GPU. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, and the GPU uses a dual-slot cooler with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming tower rather than a portable laptop. The overall tier from the percentiles is high-end, as both components sit above the 90th percentile in their respective categories, and the combined score of 92 reflects a balanced system with no significant weakness. The CPU’s 18 threads and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM make this a versatile system for both compute and graphics workloads, and the ECC memory support adds a level of reliability that is rare in consumer builds. The data shows this is a system for users who prioritize multi-threaded performance and high memory capacity over raw single-thread speed or GPU rasterization leadership, as the nearest GPU rivals all score within 1.7% of the A770.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores; the data is not measured but calculated from the components’ performance. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4757 in PassMark and 2261 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong frame pacing in games that rely on CPU physics or logic, while the GPU’s 90th percentile position and 16 GB VRAM suggest it can handle high-resolution textures and modern rendering features. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 provide a basis for estimating DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles, respectively, and the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 rate points to solid rasterization performance.

At 1080p, the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock and 18 cores will likely keep frame rates high, but the GPU may become the limiting factor in esports titles that favor single-thread speed; at 1440p, the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB memory will shine, allowing high-quality settings without VRAM overflow. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB capacity is a clear advantage, but the 90th percentile score suggests it will not match top-tier GPUs in raw frame rates, and ray tracing with the 32 RT cores will be usable but not class-leading. The Vulkan score of 94284 and OpenCL score of 109175 indicate good performance in Vulkan-based games and compute-heavy effects, while the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest APIs. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3494 and floating point math score of 162692 suggest strong performance in game physics and simulation, which can improve frame consistency in open-world titles. The data does not include specific game titles, so these estimates should be treated as general guidance; the combined 92nd percentile indicates the system will deliver a high-quality gaming experience at 1440p and capable performance at 4K, with the GPU’s VRAM being the standout feature for modern game assets.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds