SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

66,855 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + Intel Arc A580 — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 18-core Arrow Lake Refresh desktop processor with the Arc A580 graphics card, representing a desktop build that sits in the 90th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU alone ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile position among all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all gaming discussion is framed as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area, with a transistor density that reflects the advanced process node. This is a desktop-class processor with 18 cores and 18 threads—notably lacking Hyper-Threading, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. The base clock runs at 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This generous per-core L2 allocation helps feed the high-frequency cores during single-threaded workloads. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported—a feature that makes this processor viable for workstation and data-integrity-sensitive environments. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a basic display output capability, though the discrete Arc A580 renders this largely redundant for gaming.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 30,867 and single-core hits 2,261. The R20 scores are 18,442 multi-core and 2,603 single-core, while R15 shows 4,640 multi-core and 328 single-core. The single-thread PassMark score is 4,757, and the multi-thread PassMark score is 51,596. Data compression in PassMark reaches 568,721, indicating strong throughput for archival and compression workloads. Data encryption scores 42,144, extended instructions 44,565, and floating-point math 162,692. Integer math reaches 125,091, and prime number finding scores 486—a relatively modest figure that suggests the architecture prioritizes throughput over pure integer iteration speed. Random string sorting scores 69,090, and physics simulation scores 3,494.

The average benchmark score of 66,855 places this CPU at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 4465P with an average score of 66,925, a delta of -0.1% meaning the Ultra 5 is effectively tied with that server-class EPYC part. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67,006, putting the Ultra 5 250K Plus at -0.2% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (a mobile flagship) scores 67,469, which is -0.9% ahead of this desktop part. Interestingly, the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus—the same chip but with integrated graphics disabled—scores 66,159, meaning the "KF" variant trails the "K Plus" by 1.1%. This indicates the integrated graphics presence does not degrade CPU performance and the tiny delta is within normal silicon variance.

Real-world interpretation: the 18-core/18-thread configuration with 5.30 GHz boost delivers multi-threaded performance that rivals workstation EPYC and Xeon processors in benchmark averages, while the single-core scores (2,261 in R23, 4,757 in PassMark) position it as a strong performer for lightly-threaded applications like office productivity and web browsing. The data compression and encryption scores suggest excellent capability for file archiving, database operations, and secure communication workloads. The floating-point and integer math scores indicate solid general computation, though the prime number score of 486 is a weak point relative to the CPU's overall standing—likely reflecting a design trade-off in the core architecture.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-512, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across 406 mm², with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. This is an Alchemist-generation part, the predecessor to Intel's Battlemage architecture, and it succeeds the older Xe Graphics integrated solution.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth is generous for an 8 GB card and supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads that demand rapid data movement. The GPU contains 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 24 dedicated RT cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz. Pixel rate reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 384.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compliant with modern gaming APIs including hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 2.0 connections, enabling multi-monitor setups and high refresh rate displays. The card uses a dual-slot cooler with two 8-pin power connectors and has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark scores show the Arc A580 performing in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57,756. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2,229. Geekbench OpenCL scores 91,657, while Vulkan scores 79,381. The OpenCL result being higher than Vulkan suggests compute-heavy workloads perform well, while the Vulkan score still indicates solid gaming API performance.

Nearest rivals reveal a tight grouping. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, which is -0.6% relative to the A580, meaning the Arc card is essentially tied with that AMD part. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, placing the A580 at +0.7% ahead—a surprising result given the generational gap between these products. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, with the A580 at -0.8% behind this mobile part. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, putting the A580 at -1.1% behind that high-end card. This clustering indicates the A580 competes in the upper-midrange segment, with performance comparable to several AMD parts spanning multiple generations.

For rendering workloads, the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate strong rasterization capability. The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the RT performance is modest compared to the rasterization strength. The 8 GB VRAM at this bandwidth level is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but may become a constraint at 4K with ultra settings. The FP16 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is notable for AI inference and compute tasks that leverage half-precision arithmetic.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus compare to the AMD EPYC 4465P?

A: The two processors are effectively tied in average benchmark score. The Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855 while the EPYC 4465P scores 66,925, a delta of -0.1%. This is remarkable because the EPYC is a server-class platform, yet the desktop Ultra 5 matches it in aggregate benchmark performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and does it support ECC?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms. This makes the Ultra 5 250K Plus suitable for builds where data integrity is critical, such as file servers or scientific computing.

Q: Does the Arc A580 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A580 includes 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which mandates hardware ray tracing support. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 reflects its DX12 performance, which includes ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the TDP and suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W and requires a suggested power supply of 450 W. It uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so a combined system PSU should account for both components.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,261, while the multi-core score is 30,867—a ratio of roughly 13.7x. This indicates strong scaling across the 18 cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,757 and multi-thread score of 51,596 show a similar scaling pattern, confirming the processor is well-balanced for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the integrated graphics capability of the CPU?

A: The Ultra 5 250K Plus includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for video playback. The "K Plus" designation indicates the integrated GPU is present and active, whereas the "250KF Plus" variant scores 1.1% lower in average benchmark, suggesting the iGPU does not hinder CPU performance.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5. This enables high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the Gen 5 CPU lanes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 90 places this pairing in the upper decile of all CPU-GPU combinations, but the individual percentiles reveal an asymmetry. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 87th percentile. This 6-point gap indicates the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, capable of driving workloads that the GPU may not fully utilize.

In CPU-bound scenarios—such as data compression, encryption, or physics simulation—the Ultra 5 250K Plus will be the limiting factor only when the workload exceeds its 18 cores. The PassMark data compression score of 568,721 and encryption score of 42,144 show the CPU can sustain heavy throughput. The GPU will not bottleneck these workloads since they do not rely on the graphics card.

In GPU-bound scenarios—specifically gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering—the Arc A580 becomes the constraint. The GPU's 87th percentile placement, while strong, trails the CPU's 93rd percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,229 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 indicate the GPU can push high frame rates at 1080p and likely 1440p, but the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 18 cores will not be the limiting factor in most gaming situations. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for mainstream gaming, but ultra-high-resolution textures may exceed the VRAM capacity, causing the GPU to bottleneck.

The FPS scaling picture, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the component percentiles. In CPU-intensive games with many AI agents or complex physics, the CPU's high percentile will prevent bottlenecks. In GPU-intensive titles with advanced lighting or shadows, the GPU's lower percentile will cap performance. The 6-point percentile gap suggests the CPU has roughly 6-7% more headroom than the GPU, meaning the GPU will typically be the first component to reach its limit in balanced workloads. For compute tasks like machine learning inference using FP16, the GPU's 24.58 TFLOPS provides strong acceleration, but the CPU's integer math score of 125,091 will handle general processing without contention.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus achieves an average benchmark score of 66,855, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing for a desktop processor. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 4465P is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Xeon 6515P is 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is 0.9% ahead. The only rival that trails is the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus at 1.1% behind. This grouping means the Ultra 5 250K Plus is statistically tied with three other processors spanning desktop and server segments, making its performance class clear: high-end desktop with workstation-level aggregate throughput.

The Intel Arc A580 achieves an average benchmark score of 57,756, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals again show tight clustering: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.6% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 0.7% behind, the Intel Arc A570M is 0.8% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1.1% ahead. This puts the A580 in a competitive position against several AMD cards, including the RX 6950 XT which was a high-end part in its generation.

The combined picture shows a CPU and GPU that are both above the 85th percentile in their respective categories, but not at the very top tier. The CPU's 93rd percentile is exceptional for a mid-range desktop part, while the GPU's 87th percentile is strong but not flagship-level. The combined percentile of 90 reflects the average of these two positions, weighted toward the stronger CPU. In practical terms, this means the pairing will excel in multi-threaded productivity tasks where the CPU dominates, and will perform well in gaming where the GPU can keep up with most titles at mainstream resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU throughput without sacrificing gaming capability. The 93rd percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators who render video, process large datasets, or compile code—tasks that benefit from the 18 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache. The data compression score of 568,721 and encryption score of 42,144 indicate strong performance for database operations and secure file storage, making this a viable small business workstation.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the Arc A580's 87th percentile sufficient for high settings in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, though 4K gaming may require reduced settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure compatibility with modern game engines.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's single-thread score of 4,757 in PassMark, which speeds up compilation of large codebases, and the multi-thread score of 51,596 for parallel build systems. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or data processing nodes.

Students and office users will find this overkill for basic tasks, but the longevity of the platform—with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support—makes it a future-proof investment. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, ensuring the system remains functional.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A580's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,229 and Vulkan score of 79,381 indicate the GPU can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in esports titles and moderate refresh rates in AAA games. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,757 ensures frame pacing remains consistent, with no CPU-induced stutter.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 cores handle encoding workloads without competing with game threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51,596 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding at 1080p60 while gaming, and the GPU's 24 RT cores assist with any ray-traced effects in the streamed game.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,867 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance aids in effects processing and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 162,692 supports CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU's FP16 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity on GPU-only rendering.

Software development: The CPU's data encryption score of 42,144 and integer math score of 125,091 speed up compilation and code analysis. The 18 threads handle parallel build tools, while the 93rd percentile ensures quick single-threaded parsing and IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core R23 score of 2,261 delivers snappy application launches and document processing. The integrated graphics provide a redundancy layer. This is more performance than needed for typical office tasks, but the headroom prevents slowdowns during multitasking.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus processor with the Intel Arc A580 graphics card. The CPU is an 18-core, 18-thread Arrow Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, with a 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation Xe-HPG part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 175 W TDP. The combined percentile of 90 places this build in the top 10% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 87th percentile indicate an upper-midrange to high-end desktop configuration. The CPU outperforms its immediate rivals—including the AMD EPYC 4465P and Intel Xeon 6515P—in aggregate benchmark scores, making this a workstation-capable processor. The GPU competes closely with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a former high-end card, which underscores the A580's strong price-to-performance positioning (though pricing is not discussed here). This build is suitable for users who require more CPU than GPU, but still want solid gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the database. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,229 and its 87th percentile ranking, the Arc A580 is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. At 1440p, the GPU will handle medium-to-high settings, with the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supporting high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU will likely require reduced settings or upscaling techniques to maintain smooth gameplay.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4,757, Cinebench R23 2,261) ensures that even CPU-bound games—such as simulation titles or strategy games with complex AI—will not be bottlenecked. The 18 cores provide headroom for background tasks while gaming. The GPU's Vulkan score of 79,381 suggests good performance in Vulkan-based games, while the OpenCL score of 91,657 indicates strong compute for games that use GPU compute for physics or effects.

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU's high clock speed and the GPU's raw throughput should sustain high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in less demanding titles. For AAA single-player games, the GPU's 87th percentile suggests 60+ FPS at 1080p with high settings, with 1440p requiring some compromises. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are directional, not definitive.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 CPU lanes.

The CPU's TDP of 125 W and the GPU's TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W, indicate a system that can be powered by a mid-range power supply. The two 8-pin GPU power connectors are standard for this class. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows for overclocking, though this would increase power draw beyond the stock TDP.

A sensible next upgrade path would prioritize the GPU, since the CPU's 93rd percentile leaves less headroom than the GPU's 87th percentile. Replacing the Arc A580 with a higher-tier GPU would balance the system and unlock higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's 18 cores and 30 MB L3 cache will remain relevant for several years, and the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with next-generation storage and expansion cards. The ECC memory support also allows for a workstation-oriented upgrade with registered DIMMs, though the dual-channel memory controller limits maximum bandwidth to 115.2 GB/s regardless of memory choice. The platform's production status is active, meaning replacement parts and BIOS updates should remain available.