SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM — Desktop Build Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 5 245T processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-generation GeForce RTX 3070 TiM graphics card. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 68. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 TiM, with its 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, is positioned to drive 1440p gaming at high refresh rates, though the 50th GPU percentile indicates mid-pack standing. The Core Ultra 5 245T's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3699 and PassMark single-thread score of 4367 suggest sufficient CPU headroom to feed the GPU in most titles, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may constrain texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The GPU includes 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores, which support NVIDIA's encoding and AI-acceleration features typical of the GeForce 30-series. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 23656 and extended instructions score of 22071 indicate solid throughput for encoding workloads, while the 14-core/14-thread configuration provides parallel headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming pipelines. The 65W TDP of the CPU keeps thermals manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26208 and PassMark multithread score of 30833 place it at the 86th CPU percentile, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width deliver 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which accelerates effects processing and preview rendering. The combination of 14 cores and 184 tensor cores provides a balanced foundation for 4K video editing workflows, though the 24 MB shared L3 cache may limit some cache-sensitive operations.

3D rendering: The CPU's PassMark floating point math score of 108499 and integer math score of 88676 demonstrate robust compute capabilities for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 5888 shading units and 184 texture mapping units deliver 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, supporting GPU-accelerated renderers. The 46 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the 50th GPU percentile suggests mid-range rendering throughput compared to other GPUs in the database.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 283812 and random string sorting score of 34931 indicate strong performance for code compilation and build tasks. The 14 threads handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded build steps. The 86th CPU percentile places this processor above 86% of all CPUs, making it a capable choice for developers working with large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 372 and R20 single-core score of 1553 show responsive day-to-day performance for productivity applications. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides display output capability without requiring the discrete GPU, reducing power draw during light workloads. The 65W CPU TDP and 550W suggested PSU keep system power requirements modest for typical office environments.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates described here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of each component. The RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile GPU standing and the Core Ultra 5 245T's 86th percentile CPU ranking suggest a system capable of handling modern games at 1440p with high settings, though 4K gaming at ultra settings would likely push the 8 GB VRAM to its limits.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4367 in PassMark should minimize bottlenecking in most titles, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is comparable to mid-range Ampere offerings, suggesting playable frame rates at high refresh rates in esports titles. At 1440p, the 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 256-bit bus width provide adequate data throughput for modern game assets, though texture-heavy titles may experience stuttering when VRAM capacity is exceeded.

For 4K gaming, the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a significant constraint, and the 50th GPU percentile indicates that this card is not positioned for peak performance at that resolution. Ray tracing workloads would rely on the 46 RT cores, but the GPU's mid-pack standing suggests that ray-traced effects at high resolutions would require reduced settings. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient data flow for gaming workloads, but the system's overall gaming performance is ultimately bounded by the GPU's mid-range positioning.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is included, which is valuable for workstation stability in compute-oriented tasks.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which remains fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes through backward compatibility. The RTX 3070 TiM has a 220W TDP and requires a 550W suggested power supply, leaving headroom for the 65W CPU and other system components within a typical 650-750W PSU. The GPU is triple-slot wide, measuring 270mm in length, 140mm in height, and 55mm in width, requiring a spacious case with adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve increasing GPU VRAM capacity, as the 8 GB GDDR6 memory is the primary limiting factor for modern gaming and content creation workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile standing indicates it has remaining headroom for a more powerful GPU, provided the power supply and case dimensions accommodate the upgrade. The Socket 1851 platform supports future Arrow Lake refresh processors, though the 65W TDP of the current CPU suggests a power-efficient foundation that could handle higher-TDP CPUs if the motherboard's VRM design allows.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rate monitors will find this pairing well-matched, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance minimizes bottlenecks while the GPU delivers mid-range frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM capacity suits 1080p and 1440p gaming but falls short for 4K texture-heavy titles. Esports enthusiasts benefit from the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS throughput for competitive titles at high frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's 26208 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's hardware ray tracing capabilities. The 14-core configuration handles parallel workloads efficiently, while the 184 tensor cores accelerate AI-based effects and upscaling. The 65W CPU TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, making this a viable option for small form factor workstations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30833 and data compression score of 283812. Students and office workers gain from the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for basic display tasks, with the discrete GPU reserved for demanding applications. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity for storage expansion will find the platform suitable for professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 245T achieves an average benchmark score of 38194, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This performance is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, 0.1% ahead), Intel Core i5-14490F (38149, 0.1% behind), Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, 0.2% ahead), and Intel Core i5-13600KF (38103, 0.2% behind). The grouping of these four rivals within 0.2% of each other indicates a highly competitive mid-range CPU segment where the 245T is statistically tied with its peers.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 2641 in R15 multicore, 372 in R15 single-core, 11007 in R20 multicore, 1553 in R20 single-core, 26208 in R23 multicore, and 3699 in R23 single-core. PassMark results show 283812 in data compression, 23656 in data encryption, 22071 in extended instructions, 324 in find prime numbers, 108499 in floating point math, 88676 in integer math, 30833 in multithread, 2278 in physics, 34931 in random string sorting, and 4367 in single-thread tests.

The RTX 3070 TiM has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0, with a 50th percentile GPU standing. This means the GPU's performance is evaluated based on its specifications rather than measured scores. The combined 68th percentile position reflects the CPU's strong performance relative to the GPU's mid-range positioning, creating a system where CPU capabilities exceed GPU capabilities in the overall percentile rankings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The GPU is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm².

The GPU's clock speeds are 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost, which are notably lower than typical desktop RTX 3070 Ti variants, suggesting a mobile-derived or power-optimized design. The 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines deliver 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate. The FP32 throughput of 16.60 TFLOPS matches the FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio, indicating full-rate FP16 compute capability.

The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The 50th percentile GPU standing indicates this card performs at the median of all GPUs in the database, which aligns with its mid-range positioning. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p content creation but may limit high-resolution texture sets. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports GPU-accelerated effects processing and real-time previews in editing software.

The GPU's triple-slot design and 220W TDP require adequate cooling and a 550W suggested PSU. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with modern motherboards, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a clear performance imbalance where the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38194 is significantly higher than the GPU's score of 0 (due to no measured benchmarks), indicating that the GPU's mid-range positioning will constrain overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4367 PassMark, 3699 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame rates are GPU-limited in most titles. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions or with ultra texture settings. The 50th GPU percentile suggests that this card performs at the median of all GPUs, meaning roughly half of available GPUs would outperform it.

For CPU-bound workloads like data compression (283812 PassMark) and integer math (88676 PassMark), the processor's 86th percentile standing provides ample headroom. The 14-core/14-thread configuration, while lacking hyperthreading, still delivers strong multicore performance (30833 PassMark multithread). The GPU's 220W TDP versus the CPU's 65W TDP indicates that the GPU is the primary power consumer, and the 550W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom for both components under full load.

The bottleneck analysis shows that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant system-wide performance gains, while the CPU has remaining capacity to support a higher-tier graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 on the GPU ensure no bandwidth bottleneck exists between the two components.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38194.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is statistically tied with its nearest rivals, showing a -0.1% delta versus the AMD Ryzen 7 250, +0.1% versus the Intel Core i5-14490F, -0.2% versus the Intel Core i5-13600HX, and +0.2% versus the Intel Core i5-13600KF.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory, which is a useful feature for workstation stability in compute-heavy tasks.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has a 220W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 550W, with a single 8-pin power connector required.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing is 68, reflecting the CPU's stronger 86th percentile position versus the GPU's 50th percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename) using TSMC's 3 nm process. The processor contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a production status of Active and a release date of January 6, 2025. The launch MSRP is $270, and the CPU has the part number SRVFF.

The CPU features 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyperthreading enabled. Base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported through standard multiplier adjustment.

Memory support includes DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for basic display output. The 65W TDP makes this an efficient processor for desktop use.

The 86th percentile CPU ranking with an average benchmark score of 38194 places it among the top 14% of processors. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26208 and single-core score of 3699 demonstrate strong balanced performance. PassMark results show particular strength in data compression (283812) and floating point math (108499), with lower scores in find prime numbers (324) and physics (2278). This benchmark profile indicates a processor well-suited for general productivity, content creation, and moderate compute workloads, with the 5.10 GHz boost clock providing responsive single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, creating a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative benchmarks. The CPU's 86th percentile standing and the GPU's 50th percentile produce a combined 68th percentile overall, indicating a mid-to-upper-mid-tier desktop configuration.

The Core Ultra 5 245T represents Intel's Arrow Lake architecture on Socket 1851, offering 14 cores, DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and a 65W TDP. The RTX 3070 TiM uses the Ampere architecture with 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 5888 shading units, and 46 RT cores, delivering 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The GPU's 220W TDP and triple-slot design require a 550W PSU and a case with adequate length clearance (270mm).

The performance picture shows a CPU that outperforms 86% of processors while the GPU sits at the median of all GPUs. This imbalance suggests the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like software development, video encoding, and general productivity, while gaming performance is bounded by the GPU's mid-range capabilities. The 8 GB VRAM limits high-resolution texture workloads, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth 1440p gaming. The platform offers solid upgrade potential through GPU replacement or future Socket 1851 CPU releases, making this a balanced starting point for a desktop workstation or gaming system at 1080p/1440p resolution.