SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration built on Intel’s latest architectures. This analysis draws exclusively from the FACT PACK data to interpret how the CPU and GPU perform individually and as a combination, placing their scores within the context of their nearest rivals and percentiles. The data shows a system designed for balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming, productivity, and content creation, with distinct strengths in multi-threaded workloads and modern API support.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The absence of hyper-threading (14 threads for 14 cores) is notable; the data indicates this is a deliberate design choice to optimize power efficiency while maintaining strong multi-core throughput. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which supports the high boost clock in burst workloads.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal its positioning. In Cinebench R23, it scores 26208 multi-core and 3699 single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, demonstrating strong performance for heavily threaded tasks. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, scores 38221 in average benchmark score, a mere 0.1% difference, indicating near-identical overall performance. The Intel Core i5-13600KF is also close, with a 0.2% lower average score. This clustering suggests the 245T competes directly with established mid-range and upper-mid-range chips from the previous generation, trading raw core count for architectural efficiency.

For real workloads, the 26208 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translates to excellent performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all 14 cores can be utilised. The single-core score of 3699 is equally important for everyday responsiveness, gaming, and lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office suites. The PassMark data supports this: a single-thread score of 4367 and a multithread score of 30833 indicate a balanced processor that does not sacrifice single-thread speed for multi-core muscle. The data compression score of 283812 and encryption score of 23656 are particularly strong, suggesting the 245T handles file archiving and data security tasks efficiently. The floating-point math score of 108499 and integer math score of 88676 further confirm its computational versatility. The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC memory, making it suitable for workstations where data integrity is paramount. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides high bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark scores for this pairing paint a clear picture of a mid-range performer. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38194, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, -0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, -0.2%), Intel Core i5-14490F (38149, +0.1%), and Intel Core i5-13600KF (38103, +0.2%)—are all within a fraction of a percent, underscoring that the 245T sits at a performance plateau shared by several popular processors. This means users upgrading from an i5-13600KF or similar should expect similar CPU-bound performance, not a generational leap.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 achieves an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Arc A750 is also close at 20582, -0.1% delta. This indicates the B570 delivers desktop-class performance comparable to a high-end mobile GPU from the previous generation, which is significant for a desktop card. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2649, while Geekbench Vulkan scores 96844 and OpenCL scores 83514, suggesting strong compute and graphics API performance.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 76, which is higher than the GPU’s individual 65th percentile, reflecting the CPU’s strength in pulling the overall system score up. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 65th percentile indicate that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform well above average, while in GPU-bound scenarios, it will hover near the 65th percentile mark, which is solid for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and Intel Arc B570 is 76, indicating that this desktop build outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T has an average benchmark score of 38194, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 250’s score of 38221. This represents an essentially negligible performance difference.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory for error correction in critical workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T includes integrated Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which can handle basic display output and light graphical tasks.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a launch MSRP of 219 USD.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750’s score of 20582, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced pairing where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 65th percentile indicates that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. However, this is not necessarily a negative; it means the CPU has headroom to drive the GPU to its maximum potential without being a bottleneck itself.

In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulations, data compression, and software compilation, the 245T’s 86th percentile ranking ensures the system performs exceptionally well. The PassMark physics score of 2278 and data compression score of 283812 highlight its capability in these areas. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering at high resolutions or with heavy effects, the Arc B570’s 65th percentile will define the ceiling. For example, in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score of 2649 is moderate, suggesting that while the GPU can handle modern DX12 titles, it will not excel at ultra-high settings in demanding games.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect since no measured FPS data exists. However, based on the GPU’s 65th percentile and its proximity to the RTX 3070 Mobile, one can estimate that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary limiter in most games, while at 1440p, it will be even more so. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3699 in Cinebench R23 means it will easily keep up with the GPU’s frame output in esports titles, where the bottleneck is often the GPU even at high frame rates. The system is not perfectly balanced—the CPU has more headroom than the GPU—but the delta is small enough that neither component wastes the other’s potential.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming without frequent texture swapping.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are defined by its 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). This makes it capable for compute tasks like video encoding and machine learning inference, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores in the data provided. The 18 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s indicate solid fill rates for its class.

Benchmark results show the GPU scores 14195 in PassMark G3D and 7281 in GPU Compute, with a 65th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Mobile, is a high-end laptop GPU, suggesting the B570 offers comparable performance to a previous-generation flagship mobile chip. In Geekbench, the Vulkan score of 96844 far exceeds the OpenCL score of 83514, indicating the Xe2 architecture performs better with Vulkan-based games and applications. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 118 is higher than the DirectX 12 score of 72, which is unusual and may suggest driver optimizations are still maturing for DX12 titles. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is a sweet spot for 1080p ultra and 1440p high settings, though it may be limiting for 4K textures or future titles with high VRAM demands. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, though it is half the lanes of a x16 connection, which could slightly impact performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-core performance (3699 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU’s 65th percentile suggest this system can drive 1080p esports titles at high frame rates. Estimated FPS would be well above 60 in most competitive games, though the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 65th percentile ranking may limit ultra settings in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 26208 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, though the lack of dedicated hardware encoders on the GPU is not specified. The PassMark data encryption score of 23656 indicates fast encryption for secure streaming protocols.

Video editing: The CPU’s strong multi-core performance and the GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 compute make this a capable system for 1080p and 1440p video editing. The 10 GB VRAM can handle large timelines and effects, and the 380.0 GB/s bandwidth supports efficient data transfer.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s compute score of 7281 in PassMark indicate decent performance for CPU and GPU rendering. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with scene data, though rendering times will be moderate compared to higher-tier components.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 283812 and integer math score of 88676 are excellent for compiling code and running virtual machines. The 65 W TDP ensures sustained performance without excessive heat, making it suitable for long build sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4367 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity apps, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics can handle display output without the discrete GPU, saving power. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running computations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 dual-channel memory. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), providing high bandwidth for future GPUs and NVMe storage. The platform’s ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation tasks. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, such as one with a higher 3DMark score, since the CPU’s 86th percentile can support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The power supply headroom from the 450 W suggested PSU can accommodate a GPU with a higher TDP, though the exact wattage is not specified in the data. The CPU’s socket, Intel Socket 1851, is current for the Arrow Lake generation, so future CPU upgrades within the same socket are plausible, though the data does not specify which models are compatible. The DDR5 memory support means users can increase memory capacity or speed for memory-intensive workloads, and the dual-channel configuration can be expanded with additional DIMMs.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (a 14-core Arrow Lake desktop processor) with the Intel Arc B570 (a 10 GB Battlemage GPU). The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 76, indicating an upper-mid-range system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and handles GPU-bound tasks competently. The CPU is the stronger component, with an 86th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile. This configuration is designed for users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity and gaming at 1080p or entry-level 1440p, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1080p resolution and are willing to adjust settings for demanding AAA titles, as the GPU’s 65th percentile and 10 GB VRAM support high settings but not always ultra at 1440p. Content creators, particularly video editors and software developers, will benefit from the CPU’s 26208 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and strong PassMark data compression and encryption scores. Students and professionals in office environments will find the CPU’s fast single-thread performance and integrated graphics sufficient for everyday tasks, with the discrete GPU available when needed. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support for data integrity will appreciate the CPU’s capability. However, enthusiasts seeking 4K gaming or maximum ray tracing performance should look to higher-tier GPUs, as the B570’s 18 RT cores and 65th percentile are sufficient for light ray tracing but not for heavy workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the following gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3699 Cinebench R23 single-core score and the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking suggest that in most games, the GPU will be the limiting factor. At 1080p, the system should achieve playable frame rates (60+ FPS) in most titles at high settings, given the GPU’s proximity to the RTX 3070 Mobile. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the system should easily exceed 144 FPS at 1080p due to the CPU’s strong single-thread performance.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 65th percentile will be more stressed, and users may need to lower settings to maintain 60 FPS in AAA titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 and the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 72 suggest that modern DX12 games will run, but performance may vary depending on driver maturity. The Vulkan score of 96844 indicates that Vulkan-based games, such as Doom Eternal or Baldur’s Gate 3, should perform better than DX12 equivalents. Ray tracing performance, supported by 18 RT cores, will be modest; users can enable it at 1080p but should expect significant frame rate drops. Overall, the estimated FPS figures place this system as a solid 1080p gaming machine with the capability to handle 1440p at medium settings, making it a balanced choice for budget-conscious gamers who also value CPU productivity.