SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

38,194 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and Intel Arc A750 combination presents a balanced mid-range desktop pairing with complementary strengths. The CPU, a 14-core Arrow Lake part on a 3 nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded performance with an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU, an Alchemist-generation Arc part, sits at the 66th percentile. This build is positioned for high-refresh 1080p gaming and accelerated content creation, though it is essential to note that no measured FPS data exists for this specific pairing. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are therefore estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T paired with the Intel Arc A750. Consequently, any frame rate expectations must be framed as estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The data indicates a platform with high ceiling for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the exact FPS figures remain unverified for this combination.

The Arc A750's GPU benchmark scores provide a basis for these estimates. Its PassMark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it is a capable performer for modern titles. The GPU's pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s indicate it can handle high-resolution textures and effects. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generally sufficient for 1080p ultra settings and adequate for 1440p in most games.

The CPU's single-thread performance is robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4367. This ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be smooth, and the 5.10 GHz boost clock provides headroom for high-refresh gaming. The combination is estimated to excel at 1080p high-refresh, with the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions. At 1440p, users can expect playable frame rates with some settings adjustments, while 4K gaming would require significant graphical compromises.

The lack of measured data means these figures should be treated as directional rather than absolute. Benchmark results show the CPU in the 86th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile, which suggests a system that will not struggle with mainstream gaming workloads, but the exact scaling between resolutions is not verified.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate benchmark score of 38194 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently available. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which scores 38221, a marginal delta of -0.1%. This means the Core Ultra 5 245T is essentially tied with the Ryzen 7 250 in overall performance. The Intel Core i5-13600KF is also a direct competitor, scoring 38103, which is a delta of 0.2% in favor of the Ultra 5.

In specific CPU workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 confirms strong multi-threaded capability, likely benefiting from the 14 cores. The single-core score of 3699 is competitive for light-threaded tasks. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 30833 and a single-thread score of 4367. Data compression performance is high at 283812, while encryption tasks score 23656. Integer math scores 88676, and floating-point math scores 108499, indicating solid general computational performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582, placing it in the 66th percentile. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570 with a score of 20556, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the A750. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.2% behind. The A750's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 suggests strong DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, while Vulkan scores 85631.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 76, indicating a system that is above average overall. The CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU, with the CPU sitting 20 percentile points higher than the GPU. This suggests the CPU will not be a bottleneck in most workloads, and the GPU is the more likely performance limiter.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's high single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699, is well-suited for high-refresh gaming, where frame rates exceed 144 Hz. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking suggests it can deliver high frame rates at 1080p, though at 1440p, users may need to adjust settings to achieve triple-digit frame rates. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is adequate for current titles at these settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads provide substantial multi-threaded throughput for encoding and streaming workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 indicate the CPU can handle game encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's dedicated hardware for encoding, part of the Xe-HPG architecture, also offloads this task effectively.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the 86th percentile ranking, will accelerate video exports and rendering. The PassMark floating-point math score of 108499 and integer math score of 88676 are indicative of strong computational capability for codecs and effects. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and renders.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and compute capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggests competent DirectX 12 rendering performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 makes it suitable for CPU-based rendering tasks, and the combination is capable of handling both CPU and GPU render pipelines.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score 4367) ensures responsive compilation of code. The multi-thread capabilities, with a PassMark data compression score of 283812, will accelerate large build processes and data processing tasks. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for development workstations that require data integrity.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and 14 cores provide efficient performance for multitasking, document processing, and spreadsheet work. The PassMark single-thread score of 4367 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, making the system functional even without the discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile shows a 20-point gap, meaning the CPU has significantly more headroom than the GPU. In gaming, this means the Arc A750 will reach its limits before the Core Ultra 5 245T does, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, data compression, and software compilation, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 is strong, but it is not in the top tier of processors, so heavily threaded workloads will eventually saturate it. The GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score 5368) can offload some parallel tasks, but not all.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (DDR5 dual-channel) is shared between the CPU and GPU, which can create contention in memory-intensive workloads. In gaming, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s of dedicated VRAM bandwidth is separate, so this is less of a concern. The system's overall balance is acceptable, with the CPU providing ample performance headroom for the GPU to be fully utilized without being held back.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output capabilities.

Benchmark scores show the CPU is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 7 250, with a delta of -0.1%. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 indicates strong multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 3699 is solid for gaming. The PassMark single-thread score of 4367 confirms good IPC. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it outperforms most CPUs on the market, making it a strong choice for a mid-range build.

The efficiency of the 3 nm process is reflected in the 65 W TDP, which is low for a 14-core processor. This makes it suitable for compact builds and reduces cooling requirements. The production status is Active, and the launch MSRP is $270.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance support this use case, with estimated frame rates exceeding 100 FPS in most titles at 1080p ultra settings. Gamers who play at 1440p can also benefit, though they may need to reduce some settings to maintain high frame rates.

Content creators will find this system capable. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 make it suitable for video editing and 3D rendering. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 28 ray tracing cores accelerate GPU-based effects and renders, making it a versatile workstation for creators who work with both CPU and GPU workloads.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score 4367) and ECC memory support, which ensures data integrity during long compilation tasks. The 14 cores accelerate parallel builds, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide fast storage access for large codebases.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than necessary, but it provides headroom for future workloads. The low 65 W TDP makes it energy-efficient, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and multi-thread performance for data processing tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This limits CPU upgrade options to other Arrow Lake parts within the same generation, as the socket is not shared with previous Intel platforms.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Users can upgrade to faster DDR5 modules, but the maximum bandwidth is determined by the CPU's memory controller. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation use.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are sufficient for a modern GPU and a high-speed NVMe SSD. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the current Arc A750 is the performance limiter in gaming. The CPU has significant headroom to support a faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is fixed. The platform does not support CPU overclocking, as the multiplier is locked, limiting performance tuning options.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data integrity tasks.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Ryzen 7 250 scoring 38221 and the Ultra 5 245T scoring 38194, a delta of -0.1% in favor of the Ryzen.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A750 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the CPU does not support overclocking.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 76, indicating above-average performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570's score of 20556.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the DG2-512 chip and the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps. This bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

The GPU has 28 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show the GPU in the 66th percentile, with a PassMark G3D score of 12534. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, indicating strong DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, and Vulkan scores 85631. The PassMark GPU compute score is 5368.

The GPU's performance is competitive with the Intel Arc B570, with a delta of 0.1% in favor of the A750. It also matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534. This indicates the A750 provides solid mid-range performance, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles, though future games may require more memory. The production status is End-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage. The launch MSRP is 289 USD.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245T + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds