SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

This desktop build combines Intel's mainstream Arrow Lake processor with NVIDIA's flagship Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a pairing that lands in the 95th percentile of all tracked system configurations. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands the 98th percentile among all graphics cards — a combination that positions this system near the top of the performance hierarchy, though the CPU is clearly the lower-performing half of the duo.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. The GPU features 14,592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output pipelines, with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that enables high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset handling without capacity constraints.

The RTX 4090 D includes 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The FP32 compute throughput reaches 73.54 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 73.54 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the card does not rely on reduced-precision acceleration for half-precision tasks. Pixel fill rate sits at 443.5 GPixel/s, while texture rate reaches 1,149.1 GTexel/s — numbers that suggest exceptional rasterization throughput for traditional rendering pipelines.

Benchmark results reinforce this GPU's top-tier positioning. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 8,587 points. Geekbench OpenCL yields 278,621 points, and Vulkan scores 246,941 points. The average benchmark score of 178,050 places it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4090 D trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2 percent, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1 percent, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6 percent, and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9 percent — meaning it sits just below several professional-grade cards but remains ahead of the vast majority of consumer and workstation GPUs.

The GPU's 425 W TDP and suggested 800 W PSU indicate substantial power requirements, while the triple-slot cooler and 304 mm length demand a spacious chassis. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while not the newest standard, provides ample bandwidth for this card's workloads. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections, supporting multi-monitor setups. The card is marked end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, yet its benchmark performance remains near the apex of the current landscape.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 and single-core score of 5,173 demonstrate strong all-around processing capability. In Cinebench R20, the chip scores 15,391 multi-core and 2,172 single-core, while Cinebench R15 results show 3,693 multi-core and 521 single-core. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 460,123, floating-point math achieves 131,546, and integer math reaches 98,854. The multi-threaded PassMark score of 43,110 and single-thread score of 4,715 round out a comprehensive performance profile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 55,093 places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54,762 — a 0.6 percent deficit for the Intel chip. The Intel Core 7 253PQE leads by 1.5 percent with 55,919 points, and the Intel Core i9-14900HX leads by 1.6 percent with 56,004 points. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K trails by 1.9 percent with 54,053 points. This clustering shows the 245KF sits within a tight performance band among high-end processors, neither dominating nor being dominated by its immediate competitors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 178,050 at the 98th percentile far outstrips the CPU's relative standing. When combined, this system achieves a 95th percentile overall placement, indicating that the GPU's exceptional performance partially compensates for the CPU's slightly lower (though still strong) ranking. The data suggests a system where graphics-intensive workloads will see near-top-tier results, while CPU-bound tasks may fall slightly short of the absolute best configurations.

The gap between GPU and CPU percentiles — 98 versus 91 — implies that in many scenarios the processor will be the limiting factor. However, the CPU's performance remains high enough to avoid crippling bottlenecks in most applications, particularly those that leverage GPU acceleration. The combined picture is one of a high-end desktop that excels in graphics-heavy tasks while maintaining strong general-purpose computing capability.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile ranking and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput position this system for extremely high frame rates at demanding resolutions. The CPU's 5,173 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures adequate processing for game logic and physics, though the GPU will carry most of the rendering load.

Streaming: The GPU's 456 tensor cores and 114 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced features that offload streaming workloads from the CPU. The 24 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, while the CPU's multi-core score of 36,647 handles background tasks without significant impact on gaming performance.

Video editing: The GPU's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth and 73.54 TFLOPS compute power accelerate effects, color grading, and export tasks. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 460,123 aids in codec-heavy workflows, and the 24 GB VRAM allows for large timelines and high-resolution preview buffers without spilling to system memory.

3D rendering: GPU-accelerated renderers will exploit the RTX 4090 D's 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,587 indicating strong DirectX 12 rendering performance. CPU-based rendering benefits from the 36,647 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, though the 14 cores without hyper-threading limit parallel task throughput compared to higher-core-count rivals.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 98,854 and extended instructions score of 37,912 support compilation and code analysis workloads. The 24 MB L3 cache and 5.20 GHz boost clock provide responsive single-threaded performance for IDE interactions and build tools, while the GPU accelerates parallel compute tasks like testing and simulation.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,715 in PassMark handles everyday productivity applications with ease. The 14 cores manage multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools, though the high TDP of 125 W and GPU's 425 W make this an energy-intensive choice for basic tasks — the hardware is far more capable than typical student or office workloads require.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture, supporting DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 — a mismatch that means the graphics card operates on the older standard. The platform does not support ECC memory, which may matter for certain workstation reliability requirements.

The CPU's TDP of 125 W and the GPU's TDP of 425 W combine for a total of 550 W of component power draw. The GPU's suggested PSU of 800 W provides substantial headroom for the entire system, including drives, cooling, and motherboard components. This leaves room for future upgrades that increase power consumption, though users should check whether their specific power supply unit meets the 800 W recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade path involves the CPU, given that the GPU already sits at the 98th percentile. The socket 1851 platform supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, so upgrading to a higher-tier processor within the same architecture would be straightforward. The RTX 4090 D is marked end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, meaning GPU upgrades would require a new card rather than a firmware or BIOS update. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU may become a limitation if future cards leverage PCIe 5.0 bandwidth more aggressively, though current performance data does not indicate a bottleneck.

Memory upgrades are possible within the dual-channel DDR5 specification, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already substantial. The 24 GB VRAM on the GPU reduces pressure on system memory for many workloads. For users seeking more CPU performance, the nearest rival data shows the Intel Core i9-14900HX (a laptop chip) leads by only 1.6 percent, suggesting that desktop upgrades within the same generation may yield modest gains unless moving to a significantly higher-tier part.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who demand near-top-tier GPU performance without requiring the absolute highest CPU throughput. Gamers playing at 4K resolution or high-refresh 1440p will benefit from the RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile ranking, where the GPU becomes the primary driver of frame rates and the CPU's 91st percentile standing is sufficient to keep pace. The 24 GB VRAM ensures future game textures and high-resolution assets remain within memory limits.

Content creators working with 8K video, complex 3D scenes, or large machine learning models will find the GPU's 73.54 TFLOPS and 24 GB VRAM well-suited to their needs. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 supports rendering and encoding tasks, though creators heavily dependent on CPU rendering may want a higher-core-count processor. The 456 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workflows in creative applications.

Software developers building compute-intensive applications, particularly those using GPU acceleration, will appreciate the combination of the CPU's 98,854 integer math score and the GPU's massive parallel throughput. The 14 CPU cores handle compilation and tooling, while the GPU accelerates testing, simulation, and data processing. The system's lack of ECC memory may be a consideration for developers working on mission-critical systems.

Small business workstations requiring high-throughput graphics for design, visualization, or data analysis will find this build capable, though the power requirements (125 W CPU, 425 W GPU, 800 W suggested PSU) and triple-slot GPU footprint demand appropriate infrastructure. Students in graphics-intensive programs (architecture, game design, digital arts) would benefit from the performance, though the hardware exceeds the requirements of most coursework. Office workers performing standard productivity tasks would be vastly over-provisioned with this configuration.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for any game or resolution. All frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile GPU ranking and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest that at 4K resolution with ultra settings, the GPU will deliver exceptionally high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS in many games. At 1440p, the GPU's headroom becomes even more pronounced, potentially pushing frame rates toward 200 FPS or higher in less demanding titles.

The CPU's single-core performance, indicated by the 5,173 Cinebench R23 score, should not significantly constrain gaming frame rates in most scenarios. However, in CPU-bound games or at lower resolutions where the GPU is underutilized, the 245KF's 91st percentile ranking may become the limiting factor. The nearest rival data shows the CPU is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (within 0.6 percent), suggesting that gaming performance will be comparable to other high-end processors.

The 24 GB VRAM eliminates concerns about texture memory limits at any current resolution, and the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures rapid texture streaming. Ray-traced gaming will benefit from the 114 RT cores, though actual FPS depends on the specific game's ray-tracing implementation and whether DLSS is enabled. The GPU's 456 tensor cores accelerate DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. These estimates should be treated as informed projections based on benchmark scores, not verified measurements.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF features 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The lack of hyper-threading means the core count equals the thread count, which impacts heavily threaded workloads — the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 43,110 is strong but not exceptional for a 14-core part. The Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors in a 243 mm² die, represents Intel's latest desktop design.

Cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy supports the CPU's single-thread performance, which is evidenced by the 5,173 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4,715 PassMark single-thread score. The 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates this is a high-performing processor, though the nearest rival data shows it is closely matched with several other top-tier chips.

The CPU's TDP of 125 W is moderate for a desktop processor, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for enthusiasts. The DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides solid memory throughput, though the lack of ECC support limits certain professional use cases. The PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes offers high-speed connectivity for storage and other devices, separate from the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface.

Real workload implications are clear from the benchmark data. The PassMark data compression score of 460,123 indicates strong performance for file archiving and compression tasks. Floating-point math at 131,546 supports scientific computing and simulation workloads. Data encryption at 33,381 provides adequate security-related processing. The random string sorting score of 55,206 suggests capable database and sorting operations. Overall, the CPU handles a broad range of tasks well, with particular strengths in single-threaded and moderately threaded workloads, while the 14-thread limit may constrain extreme multi-threading scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system achieves the 95th percentile among all tracked builds, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55,093, which is 0.6 percent higher than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 54,762 — a very close margin.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The RTX 4090 D features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 800 W, while the GPU itself has a TDP of 425 W and the CPU has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What socket and memory type does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance gap between the GPU (98th percentile) and CPU (91st percentile) creates a clear hierarchy in workload distribution. In graphics-intensive tasks like gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, and video effects processing, the RTX 4090 D will be the dominant component, and the CPU's lower percentile will not meaningfully constrain results. The GPU's 73.54 TFLOPS and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth far exceed the CPU's processing capability for parallel workloads.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios, the 245KF becomes the limiting factor. At lower resolutions in gaming, where frame rates are less dependent on GPU throughput, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking may cap performance below what the GPU could theoretically deliver. The nearest rival data shows the CPU is competitive with other high-end processors (within 1.6 percent of the Intel Core i9-14900HX), meaning the bottleneck is not severe, but it exists relative to the GPU's near-top-tier standing.

CPU-only workloads such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark score 460,123), and single-threaded applications will be limited by the processor's 14 threads and 5.20 GHz boost clock. The lack of hyper-threading means multi-threaded CPU tasks see less scaling than competing chips with similar core counts but thread-doubling technology. The 24 MB L3 cache provides adequate data locality, but larger cache configurations on rival chips may edge out the 245KF in cache-sensitive workloads.

The PCIe configuration introduces a potential bottleneck: the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This means the graphics card does not benefit from the newer standard's bandwidth, though current GPU performance data does not suggest this limits the RTX 4090 D. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU may also become a constraint in workloads that require frequent data exchange between system memory and the GPU's 24 GB VRAM.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The system occupies the 95th overall percentile among tracked configurations, placing it in the top 5 percent of all builds. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the CPU's 91st percentile provides solid supporting performance that keeps the system competitive across a wide range of workloads.

The pairing represents an asymmetric configuration: an upper-mid-range-to-high-end CPU mated with a flagship GPU. This creates a system optimized for graphics-heavy applications where the GPU is the primary performance driver. The CPU's 14 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock ensure it does not become a severe bottleneck in most scenarios, but users with CPU-intensive workloads may find the processor to be the limiting factor.

The RTX 4090 D is an end-of-life product with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, yet its benchmark scores place it just below several professional-grade cards (within 2.2 to 4.9 percent of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, A100 SXM4 variants, and RTX 5000 Ada Generation). The CPU's production status is active, suggesting ongoing availability. This build is best suited for users who prioritize graphics performance above all else, particularly gamers targeting 4K or high-refresh 1440p, and content creators working with GPU-accelerated applications. The system's power requirements (125 W CPU, 425 W GPU, 800 W suggested PSU) and triple-slot GPU footprint make it a substantial desktop investment in both physical size and energy consumption.