SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that delivers strong multi-threaded compute performance, anchored by a CPU that outperforms its direct rivals, while the GPU provides a solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p experience. This combination is well-suited for productivity-heavy workloads and mainstream gaming, though its overall potential is capped by the graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, drawing a 125 W TDP. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Notably, it lacks integrated graphics and ECC memory support.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-core powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36,647 points in the multi-core test and 5,173 points in the single-core test. The multi-core result places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for heavily threaded applications. Its average benchmark score of 55,093 is exceptionally close to that of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which scores 54,762, a mere 0.6% difference. This means that for most productivity tasks, the 245KF will perform nearly identically to that high-end rival. It also leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K by 1.9% in average score, showing a slight performance edge over its close sibling.

In single-threaded performance, the 5,173 Cinebench R23 score is excellent, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark suite further illustrates the chip's character. It achieves 43,110 in multithreaded tests and 131,546 in floating point math, demonstrating robust scientific and engineering compute potential. Integer math scores of 98,854 and data compression scores of 460,123 show it handles database and archival workloads with ease. Data encryption performance is also solid at 33,381, which is beneficial for security-focused applications.

The processor's architecture lacks hyperthreading, given that it has 14 cores and 14 threads, yet it still manages to outperform rivals with more threads, highlighting the efficiency of the Arrow Lake design. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache contribute to its low-latency performance. This CPU is designed for workstations and high-performance desktops where multi-core throughput is critical, such as video rendering, code compilation, and simulation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The processor is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This significant gap means the Arc B570 will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions and 3D rendering. The CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, meaning in most gaming scenarios, the frame rate will be dictated by the graphics card's capabilities.

For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and data analysis, the system will perform exceptionally well, with the GPU playing a minimal role. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming, the CPU will likely be underutilized. The data shows the GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Arc A750, with a delta of -0.1%. This positions it as a mid-range graphics solution that will not fully leverage the CPU's immense processing power in frame generation.

This bottleneck is not necessarily a flaw; it creates a system where the CPU is a long-term investment, while the GPU can be upgraded later for significant performance gains without needing to replace the processor. For users whose primary workload is multi-threaded compute, this pairing is efficient. For gamers seeking maximum frame rates, the CPU's potential is partially wasted, as the GPU will cap performance. The combined percentile for this build is 78, reflecting the lower GPU score pulling the overall system tier down from the CPU's lofty position.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage. It is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC and features 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The card comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. Its base and boost clocks are both set at 2500 MHz, with memory running at an effective speed of 19 Gbps.

The GPU is equipped with 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It also includes 18 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray-traced lighting effects. The card achieves a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance doubled at 23.04 TFLOPS. The card has a 150 W TDP and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested 450 W power supply.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B570 performs admirably. It scores 2,649 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test and 96,844 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating strong modern API performance. Its PassMark G3D score is 14,195, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The card's performance is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20,534, a 0.1% difference from the Arc's 20,556 average. It also trades blows with the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20,582. This places the B570 in the upper-mid-range tier of graphics cards, capable of handling demanding titles at 1080p with high settings and providing playable frame rates at 1440p in less demanding games.

The 18 ray tracing cores allow for ray-traced effects to be enabled, though performance will take a hit compared to rasterized rendering. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad game compatibility. With 10 GB of VRAM, it is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the 160-bit bus may limit performance at higher resolutions with massive texture loads. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1, supporting high refresh rate monitors.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in overall performance. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55,093, which is only 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's score of 54,762.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20,556 is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750. It performs within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Q: Is this system more powerful for CPU or GPU tasks?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful relative to other components. It is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a substantial gap in relative performance.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier, as indicated by the "KF" suffix and the "multiplierUnlocked" field being true, allowing for manual overclocking.

Q: What memory type does this build require?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The system does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 78, placing it above the majority of all possible configurations.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 is a standout figure, placing it in the 91st percentile. This is complemented by a single-core score of 5,173. In PassMark, the CPU's multithread score is 43,110, and its single-thread score is 4,715. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 55,093, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and 1.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K.

The GPU's performance is anchored by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844. Its PassMark G3D score is 14,195, with a compute score of 7,281. The GPU's average benchmark score is 20,556, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional compute power and good, but not great, graphics performance. The CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is a solid mid-range card. This means the system excels in productivity and rendering tasks that rely on the CPU, while gaming performance will be solid but not class-leading. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this duality, indicating a well-above-average system overall, but one where the graphics card is the weaker link.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc B570's performance, comparable to the RTX 3070 Mobile, will deliver high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p. However, for demanding AAA games at high refresh rates, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU's power will be underutilized.

Streaming: The CPU's powerful multi-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 score of 36,647, is excellent for simultaneous gameplay and encoding. The 14 cores can handle game logic and video encoding without significant frame drops, making this a capable streaming setup.

Video Editing: With a PassMark multithread score of 43,110 and high floating-point performance of 131,546, the CPU excels at video processing tasks like rendering timelines and exporting final cuts. The 10 GB GPU VRAM also assists with effects and previews.

3D Rendering: The CPU's top-tier multi-core performance is ideal for CPU-based rendering engines. It will significantly reduce render times compared to lower-core-count processors, making it a professional-grade tool for this workload.

Software Development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU's 36,647 Cinebench R23 score will speed up build times. The high integer math score of 98,854 also aids in complex data processing and code analysis.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks, but the single-core performance of 5,173 in Cinebench R23 ensures instant responsiveness in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing. The GPU handles 2D applications with ease, as shown by its PassMark G2D score of 661.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, the following frame rate expectations are estimated based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU's performance is closely aligned with the Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, suggesting it is a solid 1080p card.

At 1080p with ultra settings, gamers can expect playable frame rates in most modern titles, with esports games achieving high refresh rates. The 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures. At 1440p, performance will be more demanding, and users may need to lower settings to high or medium to maintain smooth frame rates in graphically intensive games. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier card for 4K gaming, and those seeking that experience should look elsewhere.

The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in any gaming scenario, as its 91st percentile performance far exceeds the GPU's capabilities. Therefore, the frame rate will be solely determined by the Arc B570's rendering power. Ray tracing is possible thanks to the 18 dedicated RT cores, but enabling it will significantly impact performance, and users should expect to use upscaling or lower resolutions to maintain high frame rates.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, a high-end desktop processor, with the Intel Arc B570, a mid-range desktop graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake chip designed for the desktop segment, while the GPU is based on the Battlemage architecture. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all processors, making it a top-tier choice for compute-heavy tasks. The GPU, in the 65th percentile, is a competent mid-range option.

The class of this system is desktop, and its combined percentile is 78. This places it in the upper echelon of all possible builds, though the significant discrepancy between CPU and GPU performance defines its character. It is a system that prioritizes processor power, making it an excellent choice for professionals and power users who need immense multi-threading capabilities. The GPU is sufficient for mainstream gaming and general graphics tasks, but it is not the primary strength of this configuration.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for content creators, video editors, and 3D artists who rely heavily on CPU rendering and processing. The Core Ultra 5 245KF's 36,647 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will drastically reduce render and export times. It is also an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the high multithread performance will speed up build processes. Data scientists and engineers working with simulations or complex calculations will benefit from the high floating-point math score of 131,546.

For gamers, this is a strong 1080p machine. The Arc B570 will run most titles at high settings with smooth frame rates. It is also a viable entry-level 1440p system, though some settings may need to be adjusted. Students and professionals in office environments will find the system incredibly responsive, though it is more powerful than necessary for those tasks. The combination of a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU makes this a future-proof platform, allowing for a simple GPU upgrade later to unlock the CPU's full gaming potential without rebuilding the system.