SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and Intel Arc A580 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 89th percentile of all combined CPU-GPU configurations. This is a system built on a modern foundation—the 14-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851 and the Alchemist-based Arc graphics card—delivering strong multi-threaded compute and respectable rasterization performance. The data shows a balanced combination where the CPU’s high single-thread score and the GPU’s competitive average benchmark position make it a versatile platform for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks. This analysis uses benchmark-derived estimates for gaming performance, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF achieves a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5173, indicating excellent per-thread performance that minimizes CPU bottlenecks in most gaming scenarios. The Intel Arc A580, sitting at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, provides a solid foundation for 1080p gaming at high settings and can handle 1440p with adjustments to quality presets.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A580’s 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can deliver smooth frame rates in esports titles and well-optimized AAA games. The CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that even the most demanding game logic threads have headroom. For 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor; the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate will handle most titles, but users should expect to lower certain settings like shadow quality or draw distance in the most graphically intensive releases. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) means ray tracing features are available, though the 24 RT cores will deliver playable but not class-leading ray-traced performance.

The nearest rival data for the GPU places the Arc A580 within 1.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in average benchmark score, which is a strong indicator of its 1080p capability. However, the RX 6950 XT typically has more VRAM, so texture-heavy 1440p scenarios may expose the Arc’s 8 GB limitation. For competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors, the combination of the CPU’s 4715 Passmark single-thread score and the GPU’s 87th percentile position suggests the system can push well beyond 60 FPS in most esports titles, though specific frame rates depend on the game’s optimization. The estimated performance picture is positive, with the CPU ensuring frame pacing stability and the GPU providing adequate rasterization throughput for mainstream gaming resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54762, which is just 0.6% lower—this indicates the 245KF trades blows with a top-tier gaming CPU in synthetic workloads. The Intel Core 7 253PQE leads by 1.5% (55919), and the Core i9-14900HX leads by 1.6% (56004), showing that the 245KF is within a hair of these high-end parts. The Core Ultra 5 245K trails by 1.9% (54053), confirming that the 245KF is the slightly faster variant of the same family.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 36647 is a strong result for a 14-core processor, rivaling many 16-core parts from previous generations. The single-core score of 5173 is equally impressive, representing the efficiency of the 3 nm TSMC process node. The Passmark suite reinforces this: a multi-thread score of 43110 and a single-thread score of 4715, with floating-point math at 131546 and integer math at 98854. Data compression scores of 460123 and encryption at 33381 suggest the CPU handles archival and security workloads competently.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, scores 57367 (0.7% higher), while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.8% lower), and the RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (1.1% lower). This positions the Arc A580 as a mid-range card that punches above its class in synthetic tests. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 reflects modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL (91657) and Vulkan (79381) scores show strong compute capabilities for a GPU in this tier. Together, the CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile combine to a 89th percentile system ranking, indicating a well-matched pair where neither component is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has no hyper-threading, so the 14 threads equal the 14 physical cores, which is a design choice that prioritizes efficiency and power management over multi-threading overhead. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, boosting to 5.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking should the user’s cooling and motherboard support it. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 3 MB of L2 per core and 192 KB of L1 per core, providing ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

In real workloads, the R23 multi-core score of 36647 places the 245KF in the same league as high-end desktop CPUs from just a generation ago, but it achieves this with a 125 W TDP, suggesting excellent power efficiency from the 3 nm node. The single-core score of 5173 is critical for gaming and lightly threaded applications, and it is within 1.6% of the Core i9-14900HX, a top-tier laptop chip, meaning the 245KF will not hold back a modern GPU in frame rate generation. The Passmark physics score of 2998 is modest, but the floating-point math score of 131546 indicates strong scientific computing throughput.

For content creation, the data compression score of 460123 and encryption score of 33381 show that the CPU handles zipping files and encrypting data quickly, making it suitable for backup tasks and secure communications. The extended instructions score of 37912 and find prime numbers score of 416 (a low absolute number but relative to the test’s scale) suggest balanced ALU and SIMD performance. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is standard for the platform, and with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, there is ample bandwidth for a high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The architecture’s lack of integrated graphics is notable—this CPU requires a discrete GPU for any display output, which is already accounted for in this pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the platform has no ECC memory support, making it a consumer-focused setup. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single flagship GPU plus a Gen 5 NVMe SSD, though a second high-bandwidth device would need to share lanes or use the chipset’s Gen 4 connectivity. The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 W, which, combined with the CPU’s 125 W TDP, indicates a total system draw that is manageable for most mid-range power supplies; users with additional drives or peripherals should consider a 550 W or 650 W unit for headroom.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes—the card will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is not a bottleneck for this class of GPU. The Arc A580 requires two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card, so case and PSU compatibility are straightforward. The GPU’s 175 W TDP is moderate, and the 450 W suggested PSU leaves roughly 150 W of headroom for the CPU and other components, which is adequate but not generous if overclocking both the CPU and GPU.

A sensible next upgrade path for this system would be to first increase memory capacity or speed, as the CPU’s dual-channel controller benefits from higher-frequency DDR5 kits. For gaming, the GPU is the more likely upgrade target—moving to a higher-tier Arc or competitor card would directly improve FPS, especially at 1440p and above. The CPU has headroom to support such an upgrade: its 91st percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a significantly faster GPU in most scenarios. If CPU-bound workloads become a priority, the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 125 W TDP suggests there is limited thermal headroom without a robust cooler. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and potentially GPU connectivity for the next generation of components.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5173 R23 single-core score ensures minimal frame time spikes, while the GPU’s 87th percentile position supports high frame rates at 1080p. Estimated FPS in esports titles should comfortably exceed 144 Hz on competitive settings, though AAA games at ultra will hover around 60-90 FPS depending on optimization.

Streaming: The 14-core processor with a 43110 Passmark multi-thread score can handle encoding (via software) alongside gaming, but the lack of hyper-threading means there is no thread surplus. The GPU’s 24 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support suggest hardware-accelerated encoding is viable, offloading the CPU for game logic.

Video editing: The R23 multi-core score of 36647 and floating-point math score of 131546 indicate strong timeline scrubbing and export performance in non-linear editors. The GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading, making this a capable 1080p and light 4K editing rig.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is competitive with more expensive parts, as shown by its 1.5% margin to the Core 7 253PQE. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering (like Blender Cycles) will be slower than higher-tier cards, but CPU-based rendering will be efficient.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 98854 and data compression score of 460123 reflect fast compilation and archive handling. The 14 cores handle parallel builds well, and the single-thread score of 4715 ensures quick response times in code editors and IDE operations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking makes it overkill for document editing and spreadsheet tasks, but the efficiency of the 3 nm node means low power draw at idle, extending battery life if used in a compact desktop. The GPU is unnecessary for basic office tasks, but it provides headroom for future multimedia projects or light photo editing.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics (listed as "N/A" in the specifications). A discrete GPU is required for any display output, which is why this pairing includes the Intel Arc A580.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55093, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s score of 54762. This means the two are effectively tied in synthetic workloads.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses 16 lanes of PCIe 4.0, which is backward compatible and runs at the appropriate speed.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU and what PSU is recommended?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W and requires a 450 W power supply as suggested. It uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The base clock is 4.20 GHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, so manual tuning can push beyond these figures with adequate cooling.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced system, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 87th percentile means the GPU is the more likely limiting factor, as it must render each frame. The CPU’s single-thread score of 5173 ensures it can feed the GPU with draw calls efficiently, so users should see GPU-bound behavior in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate become the primary constraint, and lowering settings will be necessary for consistent frame rates.

In CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data compression, the CPU is the clear bottleneck—its 14 threads are fully utilized, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (12.29 TFLOPS FP32) are secondary. The Passmark multi-thread score of 43110 versus the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 (which is a different metric but indicates compute) shows that the CPU leads in general-purpose parallel workloads. For a mixed workload like gaming while streaming, the system balances well: the CPU handles game logic and encoding (if using x264), while the GPU handles rendering and any hardware-accelerated encode tasks.

The combined percentile of 89 suggests there is no egregious mismatch. The CPU is 4 percentile points higher than the GPU, which is a minor gap—it means the GPU is slightly more likely to be the performance ceiling in gaming, but the CPU’s headroom allows for future GPU upgrades without immediately needing a processor change. The nearest rival data for the GPU (within 1.1% of the RX 6950 XT) versus the CPU (within 1.6% of the Core i9-14900HX) reinforces that this pairing is intentionally mid-range, where each component is matched to avoid significant waste of potential.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF with the Intel Arc A580. The CPU is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, and the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the upper tier of all configurations tracked in the database. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile indicate that this is not an entry-level or budget pairing, but rather a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop that excels in multi-threaded productivity and mainstream gaming.

The platform is modern—PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 memory, and a 3 nm CPU process—ensuring relevance for several years. The GPU is a 6 nm part with DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which covers current game APIs. The 125 W CPU TDP and 175 W GPU TDP combine to a system that is power-efficient relative to its performance class, requiring only a 450 W PSU. This build is not a high-end enthusiast rig (it lacks the top-tier CPU or GPU), but it is a step above typical office machines, offering genuine compute and gaming capability. It represents a coherent, forward-looking platform for users who want current-generation features without stepping into flagship pricing territory.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer at 1080p who wants high refresh rates in competitive titles and playable frame rates in AAA games. The CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s 87th percentile position make this a capable esports machine, with estimated FPS well above 100 in most shooters and MOBAs. At 1440p, the system still delivers smooth gameplay at medium-to-high settings, making it suitable for gamers who plan to upgrade their monitor but not immediately their GPU.

Content creators who work with 1080p or light 4K video will find the CPU’s 36647 R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s compute features (24.58 TFLOPS FP16) useful for editing and effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 14 cores and 98854 integer math score, while the 5.20 GHz boost clock keeps interactive tooling responsive. Students and small business users get a system that handles office suites, web browsing, and data analysis with massive headroom, and the 3 nm CPU node means low power draw for prolonged operation. The build is less ideal for hardcore 4K gamers or those who need maximum ray tracing performance, but for the broad middle of the market, this pairing delivers a balanced, future-ready desktop.