SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF paired with the Intel Arc A380 is a desktop combination with a severe performance asymmetry. The CPU is a high-end 14-core processor that sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a modest entry-level card at the 44th percentile. The combined build percentile is 68, but this pairing is ultimately constrained by its graphics component in every gaming scenario. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS discussions here are estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is built on the Arrow Lake architecture and represents the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The chip features 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it relies on a single core type without hyper-threading. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, and its TDP is rated at 125 W.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides fast access to frequently used data, which is crucial for both gaming and productivity tasks. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results place this processor firmly in the high-performance tier. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36,647 points in multi-core and 5,173 points in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, indicating that the 14 physical cores handle heavily threaded workloads effectively. The single-core score of 5,173 is also competitive, ensuring that lightly threaded tasks like gaming and general desktop responsiveness remain snappy.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's versatility. The multithread score is 43,110, while the single-thread score is 4,715. Integer math scores 98,854, floating-point math scores 131,546, and extended instructions score 37,912. Data compression is a standout at 460,123, while data encryption scores 33,381. The find prime numbers test scores 416. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in compute-heavy tasks, particularly those that leverage floating-point operations and data compression algorithms.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 55,093, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 54,762, which is 0.6% lower; the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55,919, which is 1.5% higher; the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004, which is 1.6% higher; and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54,053, which is 1.9% lower. The Ultra 5 245KF sits in a tight cluster with these chips, meaning its real-world performance is nearly indistinguishable from its closest competitors. The 3 nm process and high boost clock allow it to match or beat many previous-generation flagship parts, making it a strong choice for pure processing power.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF delivers exceptional CPU-bound performance, while the Intel Arc A380 provides entry-level graphics capability. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647 is a clear indicator of its ability to handle rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. Its single-core score of 5,173 ensures that tasks which rely on a single thread, such as older games or certain scripting workloads, do not become bottlenecks.

The GPU's benchmark scores tell a different story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A380 scores 808 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 38,224, and its Vulkan score is 36,736. PassMark G3D score is 6,252, with a G2D score of 610. DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores are 38 and 35, respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 73 and DirectX 10 scores 37. GPU compute score is 2,762. These numbers place the Arc A380 at the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8,558.

The combined picture is one of profound imbalance. The CPU is at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is at the 44th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will feel exceptionally fast, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will limit performance to entry-level levels. The combined build percentile is 68, reflecting the average of these two disparate components. For any workload that depends primarily on the GPU, the Arc A380 will be the limiting factor, while the CPU will remain largely underutilized.

In gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means we must rely on the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance suggests it can feed a powerful GPU without issue, but the Arc A380's modest scores indicate that frame rates will be low, especially at higher resolutions and detail settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 is particularly telling; it suggests that modern AAA titles will struggle to run at playable frame rates except at the lowest settings and resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². It is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps.

The GPU core runs at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster operation units (ROPs). There are 8 ray tracing cores, though the tensor cores field is null, suggesting no dedicated AI acceleration hardware comparable to NVIDIA's Tensor Cores. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has a TDP of 75 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is modest. The card is dual-slot, measuring 222 mm in length, 114 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show the Arc A380's performance class. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, indicating entry-level DirectX 12 performance. The PassMark G3D score of 6,252 is similarly modest. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M with a score of 8,595 (0.4% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M with 8,462 (1.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with 8,458 (1.2% higher), and the AMD Radeon 880M with 8,436 (1.4% higher). These rivals are predominantly older mobile or low-power desktop parts, confirming that the Arc A380 is not a competitive modern desktop GPU.

For rendering workloads, the 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for basic 3D modeling and light rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets. The 8 ray tracing cores can handle some ray-traced effects, but the low overall performance means ray tracing should be used sparingly. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, which signals that Intel has moved on from this architecture.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform. This is a desktop socket designed for the Arrow Lake generation. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for a high-end graphics card and one or two NVMe SSDs. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation users who require error-correcting memory.

The Arc A380's TDP is 75 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W. Combined, the system has a theoretical maximum power draw of 200 W from these two components alone, plus the rest of the system. A 250 W PSU is the minimum suggestion for the GPU alone, but a sensible build would require a PSU with more headroom to account for the CPU, motherboard, storage, and cooling. The CPU's 125 W TDP is modest for a high-end chip, meaning a mid-range air cooler should suffice for stock operation.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to replacing the GPU. The CPU is at the 91st percentile and is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any workload. The Arc A380, at the 44th percentile, is the clear weak link. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile would unlock the CPU's full potential, particularly in gaming and GPU-accelerated compute tasks. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any modern GPU will be fully supported, and the 20 CPU lanes provide sufficient bandwidth for even the most demanding graphics cards.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential constraint for some workloads, but it is standard for dual-channel DDR5. Users who require more bandwidth would need to consider a platform with quad-channel memory support, which the Socket 1851 platform does not offer. The lack of ECC support also limits the platform's appeal for mission-critical data integrity, though it is not a concern for gaming or general productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 44th percentile. This means the GPU is the bottleneck in virtually every gaming and graphics workload. The CPU's single-thread score of 5,173 in Cinebench R23 is more than adequate to drive any modern GPU, but the Arc A380's modest DirectX 12 score of 35 will cap frame rates at low levels.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data compression, and 3D rendering, the system will perform exceptionally well. The CPU's multi-thread score of 36,647 in Cinebench R23 and its PassMark multithread score of 43,110 indicate that it can handle heavily parallel tasks with ease. However, in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming, video encoding (if using GPU acceleration), and machine learning inference, the Arc A380 will limit performance to entry-level levels.

The estimated FPS scaling, based on the benchmark scores, suggests that the system will deliver playable frame rates only in esports titles or older games at low resolutions and settings. For modern AAA titles, the GPU's low DirectX 12 and Vulkan scores indicate that frame rates will be below 30 FPS at 1080p with medium settings. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in these scenarios; it will be waiting on the GPU to finish its work.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance, but it does not tell the full story. The system is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a powerful CPU paired with a weak GPU. Users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and only occasionally game will find the system acceptable, but those who want smooth gaming performance will need to upgrade the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but have minimal graphics requirements. The target audience includes content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, software developers who compile large codebases, and students or professionals who run compute-intensive simulations. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and strong multi-thread scores make it ideal for these workloads.

Gamers at 1080p with low settings or esports titles may find the Arc A380 sufficient, but the GPU's 44th percentile ranking means it is not suited for high-refresh gaming or modern AAA releases. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated effects in video editing software will find the Arc A380 lacking, but those who rely on CPU-based encoding or rendering will be well served.

Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet calculations, or light 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's speed. The lack of ECC memory support is a minor drawback for such systems, but the performance per thread is excellent. Students who need a fast processor for engineering software, data analysis, or programming will find the CPU more than adequate, and the GPU can handle basic display output and light 2D tasks.

The system is also suitable for developers who need to run multiple virtual machines or containers, as the 14 cores and 14 threads provide ample parallelism. The CPU's data compression score of 460,123 is particularly strong, making it useful for workloads that involve heavy file compression or decompression.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the weakest scenario for the system. The Arc A380's DirectX 12 score of 35 and PassMark G3D score of 6,252 indicate that frame rates will be low. At 1080p with low settings, esports titles may reach 60 FPS, but modern games will struggle to maintain 30 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 5,173 ensures it is not the bottleneck, but the GPU cannot deliver high-refresh performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores are more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's weak performance means games will run at low frame rates, making the stream less engaging. The Arc A380 does have hardware encoders, but its low overall performance limits the quality of the gaming experience being streamed.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and rendering will be fast, thanks to the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,647. However, GPU-accelerated effects and timeline previews will be limited by the Arc A380's 6 GB VRAM and modest compute performance. Users who rely on CPU rendering will be satisfied, but those who depend on GPU acceleration will be disappointed.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread performance is excellent for CPU-based renderers. The PassMark floating-point math score of 131,546 indicates strong compute throughput. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can handle basic GPU rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. For pure CPU rendering, this system is capable, but for GPU-accelerated rendering, it falls short.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 460,123 and integer math score of 98,854 make it ideal for compiling code and running tests. The 14 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4,715 ensures that interactive development tools remain responsive. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong use case.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The GPU can drive multiple displays via its HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor setups. The 75 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, which is desirable in a shared workspace.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a high-end Arrow Lake processor with 14 cores and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist part with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined build percentile is 68, but this figure masks the significant gap between the components. The CPU is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, making it one of the fastest processors available, while the GPU is at the 44th percentile, placing it in the lower half of all GPUs.

The system is best described as a workstation-oriented CPU paired with a display adapter. It excels in CPU-intensive tasks such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, but it is not a gaming machine. The Arc A380's 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provide modern feature support, but the raw performance is too low for demanding games. The overall tier is that of a high-performance CPU with a basic GPU, suitable for productivity and light graphics work, but not for serious gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55,093.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average score of 54,762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's score of 55,093.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A380 is 250 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has an FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon 880M?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has an average score of 8,436, which is 1.4% higher than the Intel Arc A380's average score of 8,558, meaning the Arc A380 is slightly lower performing.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all FPS discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.