SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

55,093 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A310: A Study in Extreme Asymmetry

The pairing of the flagship-class Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF desktop CPU with the entry-level Intel Arc A310 GPU creates one of the most lopsided performance profiles in the database. The processor sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card languishes in the 40th percentile among all GPUs. This combination prioritizes compute throughput over graphical fidelity, and the benchmark data reflects a system that can chew through multi-threaded workloads while struggling with modern gaming titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 66, placing it above the median system but significantly below what the CPU alone might suggest.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55093, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s average score of 54762. This puts the two processors in a statistical dead heat.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A310 features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has integratedGraphics listed as "N/A", meaning it requires a discrete GPU for any display output. The Arc A310 in this build fulfills that role.

Q: What socket does the CPU use, and what memory type does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply rating?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 200 W. The GPU requires no power connectors.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU scores tell two entirely different stories. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF achieves an average benchmark score of 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, scores 54762, a delta of just 0.6% in the Ultra 5’s favor. The Intel Core 7 253PQE and Intel Core i9-14900HX both score slightly higher at 55919 and 56004 respectively, putting the Ultra 5 245KF 1.5% and 1.6% behind those parts. The Ultra 5 245K, a sibling part, scores 54053, meaning the KF variant is 1.9% ahead.

The Intel Arc A310, by contrast, achieves an average benchmark score of 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7557 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7580 (0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 7472 (1% behind), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M at 7447 (1.4% behind). The GPU’s best individual result is a PassMark G3D score of 5433, while its compute score via PassMark is 2157. Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 30607 and a Vulkan score of 28964.

The combined percentile of 66 reflects a system where the CPU is performing at elite levels, but the GPU drags the overall experience down for graphics-intensive tasks. The delta between the CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 40th percentile is 51 points — a chasm that defines this build’s character.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock of 4.20 GHz can boost up to 5.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for enthusiast overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 is the strongest indicator of its rendering capability, while the single-core score of 5173 demonstrates solid per-thread performance. Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 15391 multicore and 2172 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 3693 with a single-core score of 521.

PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths. The data compression score of 460123 is exceptionally high, while data encryption hits 33381. Extended instructions score 37912, floating-point math reaches 131546, and integer math scores 98854. The multithread score of 43110 and single-thread score of 4715 reinforce the CPU’s balanced but multi-core-focused profile. Physics calculations score 2998, random string sorting hits 55206, and the find prime numbers test scores 416.

For real workloads, these numbers indicate a CPU that can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with authority. The 14 cores without hyperthreading (14 threads) suggest a design favoring physical cores over logical ones, which often benefits latency-sensitive workloads. The 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded applications like older games or office software remain responsive. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is substantial for a dual-channel DDR5 setup.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-bound productivity over GPU-accelerated graphics. The 91st percentile CPU ranking makes this an excellent foundation for content creators working in video editing, 3D modeling, or software development — tasks that leverage the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and the PassMark multithread score of 43110.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU’s compile times and simulation performance, provided their coursework does not demand high-end GPU acceleration. Small business workstations handling data analysis, database management, or spreadsheet-heavy workloads would find the data compression score of 460123 and integer math score of 98854 sufficient for daily operations.

Gamers, however, should look elsewhere unless they play at 1080p with low settings or focus on esports titles. The GPU’s 40th percentile ranking means modern AAA games will require significant graphical compromises. The system is better suited as a workstation that occasionally games rather than a dedicated gaming rig. Content creators who use CPU-based rendering (like Cinebench) rather than GPU-based rendering would find this pairing more sensible.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A310’s PassMark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest very limited gaming capability. The GPU’s 4 GB of VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are severe constraints for modern titles.

At 1080p, the Arc A310 might manage low-to-medium settings in older or less demanding games, but the DirectX 11 score of 33 and DirectX 10 score of 31 indicate that even older APIs are not handled with great efficiency. The DirectX 9 score of 69 is comparatively better, hinting that legacy titles could run acceptably. The GPU’s 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest by modern standards.

The CPU would not be the bottleneck in gaming. The Ultra 5 245KF’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5173 ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are handled capably. The limiting factor is unequivocally the GPU. At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A310 would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most AAA titles, regardless of the CPU’s power. Esports games with light graphical demands might approach 60 FPS at 1080p low settings, but this is speculative given the lack of measured data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Intel Socket 1851, the platform for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for future GPUs and NVMe storage.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for the Arc A310’s bandwidth needs. The GPU’s TDP of 30 W and the suggested PSU of 200 W indicate the system has extreme headroom for a GPU upgrade. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so the combined system draw is modest. A future upgrade to a more powerful GPU — one with higher percentile ranking than the Arc A310’s 40th — would transform this system from a compute-focused workstation into a balanced gaming or rendering machine.

The socket supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, so users could theoretically move to a higher-tier Arrow Lake processor without changing the motherboard. The memory support for DDR5 ensures that a GPU upgrade would not require a platform overhaul. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes future-proof the storage and expansion capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system has a clear and overwhelming bottleneck: the GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 40th percentile creates a situation where the graphics card limits every graphics-related task. In gaming, the Ultra 5 245KF could easily feed a much more powerful GPU; the Arc A310 cannot utilize the CPU’s full potential.

For CPU-bound workloads — rendering, compiling, data processing — the system performs at elite levels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and PassMark multithread score of 43110 are the headline numbers. The GPU is irrelevant for these tasks.

For GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, machine learning inference — the Arc A310 becomes the limiting factor. Its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for modern high-resolution textures. The PassMark G3D score of 5433 places it in the same class as the AMD Radeon R7 250, a GPU from a previous era.

The balance is asymmetric by design. Anyone building this system must accept that the GPU is a placeholder for basic display output and light acceleration. The bottleneck is so pronounced that upgrading the GPU would yield a multiplicative performance increase in graphics tasks, while upgrading the CPU would yield almost nothing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a 91st-percentile CPU with a 40th-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 66. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a 14-core Arrow Lake processor on Intel Socket 1851, while the Intel Arc A310 is an Alchemist-generation GPU with 768 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The pairing is fundamentally a workstation with display output. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 55093 places it among the top processors in the database, rivaling the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and surpassing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K. The GPU’s average score of 7550 places it in entry-level territory, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 but slightly behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100.

The combined percentile of 66 masks the extreme variance between the two components. This is not a balanced build; it is a CPU-centric system with a minimal GPU. For users who need raw CPU horsepower and only require basic graphics, this pairing makes sense. For anyone expecting gaming performance, it will disappoint.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the most significant limitation. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs best in compute-oriented tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 indicate reasonable compute capability for its class. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are dismal: DirectX 10 at 31, DirectX 11 at 33, DirectX 12 at 29, and DirectX 9 at 69. The G2D score of 625 and G3D score of 5433 confirm that 2D and 3D graphics performance is entry-level.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A310 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration, but with only 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray-traced scenes would render slowly. The GPU’s 30 W TDP and single-slot design with 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs make it a viable multi-display office solution, but not a rendering powerhouse.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The Arc A310’s PassMark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 place it far below what modern high-refresh gaming requires. The CPU could handle the frame pacing, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames. Expect low settings and low resolutions, with no measured data to confirm exact FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock can handle encoding, but the GPU’s lack of dedicated encoder information in the FACT PACK and weak DirectX scores make hardware encoding questionable. Software encoding using the CPU’s strong multithread score of 43110 is the safer bet.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and PassMark floating-point math score of 131546 are excellent for timeline processing and effects that rely on CPU compute. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM may limit GPU-accelerated effects, but basic editing is feasible.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will excel with the Ultra 5 245KF’s 14 cores. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3693 and R20 score of 15391 confirm strong performance. GPU-based rendering would be bottlenecked by the Arc A310’s 2.688 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, making it unsuitable for production work.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 460123, integer math score of 98854, and multithread score of 43110 make compilation and testing fast. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a sensible pairing for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4715 in PassMark ensures responsive application usage. The GPU’s G2D score of 625 is adequate for document processing and web browsing. The 30 W GPU TDP and 200 W suggested PSU keep the system energy-efficient for daily use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds