SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM to form a desktop build that lands at the 71st percentile overall, indicating a solidly above-average combination. The CPU is the clear performance leader of this pairing, sitting at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the median 50th percentile. This creates a distinct imbalance where the processor has substantial headroom for more powerful graphics hardware. The following analysis examines the architecture, platform, and workload-specific capabilities of this configuration, with the caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, representing the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. It uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, housing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip runs at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. Clock speeds are competitive for the segment, and the unlocked multiplier allows for manual overclocking adjustments. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool.

Benchmark results position this CPU strongly. In Cinebench R23, the 245K scores 25,066 points in multi-core and 2,132 in single-core. The R20 tests show 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core, while R15 yields 3,850 multi-core and 322 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at heavily threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread performance. The PassMark suite reinforces this picture: a multithread score of 43,047, single-thread score of 4,714, and an average benchmark score of 54,053 place it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The data compression score of 458,817 and data encryption score of 33,286 suggest strong throughput in data-intensive tasks. Floating point math hits 130,678, integer math reaches 98,524, and extended instructions score 37,617.

Compared to nearest rivals, the 245K sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P (average score 53,701), 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620), and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469). The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D holds a 1.3% advantage with an average score of 54,762. These deltas show that the 245K trades blows with high-end server and desktop parts, making it a versatile choice for both productivity and content creation. The 14-thread count means no hyper-threading, but the 14 physical cores still deliver strong parallel performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench and PassMark multi-core results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the current-generation desktop socket for Arrow Lake processors. Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which extends the platform’s appeal to workstation and small business scenarios where data integrity matters. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units offers a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles all rendering duties in this build.

The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 TiM is 550 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP. This leaves realistic headroom for overclocking the unlocked multiplier on the 245K, as the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU fits comfortably within the recommended PSU specification. The GPU itself draws up to 220 W, so a 550 W supply covers both components plus system peripherals without excessive strain. For future upgrades, the platform supports the latest Gen 5 PCIe standard, so a newer high-end GPU would drop into the same slot without a motherboard change. However, the 50th percentile GPU is the limiting factor in this build, and a user looking for more graphics performance could upgrade the GPU while keeping the 245K, which sits at the 91st percentile. The LGA 1851 socket also means that newer Arrow Lake refresh parts could be considered, though the 245K already performs within 1.3% of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D, so the upgrade incentive is modest unless core counts increase.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s overall performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,053.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is 1.3% faster on average, with a score of 54,762 versus 54,053 for the 245K, a gap of roughly 709 points.

Q: What memory type does this platform require?

A: The platform supports only DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, offering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the GPU capable of ray tracing?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a 125 W TDP, and the GPU has a 220 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 245K includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a basic display output without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and core configuration?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.20 GHz from a 4.20 GHz base, with 14 cores and 14 threads across the Arrow Lake architecture.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. All gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,714, provides a solid foundation for gaming. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it delivers average performance relative to all GPUs, which translates to playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p for most titles, with 4K requiring reductions in settings.

The RTX 3070 TiM features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, which is standard for the 30-series Ampere architecture. The 46 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, and the 184 tensor cores enable DLSS support. Given the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking, it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The CPU’s data compression score of 458,817 and floating point math of 130,678 also aid in game physics and asset streaming. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the CPU’s single-thread lead ensures high frame rates, while the GPU keeps pace at medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, pushing frame rates lower but remaining playable. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 50th percentile performance limit ultra settings, with medium presets being more realistic.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 2,132 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4,714 PassMark single-thread score drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS handles rasterization. At 1080p, the combination can push well beyond 60 FPS in most games, though the 50th percentile GPU limits consistency at 1440p and above.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with a multithread score of 43,047. The GPU’s 184 tensor cores also support NVENC-based encoding, offloading the work from the CPU. Simultaneous gaming and streaming should remain smooth given the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and PassMark multithread of 43,047 indicate strong rendering performance for video export. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects processing and timeline scrubbing. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache further accelerates editing workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU’s floating point math score of 130,678 and extended instructions score of 37,617 suggest robust performance in render engines that leverage CPU compute. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS also accelerates GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s data encryption score of 33,286 and integer math score of 98,524 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis. The 14 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,714 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics can drive displays without the discrete GPU. The platform’s DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports multitasking across many browser tabs and documents.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who prioritize CPU throughput over raw graphics power. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the 91st percentile CPU ensures high frame rates, with the 50th percentile GPU delivering playable performance at medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, so gamers should expect to adjust settings for smooth playback. Content creators working in video editing and 3D rendering benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core scores — 25,066 in Cinebench R23 and 43,047 in PassMark multithread — which accelerate export times and render passes. Software developers gain from the CPU’s integer math score of 98,524 and 14 cores for parallel compilation, while ECC memory support makes this viable for small business workstations that require data integrity. Students and office users on a budget-conscious build will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread responsiveness and the integrated graphics fallback, though the discrete GPU adds unnecessary cost for pure office work. The build is less suitable for 4K gaming enthusiasts or professionals needing large VRAM pools, as the 8 GB GPU at the 50th percentile cannot sustain ultra settings at that resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance favoring the CPU. The 245K sits at the 91st percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile among GPUs. This 41-percentage-point gap means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI inference, the CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3,081 and extended instructions score of 37,617 would fully utilize the processor, leaving the GPU idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like ray tracing or high-resolution rendering, the GPU’s 46 RT cores and 16.60 TFLOPS will be saturated while the CPU waits. The FPS scaling would show diminishing returns: at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,714 ensures high frame rates, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 50th percentile performance will cap maximum FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more limiting, with the CPU’s headroom unused. For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates, with the GPU only assisting in GPU-accelerated tasks. The combined 71st percentile reflects this mixed picture — the CPU boosts the overall score, but the GPU drags down gaming and compute performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM graphics card. The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake part on Socket 1851, while the GPU is an end-of-life Ampere architecture part on PCIe 4.0. The pairing represents a mid-range-to-upper-mid-range configuration, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 71. The CPU’s 14 cores, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB L3 cache make it a strong foundation for productivity, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 16.60 TFLOPS provide adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The platform supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC memory, making it versatile for both consumer and workstation use. The 550 W suggested PSU covers the 125 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP with room for overclocking the unlocked multiplier. This build is best suited for users who need strong CPU performance for work and only moderate GPU performance for gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K achieves an average benchmark score of 54,053, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25,066 multi-core and 2,132 single-core. The R20 test yields 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core, while R15 shows 3,850 multi-core and 322 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 43,047, single-thread score of 4,714, data compression of 458,817, data encryption of 33,286, extended instructions of 37,617, floating point math of 130,678, integer math of 98,524, physics of 3,081, and random string sorting of 55,098. The CPU outperforms the Intel Xeon 6505P by 0.7%, the Intel Core i7-14700F by 0.8%, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 1.1%, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.3%.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM has no benchmark scores recorded, leaving its average benchmark score at zero. Its percentile is 50th among all GPUs, indicating median performance. The GPU offers 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 5,888 shading units, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. Memory bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus with 8 GB GDDR6. The combined picture shows a CPU that is 41 percentage points higher than the GPU in relative standing. For workloads that scale with CPU performance — such as video editing, software compilation, and 3D rendering — this build delivers top-tier results. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or machine learning inference, the performance is average, capping the overall experience. The combined 71st percentile reflects a system that is stronger than the majority of builds but held back by its graphics component.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds