SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Arc B570 pairing presents an interesting balance-of-power question, and the benchmark data provides clear evidence of where the bottleneck lies. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. This 26-percentile gap is substantial, indicating that in most workloads, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. The CPU's average benchmark score of 54,053 versus the GPU's 20,556 reinforces this disparity — the processor is operating at a fundamentally higher performance tier than the graphics solution.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each component clarifies the picture further. The CPU trades blows with the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.7% ahead), Intel Core i7-14700F (0.8% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (1.3% behind). These are all high-end desktop and workstation processors, confirming that the 245K is punching well above its weight class. Meanwhile, the GPU sits within a hair of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% ahead), Intel Arc A750 (0.1% behind), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% behind). The Arc B570 is a mid-range graphics card competing with mobile and previous-generation desktop parts.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics calculations, data compression, or single-threaded productivity — the Core Ultra 5 245K will never be the constraint. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4,714 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132 are strong indicators that even demanding single-threaded applications will run without processor-induced stutters. The multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066) further ensures that content creation and rendering workloads will be GPU-limited on the graphics side rather than CPU-limited.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads — gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with ray tracing, or GPU compute tasks — the Arc B570's 65th percentile position will dictate the frame rates and render times. The 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are respectable for a mid-range card, but they cannot match the raw throughput of higher-tier GPUs that would pair more evenly with a 91st-percentile CPU. The data suggests an asymmetric pairing: a top-tier processor harnessed to a mid-tier graphics card, which creates a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but leaves graphical performance on the table.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K delivers benchmark results that place it firmly in enthusiast territory. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and single-core score of 2,132 demonstrate balanced performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core. Older Cinebench R15 runs show 3,850 multi-core and 322 single-core. These scores, combined with the 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, confirm that this processor handles both productivity and gaming workloads with ample headroom.

The PassMark suite adds further depth to the CPU profile. The multi-thread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714 align with the processor's high percentile standing. More specialized tests reveal specific strengths: data compression at 458,817, floating-point math at 130,678, integer math at 98,524, and extended instructions at 37,617. The data encryption score of 33,286 and random string sorting at 55,098 indicate solid performance in security and data manipulation tasks. Physics processing at 3,081 and prime number finding at 414 round out the compute profile. The average benchmark score of 54,053 places this CPU in a three-way statistical tie with its nearest rivals, all within 1.3% of each other.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570 produces a more modest set of results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 reflects modern gaming performance, while Geekbench scores of 83,514 (OpenCL) and 96,844 (Vulkan) show compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and GPU compute score of 7,281 place the card at the 65th percentile overall. Its average benchmark score of 20,556 puts it in a statistical dead heat with the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% ahead), Arc A750 (0.1% behind), Quadro M4000M (0.4% ahead), and R9 M390X (0.5% behind). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which reflects the CPU dragging the overall score upward relative to the GPU's standalone position.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) from the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. This is a desktop-class processor manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. The platform supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature that appeals to workstation users who require data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling fast connectivity for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards.

The Arc B570 GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its performance class. The card draws a TDP of 150 W, and the suggested power supply is 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, meaning a combined system draw of roughly 275 W for these two components alone, leaving headroom within the 450 W PSU recommendation for other system components such as storage, fans, and motherboard circuitry. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is a modest requirement for a modern graphics card.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary candidate. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and its near-tie with the Ryzen 9 9900X3D (within 1.3%) suggest that the processor will remain relevant for years, while the GPU's 65th percentile position is the weaker link in this pairing. A future graphics card upgrade would better balance the system, though the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the Arc B570 means that any replacement should be chosen with attention to bandwidth requirements. The motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would accommodate a higher-bandwidth card, but the current GPU's interface is not a bottleneck at its performance level. The platform also supports unlocked multipliers (the CPU has multiplierUnlocked set to true), allowing overclocking headroom for users who want to extract additional performance from the 245K.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat the following as projections based on the components' synthetic test results rather than empirical frame rate data.

The Arc B570's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 indicates competent 1080p gaming performance. The card's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth provides adequate capacity and throughput for modern game textures at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, which translate to smooth frame rates in most titles when paired with a capable CPU.

Given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,714 in PassMark and 2,132 in Cinebench R23, the 245K will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. In CPU-bound titles — typically esports games, strategy games, and simulations — the processor's high single-core performance will allow the Arc B570 to operate at its full potential. In GPU-bound titles — typically AAA action games and open-world titles at high settings — the graphics card will be the limiting factor, as its 65th percentile ranking suggests. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, and Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support broaden the API coverage.

The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the card's mid-range positioning means ray-traced titles will likely require lower resolutions or reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio) deliver solid rasterization performance, but ray tracing workloads are more demanding. For competitive gaming at 1080p with high refresh rates, this pairing should perform admirably. For 1440p gaming, the Arc B570 will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though not at the highest graphical presets in the most demanding games.

# Who Should Build It

This Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc B570 system targets users who prioritize processor performance while accepting a mid-range graphics tier. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and its statistical tie with processors like the Ryzen 9 9900X3D make it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 and PassMark multi-thread score of 43,047 indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks.

For gamers, this pairing suits those who play at 1080p resolution with high refresh rates, where the CPU's single-thread performance (4,714 PassMark, 2,132 Cinebench R23) ensures consistent frame delivery and the GPU's 65th percentile ranking provides adequate graphical horsepower. Gamers who play at 1440p will still find the system capable, though they may need to adjust settings in more demanding titles. The 10 GB of VRAM on the Arc B570 is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture quality.

Software developers will appreciate the 14 cores and 14 threads for parallel builds, the ECC memory support for data integrity, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface for fast storage access. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded strength in productivity applications, data compression (458,817 PassMark score), and encryption (33,286 PassMark score). The 3 nm process node at TSMC and 125 W TDP indicate reasonable power efficiency for a desktop platform, making it suitable for environments where energy consumption matters. The CPU's launch MSRP is $319, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 219 USD.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Arc B570 pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU combination is 78, placing it in the upper quarter of all desktop systems. This reflects the CPU's strong 91st percentile ranking tempered by the GPU's more modest 65th percentile position.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K trails the Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.3% in average benchmark score. The 245K scores 54,053 versus the Ryzen's 54,762, making the two processors statistically comparable in overall performance.

Q: What are the memory specifications of this platform?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically found in workstation environments.

Q: What is the TDP for each component, and what PSU is recommended?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 450 W, which provides adequate headroom for the combined component draw plus other system parts.

Q: Does the Arc B570 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B570 includes 18 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, though performance in ray-traced titles is limited by the card's mid-range positioning.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc B570 GPU uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. Both are built with advanced process technology.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $319, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 219 USD. These are the manufacturer's suggested retail prices at launch.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p resolution, the Core Ultra 5 245K's single-thread score of 4,714 in PassMark and 2,132 in Cinebench R23 ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly to the Arc B570. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 suggests competent 1080p performance, though the 65th percentile ranking means esports titles and less demanding games will hit high refresh rates more readily than AAA blockbusters.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded performance — 25,066 in Cinebench R23 and 43,047 in PassMark multi-thread — provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The 14 cores and 14 threads can handle simultaneous game rendering and streaming workloads, though the GPU's mid-range performance may limit the game's graphical settings while streaming.

Video Editing: The PassMark data compression score of 458,817 and floating-point math score of 130,678 indicate strong performance in video processing tasks. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among top-tier processors for timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times, making this a capable video editing workstation.

3D Rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,066 is a strong indicator of 3D rendering performance in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate GPU-based renderers, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced previews and final renders.

Software Development: The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads accelerate compilation tasks, and the PassMark integer math score of 98,524 reflects strong performance in integer-heavy workloads typical of code compilation. The ECC memory support improves reliability for long-running build processes, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface enables fast access to development tools and source repositories.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread performance of 4,714 in PassMark and 2,132 in Cinebench R23 handles everyday productivity applications with ease. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures no lag in spreadsheets, word processors, web browsers, or video conferencing. The GPU's 65th percentile position is more than sufficient for office graphics, and the 10 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for graphical applications.

# Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc B570 is a desktop-class system pairing a 91st-percentile CPU with a 65th-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 78. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename) using a 3 nm process at TSMC. The GPU is a Battlemage-generation card (Arc 5 series) based on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

The overall tier of this build is upper-mid-range, with the processor performance skewing toward enthusiast territory while the graphics performance remains solidly mid-range. The CPU's average benchmark score of 54,053 places it in competition with high-end Xeon and Ryzen 9 processors, while the GPU's average score of 20,556 aligns it with mid-range and previous-generation graphics cards. This asymmetry defines the system's character: a processor that will remain relevant for years paired with a graphics card that represents the current limiting factor for high-end gaming and GPU compute workloads.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K features 14 cores and 14 threads — a configuration without hyperthreading, meaning each core handles a single thread. The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, providing strong per-core performance. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling a substantial cache footprint that reduces memory latency in repeated workloads. The processor is built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Benchmark results indicate a well-rounded processor. The Cinebench R23 scores of 25,066 multi-core and 2,132 single-core demonstrate that the 245K handles both heavily threaded and single-threaded workloads effectively. The PassMark suite reinforces this, with a multi-thread score of 43,047 and single-thread score of 4,714. These scores translate to real-world performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and data processing — tasks that benefit from the 14-core configuration and high boost clock. The 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance in applications that cannot leverage multiple cores.

The processor includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic graphics acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use. The memory support for DDR5 through a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, combined with ECC support, makes this a viable option for workstation builds. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes (CPU only) offers high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The 125 W TDP is reasonable for the performance level, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users seeking additional performance. The release date of 2024-10-23 places this processor in the current generation, and its production status is Active, indicating ongoing availability.