SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-midrange of the market. The CPU, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU provides a solid 1080p and 1440p experience. According to the data, this combination sits at the 79th percentile among all builds, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of configurations while maintaining a balanced profile for various workloads. This analysis breaks down the individual components, their benchmark performance, and the practical implications for different user scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and utilizes the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU features 28 RT cores and 3584 shading units, with a boost clock of 2400 MHz and a base clock of 2050 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy tasks, allowing the GPU to feed its 224 TMUs and 112 ROPs efficiently. The pixel rate is listed at 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate at 537.6 GTexel/s, which are indicative of its capability to handle modern rendering workloads at high settings.

In terms of compute performance, the Arc A750 delivers 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1), making it a capable performer for general GPU compute. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming and professional APIs. The benchmark scores reflect a mixed profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and a PassMark G3D score of 12534 place the GPU in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast card, it sits comfortably above the median, offering performance that rivals like the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% delta) are close to matching. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 5368 suggests that while raw graphics rendering is solid, compute-heavy workloads will not be its primary strength, as this score is significantly lower than the G3D score.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate potential bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes. With a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, the power requirements are manageable for a mainstream desktop build. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, allowing for high-refresh-rate and high-resolution monitor connectivity. The production status is marked as End-of-life, with a successor in the Battlemage architecture, but the current driver and API support (including 12 Ultimate) means it remains a viable option for new builds.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of the Core Ultra 5 245K and Arc A750 combination?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, indicating it outperforms 79% of all documented builds in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245K compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245K has an average benchmark score of 54053, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average score of 54762, meaning the Ryzen is 1.3% faster (a deltaPct of -1.3 for the Intel part).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and type supported by the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A750 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 features 28 RT cores, specifically designed for ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Arc A750 is 289 USD.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The boost clock is 2400 MHz.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 245K and the Arc A750 is generally well-matched for a mid-range system, but the data reveals specific scenarios where one component may limit the other. The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance (PassMark Multithread score of 43047) and strong single-core capabilities (PassMark Single Thread score of 4714) mean it can feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios without being a limiting factor. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, significantly higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, suggesting that the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

In pure gaming at high resolutions, the Arc A750's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12534 is modest compared to its CPU counterpart, meaning that in titles that are heavily GPU-bound, the frame rate will be dictated by the graphics card. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression, the Core Ultra 5 245K will excel; its PassMark Physics score of 3081 and Data Compression score of 458817 indicate that the CPU will not hold back the system in these areas. The lack of measured FPS data for this pair makes precise bottleneck quantification impossible, but the percentile discrepancy (91 vs 66) implies a GPU-heavy bottleneck in gaming.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The GPU's compute score (PassMark GPU Compute of 5368) is low relative to its graphics score, meaning tasks like 3D rendering that rely on GPU compute will see the Arc A750 lag behind the CPU's processing power. The CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB of L3 cache are better suited for tasks that can utilize all threads, such as video encoding or compilation. In such scenarios, the CPU will be the dominant performer, and the GPU will serve as a secondary accelerator. Overall, the system is balanced for general use, but users should expect the Arc A750 to be the limiting factor in high-FPS gaming and GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) generation. This platform supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel configuration and up to 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature that can be beneficial for workstation and server-like applications where data integrity is critical.

The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s TDP is 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which leaves headroom for the 125 W TDP CPU and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A750 with a more powerful GPU that can leverage the CPU's performance headroom. Given that the CPU is at the 91st percentile, it can support a significantly faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck, making the GPU the primary upgrade target for improved gaming performance.

The platform itself is not the limiting factor, as the Socket 1851 and PCIe Gen 5 support are current-generation features. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is standard for dual-channel DDR5, and a move to higher-frequency kits would not be supported beyond the dual-channel architecture. The CPU's 20 PCIe lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a fast NVMe drive, but users with multiple expansion cards may need to consider a chipset-based solution. The production status of the GPU is End-of-life, so future driver support may taper off, but the CPU is Active, ensuring a longer support window for the platform.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed for high single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, as reflected in its benchmark scores. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and has an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, which provides basic display output without a discrete GPU.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25066 in multi-core and 2132 in single-core, indicating strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark Multithread score of 43047 and Single Thread score of 4714 further corroborate this, placing the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.7% faster), Intel Core i7-14700F (0.8% faster), and AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (1.3% faster), showing that the 245K is competitively positioned within a tight performance band.

The architecture's efficiency is notable, with a 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This allows for a high transistor density, contributing to the CPU’s strong performance-per-watt. The PassMark scores for specific tasks highlight its versatility: Data Compression (458817), Floating Point Math (130678), and Integer Math (98524) are all robust, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and software development. The Extended Instructions score of 37617 indicates solid AVX-512 or similar capabilities, which can accelerate certain professional workloads. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), allowing for overclocking should the user's cooling solution permit.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimated from the individual benchmark scores. The Arc A750’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggest it is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming GPU. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures at these resolutions, but the 66th percentile ranking indicates it will not handle 4K gaming at maximum settings smoothly.

The Core Ultra 5 245K’s single-thread score of 4714 (PassMark) and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2132 ensure that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, particularly at 1080p where CPU load is higher. In e-sports titles and less demanding games, the system should achieve high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, given the CPU's strong IPC and the GPU's mid-range performance. For AAA titles, the system is likely to deliver 60-100 FPS at 1080p on high settings and 50-80 FPS at 1440p, depending on the game's optimization for Intel GPUs.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support means it can handle ray tracing, but with only 28 RT cores, performance in RT-heavy titles will be lower than non-RT performance. The Vulkan 1.4 support is beneficial for modern games that utilize this API. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 70 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 72, which is unusual and may indicate driver overhead in certain DX12 titles. Overall, the gaming experience is expected to be smooth for mainstream resolutions, but users should temper expectations for 4K or high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this build is represented by the 79th percentile, which is a solid position for a mid-range desktop. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54053, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rivals being the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701, 0.7% delta), Intel Core i7-14700F (53620, 0.8% delta), and AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54762, -1.3% delta). The CPU is effectively neck-and-neck with these parts, showing that it is a high-performance processor for its class.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20556, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.2% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.4% delta). The GPU is well within 0.5% of these parts, indicating a tightly packed mid-range segment. The disparity between the CPU and GPU percentiles (91 vs 66) is significant, suggesting that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

In specific tests, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25066 and PassMark Multithread score of 43047 are indicative of a powerful workstation-class CPU. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 is moderate, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show that it performs better in compute benchmarks than in pure rasterization, although the PassMark GPU Compute score of 5368 contradicts this somewhat. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and is adequate for GPU-bound tasks, making it a good all-rounder but not a specialist in any single area.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K with the Intel Arc A750, creating a desktop system that is positioned in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The combined percentile of 79 means it outperforms 79% of all recorded builds, which is a strong showing for a system that does not feature top-tier components. The CPU is a high-end mainstream part, ranking at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is a more modest mid-range part, ranking at the 66th percentile.

The class is desktop, and the system is designed for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and gaming, with adequate GPU performance for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. The CPU’s 14 cores and 5.2 GHz boost clock make it a workhorse for multi-threaded applications, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure it can handle modern game titles at high settings. The build is not a high-end enthusiast rig, but it is a capable and balanced system for a wide range of tasks.

The overall tier is "upper-midrange," with the CPU providing a significant performance advantage over the GPU. This imbalance means that users who prioritize gaming may want to consider a more powerful GPU in the future, while those who focus on CPU-intensive workloads will find this build to be exceptionally capable. The production status of the GPU is End-of-life, which is a consideration for long-term support, but the CPU is Active, ensuring a longer platform lifespan.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are comfortable with high, but not necessarily ultra, settings in modern AAA titles. The Arc A750’s performance, as indicated by its 66th percentile and PassMark G3D score of 12534, is sufficient for smooth gameplay at this resolution. Gamers targeting 1440p can also use this build, but they may need to adjust settings to maintain high frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that e-sports titles and competitive shooters will run exceptionally well.

Content creators and software developers will benefit greatly from the Core Ultra 5 245K’s multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25066 and PassMark Multithread score of 43047 make it suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a plus for professionals who require data integrity in their workstations. Students and small business users will find this build to be a reliable and fast machine for office productivity, data analysis, and general computing tasks.

The GPU’s compute capabilities, while not its strongest suit, are still adequate for light GPU-accelerated workloads. The 28 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but this is not a primary selling point. Users who need advanced AI or machine learning acceleration may find the GPU lacking, but for general-purpose computing, this build is a solid choice. Overall, it is a versatile system that serves a broad audience, from gamers to professionals, without excelling in any single niche.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Core Ultra 5 245K’s strong single-core score (4714 PassMark) ensures that the CPU can keep up with high frame rates, while the Arc A750’s mid-range performance (66th percentile) will likely deliver 100+ FPS in less demanding titles at 1080p, though AAA games may hover around 60-80 FPS.

Streaming is a viable scenario for this build. The CPU’s 14 cores provide ample headroom for encoding the stream while maintaining game performance, as evidenced by its high multi-threaded scores. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for the game, and the system should handle 1080p streaming without significant frame drops.

Video editing is a strong suit for this system. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25066 will speed up timeline rendering and export times, while the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects processing. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing projects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or 3ds Max will rely heavily on the CPU, and the PassMark FP32 and FP64 scores (130678 and 37617 respectively) indicate solid performance. The GPU will provide modest acceleration in render engines that support it, but it is not a top-tier compute card.

Software development is an ideal workload for this build. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores (4714 and 43047) will compile code quickly, and the 24 MB of L3 cache helps with repetitive tasks. The system’s ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running build processes.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking ensures snappy application launches and multitasking, while the GPU is more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and light photo editing. The system’s 79th combined percentile makes it a high-performing machine for everyday tasks, with no component acting as a significant bottleneck in these scenarios.