SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

54,053 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc A380: A Desktop Pairing of Extremes

This desktop build pairs Intel’s 14-core Arrow Lake processor with the company’s entry-level Arc A380 graphics card, creating a system where the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all processors stands in stark contrast to the GPU’s 44th percentile position. The combination yields a 68th percentile overall build score, indicating a machine that excels in processor-heavy tasks while remaining modest in graphics performance. The data shows a system with substantial compute capability for productivity workloads, but one that will require careful expectation-setting for gaming scenarios.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This entry-level Alchemist-generation part packs 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance sits at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, with FP16 reaching 8.397 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

Memory configuration includes 6 GB of GDDR6 across a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. This narrow bus and modest capacity place the A380 firmly in entry-level territory, though the bandwidth figure is adequate for its intended resolution targets. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT workloads, though their computational throughput is limited by the overall GPU scale.

The A380’s benchmark results paint a picture of a graphics card that handles basic rendering tasks competently but struggles with demanding modern titles. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 808 points, a figure that reflects its position near the bottom of discrete GPU performance charts. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 38,224 and 36,736 respectively indicate functional compute capability, but PassMark results tell a more nuanced story. DirectX 9 scores of 73 are relatively strong, while DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores drop to 37, 38, and 35 respectively. This pattern suggests the architecture performs better with legacy APIs than with modern graphics workloads.

The PassMark G3D score of 6,252 places the A380 at the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with its average benchmark score of 8,558 sitting within 1.4% of the AMD Radeon 880M and 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The closest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8,595, a delta of -0.4%. These comparisons reveal that the A380 occupies a performance tier typically associated with mobile or integrated-class graphics rather than desktop discrete cards. For rendering workflows, the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provide basic hardware-accelerated features, but the low VRAM capacity and narrow memory bus will limit texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K delivers benchmark scores that place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Cinebench R23 multi-core results reach 25,066 points, while single-core performance hits 2,132. The R20 tests show 15,368 multi-core and 2,169 single-core, with R15 producing 3,850 multi-core and 322 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 43,047, single-thread of 4,714, and an average benchmark score of 54,053.

The CPU’s nearest rivals demonstrate its competitive positioning. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701, a delta of 0.7% behind the Ultra 5. The Intel Core i7-14700F achieves 53,620, trailing by 0.8%. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 posts 53,469, a 1.1% deficit. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D leads with 54,762, a -1.3% delta relative to the Ultra 5. These tight margins show the 245K sitting in a crowded performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate competitors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 8,558 places it at the 44th percentile, with rivals clustered closely. The AMD FirePro W5170M leads slightly at 8,595, while the AMD Radeon HD 8870M trails at 8,462. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 posts 8,458, and the AMD Radeon 880M manages 8,436. The A380’s PassMark G3D score of 6,252 and GPU compute score of 2,762 illustrate its modest compute capabilities.

The combined build percentile of 68 reflects a system where the CPU’s strength dominates the overall assessment. The data shows a processor that outperforms 91% of all CPUs, paired with a GPU that only exceeds 44% of its peers. This creates a significant performance disparity, with the CPU capable of feeding far more graphics data than the A380 can process. For users prioritizing processor-intensive workloads, this pairing makes sense; for graphics-focused applications, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D in benchmark scores?

A: The Ultra 5 245K has an average benchmark score of 54,053, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 54,762. This represents a delta of -1.3%, meaning the Ryzen 9 leads by about 1.3% in average performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A380 features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, delivering 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What DirectX version does the Arc A380 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the Arc A380 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX330?

A: The Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8,558, which is 1.2% higher than the GeForce MX330’s 8,458. The A380 also has a higher PassMark G3D score of 6,252.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has a TDP of 125 W, while the Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ultra 5 245K includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output option alongside the discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU in this build is substantial, and benchmark data reveals where bottlenecks will occur. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and average score of 54,053 stand in stark contrast to the GPU’s 44th percentile and average score of 8,558. In gaming scenarios, the A380 will almost certainly be the limiting factor, as its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 35 and 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 808 indicate a graphics processor that cannot fully utilize the Ultra 5’s processing headroom.

For CPU-heavy workloads such as data compression, where the Ultra 5 scores 458,817 in PassMark, or floating-point math at 130,678, the GPU plays a minimal role. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 43,047 in PassMark demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability that will be fully exercised in rendering, compilation, or scientific computing tasks. In these scenarios, the A380’s limitations in VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth become secondary considerations.

The bottleneck analysis shows a system where the CPU operates at only a fraction of its potential in graphics-intensive applications. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s will constrain frame rates in modern games, while the CPU remains largely idle. Conversely, in productivity applications that leverage the CPU’s 14 cores and 24 MB of L3 cache, the system performs admirably, with the GPU handling only basic display output and light acceleration.

The 68th combined percentile reflects this imbalance. Users will experience excellent responsiveness in CPU-bound tasks, but the GPU will limit gaming performance at any resolution above 1080p. The estimated FPS figures, discussed later, reinforce this assessment, showing that the A380’s 44th percentile position places it in a performance tier where even CPU-intensive games will be GPU-limited.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S. It represents Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2 and is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. The base clock runs at 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. This desktop processor uses Intel Socket 1851 and has a TDP of 125 W.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 64 execution units. Released on October 23, 2024, the processor has a launch MSRP of $319 and remains in active production.

Benchmark data shows the Ultra 5 245K performing strongly across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,132 and multi-core score of 25,066 indicate balanced performance. PassMark results further detail the processor’s capabilities: integer math scores 98,524, floating-point math reaches 130,678, and extended instructions hit 37,617. Data encryption scores 33,286, while data compression achieves 458,817. Physics simulation scores 3,081, and random string sorting posts 55,098. Prime number finding scores 414.

The average benchmark score of 54,053 places the Ultra 5 at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals within 1.3% in either direction. The 14-thread configuration, while lacking hyper-threading, still delivers strong multi-core performance through its physical cores. For real workloads, this translates to rapid compile times, efficient video encoding, and responsive multi-tasking. The single-thread score of 4,714 in PassMark indicates excellent performance in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The 5.20 GHz boost clock provides headroom for burst workloads, while the 14 cores handle parallel tasks effectively.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users whose workloads prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. The Ultra 5 245K’s 91st percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or other multi-threaded applications where the 14 cores and 25,066 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide substantial throughput. Data scientists and developers will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 33,286 and extended instruction score of 37,617, which indicate strong performance in cryptographic and SIMD-heavy workloads.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU’s capabilities sufficient for compilation, simulation, and data analysis tasks, while the A380 GPU handles basic graphics requirements for coursework and research. Small business workstations running productivity suites, database management, or light virtualization will perform well, as the CPU’s 43,047 PassMark multi-thread score ensures smooth operation under concurrent workloads.

For gamers, this build is best suited to 1080p esports titles and older games where the A380’s DirectX 9 score of 73 and DirectX 11 score of 38 can provide playable frame rates. The GPU’s 44th percentile position means modern AAA titles at high settings will struggle, but users who prioritize CPU performance for streaming or recording while gaming may find the balance acceptable. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support offers a clear upgrade path for users who find the A380 insufficient. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate substantially more powerful graphics cards, and the 125 W TDP leaves ample thermal headroom in most systems. The Arc A380’s suggested PSU of 250 W indicates that a system with this GPU has minimal power requirements, making upgrades to higher-tier graphics cards feasible without immediate PSU changes.

Memory support for DDR5 with ECC capability provides flexibility for professional workloads, and the dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth can be expanded as needed. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional CPU performance, though the 5.20 GHz boost clock already provides strong out-of-box speeds. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors suggest efficient power delivery, with the 125 W TDP keeping cooling requirements modest.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the A380 with a more capable GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck mainstream graphics cards. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the system for next-generation storage and graphics, while the 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores ensure the CPU remains relevant for years. The production status of the CPU is active, indicating ongoing availability and driver support, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting that users should plan for a graphics upgrade before CPU replacement.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, a 14-core Arrow Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Alchemist-generation GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all processors and average benchmark score of 54,053 place it firmly in high-performance territory, while the GPU’s 44th percentile and average score of 8,558 position it at the lower end of discrete graphics. The combined percentile of 68 reflects a system that excels in processor-intensive tasks but remains modest in graphics performance.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary system designed for productivity and light gaming rather than mobile use. The pairing represents a significant CPU-to-GPU imbalance, with the processor capable of supporting far more graphics horsepower than the A380 provides. For users who prioritize multi-threaded workloads, content creation, or software development, this system offers exceptional CPU performance. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A380 will be the limiting factor, and users should consider upgrading the graphics card to fully leverage the CPU’s capabilities. The 68th combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms most desktops overall, driven primarily by its strong processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Arc A380’s 44th percentile ranking and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 35 suggest that gaming performance will be limited, particularly in modern titles that leverage DX12 features. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 reinforces this assessment, indicating entry-level DirectX 12 performance.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark scores and 6 GB VRAM capacity, estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely fall below 30 FPS in demanding AAA titles, while esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant might achieve 60 FPS or higher due to their lighter graphics requirements. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 4,714 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU will cap overall throughput. At 1440p, the A380’s 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 96-bit bus would likely result in sub-30 FPS performance in most modern games. The 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides enough compute for 1080p gaming at medium settings in less demanding titles, but the narrow memory bus and limited VRAM will cause texture streaming issues at higher resolutions.

Users should expect this build to handle older games and indie titles comfortably, with the CPU’s 91st percentile ensuring no processor-related frame drops. For current-generation AAA games, the A380 will require significant settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates, and ray tracing features will be largely unusable given the 8 RT cores’ limited throughput. The estimated figures should be treated as approximations, as actual performance varies by game optimization and driver maturity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds