SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 245 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in a desktop configuration that sits at the 91st combined percentile of all builds. This pairing combines a 14-core Arrow Lake processor with a flagship Blackwell GPU, creating a system that delivers top-tier performance across both productivity and gaming workloads. The data indicates a desktop build with a combined percentile of 91, placing it in the upper echelon of systems, with an average FPS across games of 236.7 at 1080p. The benchmark results show a machine that is heavily weighted toward GPU performance, which has significant implications for balance, gaming experience, and target users.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, and features 14 cores and 14 threads. This is a desktop-class processor that operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, with a TDP of 65 watts, making it a relatively efficient part that does not require high-end cooling. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU sits on Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2.

The benchmark scores for the CPU reflect a strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 32924 points in the multi-core test and 4648 points in the single-core test. These are high marks that indicate a processor capable of handling both heavy multi-threaded workloads and tasks that rely on single-thread performance. The single-core score of 4648 is particularly significant, as it suggests that the CPU can handle older games and applications that are not well-optimized for multiple cores. In PassMark, the single-thread score is 4394, while the multi-thread score is 38706, which further supports the processor's balanced performance profile. The CPU's average benchmark score is 48995, and it sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows how it stacks up. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average score of 49196, a -0.4 percent difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is also close with a 49228 average score, a -0.5 percent difference. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is slightly behind with a 48698 average, a 0.6 percent difference. The Intel Core i5-14600K is a close competitor as well, with a 48618 average and a 0.8 percent difference. These numbers indicate that the Core Ultra 5 245 is competitive, but not a clear winner in its immediate class, as it is essentially on par with these rivals. The multi-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23, was 32924, which is competitive but lower than the 7900, which is a 12-core processor. The single-core performance is where the processor shows strength, with the 4648 score in R23 single-core being a high mark. For a 65-watt processor, the data shows a good balance between efficiency and performance. The processor's PassMark data compression score of 400942, data encryption of 30236, and extended instructions of 33304 show that it is capable in specific workloads, while the floating point math score of 120548 and integer math of 91187 are also strong. The processor is not unlocked, meaning it is a locked multiplier, which is a consideration for users who plan to do heavy overclocking. The processor also has an integrated graphics solution, the Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, which is a basic iGPU that can handle light tasks, but it is not a gaming solution. The processor supports 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a good amount for a single GPU and some storage. The data shows that the Core Ultra 5 245 is a solid performer in the mid-range to upper-mid-range class, with a good balance of multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, but it is not a top-tier processor in terms of absolute performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 32924, which places it in the 90th percentile for all CPUs. The single-core score of 4648 is also a strong result. In the PassMark suite, the CPU scores 38706 in multi-thread and 4394 in single-thread. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 48995, which is a figure that is slightly lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which both have average scores around 49,200. The data shows that the CPU is in a tight grouping with these rivals. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and the Intel Core i5-14600K are also in the same range, with scores of 48698 and 48618, respectively. This means that the Core Ultra 5 245 is essentially on par with these processors, with a difference of less than 1 percent in the average benchmark score. This is a strong result, as it means that the CPU is capable of competing with other top-tier processors in its class. The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, is a different beast. It has a benchmark score of 77712 in the average, and it sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 14326 points, which is a high number. In PassMark, the G3D score is 44065, and the G2D score is 1487. The GPU compute score is 28396. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, which has an average score of 76904, a 1.1 percent difference, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, which has an average score of 78940, a -1.6 percent difference. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and 16 GB are also in the same range, with scores of 79396 and 79605, respectively. The data shows that the RTX 5090 D is slightly ahead of the RX 6650M XT, but slightly behind the RX 6850M XT and the Tesla P100. This is a high-end GPU, but it is not the absolute top performer in its class. The combined percentile of the build is 91st, which is a high number, but it is not the absolute highest. The pair rank by FPS is 12 out of 3732 pairs, and the average FPS across games is 236.7. This is a very strong average, indicating that the build is capable of high frame rates in most games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is a 90th percentile part, while the GPU is a 92nd percentile part. This means that the GPU is slightly stronger than the CPU, which can lead to the CPU being the bottleneck in some scenarios. The CPU's performance is competitive with its rivals, but the GPU is a performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4394 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 indicate that the CPU is capable of high single-thread performance, which is important for gaming. However, the GPU's raw power is so high that in many games, the CPU will be the limiting factor, especially at lower resolutions. Looking at the frame rate data, the FPS scales well with resolution. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the game runs at 392 FPS at 1080p, 260 FPS at 1440p, and 145 FPS at 4K. This shows that the CPU is able to push high frame rates, but the GPU is still the primary driver. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rates are 116 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p, and 57 FPS at 4K. This shows a more balanced load, where the GPU is heavily utilized. At 1080p, the CPU is often the bottleneck, as the GPU is so fast that it waits for the CPU to send data. At 4K, the GPU is more likely to be the primary bottleneck, as the resolution demands more from the GPU. The data shows that the pair rank by FPS is 12 out of 3732 pairs, which is a top 1% ranking. This indicates that this is one of the fastest combinations for gaming. In the CPU's FPS average is 236.7, which is high. The CPU is a 14-core processor, and for the heavy multi-threaded workloads, it is a good performer, but it is not a top-tier in terms of a high core count. The GPU is a massive performer, and the build is balanced overall, but the GPU is the stronger component. In terms of a bottleneck, it is more likely that the CPU is the limitation in some games, especially at lower resolutions. In 1080p, the CPU is often the bottleneck, as the GPU is able to handle the load, but the CPU cannot keep up. In 1440p and 4K, the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, as the higher resolution increases the load on the GPU. The data shows that the build is balanced, but the GPU is the stronger component in a majority of workloads.

Gaming Performance

The gaming performance data is extensive, with the measured frames per second in a variety of titles. At 1080p, the build delivers an average of 227.6 FPS across all games. This is a high number, and it indicates that the build is more than capable of high-refresh. In Counter-Strike 2, the build reaches 392 FPS at 1080p, 260 FPS at 1440p, and 145 FPS at 4K. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the frame rates are even higher, with 866 FPS at 1080p, 596 FPS at 1440p, and 352 FPS at 4K. These are extremely high frame rates, which are typical for a build with such a powerful GPU. In Valorant, the build reaches 575 FPS at 1080p, 545 FPS at 1440p, and 506 FPS at 4K, which shows that the game is heavily dependent on the CPU, and the CPU is able to deliver. In Roblox, the frame rates are 507 FPS at 1080p, 338 FPS at 1440p, and 191 FPS at 4K, which is a high frame rate. In Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, the frame rates are 466 FPS at 1080p, 306 FPS at 1440p, and 168 FPS at 4K. In Minecraft, the frame rates are 386 FPS at 1080p, 327 FPS at 1440p, and 127 FPS at 4K. These are all high frame rates, indicating that the build is a top performer. In more demanding titles, the frame rates are lower, but still high. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rates are 116 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p, and 57 FPS at 4K. In Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rates are 105 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. In The Medium, the frame rates are 82 FPS at 1080p, 69 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rates are 57 FPS at 1080p, 36 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K. In Control, the frame rates are 163 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 83 FPS at 4K. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the frame rates are 142 FPS at 1080p, 114 FPS at 1440p, and 84 FPS at 4K. The data shows that in demanding games, the build can still achieve high frame rates, but the 4K is the most challenging. The average FPS across all games is 233.68, which is a very high number. The data is measured, meaning the frame rates are from actual testing, not estimates. The performance in 4K is still strong, with many games achieving over 60 FPS, but the most demanding games like Ark and Cyberpunk are below 60 FPS at 4K. The build is a top performer, and the data is a strong indicator of a high-end gaming experience.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who wants the top-tier gaming performance. The data shows that the build is a 91st percentile performer, and it is capable of high frame rates at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. A gamer who wants to play at 1080p with high refresh rates will be well-served, as the build can achieve 392 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 575 FPS in Valorant. The high frame rates are also beneficial for competitive gamers. The build is also a good fit for content creators, such as video editors and 3D artists, as the CPU is a strong 90th percentile performer, and the GPU is a 92nd percentile performer. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is high, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924, which is a good mark for rendering. The GPU's performance is also a high tier. The build is also suitable for software developers, as the CPU's single-thread performance is good, and the GPU can be used for compute. The build is a desktop, so it is for a user who wants a stationary PC. The data is measured for the FPS, and the build is a high-end. The build is not for a budget-conscious user, but for a user who wants a top-tier performer. The build is also a good fit for a user who wants a machine that can handle both gaming and productivity tasks, as the CPU and GPU are both strong.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The build is a top-tier for high-refresh gaming. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rates are 392 FPS at 1080p, and in Valorant, they hit 575 FPS. This is a machine that can handle a 240Hz monitor with ease.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is good, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924. This allows for streaming and gaming simultaneously, as the CPU can handle the encoding and the game. The GPU also has hardware encoders, which are fast.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-core score is high, and the GPU is a 92nd percentile performer. The GPU is a good for video editing, as it can accelerate rendering. The CPU is also a solid performer.

3D Rendering: The GPU is a good performer, and the GPU is a strong for rendering. The CPU is also a solid performer, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 38706, which is a good mark.

Software Development: The CPU's single-thread performance is high, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648. This is good for compilation tasks that rely on single-thread. The GPU is also a good for compute.

Student and Office Work: The CPU is a good performer for office tasks, and the GPU is a high-end for any heavy tasks. The build is overkill for a student, but it is a good performer.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 91, meaning it outperforms 91% of all builds.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 watts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the socket for the current LGA 1851 platform. This is a platform that supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a good amount for a single GPU and a few storage devices. The GPU is a PCIe 5.0 x16 card, which is a modern interface. The TDP of the CPU is 65W, which is a low power. The GPU has a TDP of 575W, and the suggested PSU is 950W. This means that a 950W PSU is required for the build. The upgrade path is limited, as the socket is for the current generation, and the next generation may use a different socket. The CPU is not unlocked, so the overclocking is limited. The memory is DDR5, and the user can upgrade to a higher capacity. The storage is supported by the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The upgrade path is to a higher-end CPU, such as a Core Ultra 7 or 9, or to a more powerful GPU, but the GPU is already a top-tier. The platform is a desktop, so there is no mobile upgrade.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is a 32 GB GDDR7 card with a TDP of 575W. The build is in the 91st percentile for combined performance, and it is a top-tier performer. The CPU is a 90th percentile performer, and the GPU is a 92nd percentile performer. The GPU is slightly stronger than the CPU, but the build is balanced. This is a high-end build that is designed for gaming and heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, GB202, has a die size of 243 mm², and it contains 92,200 million transistors. The GPU has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The clock speeds are a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz. The memory is 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The GPU has a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The GPU also has a TDP of 575W and a suggested PSU of 950W, and it is a dual-slot card. The GPU's performance is strong, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14326, and a PassMark G3D score of 44065. The GPU's average benchmark score is 77712, and it is in the 92nd percentile. The GPU is a high-end performer, but it is not the absolute top, as it is slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT and the NVIDIA Tesla P100. The GPU is a good for 4K gaming, and it can handle high frame rates at lower resolutions. The GPU is also a strong for compute workloads, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 28396. The GPU's memory bandwidth is high, which is good for high resolutions and texture-heavy workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU is a high-end card that is a strong performer in a range of workloads.