SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM pairing represents a desktop build that sits at the 70th percentile overall, combining a modern Arrow Lake processor with an Ampere-generation graphics card. This analysis examines the available benchmark data to interpret what this combination offers, noting that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, placing it firmly in the Core Ultra Series 2 generation with the Arrow Lake-S architecture. The CPU communicates over a Gen 5 PCIe implementation with 20 lanes available from the processor itself, while the GPU in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the graphics card has ample bandwidth for its class, and the platform leaves headroom for future storage or expansion devices that could take advantage of the newer Gen 5 standard.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with the system providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The board supports ECC memory, which is notable for users who prioritize data integrity in workstation tasks. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 14-core desktop processor, and the GPU carries a 220 W TDP. The suggested PSU for this combination is 550 W, which indicates that a standard mid-range power supply should suffice without excessive headroom for overclocking — and the CPU multiplier is locked, so enthusiasts should not plan on manual overclocking of the processor.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU rather than the CPU. The processor sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, which is substantially higher than the GPU's 50th percentile position. Replacing the RTX 3070 TiM with a newer-generation card would likely yield the most significant performance improvement, while the current processor has enough headroom to support a faster GPU without becoming the primary bottleneck. The platform's Gen 5 PCIe support also future-proofs the system for next-generation storage devices, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory controller is sufficient for the processor's bandwidth needs.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 delivers strong multi-threaded performance across Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32924 multi-core and 4648 single-core. The R20 results show 13828 multi-core and 1952 single-core, while R15 yields 3318 multi-core and 468 single-core. These numbers position the processor at the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48995.

The nearest rival data places this CPU in a tight competitive cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, which is 0.4% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, 0.5% higher. On the other side, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 (0.6% lower) and the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48618 (0.8% lower). This means the Core Ultra 5 245 is essentially level with these four rivals, with deltas all under one percentage point. The practical takeaway is that users upgrading from an i5-14600K would see roughly a 0.8% average improvement, which is within run-to-run variance.

PassMark results show the CPU achieving 38706 in multithreaded tests and 4394 in single-threaded tests. Data compression scores 400942, while encryption reaches 30236. Extended instructions score 33304, floating-point math hits 120548, and integer math reaches 91187. Physics tests yield 2569, random string sorting scores 49140, and prime number finding scores 365. The combined picture is a processor that excels at mixed workloads, with particularly strong floating-point and integer math performance that indicates solid all-around compute capability rather than specialization in any single domain.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data, so its performance must be inferred from its 50th percentile position among all GPUs. This places it at the midpoint of the GPU performance distribution, which is a significant gap below the CPU's 90th percentile standing. The combined 70th percentile for the build reflects this imbalance, sitting between the two component percentiles.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, and no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries exist. Therefore, all gaming figures in this section are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and percentile positions, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and the CPU's 90th percentile performance, this system should be capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most titles, but the exact frame rates will vary substantially by game. The RTX 3070 TiM's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for current titles at these resolutions, though texture-heavy games may approach the VRAM limit at maximum settings.

The CPU's strong single-threaded score of 4648 in Cinebench R23 suggests that it can feed the GPU effectively in CPU-bound scenarios, while the multi-threaded score of 32924 indicates that background tasks and streaming overhead will not cripple gaming performance. However, since the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, users should expect that graphics settings will need to be tuned to achieve high refresh rates in demanding titles. Esports and competitive games that are less GPU-intensive should run at very high frame rates given the CPU's single-thread performance, while AAA titles at ultra settings will likely see the GPU become the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the two components. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means that in gaming workloads, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the bottleneck in the vast majority of scenarios. The GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0 in the data, which prevents direct numerical comparison, but the percentile gap of 40 points is stark.

For productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the primary driver, and its 90th percentile position means it will not hold back most applications. The nearest rival data shows the Core Ultra 5 245 within 0.8% of the i5-14600K and Ryzen 9 7900, so users coming from those platforms should not expect a dramatic uplift. The bottleneck analysis suggests that a GPU upgrade would be the most impactful change to this system, as the CPU has substantial headroom to support a faster graphics card without becoming the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling picture, while estimated, reinforces this view. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance could allow the GPU to reach its maximum output, but the GPU's mid-pack positioning will cap absolute frame rates. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's 50th percentile performance becomes even more limiting, as pixel throughput demands scale with resolution. The 220 W GPU TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate that there is power headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future, which aligns with the bottleneck analysis.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors based on the Arrow Lake architecture.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245 compare to the Intel Core i5-14600K?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995, which is 0.8% higher than the i5-14600K's 48618. This difference is minimal and likely not noticeable in real-world usage.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it at the midpoint of the performance distribution.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 5 245 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, based on the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The GPU is on an 8 nm process at Samsung with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but are willing to accept mid-range GPU capability for gaming. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where multi-threaded performance directly translates to faster compile times and shorter render durations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and PassMark multithread score of 38706 indicate that the processor can handle demanding compute workloads without breaking a sweat.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions who prioritize frame rate over maximum graphical fidelity will find the RTX 3070 TiM adequate, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking means they should temper expectations for ultra settings in the latest AAA titles. Students and small business users will appreciate the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP, which keeps power costs down and allows for quieter cooling solutions. The ECC memory support makes this build attractive for users running long-duration compute tasks where memory errors could corrupt results, such as scientific simulations or financial modeling.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor with no hyperthreading, meaning each core handles one thread. Base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the processor is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² area, and the cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that performs strongly in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 is competitive, while the multi-core score of 32924 shows that all 14 cores scale well under load. The PassMark results paint a nuanced picture: data compression scores 400942, which is excellent for file archiving and database workloads, while encryption at 30236 and extended instructions at 33304 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. Floating-point math at 120548 and integer math at 91187 show balanced compute capability, while physics at 2569 and prime number finding at 365 are lower but not unusual for this class of processor.

The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor in the upper tier of desktop computing, and the nearest rival data shows it trading blows with established chips like the Ryzen 9 7900 and i5-14600K. The locked multiplier means overclocking is not possible, so users must rely on the factory boost behavior. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU in this build will handle all graphics workloads.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, creating a system that sits at the 70th combined percentile. The CPU is a modern Arrow Lake part from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is an Ampere-generation card that is now end-of-life. The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower or workstation form factor rather than a laptop.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mid-to-upper range: the CPU at 90th percentile is high-end, the GPU at 50th percentile is mid-range, and the combined 70th percentile reflects the GPU pulling the system down from the CPU's level. This is not a flagship build, but it is a capable system that can handle a wide range of tasks, with the CPU being the clear star of the show. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current games, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with the most demanding titles at maximum settings.

The build's strengths lie in CPU-bound workloads: software compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing will all benefit from the 14-core Arrow Lake processor. The GPU is sufficient for mainstream gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, but users who prioritize gaming performance should consider this a starting point for future upgrades rather than a final destination.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4648 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, but the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile ranking limits maximum frame rates. Competitive shooters and esports titles should run at high refresh rates, while demanding AAA games will require settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 14 cores and strong multi-threaded score of 32924 in Cinebench R23, allowing simultaneous gameplay and encoding without significant frame drops. The PassMark data compression score of 400942 also helps with stream encoding efficiency, though the GPU's mid-range position means streamers should use NVENC rather than CPU encoding to preserve gaming performance.

Video editing workflows will see strong performance from the CPU's floating-point math score of 120548 and integer math score of 91187, which accelerate effects processing and timeline scrubbing. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with large media files, and the ECC memory support provides peace of mind for long rendering sessions where a single bit error could ruin hours of work.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will rely heavily on the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 indicates that CPU-based rendering will be reasonably fast. GPU rendering with the RTX 3070 TiM is possible but will be limited by the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's 50th percentile performance.

Software development benefits from the 14 cores and fast single-thread performance, reducing compile times for large projects. The PassMark integer math score of 91187 and extended instructions score of 33304 indicate strong performance for code compilation and test execution. The Gen 5 PCIe lanes also support fast NVMe storage for quicker build and test cycles.

Student and office work is handled easily by this system, with the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP keeping power consumption low and the integrated graphics providing a backup display option. The 90th percentile CPU ranking means that even demanding academic workloads like data analysis or machine learning preprocessing will run smoothly, though the GPU's mid-range position limits deep learning training performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip using the Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The GPU contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 46 RT cores for ray tracing and 184 tensor cores for AI acceleration. Clock speeds are 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost, yielding a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that this card is exactly average in the current GPU landscape. It is end-of-life, which means it is no longer in production, and its predecessor and successor are the GeForce 20 and GeForce 40 series respectively. The 220 W TDP requires a triple-slot cooler and a single 8-pin power connector, with the card measuring 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 46 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 50th percentile performance means it will be outclassed by newer cards. The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based features, which can help offset the modest raw performance. The 8 GB VRAM is becoming a limitation for modern games and professional rendering at high resolutions, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional. The GPU's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future software.