SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

48,995 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Intel Arc A310E form a desktop pairing that sits in the 70th percentile of all combined CPU and GPU configurations. The processor is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S part built on a 3 nm process, while the graphics card is an entry-level Alchemist-generation part with 4 GB of VRAM. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Core Ultra 5 245 delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, which places it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. That strong single-thread performance is the foundation for high frame rates in esports and competitive titles, where CPU speed often dictates maximum FPS. However, the Arc A310E’s FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB of VRAM will limit achievable frame rates at high refresh rates, particularly at 1440p or above. The pairing is better suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming at medium settings than for pushing maximum frame rates in demanding AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 14 threads provide solid headroom for encoding and broadcasting simultaneously with gameplay. In PassMark’s multithread test, the processor scores 38706, which is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (deltaPct -0.5) and the Intel Core i5-14600K (deltaPct 0.8). The GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores and has a modest 75 W TDP, so software encoding on the CPU is the practical approach. The processor’s data encryption score of 30236 further supports its capability to handle the additional background load of streaming software without introducing stutter.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 places the CPU comfortably in the upper tier of desktop processors. With 14 threads available, timeline scrubbing and export tasks will benefit from the parallel processing power. The GPU’s 768 shading units and 32 TMUs provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, but the 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance when working with large 4K timelines or complex composites. For 1080p editing workflows, this is a capable combination; for 4K or heavy effects work, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this workload. Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13828 and R15 multicore score of 3318 indicate strong sustained performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s 6 ray tracing cores and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance allow it to participate in GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM capacity will prevent rendering of large scenes that exceed local memory. The processor’s PassMark floating point math score of 120548 reinforces its capability for physics simulations and numerical computing tasks common in rendering pipelines.

Software development: The 14-thread configuration handles compilation workloads effectively, with the PassMark integer math score of 91187 demonstrating strong arithmetic throughput. The processor’s L3 cache of 24 MB shared across all cores reduces latency when accessing frequently used data structures. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for developers working on reliability-critical applications, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for fast NVMe storage that accelerates build times.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially overprovisioned for typical productivity tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4394 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheet manipulation. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU mean the system can be cooled quietly with minimal airflow, making it suitable for shared spaces like dorm rooms or libraries. The GPU’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors for research and writing workflows, though the total system cost is higher than necessary for document-centric use.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 245 achieves an average benchmark score of 48995 across all tested workloads, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (deltaPct -0.4), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at 49228 (deltaPct -0.5), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H at 48698 (deltaPct 0.6), and the Intel Core i5-14600K at 48618 (deltaPct 0.8). The processor sits within 1% of all four rivals, indicating that its performance envelope is tightly clustered with these established parts.

In single-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 4648 and PassMark single-thread score of 4394 demonstrate strong per-core performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications. The multi-threaded picture is equally strong: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 32924, while PassMark multithread scores 38706. The PassMark data compression score of 400942 and random string sorting score of 49140 indicate robust memory subsystem performance, while the extended instructions score of 33304 confirms good SIMD throughput.

The Arc A310E has no benchmark entries in the database, and its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, placing it at the median of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is reported as 0 due to missing data. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 70, reflecting a strong processor paired with a mid-pack graphics solution. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of the build: the CPU is a top-decile performer, while the GPU is an entry-level part.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, meaning this configuration outperforms approximately 70% of all CPU and GPU pairings in the database. The CPU alone sits in the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245 compare to the Intel Core i5-14600K?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995, while the Core i5-14600K scores 48618. This represents a deltaPct of 0.8, meaning the Ultra 5 245 is approximately 0.8% faster on average across all benchmark workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A310E?

A: The Arc A310E has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, achieved through a 64-bit memory bus using GDDR6 memory running at an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 245 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a total memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Core Ultra 5 245?

A: The boost clock speed is 5.10 GHz, while the base clock is 3.50 GHz. The processor has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the Arc A310E include?

A: The Arc A310E includes 6 ray tracing cores. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The GPU is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers: This configuration targets gamers who play at 1080p resolution with medium to high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4648) ensures consistent frame pacing, while the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS are adequate for current esports titles and older AAA games, but will struggle with the latest releases at high settings.

Content creators on a CPU-centric workflow: Video editors and 3D artists who rely primarily on CPU rendering will find the 14-thread processor highly capable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 is competitive with workstation-class parts, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long render jobs. The GPU provides basic acceleration for previews and effects, but is not the primary compute engine.

Software developers: The combination of 14 threads, 24 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity makes this a strong platform for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The processor’s PassMark data encryption score of 30236 supports secure development workflows.

Students and small business workstations: For users who need a responsive desktop for office applications, web browsing, and light content creation, this build offers substantial headroom. The low TDPs (65 W CPU, 75 W GPU) mean the system runs cool and quiet, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Not recommended for: High-resolution gaming at 1440p or 4K, GPU-accelerated rendering with large scenes, or machine learning workloads that benefit from tensor cores (which this GPU lacks). The 4 GB VRAM is a hard constraint for modern game textures and large datasets.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename), part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The processor is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This process node represents a significant advancement in transistor density, contributing to the chip’s 65 W TDP.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation parts. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, enabling fast connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

In benchmark terms, the processor delivers 32924 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4648 in single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 38706 and single-thread score of 4394. The data compression score of 400942 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance that benefits archiving and file operations. The physics score of 2569 indicates solid computational physics capability.

The nearest rival comparison shows the Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% faster than the Core i5-14600K and 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, but 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. These differences are within measurement noise, meaning the processor trades blows with these established parts across various workloads. The 90th percentile ranking confirms its position as a high-end desktop processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist (Arc 3 generation). It uses the DG2-128 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The card has a transistor density of 45.9 million transistors per square millimeter.

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory runs at an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operations pipelines. It includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. There are no tensor cores listed.

Clock speeds are fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost. The compute throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 75 W and requires no power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W.

With a percentileVsAllGpus of 50, this GPU sits exactly at the median of all graphics cards. However, the lack of benchmark data means this percentile may not fully reflect its real-world performance. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation, constraining texture resolution and scene complexity. The 64-bit memory bus also limits bandwidth, which will affect performance at higher resolutions and with memory-intensive effects.

The card is end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-03-31. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage. The display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. The socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, providing substantial bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The processor’s multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported through multiplier adjustment.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The card is single-slot with dimensions of 168 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width, making it suitable for compact cases.

The power requirements are modest: the CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU alone. This leaves substantial headroom for system components. A typical 500-650 W PSU would provide ample capacity for this configuration plus storage and peripherals.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its 90th percentile ranking and performance parity with the Ryzen 9 7900 and Core i5-14600K. Replacing the Arc A310E with a more powerful graphics card would immediately improve gaming performance and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth GPUs.

Another upgrade path is memory capacity. The dual-channel DDR5 configuration supports expansion, and the ECC capability is useful for users who value data integrity. The 24 MB L3 cache is fixed, but adding more system memory can improve performance in memory-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop configuration pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 CPU with the Intel Arc A310E GPU. The build class is desktop, meaning components are designed for stationary tower or small form factor systems. The CPU is a high-end mainstream processor, while the GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life part.

The combined percentile of 70 indicates this system outperforms 70% of all CPU and GPU pairings in the database. This figure is heavily weighted by the CPU’s strong performance (90th percentile), while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The asymmetry between component tiers is the defining characteristic of this build.

The CPU’s release date is 2025-01-06 with a launch MSRP of $270, placing it in the upper mid-range pricing tier. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The CPU is in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting this pairing may be transitional for users planning a GPU upgrade.

The system is best described as a CPU-first build, where the processor provides exceptional compute capability for productivity and content creation, while the GPU handles basic graphics duties and light gaming. The 70th percentile combined ranking reflects this balance, positioning the system above average but not at the enthusiast tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry is stark: the CPU ranks in the 90th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 50th percentile. This creates a significant bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads. In gaming, the Arc A310E will be the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, as its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM are far below what the CPU can feed.

Evidence from FPS scaling: since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, estimates must be derived from component specifications. The GPU’s 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus are typical of entry-level cards, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 4648 (Cinebench R23) is sufficient to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. This suggests that at 1080p with low settings, the GPU will max out before the CPU becomes a limiting factor.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck reverses. The GPU’s 768 shading units can accelerate certain tasks, but the CPU’s 14 threads will dominate in multi-threaded applications like video encoding and 3D rendering. The PassMark multithread score of 38706 confirms the CPU’s capability, while the GPU’s lack of benchmark data makes its contribution difficult to quantify.

The memory system presents another potential bottleneck. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is higher than the GPU’s 124.0 GB/s, but the GPU’s 4 GB capacity can cause texture thrashing in modern games. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache mitigates some memory latency, but the GPU has no such compensation.

Ultimately, the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU is the dominant component for productivity and content creation. Users seeking balanced performance should prioritize a GPU upgrade.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A310E’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM suggest playable frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at medium settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4648) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, with no CPU-induced stutter in these lightly threaded games.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor. Games released in the last few years typically require more than 4 GB VRAM at high settings, causing texture quality to be reduced or causing memory overflow. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also constrain performance in open-world games with large streaming landscapes.

At 1440p or 4K, this GPU is inadequate for modern gaming. The pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are insufficient to drive high resolutions at acceptable frame rates. The CPU would remain underutilized in these scenarios, as the GPU would be fully saturated.

Ray tracing performance is limited by the 6 ray tracing cores, which are the entry-level implementation in Intel’s Alchemist architecture. Games with heavy ray tracing effects will see significant frame rate drops. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern ray-traced titles, but performance will be modest at best.

For users who prioritize gaming, this configuration is acceptable for 1080p esports and older titles, but will disappoint for modern AAA gaming at high settings. A GPU upgrade to a mid-range or high-end card would unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential.