SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Core Ultra 5 235T and Arc B580 pairing forms a desktop configuration that sits at the 77th combined percentile, indicating a system that is well above average but not at the extreme high end. The CPU holds an 86th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. This percentile gap suggests the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning in most workloads the GPU will be the first component to reach its limit.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,561 positions it nearly identically to the Intel Core i5-14500, which scores 38,531 (a 0.1% delta). This near-parity indicates the 235T delivers essentially the same compute throughput as a well-established mid-range desktop processor. The GPU's average score of 23,021 places it within 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,895) and just 0.7% behind the RTX 3080 (23,172), which is remarkable given the architectural differences.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the 14-core, 14-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock will keep up with demanding workloads, but the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will be the limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The data shows a system where the CPU has headroom to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but GPU-bound workloads will see the Arc B580 reach its ceiling first. For productivity tasks that rely heavily on CPU multi-threading, the 26,232 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides ample compute, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth become the constraint in large texture workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip packs 19,600 million transistors across a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a fixed base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Rendering capabilities are defined by 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for its class. The 20 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, while FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and FP16 of 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) define the compute ceiling. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs fully.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,068 and PassMark G3D score of 15,748 place this GPU in the 68th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all graphics cards tracked. Geekbench scores of 92,821 (OpenCL) and 109,672 (Vulkan) show strong compute performance under heterogeneous workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7,729 is notably lower than the G3D score, suggesting the card's raw compute throughput is less dominant than its graphics rendering performance.

The 190 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU indicates moderate power requirements. The dual-slot card measures 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width, with a single 8-pin power connector. Display output includes one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections, supporting modern high-refresh displays. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for this performance class, though it does halve the lane count compared to x16 implementations.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 235T achieves 26,232 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,703 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, scores are 11,017 multi-core and 1,555 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2,644 multi-core and 373 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score reaches 30,918, with single-thread at 4,339. These CPU benchmarks consistently place the processor at the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 38,561.

The nearest rival comparison shows the CPU trailing the Intel Core i5-14500 by just 0.1%, ahead of the Intel Xeon w3-2525 by 0.4%, and ahead of the Intel Core 9 270H and Core Ultra 9 285H by 0.6% and 0.7% respectively. This tight clustering means the 235T is competitive with a range of desktop and mobile processors, though the delta percentages are small enough to be within run-to-run variance.

The Arc B580's benchmark results show a GPU that punches above its percentile ranking. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 and PassMark G3D score of 15,748 demonstrate solid DirectX 12 rendering performance. The average GPU benchmark score of 23,021 places it at the 68th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23,061 (0.2% ahead), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23,172 (0.7% ahead) and the RTX 2080 at 22,895 (0.6% behind).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is comparatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile means the processor can handle more demanding computational tasks than the graphics card can feed in gaming scenarios. For mixed workloads, the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most cases, but the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically intensive titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the LGA 1851 socket for Arrow Lake desktop processors. The architecture is Arrow Lake-S, built on a 3 nm process from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5, providing 20 lanes. This gives ample bandwidth for a modern graphics card and NVMe storage. The motherboard platform supports PCIe Gen 5, which is forward-compatible with the Arc B580's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface — the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds, which is its native implementation.

The system's power requirements are well defined. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 190 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which accounts for the combined draw plus system overhead. This leaves headroom for additional drives or peripherals without requiring an oversized power supply.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the component most likely to benefit from replacement. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it will remain competitive for several generations, while the GPU's 68th percentile leaves more room for improvement. A user could move to a higher-tier graphics card while keeping the same platform, as the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU will not bottleneck any current GPU. The 65 W CPU TDP also means the platform can accommodate more power-hungry processors in the future without changing the power supply, provided the PSU has sufficient capacity beyond the 450 W suggested for the current GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family. It runs at a base clock of 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The passmark data reveals distinct workload characteristics. Integer math scores 84,244, while floating-point math reaches 106,546 — the FP advantage indicates strong performance in scientific and engineering calculations. Data compression scores 295,100, which is an exceptionally high mark, while data encryption scores 23,457. Extended instruction set performance hits 23,212, and prime number finding scores 318, a relatively weak result that suggests the integer-heavy algorithm is not this processor's strength. Random string sorting scores 35,377, and physics simulation scores 2,157. Single-thread performance at 4,339 in PassMark is solid for a mid-range desktop part.

The Cinebench results provide additional context. The R23 multi-core score of 26,232 against a single-core score of 3,703 shows a multi-core scaling factor of roughly 7x, which is reasonable for 14 cores at 14 threads. The R20 scores of 11,017 multi-core and 1,555 single-core follow a similar pattern. The R15 scores of 2,644 multi-core and 373 single-core continue this trend.

The processor's 86th percentile ranking places it ahead of most CPUs tracked in the database. The average benchmark score of 38,561 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14500 at 38,531, differing by just 0.1%. This suggests the 235T offers comparable performance to a well-known mid-range desktop processor, making it a predictable choice for workstation builds. The unlocked multiplier is not available — the multiplier is locked — so overclocking is not a feature of this processor. The launch MSRP was $247.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 235T and Intel Arc B580. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. All frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile, the gaming performance of this system will be GPU-limited in most titles. The Arc B580's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality and modern game assets at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 and PassMark G3D score of 15,748 indicate the GPU handles DirectX 12 workloads efficiently, which is the dominant API for modern games.

The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 4,339 in PassMark ensure that frame pacing will be stable in CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with many NPCs or strategy titles with complex simulations. The 24 MB L3 cache helps maintain low latency for game assets that are frequently accessed. The GPU's 20 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for RT effects, though the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute will limit the quality settings at which ray tracing can run smoothly.

For esports titles and less demanding games, this system should achieve high frame rates at 1080p. For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU will be the constraint, and users should expect to adjust settings to maintain smooth gameplay. At 4K resolution, the Arc B580's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for maximum settings in most modern games — the GPU will need reduced texture quality or resolution scaling. The CPU will not be the limiting factor at any resolution, as its compute and memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s) are sufficient for feeding the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, placing the system above roughly three-quarters of all tracked configurations.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 235T compare to the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235T has an average benchmark score of 38,561, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500's 38,531. This makes them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the processor does not support overclocking.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B580 is 450 W.

Q: What memory type does the Core Ultra 5 235T support?

A: The processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count of the GPU?

A: The Arc B580 is built on TSMC's 5 nm process and contains 19,600 million transistors across a 272 mm² die.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T processor with the Intel Arc B580 graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with a 190 W TDP. The system targets the mid-range desktop market, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 77.

The build class is desktop, meaning this is a stationary workstation or gaming PC rather than a mobile solution. The CPU's near-parity with the Intel Core i5-14500 (0.1% delta) establishes it as a solid mid-range processor, while the GPU's proximity to the RTX 2080 (0.6% delta) and RTX 3080 (0.7% delta) in average benchmark scores places it in the upper-mid-range graphics tier. The overall tier, based on the 77th combined percentile, is firmly in the upper half of all tracked builds, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming as well as productivity workloads.

The system is balanced toward CPU-heavy tasks, with the processor outperforming the GPU relative to their respective peers. This makes the build well-suited for mixed workloads that include both computational and graphics tasks, such as content creation with occasional gaming. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU provides headroom for modern game textures and GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock handle single-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks efficiently.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p resolution and are willing to adjust settings for AAA titles. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-quality textures at these resolutions, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,339 PassMark single-thread) ensures stable frame pacing. Esports players will find the 5.00 GHz boost clock sufficient for high-refresh monitors at lower resolutions.

Content creators working with video editing or photo processing will benefit from the CPU's 26,232 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's OpenCL score of 92,821. The 14 cores handle multi-threaded rendering tasks, while the GPU accelerates effects and encoding workloads. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 84,244 and data compression score of 295,100, which speed up build times and archive operations.

Students and small business users running office applications, web development, or light data analysis will find this system more capable than needed for their workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile means it will not bottleneck for these tasks, and the GPU's compute capability (13.67 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate scientific computing in Python or MATLAB. Users who require ECC memory should note that this platform does not support it, so mission-critical server workloads are not the intended use case.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 4,339 PassMark single-thread score ensure the processor can keep up with high frame rates, while the GPU's 68th percentile means it will be the limiting factor in most titles. Users should expect to run competitive games at high settings but may need to lower settings in demanding AAA titles to maintain frame rates above 100 FPS.

Streaming gameplay adds a CPU load for encoding, but the 14-core, 14-thread configuration with a 26,232 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides enough headroom to encode video while gaming, assuming the GPU is not fully saturated. The 65 W CPU TDP means thermals will not be a concern during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage both components. The CPU's 11,017 Cinebench R20 multi-core score handles timeline operations and exports, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and color grading. The 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces bottlenecks when working with 4K footage.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will benefit from the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and multi-threaded performance, but the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute will be the primary renderer for Cycles or similar GPU-accelerated engines. The 20 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, improving render times for scenes with ray-traced lighting.

Software development workloads, including compilation and testing, are CPU-bound and will run efficiently with the 84,244 PassMark integer math score. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code modules, while the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports parallel builds.

Student and office work involving document creation, spreadsheets, and web browsing will run effortlessly on this hardware. The CPU's 86th percentile ensures there is no performance ceiling for these tasks, and the system's 65 W plus 190 W power draw means it can run on a standard office power circuit without issue.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds