SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

38,561 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, which represents Intel's transition to a tiled, disaggregated design philosophy. The chip integrates 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die, a density that reflects the advanced process node. With a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, this is a processor that prioritizes efficiency at idle and burst performance under load — the 65 W TDP confirms that positioning, making it suitable for systems where thermal and power envelopes are constrained.

The cache hierarchy is substantial. Each core receives 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache, while a shared 24 MB L3 cache pools resources across the entire chip. This arrangement benefits workloads that exhibit temporal locality, such as compiling code or running database queries, where repeated access to the same data structures can be served from faster cache levels. The core count — 14 cores and 14 threads — means there is no hyperthreading, so the processor relies entirely on physical cores. For heavily threaded applications, this can be a limitation compared to CPUs that offer simultaneous multithreading, but the high boost clock partially compensates in single-threaded scenarios.

Benchmark results illustrate the CPU's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 26,232 points, while the single-core score is 3,703. Those figures place the chip in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors currently tracked. The PassMark suite provides additional granularity: multithread score of 30,918, single-thread score of 4,339, integer math at 84,244, floating-point math at 106,546, and extended instructions at 23,212. Data compression scores 295,100, while encryption hits 23,457. Physics simulation in PassMark yields 2,157, and random string sorting — a proxy for memory access patterns and branch prediction efficiency — reaches 35,377. Prime number finding, which stresses integer throughput and loop efficiency, scores 318.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database offer context. The Intel Core i5-14500 averages 38,531, which is just 0.1% different from the Ultra 5 235T's average of 38,561. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 trails by 0.4% with 38,392. The Intel Core 9 270H and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H are 0.6% and 0.7% behind, respectively, with average scores of 38,335 and 38,312. This clustering suggests that the Ultra 5 235T sits at a performance plateau shared by several recent mid-range and high-end parts, where architectural differences translate to only marginal benchmark deltas. The practical implication is that users upgrading from any of these rivals would see negligible gains in raw compute — the differences are within noise for most real-world workloads.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which narrows its appeal for mission-critical server deployments but is irrelevant for gaming and mainstream content creation. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units means the chip can drive displays without a discrete GPU for basic tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-512, and represents the Alchemist generation of Arc 7 products. Manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, the GPU packs 21,700 million transistors into a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The chip is now end-of-life in production status, with Battlemage listed as its successor, but it remains a capable discrete graphics solution for desktop builds.

Memory configuration is a highlight. The A770 carries 16 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory capacity is generous for the GPU's class, enabling large texture sets and high-resolution assets without spilling into system memory. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB frame buffer allows complex scenes with numerous high-resolution textures, ray-traced geometry, and multi-sample anti-aliasing to reside entirely on the GPU.

The compute configuration is robust. Shading units number 4,096, with 256 texture mapping units and 128 raster output pipelines. The 32 ray tracing cores provide dedicated hardware for RT workloads, while the absence of a tensor core count in the fact pack means AI-accelerated features rely on the general-purpose compute units. Clock speeds are set at a 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. Pixel rate reaches 307.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 614.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. These figures indicate a GPU that can handle substantial parallel compute, though it lags behind the highest-tier offerings from other vendors in raw throughput.

Benchmark scores place the A770 in the 90th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2,969, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 109,175 and Vulkan scores 94,284. The average benchmark score is 68,809. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69,000 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68,562 (0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69,870 (1.5% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69,986 (1.7% ahead). These deltas are small, placing the Arc A770 in a competitive band where architectural differences — not raw throughput — determine suitability for specific tasks.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connections, enabling multi-monitor setups with high refresh rates at 4K or higher. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for data transfer rates that do not bottleneck the GPU's compute capabilities. Power requirements include a 225 W TDP, with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The dual-slot cooler design should fit standard ATX cases without clearance issues.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from CPU and GPU benchmarks is one of balanced mid-to-high-tier performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,561 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average of 68,809 places it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 88, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 88% of tracked configurations.

Specific CPU scores bear closer examination. Cinebench R23 multicore at 26,232 is a strong result for a 65 W part, suggesting efficient power delivery and thermal management. The single-core score of 3,703 reflects the 5.00 GHz boost clock, which is competitive with higher-TDP desktop chips. Cinebench R20 scores of 11,017 multicore and 1,555 single-core follow the same trend, as do R15 scores of 2,644 multicore and 373 single-core. The PassMark multithread score of 30,918 and single-thread score of 4,339 corroborate these results, showing consistency across different benchmark suites.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses geometry, shading, and ray tracing. Geekbench OpenCL at 109,175 and Vulkan at 94,284 indicate strong compute performance in both APIs, with OpenCL leading Vulkan by roughly 16%. The 90th percentile GPU ranking means the Arc A770 outperforms most discrete GPUs in the database, including several professional workstation cards with higher average scores but similar percentile placement.

When combined, these scores suggest a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks and handles modern game rendering at high settings. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile are close enough that neither component dramatically overshadows the other, though the GPU holds a slight edge in relative standing. For users prioritizing GPU-bound workloads like rendering or gaming, the Arc A770 is the stronger component; for CPU-bound tasks like compilation or physics simulation, the Ultra 5 235T carries the load.

Balance and Bottleneck

Analyzing which component limits which workload requires examining the percentile differential and the nature of the benchmark scores. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile, the GPU at the 90th — a 4-point gap that indicates the GPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its own peers. This skew suggests that in heavily GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with ray tracing enabled, the Arc A770 will be the limiting factor only at extreme settings. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics-heavy simulations or single-threaded game logic, the Ultra 5 235T will cap performance.

The FPS scaling evidence — though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,157 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 indicate that the GPU is capable of high frame rates at 1080p, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4,339 ensures that game logic threads will not be the primary bottleneck in most titles. However, for esports titles that run at very high frame rates (300+ FPS), the CPU's 14 non-hyperthreaded cores may struggle to feed the GPU, as those games often rely on 2-4 threads with high IPC demands.

Memory bandwidth plays a role in balance. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is adequate for its class, while the GPU's 512.0 GB/s is disproportionately higher. In mixed workloads where data must transfer between CPU and GPU — such as streaming with hardware encoding or physics computed on the CPU alongside GPU rendering — the PCIe Gen 5 x16 link (20 lanes) provides ample bandwidth, but the CPU's memory bandwidth could become a constraint if multiple CPU cores are simultaneously writing to system memory while the GPU streams textures.

For 1080p gaming, the balance favors the GPU being the primary bottleneck, as resolution is low enough that the GPU can achieve high frame rates, but the CPU must maintain those rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiter, and the CPU's percentile advantage over its own peers matters less. For productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the application: video editing with GPU acceleration will lean on the Arc A770, while 3D rendering with CPU-based engines will lean on the Ultra 5 235T. The combined percentile of 88 reflects this balanced design — neither component severely bottlenecks the other in typical usage.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T has 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyperthreading. It operates at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what memory bandwidth does it provide?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which is 16 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores and how do they compare to rivals?

A: The CPU scores 26,232 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3,703 in single-core. Its average benchmark score of 38,561 is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i5-14500 and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon w3-2525.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and which rivals are closest?

A: The Arc A770 sits in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68,809. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX is 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% behind.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No. ECC memory is not supported, which limits its suitability for mission-critical servers. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What graphics APIs does the GPU support?

A: The Arc A770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 32 ray tracing cores and 4,096 shading units.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, meaning this configuration outperforms 88% of tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 90th.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and its 90th percentile ranking indicate strong rasterization performance. At 1080p, the Arc A770 should deliver high frame rates in most titles, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in competitive shooters and AAA games at high settings, given the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 4,339 will support these frame rates without bottlenecking at standard refresh rates (60-144 Hz).

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB frame buffer becomes an advantage, allowing ultra textures and high-resolution assets. The 3DMark score suggests the GPU can maintain 60+ FPS in demanding titles at this resolution, though ray tracing workloads will stress the 32 RT cores, potentially dropping frame rates by 30-50% depending on the game. The CPU's contribution at 1440p diminishes, as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, but the 86th percentile CPU ensures consistent frame pacing.

At 4K, the Arc A770 will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding titles without upscaling or reduced settings. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the GPU's raw compute — 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate — is below what top-tier GPUs offer for 4K ultra settings. The CPU will not be the limiting factor at this resolution; the GPU's pixel throughput and shading rate will cap performance. For users targeting 4K, DLSS-style upscaling or medium-high settings would be necessary, though the GPU's Vulkan score of 94,284 suggests strong driver optimization in that API.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's high boost clock and the GPU's fast rasterization should enable frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p, though the lack of measured data means exact figures cannot be stated. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,339 and the GPU's 614.4 GTexel/s texture rate support this expectation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 86th percentile ranking, combined with the GPU's 90th percentile and 19.66 TFLOPS, support 1080p and 1440p gaming at refresh rates up to 144 Hz. The 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for texture-heavy titles. Esports titles should comfortably exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, based on the benchmark scores, though exact figures are estimates.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 non-hyperthreaded cores provide adequate headroom for game capture and encoding while the GPU handles rendering. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 RT cores allow simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant frame drops, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-based enhancement features are unavailable.

Video editing: The GPU's 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,232 handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 16 GB VRAM allows 4K timelines with multiple layers to fit in GPU memory, reducing reliance on system RAM.

3D rendering: CPU-based render engines will leverage the Ultra 5 235T's 26,232 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which is competitive with other mid-range desktop chips. GPU-based renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles with OptiX-style acceleration) will use the Arc A770's 4,096 shading units and 32 RT cores, though the GPU's 90th percentile ranking means it will be slower than top-tier workstation GPUs.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache, with PassMark integer math at 84,244 indicating strong throughput. The 65 W TDP allows sustained all-core loads without thermal throttling in standard cases, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded build steps.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile are overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 EU can drive displays without the discrete GPU, allowing power savings by disabling the A770 when not needed, though the system is designed for the discrete GPU to be active.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T with the Intel Arc A770, representing a mid-to-high-tier system from the Core Ultra Series 2 and Arc 7 (Alchemist) generations. The CPU is an active production part released in January 2025, while the GPU is end-of-life, having launched in October 2022. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary, full-power system rather than a laptop or compact form factor.

The combined percentile of 88 places this build above 88% of tracked configurations, with the GPU contributing a 90th percentile rank and the CPU an 86th percentile. This is a well-balanced pairing for its class, avoiding the trap of pairing a flagship CPU with a weak GPU or vice versa. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP imply a total system draw that is manageable with a 550 W power supply, as suggested for the GPU. The CPU's launch MSRP is $247, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 329 USD — these are the only pricing figures available and are stated once here.

The architecture is modern on both sides: Arrow Lake for the CPU (3 nm, TSMC) and Xe-HPG for the GPU (6 nm, TSMC). The CPU supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — a match that does not bottleneck the GPU's bandwidth. The 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM is a standout feature for this tier, exceeding what many competing GPUs offer. The system is suitable for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, content creation, and general productivity, with the GPU providing strong compute for rendering and the CPU providing efficient multi-threading.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p with high settings will find this build appropriate. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM handle modern AAA titles, while the CPU's 86th percentile ensures no significant bottleneck at these resolutions. For 4K gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, so users expecting 4K ultra settings should look elsewhere. Esports enthusiasts will benefit from the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and the GPU's fast rasterization, enabling high refresh rates.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or digital art will appreciate the 16 GB VRAM for large projects and the CPU's 26,232 Cinebench R23 multicore score for export tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will leverage the 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache, with PassMark integer math at 84,244 indicating strong build performance. Students and office workers will find the system more capable than needed for everyday tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity for future software requirements.

Small business workstations that run database queries, virtualization, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's compute capability, though the lack of ECC memory is a consideration for critical data integrity. The GPU's end-of-life status means driver updates may become less frequent over time, which is a risk for long-term deployments. The suggested PSU of 550 W indicates the build fits into standard mid-tower cases with typical power supplies, making it accessible for DIY builders.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) family. This socket is not forward-compatible with older LGA 1700 coolers or motherboards, so any upgrade to a different CPU generation would require a new motherboard. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and the current 102.4 GB/s bandwidth can be improved by selecting higher-speed DDR5 kits, though the memory controller's limits are not specified in the fact pack.

PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe SSDs and future GPUs that take advantage of Gen 5 bandwidth. The current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible and does not bottleneck the Arc A770's performance. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU, as the Arc A770 is end-of-life and its successor (Battlemage) is listed in the fact pack. The CPU's 86th percentile and 65 W TDP leave room for a more powerful GPU without requiring a CPU upgrade, as the PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 memory support will not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU. The suggested PSU of 550 W may need to be increased for a higher-power GPU, but the fact pack specifies 550 W for the current configuration, so any upgrade should verify power requirements.

The CPU itself is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not possible via multiplier adjustments. Users seeking performance gains would need to rely on the 5.00 GHz boost clock, which is already high, or upgrade to a higher-tier Arrow Lake CPU on the same socket. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 kits could provide marginal gains in memory-sensitive workloads, given the dual-channel 102.4 GB/s baseline. The platform overall is modern and has room for storage expansion via PCIe Gen 5, but the socket's longevity beyond the current generation is unverified, making future CPU upgrades dependent on motherboard support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235T + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds