SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235H + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

37,522 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This CPU and GPU pairing represents a mobile platform with a significant performance imbalance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a high-end mobile processor, sitting at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A770M is a mid-range mobile GPU, ranking at the 62nd percentile. The data shows a clear processor-heavy configuration, where the CPU’s capabilities will frequently outpace the GPU’s ability to render frames in graphically intensive tasks. This analysis is based solely on synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HK?

A: The benchmark results indicate a near tie. The Ultra 5 235H has an average benchmark score of 37522, which is a mere 0.3% higher than the Core i9-13900HK's 37425. In practical terms, the data shows negligible performance difference between these two processors.

Q: What is the single-threaded performance of the Core Ultra 5 235H?

A: The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3613 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4359. These figures indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

Q: Is the Arc A770M more comparable to a desktop GPU or a mobile GPU?

A: According to the benchmark data, its average score of 18383 is 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159) and 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373). This places it firmly in the mid-range mobile GPU tier.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A770M?

A: The GPU has a 256-bit memory bus using GDDR6 memory, which provides a total bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth for a mobile GPU.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 235H support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK indicates that the CPU has `eccMemory: false`. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 74. This indicates that, overall, the system is expected to outperform about three-quarters of all other laptop configurations in the database.

Q: Which component is likely to limit gaming performance?

A: The data strongly suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 62nd percentile. In gaming workloads, the lower-performing GPU is likely to be the bottleneck, preventing the powerful CPU from reaching its full potential.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is expected to be limited by the GPU. While the Core Ultra 5 235H’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3613) can handle game logic, the Arc A770M’s 62nd percentile standing suggests it may struggle to consistently hit very high frame rates at demanding settings in the latest titles. The data indicates a capable, but not top-tier, gaming experience.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from a strong CPU, and the data shows this processor is well-suited for the task. The multi-core might of the 235H, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25598 and 85th percentile ranking, provides ample headroom for encoding video while running a game. This is a scenario where the CPU’s strength helps compensate for the GPU’s more modest position.

Video editing software often leverages both CPU and GPU. The high CPU performance, with a Passmark multithread score of 30091, will accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing that are not GPU-accelerated. For GPU-accelerated effects and export, the Arc A770M’s 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be utilized, but its overall performance tier may not match the CPU's speed.

3D rendering is heavily multi-threaded, and this is where the Core Ultra 5 235H excels. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10751 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle complex rendering tasks. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport previews, but final frame rendering will be a CPU-dominated process, making this a viable, if not top-tier, option for 3D artists.

Software development involves compiling code, which is a parallel task. The 14-core, 14-thread configuration of the 235H will provide significant speedups during builds, as reflected in its high Passmark multi-thread score of 30091. The GPU is less critical here, meaning the system’s overall performance in this scenario is dictated by the strong CPU.

For student and office work, this configuration is overpowered. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in productivity suites and multitasking. The dedicated GPU is unnecessary for these tasks, but its presence does not detract from the system’s capability. The data suggests this laptop would handle any office or academic workload with ease.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a 14-core, 14-thread mobile processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. This is a high-performance part designed for the mobile segment, fitting into the Intel BGA 2049 socket.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a very capable processor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25598 is exceptional for a mobile chip, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This score is a 0.3% improvement over the Intel Core i9-13900HK's 37425 average score, indicating that the Ultra 5 235H is at the top of its class. The single-core performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3613, which ensures responsive system interaction and strong performance in applications that rely on a single thread.

The processor’s memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache. For connectivity, it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc Graphics 140T, which can serve as a fallback, but this system includes a dedicated GPU. The Passmark scores for integer math (74247) and floating-point math (93509) further demonstrate its balanced compute capabilities across different workload types.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a significant performance imbalance in this laptop build. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 62nd percentile. This 23-point gap strongly suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU is more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is, creating a scenario where the system cannot fully utilize the CPU’s potential in gaming.

In gaming, the frame rate is typically dictated by the GPU. The Arc A770M, with its Passmark G3D score of 11774, will likely be the primary constraint. The 235H’s strong single-core performance means it is less likely to be the bottleneck at lower resolutions, but at higher resolutions and in graphically demanding scenes, the GPU will hit its limit first. The CPU will be waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the balance shifts completely. The Arc A770M’s performance becomes secondary, and the workload is driven by the 235H’s multi-core capabilities. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30091 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25598 indicate that this CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads, making the system a powerful workstation for these tasks. The bottleneck is the component with the lower relative performance, and in this case, it is dependent on the workload: the GPU for graphics, and neither for CPU-heavy tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H delivers top-tier CPU benchmark scores. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25598 and a single-core score of 3613. In Passmark tests, it scores 30091 in multi-thread and 4359 in single-thread. Its average benchmark score is 37522, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-13900HK, which it leads by 0.3%, and the Intel Core i5-13600K, which leads it by 0.4%. This shows that its performance is directly comparable to some of the best desktop and mobile chips from the previous generation.

The Intel Arc A770M presents a contrasting picture. Its Passmark G3D score is 11774, and it achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278. Its average benchmark score is 18383, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in the mid-range tier, with its closest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 460, which it leads by 0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which it leads by 1.2%. The combined percentile for this build is 74, reflecting the system's overall position due to the strong CPU and mid-range GPU. The data clearly shows a platform where the CPU is a generation ahead of the GPU in relative performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users who prioritize heavy multi-threaded CPU workloads. The Core Ultra 5 235H’s 85th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, engineers running simulations, and content creators rendering 3D scenes or encoding high-resolution video. For these users, the system’s performance is dictated by the powerful CPU, and the GPU is a secondary consideration.

Gamers at high resolutions, such as 1440p or 4K, are not the primary target. While the system can run games, the GPU's 62nd percentile position means it will be the limiting factor. A gamer in this segment would find the CPU’s power underutilized. However, gamers who also stream or create content could benefit from the CPU’s headroom for encoding.

Students and office workers would find this system to be exceptionally fast, but it is over-provisioned for their needs. The data suggests that while it can easily handle all productivity tasks, the same performance could be achieved with a lower-tier CPU and GPU. The target user is a professional who needs top-tier mobile CPU performance for demanding computational tasks, not a pure gaming enthusiast.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame rate data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores of the individual components. The Arc A770M’s 62nd percentile and Passmark G3D score of 11774 suggest it can handle modern games, but its performance tier is mid-range.

Estimated frame rates will be most dependent on the GPU. In less demanding e-sports titles, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3613) will allow the GPU to push high frame rates. For graphically demanding AAA games, the GPU will likely become the bottleneck, and settings may need to be lowered to achieve smooth performance. The 16 GB of VRAM is a positive factor, as it will prevent memory-related stuttering in games with high-resolution textures. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is also sufficient for the GPU’s compute capabilities. These estimates indicate a system that is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings, but it is not designed for maximum frame rates in the most demanding titles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs a top-tier mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a 14-core processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the Intel Arc A770M is a dedicated GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combination results in a system at the 74th overall percentile, indicating a performance level above the majority of laptops.

The core identity of this build is its CPU. The 235H is a high-performance processor that ranks in the 85th percentile, making it one of the most powerful mobile chips in the database. The GPU, ranking in the 62nd percentile, is competent but does not match the CPU’s position. This creates a system that is defined by its processing power rather than its graphical capabilities. The pairing is logical for a mobile workstation or a high-performance productivity laptop, offering substantial compute power for professionals on the go.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is a dedicated mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture. It uses the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process, and contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. It features 32 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, and offers FP32 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS. The base clock is 1650 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Its benchmark performance, with a Passmark G3D score of 11774, places it in the mid-range category. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2278 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494 align with this ranking.

In rendering workloads, the GPU can assist with real-time viewport rendering, but its compute performance is secondary to the CPU in final frame production. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing for large scenes and textures to be loaded without issue. The data suggests that the A770M is a capable GPU for 1080p gaming and light-to-moderate creative work, but it is not a high-end solution for 4K gaming or professional-grade 3D rendering. Its performance is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, indicating it is a solid, but not exceptional, mobile graphics option.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235H + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds