SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

37,522 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Arc A570M pairing is a high-performing mobile combination that sits near the top of the hardware hierarchy, with a combined percentile rank of 87. The data indicates a balanced partnership where the CPU leads in single-threaded and multi-threaded compute tasks, while the GPU provides substantial graphics throughput, though neither component is the clear bottleneck in most scenarios. This analysis is based entirely on benchmark scores and hardware specifications, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in overall capability, but their workload distribution differs significantly. The CPU holds an 85th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU achieves an 88th percentile rank among all GPUs. This 3-point difference is negligible, suggesting that neither component is likely to be a persistent bottleneck in most applications.

In CPU-heavy tasks, the Core Ultra 5 235H demonstrates strong performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,598 and a single-core score of 3,613. This places it within 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600K in average benchmark score, indicating that the mobile chip is competitive with desktop-class processors. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,091 further confirms its capability in parallel workloads.

For GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A570M delivers an OpenCL score of 58,239, which is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA P102-100. This suggests that at higher resolutions where GPU load increases, the Arc A570M can keep pace with the CPU's output. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory provide sufficient data throughput for modern game textures and rendering tasks.

The bottleneck analysis shifts based on workload type. For lightly threaded tasks like data encryption (PassMark score: 23,121) or single-threaded operations (PassMark single-thread score: 4,359), the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock is the limiting factor, and the GPU remains underutilized. Conversely, in floating-point math (PassMark score: 93,509) and extended instruction workloads (PassMark score: 23,354), the CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads are the primary drivers, with the GPU contributing little.

Gaming performance is where the balance becomes most critical. With no measured FPS data available, estimates from the benchmark scores suggest that at 1080p, the CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core: 3,613) will often be the limiting factor for high-refresh-rate scenarios, while at 1440p and above, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 ray tracing cores will determine frame rates. The data indicates a system that can handle both CPU-intensive strategy games and GPU-heavy action titles, but not necessarily at maximum settings simultaneously.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235H is built on the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU cannot be upgraded independently; any CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard or complete system replacement. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is adequate for the CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and should not bottleneck the Arc A570M's 224.0 GB/s VRAM bandwidth.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the bandwidth of the CPU's available lanes. This mismatch does not create a significant bottleneck in practice, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and frame buffer are the more critical factors. For storage, the Gen 5 lanes allow for high-speed NVMe SSDs, which can improve load times and texture streaming in open-world games.

The CPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 28 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 watts. Combined, this creates a total system power draw of approximately 103 watts for the core components, not including memory, storage, display, and other peripherals. This is a modest power envelope for a laptop, suggesting that a well-designed cooling solution and a battery of sufficient capacity can sustain performance without severe thermal throttling. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP," which indicates it is an integrated graphics processor, and its display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the manufacturer determines the video output configuration.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited. Users cannot swap the CPU or GPU, but they can potentially upgrade memory and storage. Moving to a higher-capacity DDR5 or LPDDR5X kit could improve performance in memory-sensitive applications, though the dual-channel controller and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are already robust. For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider external GPU enclosures if the laptop supports Thunderbolt, though this is not specified in the data. Otherwise, the primary upgrade is to a new system with a newer CPU and GPU generation.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare to the Intel Core i9-13900HK?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235H has an average benchmark score of 37,522, which is 0.3% higher than the Core i9-13900HK's 37,425. This indicates nearly identical overall CPU performance, despite the i9 traditionally being a higher-tier product.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Arc A570M has an average benchmark score of 58,239, which is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT's 58,392. This places the mobile GPU within a negligible margin of a high-end desktop card in OpenCL compute workloads.

Q: Is this CPU good for multi-threaded tasks like video rendering?

A: Yes. The CPU scores 25,598 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 10,751 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 30,091. These results place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong parallel processing capability.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for the CPU's cache hierarchy and GPU data needs.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A570M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features. It also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, which is low for a 14-core processor. This indicates efficient power management, especially when combined with the GPU's 75-watt TDP for a total core power draw of approximately 103 watts.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU is soldered to the BGA 2049 socket. Users cannot adjust clock multipliers to boost performance beyond the factory 2.40 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clocks.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is designed for laptop users who need a balance of CPU and GPU power for demanding applications. The 85th percentile CPU rank and 88th percentile GPU rank indicate that this system targets enthusiasts and professionals who require high performance without stepping into workstation-class hardware.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions are the primary beneficiaries. The CPU's single-core score of 3,613 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM handle modern game graphics. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 ray tracing cores allow for high-quality settings, though maximum ray tracing effects may be demanding.

Content creators will find the 14-core CPU valuable for video editing and 3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,598 and PassMark data compression score of 301,979 indicate strong performance in codecs, file archiving, and rendering tasks. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 aids in GPU-accelerated effects and export processes.

Software developers and data scientists can leverage the CPU's floating-point math score of 93,509 and integer math score of 74,247 for algorithm development and data processing. The PassMark data encryption score of 23,121 supports secure workloads, though the lack of ECC memory may be a limitation for enterprise-grade reliability.

Students and small business users in engineering or design fields will appreciate the combination's ability to run CAD software and simulation tools. The CPU's 18 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce latency in iterative computations, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for visualization.

Gaming Performance

Important note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not verified results. The dataIsMeasured field is false for this system.

Based on the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23: 3,613) and the GPU's compute capabilities, this system is estimated to deliver smooth gaming performance at 1080p and playable frame rates at 1440p. At 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 4,359 in PassMark suggest high frame rates in esports titles and competitive shooters, where CPU-bound physics and game logic are critical.

For AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide sufficient throughput for modern game engines. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance will likely drop when ray tracing is enabled at high settings. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p textures, but 1440p games with high-resolution texture packs may approach capacity limits.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest for this resolution, and frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles without adjusting settings to medium or high. Games with heavy draw distances or particle effects will be especially demanding.

The CPU's 14 threads provide ample headroom for modern games that use multiple cores, and the PassMark physics score of 1,985 indicates good performance in physics simulations. However, games that are poorly optimized for multi-threading will rely on the single-core performance, which is competitive but not top-tier.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, providing a balanced configuration for rasterization and compute tasks.

Memory performance is a key strength. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth is a critical factor in maintaining frame rates in texture-heavy scenes.

The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by its FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These figures place it in the mid-range of mobile GPUs, suitable for gaming and content creation. The 16 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will require lower resolutions or settings.

The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p displays, but they may limit performance at 4K. The GPU's clock speeds are 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, which are relatively low, but the 75 W TDP keeps power consumption in check for a laptop form factor.

The GPU's OpenCL benchmark score of 58,239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.3% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% lower). This suggests the A570M punches above its mobile class in compute tasks, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering and scientific computing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and codenamed Arrow Lake-H. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, a advanced node that contributes to its efficiency. The CPU has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 28 watts.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in workloads with high data reuse, such as database queries and compression algorithms. The PassMark data compression score of 301,979 reflects this strength.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for server-style workloads. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes, providing high bandwidth for storage and peripherals.

The CPU's integrated graphics, Arc Graphics 140T, provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A570M handles most graphics tasks. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking, and the socket is BGA 2049, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard.

Benchmark results place the CPU in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,598 and R20 multi-core score of 10,751 indicate strong multi-threaded performance, while single-core scores of 3,613 (R23) and 1,517 (R20) are competitive with desktop chips. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,359 confirms its strength in lightly threaded tasks.

In real-world workloads, the CPU excels at video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where its 14 cores provide parallel throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 74,247 and floating-point math score of 93,509 indicate robust computation capabilities. Data encryption (23,121) and extended instructions (23,354) scores show proficiency in security-related tasks.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H CPU with the Intel Arc A570M GPU in a laptop form factor. The system represents a high-tier mobile configuration, with a combined percentile rank of 87. This places it above the majority of systems in the database, indicating strong overall performance for gaming, content creation, and professional applications.

The build class is laptop, which means all components are integrated into a portable chassis. The CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP create a combined thermal load of approximately 103 watts, which is manageable with a standard laptop cooling solution. This power efficiency makes the system suitable for both plugged-in and battery-powered use, though sustained performance under load will depend on the specific laptop's thermal design.

The pairing is well-matched in terms of performance tier. The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are close enough that neither component is likely to be a significant bottleneck in most applications. This balance is rare in laptops, where one component often overshadows the other.

The system is best described as an upper-midrange to high-end mobile platform, capable of handling modern games at 1080p and 1440p, as well as demanding productivity tasks. It does not reach the top tier of mobile workstations with dedicated server-grade CPUs or desktop-class GPUs, but it offers a compelling balance of performance and portability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,522, which is within 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (37,313) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600K (37,685). The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37,762), is 0.6% higher, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 235H sits in a tightly contested performance band. The CPU's 85th percentile rank confirms its upper-tier status.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239, which is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392) and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528). The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085) is 0.3% lower, showing that the Arc A570M is competitive with several desktop-class GPUs in compute workloads. The GPU's 88th percentile rank is slightly higher than the CPU's, indicating marginally stronger relative performance.

The combined picture shows a system that is greater than the sum of its parts. The CPU's multi-core strength (Cinebench R23: 25,598) and single-core agility (PassMark single-thread: 4,359) pair well with the GPU's compute density (OpenCL: 58,239) and memory bandwidth (224.0 GB/s). This combination yields a 87th percentile rank for the overall build, reflecting balanced, high-level performance.

In CPU-bound scenarios like data encryption (23,121) and integer math (74,247), the system performs at a level comparable to desktop processors, as evidenced by its proximity to the Intel Core i5-13600K. In GPU-bound scenarios like OpenCL compute, it rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a desktop high-end card. The data confirms that this is a well-rounded laptop platform suitable for users who need reliable high performance across a wide range of applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds