SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 235A + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

48,201 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A paired with the Intel Arc A750 is a desktop build that lands in the 78th combined percentile, indicating a system positioned for solid 1440p gaming and productive multi-threaded workloads. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all processors, while the GPU occupies the 66th percentile, creating a configuration where the processor has significant headroom over the graphics card in many scenarios. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A750’s 66th GPU percentile suggests capable performance for esports and older titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means expectations must be framed by its 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 4,607 Cinebench R23 single-core score provide ample instruction throughput to avoid holding back frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. This pairing favors 1080p high-refresh gaming where the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient, rather than 4K ultra settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 14 threads deliver a 32,633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which supports concurrent game encoding and streaming workloads without severe contention. The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units offload rendering tasks, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means the system relies on the CPU’s 65 W TDP efficiency for software encoding. Data compression performance of 393,800 in PassMark indicates the CPU can handle stream encoding overhead while maintaining game performance.

Video Editing: The CPU’s 118,778 PassMark floating-point math score and 88,626 integer math score suggest strong computational throughput for video transcoding and effect processing. The GPU’s 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) accelerates compatible rendering tasks, while the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth moves large frame buffers efficiently. The CPU’s 24 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency when scrubbing timelines or applying multi-layer effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 32,633 multi-core Cinebench score places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, indicating professional-grade rendering performance for CPU-based engines. The GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports GPU-accelerated renderers, though its 66th percentile ranking suggests it will be the limiting factor in hybrid workloads. The 225 W GPU TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate the system can sustain prolonged render sessions without thermal throttling.

Software Development: The CPU’s 30,136 PassMark data encryption score and 31,625 extended instructions score provide robust support for compilation, code signing, and cryptographic operations. The 14-core configuration with 14 threads (no hyperthreading) excels at parallel build tasks, evidenced by the 38,392 PassMark multi-thread score. The 90th CPU percentile demonstrates headroom for running virtual machines, containers, and IDEs simultaneously.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 4,557 PassMark single-thread score ensures responsive application launches and smooth document editing, while the 65 W TDP allows for efficient cooling in compact chassis. The GPU’s 732 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration and multiple displays (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0) without strain. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports heavy multitasking with DDR5, though the 8 GB GPU memory is overkill for basic office tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 48,201 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48,171), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48,287), and 0.6% lower than the AMD EPYC 4345P (48,470). It sits 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47,918).

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to its closest competitors?

A: The Arc A750 averages 20,582, which is 0.1% above the Intel Arc B570 (20,556) and 0.2% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534). It trails the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.4% (20,662) and leads the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M by 0.5% (20,480).

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A does not support ECC memory. It features dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is suitable for consumer workloads but not for error-correcting server applications.

Q: What are the CPU’s clock speeds and power requirements?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Q: Is the Arc A750 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage. It was released on October 11, 2022, with a launch MSRP of 289 USD.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The Arc A750 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 28 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units, with a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 4,607 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,557 in PassMark single-thread tests. This places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong performance for lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office software.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture at TSMC’s 3 nm node. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a 65 W TDP that enables efficient cooling in standard desktop cases. The base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide a wide dynamic range, allowing the chip to scale from idle to demanding workloads. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the 5.00 GHz boost handles peak single-thread demands.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. This arrangement supports the 32,633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48,287 average). The data shows a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48,201. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves 38,392 in multi-thread, 4,557 in single-thread, and 118,778 in floating-point math, indicating balanced performance across integer and floating-point operations.

The 14 cores without hyperthreading mean the chip prioritizes physical core efficiency over thread oversubscription. This is evident in the 392 PassMark prime numbers score, which is modest compared to the 88,626 integer math score, suggesting the architecture favors sustained throughput over bursty integer workloads. The 3 nm process and TSMC foundry contribute to the 65 W TDP, which is low for a 14-core part, enabling it to maintain boost clocks under sustained loads. The 24 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s DDR5 memory bandwidth provide adequate data flow for the 32,633 multi-core Cinebench score.

For software development, the 30,136 data encryption score and 31,625 extended instructions score indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The 393,800 data compression score highlights the CPU’s ability to handle archiving and decompression tasks efficiently. The lack of ECC memory support and the dual-channel memory bus (102.4 GB/s) position this as a consumer-grade processor, though the 90th percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop CPUs in aggregate benchmarks. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, is only 0.1% behind, indicating that the 235A is a competitive mid-range option at its launch MSRP of $269.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 78, with a CPU at 90 and GPU at 66, reveals a significant imbalance: the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card. This means that in gaming workloads, the Arc A750 will typically be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where GPU fill rate and memory bandwidth dominate. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost and 4,607 Cinebench R23 single-core score are more than sufficient to feed the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, so CPU-bound bottlenecks are unlikely in most scenarios.

In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the GPU’s 66th percentile becomes less relevant, as the CPU’s 32,633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score drives rendering and compilation. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can become a bottleneck in 1440p or 4K gaming with high-resolution textures, as the 66th percentile ranking suggests it competes closely with the Arc B570 (0.1% ahead) and RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% ahead). The FPS scaling from the CPU’s 90th percentile to the GPU’s 66th percentile indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield larger frame rate gains than upgrading the CPU.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP create a thermal envelope where the GPU demands significantly more power and cooling. The 550 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom, but the dual-slot GPU with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors requires a case with good airflow. In memory-bound scenarios, the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is shared with the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s, so the GPU’s memory subsystem is not a constraint for CPU operations. The data shows that the CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by up to 0.6% (against the EPYC 4345P) and underperforms by only 0.2% (against the 245HX), while the GPU leads or trails its rivals by no more than 0.5%, indicating a balanced but GPU-limited pairing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A750’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 and PassMark G3D score of 12,534 place it in the 66th GPU percentile, suggesting it can handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles and 1440p with adjustments. The GPU’s 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p, but may require texture quality reductions in VRAM-heavy games.

The CPU’s 4,607 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, preventing stutters in CPU-bound titles. In esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the 5.00 GHz boost clock and 14 cores provide more than enough headroom, and the GPU’s 268.8 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high refresh rates at 1080p. For AAA titles, the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 28 ray tracing cores deliver playable frame rates at 1080p ultra, but the 66th percentile ranking indicates that 1440p ultra will push the GPU to its limits.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative estimates. The GPU’s 70 PassMark DirectX 12 score and 72 DirectX 11 score (relative to a baseline of 100) suggest that modern APIs are handled efficiently, while the 181 DirectX 9 score indicates strong legacy performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612, which is a DX12 benchmark, implies that the GPU can maintain stable frame times in DX12 titles. The CPU’s 90th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, but at 1440p, the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes the primary constraint, limiting frame rates compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings at 1440p. The CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile mean that esports enthusiasts will see excellent frame rates, while AAA gamers at 1440p should expect to dial back settings. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 32,633 multi-core Cinebench score, which rivals the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX within 0.2%, making it suitable for overnight renders and batch processing.

Software developers will find the 14 cores and 38,392 PassMark multi-thread score useful for parallel builds, while the 30,136 encryption score supports secure communication tasks. Students and office workers will appreciate the 65 W TDP and the 4,557 single-thread score for responsive daily use, though the GPU is overkill for document processing. Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration for design or video tasks will benefit from the 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS, but the end-of-life status of the GPU and the lack of ECC memory may deter enterprise deployment.

The CPU’s launch MSRP of $269 positions it as a mid-range desktop processor, though pricing is not a factor in this analysis. The GPU’s 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU mean builders need a quality power supply and adequate case cooling. This pairing is best for users who want a strong CPU for productivity and a capable GPU for gaming, accepting that the GPU is the weaker link. For those who prioritize gaming above all, a more balanced GPU would be preferable, but for mixed workloads, the CPU’s headroom ensures long-term relevance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for its class.

The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores and no dedicated tensor cores. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These specifications place the GPU in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,582.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,612, which is a measure of its modern API performance. Geekbench scores of 98,554 (OpenCL) and 85,631 (Vulkan) indicate strong compute and graphics capabilities. PassMark results show 12,534 in G3D and 5,368 in GPU compute, with DirectX scores of 65 (DX10), 72 (DX11), 70 (DX12), and 181 (DX9). The higher DX9 score suggests legacy titles run particularly well, while DX11 and DX12 performance is more moderate.

The GPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570, which is 0.1% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is 0.2% behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X leads by 0.4%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.5%. This clustering indicates that the A750 is competitive with these mid-range parts, but the 66th percentile ranking shows it is not a high-end GPU. The 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooling, and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors require substantial power delivery, and the end-of-life status means no further driver optimizations are expected.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A and the Intel Arc A750, with a combined percentile of 78. The CPU is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-S processor on Socket 1851, with a 65 W TDP and 5.00 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an end-of-life Arc A750 with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The pairing represents a CPU-first configuration, where the processor’s 90th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU’s 66th percentile.

The CPU’s 48,201 average benchmark score places it within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 4345P and 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, indicating it is a strong mid-range processor. The GPU’s 20,582 average score is nearly identical to the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile, showing it is a capable mid-range graphics card. The combined 78th percentile suggests that the system outperforms 78% of all desktop builds, but the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming.

For productivity, the CPU’s 32,633 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 118,778 PassMark floating-point math score make it suitable for rendering and compilation. For gaming, the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 28 ray tracing cores provide solid 1080p performance, with 1440p requiring settings adjustments. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A achieves an average benchmark score of 48,201, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench scores are 3,289 (R15 multi-core), 464 (R15 single-core), 13,705 (R20 multi-core), 1,934 (R20 single-core), 32,633 (R23 multi-core), and 4,607 (R23 single-core). PassMark results include 393,800 in data compression, 30,136 in data encryption, 31,625 in extended instructions, 392 in prime numbers, 118,778 in floating-point math, 88,626 in integer math, 38,392 in multi-thread, 2,437 in physics, 49,489 in random string sorting, and 4,557 in single-thread.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (48,171, 0.1% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48,287, 0.2% lower), AMD EPYC 4345P (48,470, 0.6% lower), and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47,918, 0.6% higher). These narrow deltas indicate that the 235A is highly competitive with its direct peers.

The Intel Arc A750 achieves an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612, with Geekbench scores of 98,554 (OpenCL) and 85,631 (Vulkan). PassMark results show 65 in DX10, 72 in DX11, 70 in DX12, 181 in DX9, 732 in G2D, 12,534 in G3D, and 5,368 in GPU compute. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20,556, 0.1% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, 0.2% higher), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, 0.4% lower), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.5% higher).

The combined picture shows a CPU that is 24 percentile points higher than the GPU, indicating that the processor will not bottleneck the graphics card in most workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile produce a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks like rendering and compilation, while gaming performance is limited by the GPU. The 78th combined percentile reflects this balance, positioning the build as a strong all-rounder for productivity and 1080p gaming, with headroom for a future GPU upgrade to unlock the CPU’s full potential.