SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a high-end mobile solution, placing in the 82nd percentile overall. The CPU is a 75th-percentile performer, while the GPU is notably stronger, sitting in the 88th percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all performance framing is estimated from benchmark scores and component specifications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a 17 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile-market segment chip using the Intel BGA 2833 socket.

Benchmark results position this CPU at the 75th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 21440. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, which scores 21484 — a mere 0.2% difference. The data shows this CPU essentially matches a desktop-class Ryzen 5 2600 in average performance, despite being a low-power mobile part. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-11900H by 0.3% (21367), trails the Intel Xeon D-1746TER by 0.9% (21635), and leads the AMD EPYC 9454 by 1% (21223).

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 9932, while single-core reaches 1758. The single-core figure is particularly strong, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded workloads. PassMark single-thread score of 3836 confirms this, placing it well above typical mobile processors. The multicore PassMark score of 18227 indicates that while it has only 8 threads, the architecture’s efficiency allows it to compete with older 12-thread desktop parts like the Ryzen 5 2600.

The CPU’s floating-point math score of 53310 and integer math score of 39679 in PassMark show balanced compute capabilities. Data compression at 173924 and encryption at 13032 indicate strong data-handling throughput for its class. The physics score of 1538 and extended instructions score of 14801 round out a profile that favors single-thread responsiveness and efficiency over raw multi-thread throughput. The 8 MB shared L3 cache is modest, but the per-core L2 of 2.5 MB helps mitigate latency in latency-sensitive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The component balance here is unusual: the GPU is a stronger performer relative to its peers than the CPU. The GPU sits in the 88th percentile, while the CPU is in the 75th. This indicates that in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the CPU is the limiting factor. The data suggests the Arc A570M has headroom that the Core Ultra 5 228V may not always feed.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is its strongest asset, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1758. This helps prevent severe bottlenecks in games that rely on a few fast cores. However, the 8-thread limit means that in heavily multi-threaded titles or when background tasks compete for CPU resources, the processor will saturate quickly. The PassMark multithread score of 18227 versus single-thread of 3836 shows a scaling efficiency of roughly 4.75x across 8 threads, which is reasonable but not exceptional.

The GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128-bit bus are adequate for its class, but the CPU’s memory support is listed as “unknown” and depends on the motherboard, which introduces uncertainty in system-level bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5, 4 lanes (CPU only) provides high bandwidth to the CPU, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the Arc A570M’s throughput.

For frame rate scaling, the data indicates that at lower resolutions or with lighter graphical settings, the CPU will limit performance. At higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the bottleneck, the system will show more consistent scaling. The 75th-percentile CPU versus 88th-percentile GPU gap suggests that users should target GPU-bound scenarios to get the most out of this pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 88th-percentile standing suggests strong 1080p performance, but the CPU’s 75th-percentile position may cap frame rates in CPU-intensive titles. The single-core score of 1758 in Cinebench R23 helps maintain high minimums, but the 8-thread limit could cause dips in games that use 6+ threads heavily.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 threads are a constraint here. PassMark multithread score of 18227 is modest for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Arc A570M’s Xe-HPG architecture with 16 RT cores could offload encoding tasks, but the CPU may still struggle with the combined load of game logic and stream encoding.

Video editing: The GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance accelerates effects and rendering. CPU-side, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9932 handles timeline operations, but large projects with many effects will feel the thread count limitation. The data suggests this is capable for 1080p editing, with 4K being workable but not ideal.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 88th-percentile OpenCL score of 58239 indicates strong compute for GPU-accelerated renderers. CPU rendering is less impressive, with the multicore score of 9932 in Cinebench R23 placing it below many desktop parts with higher thread counts. The balance favors GPU-accelerated pipelines over CPU-only rendering.

Software development: The PassMark single-thread score of 3836 and data encryption score of 13032 indicate fast compile times for single-file changes and secure development workflows. The FP32 performance of the GPU can accelerate parallel compute tasks like data processing, but the 8-thread CPU limits heavy parallel builds.

Student and office work: The 17 W TDP and 75th-percentile CPU performance make this excellent for productivity suites. PassMark integer math of 39679 and floating-point math of 53310 handle spreadsheets, documents, and light multitasking with ease. The integrated Arc 130V graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 228V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

A: The two are nearly identical in average benchmark score, with the Ryzen 5 2600 at 21484 and the Core Ultra 5 228V at 21440, a difference of just 0.2%. This is notable because the Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop part with higher power draw, while the Intel chip is a 17 W mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A570M sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58239. This places it in the upper tier of mobile graphics, closely matching the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT which scores 58392 (0.3% difference).

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, meaning the multiplierUnlocked field is false. Users cannot adjust the clock multiplier beyond factory settings.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which is 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 for its connection.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimated from benchmark scores and component specifications.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process, also by TSMC. The GPU has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. The 88th-percentile GPU makes it suitable for gamers at 1080p with high settings, where the data indicates the GPU can handle demanding titles. The CPU’s 75th-percentile standing means that 1440p gaming on lighter titles is feasible, but users should expect CPU limitations in simulation-heavy games.

Content creators who work primarily in GPU-accelerated applications will find the Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 RT cores beneficial for rendering and effects. The CPU’s 8 threads are sufficient for light video editing and photo work, but not for heavy multi-layer compositing. The 17 W CPU TDP combined with the 75 W GPU TDP makes this a power-efficient option for creators who need sustained performance on battery.

Developers writing multi-threaded code will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread speed for compilation, but the 8-thread limit means large parallel builds will take longer than on higher-core-count parts. The data encryption score of 13032 indicates strong security-focused workloads, making this suitable for secure development environments.

Students and small business users get a balanced system that excels at productivity tasks. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3836 ensures snappy application load times, while the GPU can handle occasional light 3D work or CAD tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is generous for this class, supporting multi-display setups and moderate GPU compute.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, along with 16 ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, while memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The GPU has a 75 W TDP and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58392 — a 0.3% difference. The Arc A570M also leads the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085) by 0.3%, trails the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528) by 0.5%, and sits below the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657) by 0.7%.

The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This makes the GPU feature-complete for modern gaming APIs. The FP16 performance at 10.65 TFLOPS doubles the FP32 rate, indicating strong support for AI and compute workloads that use reduced precision. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest but adequate for the 128-bit bus, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity supports high-resolution textures without overflow.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21440, placing it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, scores 21484, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with a desktop processor from a previous generation. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, which the Core Ultra 5 228V beats by 0.3%. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, beating the Core Ultra 5 228V by 0.9%. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which the Core Ultra 5 228V leads by 1%.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Arc A570M is 0.3% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085, which the Arc A570M beats by 0.3%. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528, beating the Arc A570M by 0.5%. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, beating the Arc A570M by 0.7%.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU matches a Ryzen 5 2600, while the GPU approaches Radeon RX 6950 XT territory in OpenCL compute. This indicates that GPU-accelerated workloads will see near-desktop-class performance, while CPU-bound tasks will perform at upper-midrange mobile levels. The 82nd combined percentile reflects this uneven but capable profile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradable in the traditional sense. The motherboard determines memory support, which is listed as “unknown” and depends on the specific board. Memory is dual-channel, and ECC is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), which limits high-bandwidth peripherals connected directly to the CPU.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The 75 W GPU TDP and 17 W CPU TDP suggest a combined thermal envelope of roughly 92 W, which is modest for a laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the low TDPs mean a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The GPU has no power connectors listed, consistent with a mobile IGP-class implementation.

A sensible next upgrade within this platform is limited. The CPU’s soldered design and the GPU’s IGP form factor mean users cannot swap either component. The 8 GB VRAM is fixed, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface cannot be expanded. The only meaningful upgrade path is to a new laptop with a higher-tier CPU and GPU. The data shows this platform is at the upper end of its class, with the GPU already in the 88th percentile, leaving little headroom for improvement without a full system replacement.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Lunar Lake architecture, and the GPU is from the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile) using Xe-HPG. The combined percentile is 82, indicating an above-average system overall.

The CPU’s 75th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile create a GPU-favored balance. This is a system that excels in graphics-intensive tasks while maintaining respectable CPU performance for general use. The 8-core, 8-thread CPU with a 4.50 GHz boost clock handles everyday tasks with ease, while the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth GPU delivers strong gaming and compute performance.

The 17 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient pairing, suitable for thin-and-light laptops that still want discrete-class graphics. The 3 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process represent current-generation manufacturing, contributing to the performance-per-watt. The system sits in the upper tier of mobile computing, with the GPU approaching desktop-class compute performance as evidenced by its 0.3% delta from the Radeon RX 6950 XT.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds