SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a mobile processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node. It uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform — this is a laptop-class CPU, and the data confirms there is no socket-based upgrade path. The chip is paired with integrated Arc 130V graphics, and the platform supports dual-channel memory, though the exact memory type is listed as dependent on the motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU itself, which is a modest lane count designed for thin-and-light mobile systems rather than expansive multi-GPU or storage configurations.

The TDP of the CPU is 17 W, which places it firmly in the ultra-low-power segment. The accompanying Intel Arc A370M GPU has a 35 W TDP, and there is no suggested PSU listed in the data — a notable absence that underscores the mobile, integrated nature of this pairing. For a laptop build, the combined thermal and power envelope is modest, meaning a capable air cooler or the laptop's stock cooling solution should suffice; there is no data suggesting exotic cooling requirements. Since the CPU is soldered (BGA 2833) and the GPU is an IGP-class part, the sensible next upgrade is not a component swap but rather a move to a different platform entirely — one with a higher-tier CPU and a discrete GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. The data shows the CPU sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, so users seeking more headroom would need to step up to a higher-tier mobile processor, as the current socket offers no path forward.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a discrete mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s — a figure that is adequate for 1080p-class gaming but will constrain performance at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

The shader configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The GPU also features 8 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest shader count and memory bandwidth suggest that ray tracing workloads will be limited in scope. The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) — this is a capable entry-level compute part, but the data positions it below higher-tier discrete GPUs.

In benchmark terms, the A370M scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are telling: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29,197 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874 (1.0% behind). The inclusion of the RX 6800M — a high-end mobile GPU — among rivals at nearly identical scores is a strong indicator that the A370M's percentile is driven by a wide field of weaker parts, and that its raw compute is competitive with much older or differently-classed hardware. For rendering, the data shows the A370M is a 1080p-oriented GPU; the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors for modern game assets.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V shows a CPU that performs well above its ultra-low-power class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 9,932 multi-core and 1,758 single-core. The R20 scores are 6,491 multi-core and 916 single-core, while R15 scores are 1,502.5 multi-core and 267 single-core. PassMark results are similarly broad: a multi-thread score of 18,227, single-thread of 3,836, integer math at 39,679, floating-point math at 53,310, and extended instructions at 14,801. Data compression hits 173,924, encryption at 13,032, physics at 1,538, and random string sorting at 21,254. Find prime numbers scores 168.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 21,440, placing it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 21,484 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21,367 (0.3% behind), the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21,635 (0.9% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21,223 (1.0% behind). This is a remarkable result — a 17 W mobile chip trading blows with desktop-class processors from older generations and even a server EPYC part. The single-core score of 1,758 in R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded workloads.

On the GPU side, the Arc A370M's average benchmark score is 29,175, at the 74th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, indicating a balanced system overall. However, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — there are no measuredFps entries in the FACT PACK. This means all frame-rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The CPU's high percentile and the GPU's slightly lower percentile suggest that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary constraint, particularly at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop-class build targeting users who need strong CPU performance in an ultra-portable form factor. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking and its ability to match the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i9-11900H make it suitable for content creators who work with code compilation, data compression (scoring 173,924 in PassMark), and floating-point math (53,310). The single-thread score of 3,836 in PassMark indicates excellent responsiveness for office applications and web browsing.

For gamers, this system is aimed at 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings, given the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's 74th percentile suggests it can handle esports titles and older AAA games, but the 4 GB memory limit will be a bottleneck for modern games with high-resolution texture packs. Students and small business users will benefit from the CPU's efficiency (17 W TDP) and the integrated nature of the GPU — there is no data suggesting discrete GPU installation is possible, as the GPU is listed as "IGP" slot width. Developers will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded performance in the 18,227 PassMark multi-thread score, which accelerates builds and test suites.

The production status of the GPU is listed as "End-of-life," which means this is not a forward-looking platform for those seeking long-term upgradeability. The CPU is "Active" in production, but the BGA socket means the laptop is the product — there is no component-level upgrade path. This build is for users who want a complete, integrated system with a strong CPU and a competent entry-level GPU, not for those planning incremental hardware upgrades.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile — a close but telling gap. The CPU's nearest rivals include server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 9454 (1.0% ahead) and the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (0.9% ahead), indicating that the 228V is punching far above its 17 W TDP. The GPU, meanwhile, is closest to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and the AMD FirePro W8000, both older or specialized parts, with the RX 6800M — a much higher-tier mobile GPU — only 1.0% ahead in the benchmark.

This imbalance means that in CPU-bound workloads — such as code compilation, data compression, or multi-threaded productivity tasks — the system will perform at a level comparable to much larger desktop processors. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high settings or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the A370M will be the limiting factor. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are the primary constraints; the GPU's compute performance (4.198 TFLOPS FP32) is respectable, but the memory subsystem cannot feed it sufficiently for high-resolution textures.

For gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means we must estimate from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,758 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can drive high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will cap performance at 1080p. The combined percentile of 75 indicates that, on average, this system performs in the top quarter of all builds, but the specific bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: CPU-heavy tasks will feel near-desktop-class, while GPU-heavy tasks will feel entry-level.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and may cause stuttering in games with large assets. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,836 PassMark) ensures minimal bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded score of 18,227 in PassMark and 9,932 in Cinebench R23 provide enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p, though the GPU's 8 ray tracing cores and 1024 shading units can offload encoding tasks if the software supports Intel Quick Sync — the data does not specify encoder capabilities, but the Arc architecture is designed for media workloads.

Video Editing: The CPU's data compression score of 173,924 and integer math of 39,679 indicate strong performance in codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 can accelerate effects, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit preview quality for long timelines or 4K projects.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing, but the 112 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cause slowdowns with complex scenes. The CPU's 9,932 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will handle geometry processing and physics, but the GPU is the clear bottleneck here.

Software Development: The CPU is the star in this scenario. The 75th percentile ranking, multi-thread score of 18,227, and single-thread of 3,836 make builds, test runs, and container orchestration smooth. The 17 W TDP means sustained load without thermal throttling in a well-designed laptop chassis.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 1,758 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3,836 PassMark single-thread translate to snappy spreadsheet, browser, and document workloads. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but the integrated Arc 130V graphics in the CPU provide adequate display output — the data lists the CPU's iGPU as Arc 130V, which is distinct from the discrete A370M.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21,440. This means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested CPUs, which is exceptional for a 17 W mobile part.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is within 1% of several very different parts: it is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900H, 0.9% behind the Intel Xeon D-1746TER, and 1.0% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9454.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact pairing. All frame-rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is listed as "End-of-life" in production status, with a release date of 2022-03-29. The CPU is "Active" with a release date of 2024-09-23.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. It has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, which is modest. Its FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is a Lunar Lake architecture part on a 3 nm TSMC process, with 8 cores and 8 threads, a 17 W TDP, and a 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture part (DG2-128 chip) on a 6 nm TSMC process, with 4 GB GDDR6, a 74th percentile ranking, and an "End-of-life" production status. The combined percentile for the pairing is 75, placing the system in the top quarter of all builds in the database.

The overall tier is solidly mid-range for a laptop: the CPU is the standout component, delivering desktop-class multi-threaded performance (9,932 in Cinebench R23) at ultra-low power, while the GPU is a competent entry-level discrete part that is limited by its memory subsystem. The data shows a system that excels at productivity, development, and light content creation, with gaming capability at 1080p constrained by the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth. There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming assessments are estimates from benchmark scores.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Lunar Lake architecture and manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and the TDP is a remarkably low 17 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel memory, though the specific memory type is listed as "unknown — depends on motherboard." The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, and it includes integrated Arc 130V graphics.

The benchmark scores tell a story of a CPU that punches far above its power class. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 9,932 and single-core score of 1,758 are impressive for a 17 W part. The PassMark multi-thread score of 18,227 and single-thread score of 3,836 reinforce this. The data compression score of 173,924 is particularly strong, indicating excellent performance in archiving and file operations. The integer math score of 39,679 and floating-point score of 53,310 show balanced compute capabilities.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 21,440 places it at the 75th percentile, and the nearest rivals are instructive: it trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (a 65 W desktop part), the Intel Core i9-11900H (a high-end mobile part), the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (a server part), and the AMD EPYC 9454 (a server part). This demonstrates that the 228V's efficiency is not achieved at the cost of raw performance — it delivers competitive multi-threaded throughput while drawing a fraction of the power. The single-thread score of 3,836 in PassMark is particularly notable for a low-power chip, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The production status is "Active," and the release date is 2024-09-23, making this a current-generation part. The multiplier is locked, which is expected for a mobile BGA processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds