SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

21,440 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V paired with the Intel Arc A350M represents a specific tier of laptop computing, combining a highly efficient Lunar Lake CPU with a capable entry-level discrete GPU. The data places this pairing at the 73rd percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of existing hardware, though it is not without its compromises. The benchmark results show a CPU that trades multi-threaded dominance for exceptional single-core performance and efficiency, while the GPU provides solid 1080p-class rendering capabilities, making this a balanced platform for mainstream productivity and esports gaming.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare to older desktop CPUs?

A: The Ultra 5 228V’s average benchmark score of 21440 places it in a tight grouping with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, which scores 21484 (a -0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i9-11900H, which scores 21367 (a 0.3% delta). This shows that despite its mobile, low-power design, it offers compute performance comparable to a previous-generation desktop six-core processor.

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Arc A350M GPU?

A: The Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5% delta), indicating it performs in the range of a mid-range desktop GPU from a few generations ago.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V does not support overclocking. Its performance is defined by its base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which are managed automatically by the hardware.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel memory, but the specific type is dependent on the motherboard design. The system memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, though the CPU itself has an 8 MB shared L3 cache and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 4 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for its own use. This is a limited number, indicating that the primary expansion is likely for the integrated GPU or a single high-speed NVMe drive, rather than multiple add-in cards.

Q: Is the GPU considered a current product?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is marked as end-of-life, with a release date in 2022. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and uses a 6 nm process, making it a previous-generation product.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size of the GPU?

A: The Arc A350M contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². This gives the chip a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered, mobile-only design. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. Consequently, any future upgrade would require a completely new laptop or motherboard, rather than a simple CPU swap. The memory support is likewise dependent on the motherboard, though it is dual-channel, which is beneficial for integrated graphics performance. The system’s PCIe connectivity is limited to 4 CPU lanes of Gen 5, which is sufficient for a modern NVMe SSD but restricts the possibility of adding external GPUs or other high-bandwidth peripherals without a separate controller.

The power envelope is remarkably low, with a CPU TDP of 17 W and a GPU TDP of 25 W. This combined 42 W thermal budget is a defining characteristic of the platform, allowing for thin-and-light designs with minimal cooling requirements. There is no suggested PSU for the GPU, as it is an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) form factor, meaning it is designed to be powered by the laptop's main battery and power delivery system. A sensible next upgrade would be to a system with a higher-TDP GPU, such as an Arc A-series with more Xe-cores, to gain significant rendering performance, though this would necessitate a larger chassis and more robust cooling. Given the end-of-life status of the GPU, a future upgrade would likely target a newer Intel Arc generation with more VRAM and higher bandwidth.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance profile for both components. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21440, which places it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 9932 and a single-core score of 1758. The single-core score is notably strong, suggesting excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The multicore score, while respectable, shows its limits under heavy, all-core loads, which is typical for a 17 W part. The PassMark multithread score of 18227 and a single-thread score of 3836 corroborate this, indicating a processor that is far stronger in single-threaded operations than in multi-threaded rendering. Specific workloads like data compression score 173924, while floating-point math scores 53310, showing competent but not class-leading performance in these areas.

The GPU presents a compelling picture for its class. With an average benchmark score of 24647, it sits at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, is only 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead. This places the A350M in a performance bracket where it can comfortably handle 1080p gaming and hardware-accelerated content creation. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, showing consistent performance across different APIs. The combined picture is a system that excels at single-threaded tasks and offers solid, dependable graphics performance that is well above the integrated-graphics baseline but below the high-end discrete GPU tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is skewed towards the CPU for most productivity tasks, but the GPU becomes the primary limiter in graphically intensive scenarios. The CPU’s 75th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 70th percentile rank indicates that the processor is slightly more capable relative to its peers. In gaming, the Arc A350M’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will be the first constraint, particularly at higher resolutions or with high-detail textures. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by its 1758 Cinebench R23 score, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, meaning the GPU will likely be at 100% usage while the CPU has headroom.

The bottleneck shifts in multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. Here, the CPU’s 8 cores and 8 threads are the limiting factor, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9932 that will trail more powerful desktop processors. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for hardware acceleration, but the CPU will be the primary constraint on total throughput. The data suggests a system where neither component is drastically overpowered, but the GPU is the clear limiting factor for gaming at 1080p, while the CPU limits heavily threaded production work. The FPS scaling, which is not measured but estimated, would show that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield smaller gains once the CPU becomes the bottleneck, while the opposite is true for GPU-bound scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This platform is ideally suited for users who need a highly portable laptop with strong single-threaded performance and decent graphics capability. Students will find it excellent for general coursework, research, and running productivity suites that rely on single-core speed. The CPU’s high PassMark single-thread score of 3836 ensures snappy application loading and fluid multitasking. Small business workstations for office tasks, data entry, and light database management would also benefit, as the CPU’s data compression score of 173924 indicates proficiency in handling these workloads efficiently.

Content creators who work with photos and light video editing will find a capable partner in the Arc A350M, whose OpenCL score of 24546 supports hardware acceleration in editing software. However, developers compiling code will appreciate the fast single-core performance, though large parallel builds will be slower due to the lack of multi-threading. Gamers at 1080p will be the primary target, as the GPU is positioned to deliver playable frame rates in esports and less demanding AAA titles. It is not a workstation for heavy 3D rendering or a high-refresh-rate gaming machine, but for a balanced mobile experience, it hits a sweet spot.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A350M’s average benchmark score of 24647, which is comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, suggests it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most modern titles. Esports games like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, which are CPU-bound, will likely run at very high frame rates, leveraging the CPU’s strong single-core performance.

For more demanding AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor. At 1080p with ultra settings, texture quality may need to be reduced to avoid stuttering. The estimated performance would place this system in the range of 30-60 FPS for graphically intensive titles, depending on the optimization. The GPU’s 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus width are modest, so users should expect that high resolutions like 1440p will be challenging, and the system is best considered a 1080p gaming machine. The Vulkan score of 24747 suggests good performance in modern APIs, which can help offset the hardware limitations in well-optimized games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a mobile processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. This is a notable design choice, as it lacks Hyper-Threading, meaning the 8 cores handle 8 threads simultaneously. Despite this, its benchmark scores are strong, particularly in single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1758 is a high watermark, indicating excellent IPC (instructions per clock) and frequency scaling.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This structure is designed to minimize latency for frequently accessed data. For real workloads, this means snappy performance in office applications, web browsing, and software development. The PassMark integer math score of 39679 and floating-point math score of 53310 show balanced compute capabilities. The CPU’s 75th percentile rank places it ahead of the average processor, but its average benchmark score of 21440 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, a desktop chip from a previous generation. This indicates that while the Ultra 5 228V is not a multi-threaded powerhouse, its architectural efficiency allows it to compete with older, higher-power parts in general tasks.

Build Overview

This build is classified as a laptop configuration, combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V with the Intel Arc A350M. The combined percentile of 73 indicates that this system outperforms 73% of all recorded configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of performance. This is a pairing of a high-efficiency, premium mobile CPU with a previous-generation entry-level discrete GPU. While the CPU is current and active in production, the GPU is end-of-life, creating a slight generational mismatch.

The system is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is paramount. The CPU’s 17 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP allow for a compact thermal solution. In terms of overall tier, this is not a high-end gaming rig or a professional workstation, but rather a well-rounded mobile platform for mainstream users. It offers significantly better graphics performance than a standard integrated GPU, while the CPU provides top-tier single-threaded performance for a mobile part. The pairing’s strength lies in its balance, making it a versatile choice for users who want a single device for work and play without compromising on portability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory configuration that will limit performance in high-resolution textures and heavy VRAM usage.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its clocks run from a base of 1150 MHz to a boost of 2200 MHz. This hardware configuration yields a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1). For rendering, this means it can handle light 3D modeling and hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 6 RT cores will struggle with demanding ray-traced effects. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 and 70th percentile rank show it is a capable performer for 1080p gaming and content creation. Its nearest rival, the Radeon RX 590, is only 0.4% faster, which is a solid baseline for expected performance. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 228V + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds