SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

19,368 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and Intel Arc A550M is a mobile-first pairing built around efficiency and portability. The CPU uses the Lunar Lake architecture on Intel’s BGA 2833 socket, a soldered platform that locks the processor to the motherboard. That means there is no CPU upgrade path; the silicon is the silicon. The 8-core, 8-thread design is paired with a 17 W TDP, which signals a strong focus on battery life and thermals. The system memory is dual-channel, but the FACT PACK notes that support is motherboard-dependent, meaning the exact type and capacity will vary by the specific laptop chassis. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU, which is enough for a discrete GPU and a fast SSD, but not for multi-GPU or heavy expansion. The GPU sits on PCIe 4.0 x16, so the bandwidth available to the Arc A550M is ample for its class. The PSU headroom is a non-issue in a laptop context, as the GPU’s 60 W TDP is modest and the CPU’s 17 W is negligible; the power delivery is integrated into the motherboard design. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a component swap but a full laptop replacement, as both the CPU and GPU are soldered and the socket is dead-end. The production status of the CPU is active, but the GPU is end-of-life, so any future build should look at newer Intel Arc parts rather than attempting to refresh this one.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. It packs 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 16 dedicated RT cores. The die is 406 mm² and contains 21,700 million transistors, giving a density of 53.4M per mm². Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, with pixel rate at 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate at 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern gaming and compute workloads.

Benchmark results place the A550M at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49737. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 49894, and in Vulkan, it scores 49580. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which scores 49957, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the A550M is nearly identical in raw compute. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is also close at 50001, with a -0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, putting the A550M 2.4% behind, while the RX 6800 XT scores 48477, putting the A550M 2.6% ahead. The data shows that the A550M sits in a competitive band with desktop-class GPUs from the previous generation, which is remarkable for a mobile part. The 16 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, and the 2048 shading units handle rasterization with strength. For rendering workloads, the 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 is substantial, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is the limiting factor for high-resolution texture streaming and complex scenes. The Vulkan score of 49580 suggests strong low-level API performance, which is good for modern game engines that leverage Vulkan for efficiency.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V use?

A: The CPU uses Intel BGA 2833, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard and cannot be removed or upgraded.

Q: How does the Arc A550M compare to the RTX 5070 Ti in raw compute?

A: The Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957. The delta is -0.4%, meaning the A550M is almost exactly on par with the RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A550M?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The effective memory clock is 14 Gbps.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this pairing?

A: The GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. The combined percentile is 80. The data indicates the GPU is the stronger relative performer.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W. This totals 77 W for the core components, which is low for a laptop pairing.

Q: Does the Arc A550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 16 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A550M?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life in the FACT PACK, while the CPU is listed as active production.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 5 226V and the Arc A550M is skewed toward the GPU. The CPU is at the 73rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 86th percentile. That gap means that in most GPU-bound scenarios, the A550M will be the limiting factor, but in CPU-bound workloads, the 226V could hold the system back. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19368, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and a single-core score of 1744. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737. The data shows that the GPU has a much higher absolute score, which is typical for a discrete graphics card versus a low-power mobile CPU. For gaming at high settings, the GPU will be the bottleneck because it handles the rendering pipeline. The CPU’s 8 cores and 8 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU, but the low TDP of 17 W means sustained all-core loads will cause clock throttling, potentially reducing frame pacing in CPU-heavy scenes like large multiplayer battles or physics simulations. The PassMark multi-thread score of 17850 and single-thread score of 3754 indicate that the CPU can handle general productivity, but it is not a high-end compute part. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS is strong for a 60 W part, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for 1440p or 4K gaming with high-resolution textures. The data suggests that the system is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, where the GPU’s strengths are maximized and the CPU’s weaknesses are less exposed. For content creation, the GPU will accelerate rendering, but the CPU will slow down tasks like video encoding that rely on the processor. The combined percentile of 80 confirms that this is a solid mid-range laptop pairing, not a high-end desktop replacement.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and a single-core score of 1744. In Cinebench R20, it scores 6381 multicore and 900 single-core. Cinebench R15 scores are 1501 multicore and 267 single-core. Geekbench scores are 8598 multicore and 1930 single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 17850, single-thread of 3754, and specific workloads: data compression 170687, data encryption 12710, extended instructions 14724, find prime numbers 166, floating point math 52270, integer math 38647, physics 1449, and random string sorting 20813. The average benchmark score is 19368, with a percentile rank of 73. Nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS at 19364 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 (-0.7%). The CPU is effectively tied with these parts, showing that it trades blows with a mix of older desktop chips and modern mobile parts. The 8 MB of shared L3 cache and 2.5 MB per-core L2 cache are modest, which contributes to the single-core scores being unremarkable. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737 at the 86th percentile. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 49894, and in Vulkan, it scores 49580. The nearest rivals are the RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (-0.4%), RX Vega 64 at 50001 (-0.5%), RX 6900 XT at 50951 (-2.4%), and RX 6800 XT at 48477 (2.6%). The combined picture is a laptop that is 80th percentile overall, with the GPU carrying the performance load. The CPU is competent but not exceptional, and the GPU is a standout performer that punches above its weight class.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who need a laptop that can handle both productivity and gaming without sacrificing portability. The 17 W CPU and 60 W GPU make it ideal for students who need a machine for coursework, note-taking, and light development work, with the ability to game on the side. The 8 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for compiling code, running virtual machines, or juggling multiple Office applications. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p gaming and entry-level 3D modeling. Content creators who work with photos or 1080p video will find the GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS useful for acceleration in apps that support OpenCL or Vulkan. The data shows the GPU is on par with an RTX 5070 Ti in raw compute, so tasks like rendering or machine learning inference will benefit. Small business users who run spreadsheets, databases, and web applications will find the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 17850 adequate for daily tasks. The 73rd percentile CPU rank means it is above average, but not a powerhouse for heavy simulation or large data processing. Gamers at 1080p will get the most out of this system, as the GPU’s strengths are most apparent at that resolution. The 86th percentile GPU rank suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means precise expectations are estimates. Developers who use IDEs, containers, and local databases will appreciate the 8 threads, but should not expect high-end server-like performance. The laptop class means it is not a desktop replacement; it is a portable workstation that balances battery life with capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and Intel Arc A550M in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 at the 86th percentile places it in the range of desktop GPUs like the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT, which are known for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance. Given the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, the A550M should handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles at 60 FPS or higher, with esports titles likely exceeding 100 FPS. The 16 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit ray-traced performance at higher resolutions. At 1440p, expect playable frame rates in less demanding games, but more graphically intense titles may require lowering settings. The CPU’s single-core score of 1744 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for gaming, as most games rely on single-thread performance for frame pacing. The 8 threads are enough for modern game engines, but the 17 W TDP means sustained gaming sessions could see CPU clock dips. The data suggests a balanced 1080p gaming machine that can push high frame rates in competitive titles and maintain 60 FPS in AAA games on high settings. For 1440p, frame rates will vary, with some games hitting 60 FPS and others falling short. These are estimates, not measured results, so actual performance will depend on the specific laptop cooling solution and power limits.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, an 8-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the Intel Arc A550M, a mobile discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is built on a 3 nm TSMC process using the Lunar Lake architecture, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process with Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile is 80, meaning this system outperforms 80% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU is at the 73rd percentile, and the GPU is at the 86th percentile, making the GPU the dominant component. This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range laptop pairing, suitable for gamers who prioritize portability and content creators who need GPU acceleration. The total TDP of 77 W is low, which enables thinner and lighter chassis designs. The GPU is end-of-life, so this is not a future-proof platform, but it remains competitive based on benchmark scores. The CPU is active, so laptops with this processor are still being produced. This build is not for enthusiasts who want maximum performance; it is for practical users who need a versatile machine that can do a bit of everything without weighing them down.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor based on the Lunar Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 17 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel memory, but the exact type is motherboard-dependent. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc 130V, which is a fallback option if the discrete GPU is not in use. The market segment is mobile, and the production status is active. The release date was 2024-09-23.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9848 and a single-core score of 1744. The Geekbench multicore score is 8598, and single-core is 1930. PassMark scores include a multi-thread of 17850 and single-thread of 3754. The average benchmark score is 19368, placing it at the 73rd percentile. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (19364, 0%), Intel Core i5-1345U (19411, -0.2%), Intel Core i7-8700K (19238, 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, -0.7%). This puts the 226V in the same performance band as a desktop i7-8700K, which is a 2017-era 6-core chip, and a modern Ryzen 5 mobile part. The 8 MB L3 cache is small by modern standards, which explains why the single-core score of 1744 is not exceptional. The boost clock of 4.50 GHz is high, but the 17 W TDP limits how long the CPU can sustain that frequency under load. For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for bursty tasks like web browsing, document editing, and light coding. The PassMark integer math score of 38647 and floating point math score of 52270 show decent arithmetic capability, but the find prime numbers score of 166 is low, indicating weak integer throughput in certain algorithms. The data compression score of 170687 is strong, which helps with file archiving and decompression. The physics score of 1449 is modest, so it is not ideal for heavy simulation or scientific computing. Overall, the 226V is a capable efficiency-focused CPU that delivers adequate performance for daily use and light productivity, but it is not a high-performance compute part.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds