SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T's position among all CPUs?

A: The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 30,468. It lands within 0.3% of several mobile rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, while trailing the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.3%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU holds the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average score of 20,556. It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% ahead) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% behind), while sitting 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Ultra 5 225T?

A: The CPU features 10 cores and 10 threads, meaning there is no hyper-threading. It operates on a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 4.90 GHz, with a 65W TDP.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc B570?

A: The GPU comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The pair achieves a combined percentile of 74 among all systems, placing it in the upper quarter of desktop configurations based on aggregate CPU and GPU performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing reveals a CPU that punches well above its modest 65W envelope, paired with a GPU that delivers solidly mid-pack rasterization performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,468 places it at the 82nd percentile globally, which is an exceptional result for a 10-core, 10-thread part. The nearest rival comparisons show a tightly clustered field: the Core i9-11980HK scores 30,422 (0.2% behind), the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390 (0.3% behind), the Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364 (0.3% behind), and the Core i5-13600H scores 30,548 (0.3% ahead). This indicates that the Ultra 5 225T is trading blows with mobile H-series and desktop-class processors from the previous generation, despite its power-efficient design.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Arc B570 achieves an average benchmark score of 20,556, landing at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similar pattern of near-parity: the RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.1% behind), the Arc A750 scores 20,582 (0.1% ahead), the Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (0.4% behind), and the Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (0.5% ahead). This places the B570 in a strange middle ground — it is not a high-end part, but it is clearly not entry-level either, sitting comfortably above the 50th percentile.

The combined picture is one of asymmetric strength. The CPU is the star performer, ranking in the top 18% of all processors, while the GPU is more workmanlike, ranking in the top 35% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance — the system is greater than the sum of its GPU parts, but the GPU is not holding the CPU back to a catastrophic degree. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 suggests it can sustain heavy all-core loads, while the PassMark multithread score of 25,358 reinforces that impression. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,348, indicating that the 4.90 GHz boost clock is genuinely effective.

What the data implies is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but will show its limits in GPU-heavy scenarios. The 82nd percentile CPU will not be the bottleneck in most gaming or rendering workflows; the 65th percentile GPU will be the limiting factor. This is a classic "strong CPU, mid GPU" configuration that rewards users who prioritize responsiveness, compilation speeds, and productivity over raw frame rates.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. This is a significant manufacturing advantage — the 3 nm node is among the most advanced in the industry, and it shows in the efficiency numbers. The chip packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, which is a dense but not extreme layout. The 10 cores and 10 threads are arranged without hyper-threading, which is a deliberate design choice for Arrow Lake — the architecture relies on physical cores and high IPC rather than thread duplication.

Clock speeds are modest on paper — 2.50 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost — but the single-core benchmark results reveal the efficiency of the architecture. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101 is competitive with far higher-clocked parts, indicating excellent instructions-per-clock (IPC) execution. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,348 reinforces this, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 20,083 suggests strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities. Cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3, which provides ample data locality for multi-threaded workloads.

Multi-threaded performance is where the 225T surprises. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 is exceptional for a 65W part, and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9,227 confirms it. The PassMark multithread score of 25,358, combined with a data compression score of 233,998, indicates that this CPU handles parallel workloads with ease. The floating-point math score of 82,751 and integer math score of 59,543 suggest balanced ALU and FPU performance, which is important for scientific computing and financial modeling. The physics score of 2,053 in PassMark is lower than the other metrics, hinting that the CPU may not be optimized for legacy physics simulators that rely on specific instruction sets.

For real-world workloads, the data implies a processor that excels at compilation, rendering, data analysis, and any task that scales across 10 physical cores. The lack of hyper-threading means that heavily threaded workloads that benefit from 20+ threads will see less scaling, but the high IPC and strong cache design mitigate this. The 82nd percentile ranking places it above the majority of desktop CPUs, including many with higher core counts, which speaks to the efficiency of the Arrow Lake architecture. The 65W TDP means it can be cooled by a capable air cooler, and the 3 nm process ensures that power draw remains manageable under sustained loads.

# Gaming Performance

It must be stated clearly: no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not direct measurements.

With that caveat, the gaming picture is predictable from the component scores. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking means it will not be a significant bottleneck in most titles — its single-thread score of 4,348 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101 indicate strong per-core performance that handles game logic, physics, and draw call submission efficiently. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking is the limiting factor. The Arc B570's PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 suggest it is a mid-range rasterization performer, roughly on par with an RTX 3070 Mobile.

At 1080p, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with estimated averages in the 60-90 FPS range for AAA games on ultra settings, assuming the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 380.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should push well above 144 FPS at 1080p, as they are typically CPU-bound and the 225T's single-thread strength will shine. At 1440p, expect frame rates to drop by roughly 25-30% across the board, with AAA games hovering around 45-70 FPS on ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU will become the primary constraint — the 10 GB of VRAM and 160-bit bus will limit texture-heavy scenes, and estimated frame rates will fall below 40 FPS in many AAA titles on ultra settings.

The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility mean the GPU is feature-complete for modern APIs, which could improve performance in titles that leverage mesh shaders or ray tracing. However, the RT performance is modest — with only 18 RT cores, ray-traced workloads will likely see significant frame rate drops, and DLSS-style upscaling is not available (the B570 lacks dedicated tensor cores, relying on the Xe2-HPG architecture's AI capabilities instead). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844 is strong, suggesting good driver efficiency in Vulkan titles, which bodes well for games that use that API.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile creates a clear hierarchy: in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a high level, while in GPU-bound workloads, the graphics card will determine the ceiling.

Evidence for this comes from the FPS scaling expectations. At 1080p, where CPU overhead is more significant, the strong single-thread score of 4,348 will help maintain high frame rates even in CPU-heavy scenes. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the B570's 65th percentile position will assert itself — frame rates will scale down with resolution, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The CPU's 10 cores and high IPC mean it is unlikely to bottleneck even at 1080p in most titles, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 provides ample headroom for game threads plus background tasks.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU is the obvious workhorse — its PassMark multithread score of 25,358 and data compression score of 233,998 indicate that CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, and spreadsheet analysis will run at a level consistent with a top-quintile processor. The GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 7,281 in PassMark GPU compute and 83,514 in Geekbench OpenCL, are adequate for light GPU acceleration but will not accelerate rendering or machine learning tasks to the same degree as a higher-end card.

The bottleneck analysis suggests that for a balanced upgrade path, the GPU should be the first component replaced. The CPU has headroom to support a significantly faster GPU — a hypothetical upgrade to a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher would better utilize the CPU's capabilities, whereas upgrading the CPU while keeping the B570 would yield minimal gains in GPU-bound scenarios. The 65W TDP CPU also means that the system's power delivery and cooling infrastructure is primarily dictated by the GPU's 150W TDP, making the suggested 450W PSU adequate for the current configuration but potentially limiting for higher-end GPU upgrades.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is designed for users who prioritize CPU performance without sacrificing the ability to play modern games at reasonable settings. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development — tasks that are heavily CPU-bound and benefit from the 10 cores and high IPC. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 and PassMark multithread score of 25,358 indicate that rendering times will be competitive with much more expensive processors.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build well-suited for high-refresh-rate esports titles, where the CPU's single-thread performance shines and the GPU's 65th percentile position is sufficient for 144+ FPS in less demanding games. For 1440p gaming, the build is viable but not ideal — frame rates will be playable in most titles, but users seeking ultra settings in the latest AAA releases will need to compromise on graphical fidelity. 4K gaming is not recommended with this GPU, as the 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit bus will struggle with high-resolution textures.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed — the PassMark data compression score of 233,998 and integer math score of 59,543 indicate strong performance in build tools and code analysis. Students and small business users engaged in data analysis, spreadsheet work, or documentation will find the CPU's responsiveness and the GPU's adequate 2D performance (PassMark G2D score of 661) more than sufficient. The lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for mission-critical workstations, but for general professional use, the platform is solid.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,348 and the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should sustain 144+ FPS in esports titles and 60-90 FPS in AAA games on ultra settings. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 suggests the GPU handles modern DX12 workloads competently.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores provide headroom for encoding alongside gaming, though the lack of hyper-threading means simultaneous heavy encoding and gaming could strain the thread count. The PassMark multithread score of 25,358 suggests x264 encoding at medium preset is feasible while gaming at 1080p.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 and floating-point math score of 82,751 indicate strong performance in rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM supports hardware acceleration in editing suites, though the 160-bit bus may limit 4K multi-stream workflows.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be the primary strength — the PassMark multithread score of 25,358 and data compression score of 233,998 suggest solid performance in Blender or similar CPU-based renderers. GPU rendering will be slower, with the B570's 7,281 PassMark GPU compute score indicating modest acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 59,543 and extended instructions score of 20,083 point to strong compilation performance. The 20 MB of L3 cache provides ample space for build tools and source trees, reducing I/O bottlenecks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites, while the GPU's 661 PassMark G2D score handles 2D rendering and display output across the three DisplayPort 2.1 and one HDMI 2.1a outputs. The 65W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day operation.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform is the foundation for this build, and it offers several upgrade avenues. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth — this is sufficient for current workloads, but users with memory-intensive tasks may consider higher-capacity kits. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU is a forward-looking feature, allowing for high-bandwidth NVMe SSDs and future GPUs to run at full speed.

The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for desktop platforms, and the lack of ECC support means this is not a server-grade workstation. The integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG with 16 execution units — provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, though it is not suitable for gaming. The CPU's multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the 4.90 GHz boost clock is already high, and the 3 nm process ensures efficient operation at stock settings.

The GPU's upgrade path is more constrained. The Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the x16 used by most high-end cards. This means that upgrading to a faster GPU will require a card that can operate effectively on x8 lanes, or the user must accept some bandwidth loss on x16 cards. The suggested PSU is 450W, which provides headroom for the 150W GPU and 65W CPU, but a higher-end GPU with a 200W+ TDP would require a PSU upgrade. The power connector is a single 8-pin, so most modern GPUs will need adapter cables.

A sensible next upgrade would be a faster GPU, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to support a card in the 80th percentile or higher. The 10-core CPU with 20 MB of L3 cache will not bottleneck a higher-end GPU at 1440p or 4K, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure future GPUs have bandwidth to spare. Upgrading the CPU on this platform is possible, but the 225T's 82nd percentile position means gains would be marginal unless moving to a significantly higher core-count part.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and Intel Arc B570 represents a mid-range system with a strong CPU and a mid-pack GPU. The combined percentile of 74 places it in the upper quarter of all systems, but the composition is uneven: the CPU is a top-quintile performer, while the GPU is a solidly mid-range component.

The overall tier is best described as a "productivity-first gaming system." The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it ideal for workstations, development machines, and content creation rigs, while the GPU's 65th percentile position allows for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings. This is not a high-end gaming rig, nor is it a budget build — it sits in a comfortable middle ground where CPU-intensive tasks are handled with aplomb, and gaming is a secondary but viable use case.

The platform is current-generation, with Socket 1851, DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5, ensuring that the system will not be obsolete for several years. The 65W CPU TDP and 150W GPU TDP keep the system power-efficient, and the 450W suggested PSU indicates modest power requirements. This is a versatile, balanced system that will serve a wide range of users, but its identity is defined by the CPU's strength — a machine that rewards those who demand fast computation and are willing to accept mid-range graphics.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and represents the second generation of Intel's discrete GPU efforts. The chip, BMG-G21, is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die — a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, which explains its PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s.

Memory is a key differentiator: 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate capacity and bandwidth, sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but limiting at 4K with high-resolution textures. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), which is standard for GDDR6. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and FP32 compute of 11.52 TFLOPS place it in the mid-range tier, consistent with its 65th percentile ranking.

Ray tracing is handled by 18 dedicated RT cores, which is a modest count. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures feature parity with modern GPUs, but the RT performance will be below that of NVIDIA's RTX 30-series parts with similar average scores. The GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores — the tensorCores field is null — meaning AI acceleration relies on the Xe2-HPG architecture's general compute capabilities. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,514 and Vulkan score of 96,844 indicate strong compute performance for a mid-range card, which is useful for content creation applications that leverage GPU acceleration.

The 150W TDP is reasonable for this performance class, and the single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The dual-slot form factor and 272 mm length mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases. Display output is comprehensive, with one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections, supporting high refresh rates and multiple monitors. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a potential limitation for bandwidth-sensitive workloads, but for gaming and most productivity tasks, the 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the more relevant constraint.

In the context of this build, the B570 is the weaker link. Its 65th percentile ranking is respectable, but it consistently trails the CPU's 82nd percentile performance. The benchmark data shows it is competitive with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, but not with desktop-class GPUs in the 80th percentile or higher. For users who prioritize gaming, this GPU will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the CPU's potential will remain partially untapped until a faster GPU is installed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds