SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc A770: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Arrow Lake desktop CPU with Intel's flagship Alchemist GPU, creating an all-Intel desktop build that lands in the 86th percentile overall. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 90th percentile among all graphics cards. The benchmark data shows a system with robust multi-threaded compute capability and strong rasterization performance, though the lack of measured FPS data means gaming expectations must be derived from component-level scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. It houses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning overclocking headroom is not available to users.

The 65 W TDP classifies this as an efficient desktop chip, and the benchmark results reflect a processor that punches above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,971 in multi-core and 3,101 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates strong sustained throughput for rendering and compilation workloads, while the single-core result suggests responsive everyday performance. The Cinebench R20 scores of 9,227 multi-core and 1,302 single-core follow the same pattern, and the R15 results of 2,214 multi-core and 312 single-core confirm consistency across benchmark generations.

PassMark results add further context. The multi-thread score of 25,358 aligns with the Cinebench multi-core performance, while the single-thread score of 4,348 shows competitive per-core strength. Data compression scores 233,998, which is an unusually high figure and indicates the CPU handles compression algorithms exceptionally well. Integer math scores 59,543, floating point math scores 82,751, and extended instructions score 20,083. The physics score of 2,053 and find prime numbers score of 284 are more modest, suggesting that some scientific workloads may not scale as well as content creation tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,468 places it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals illustrate the competitive landscape: the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30,422 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390 (0.3% behind), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30,548 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364 (0.3% behind). This grouping shows the Ultra 5 225T sits in a tight cluster with several mobile-focused high-end chips, despite being a desktop part. The differences are negligible — all four rivals fall within 0.3% of the Ultra 5's average score.

Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The platform uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units offers basic display output capability, though the discrete Arc A770 in this build handles all demanding graphics work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ultra 5 225T and the Arc A770 requires careful consideration. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 90th percentile suggest the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This creates a scenario where the GPU is likely the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, which is generally the preferred configuration for gaming builds.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,053 is notably lower than its other scores, which may indicate weaker performance in certain simulation-heavy workloads. However, the strong multi-thread score of 25,358 and the exceptional data compression score of 233,998 show that the CPU excels in throughput-oriented tasks. The floating point math score of 82,751 further confirms strong compute capability.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU paired with the 225 W TDP of the GPU creates a total power draw that the suggested 550 W PSU can handle with reasonable headroom. The GPU's power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard for this performance class. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not bandwidth-limited, even if future GPUs require more bandwidth.

Bottleneck analysis from the percentile data shows that the GPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 82nd percentile means the CPU will limit performance in some CPU-bound scenarios. In games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the CPU's single-core scores — Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,101 and PassMark single-thread of 4,348 — will determine frame rates. In GPU-bound scenarios, which are more common at higher resolutions, the Arc A770's 90th percentile performance will be the limiting factor.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s for the CPU is modest by modern standards, but the dual-channel DDR5 configuration is adequate for the 10-core design. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantially higher, ensuring that graphics data flows freely without memory constraints.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the DG2-512 chip using TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The Xe-HPG architecture features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The GPU includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, and while tensor core data is not provided, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This large memory pool is a standout feature, providing capacity for high-resolution textures and large datasets that exceed the VRAM of many competing cards in this class. The base clock is 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz.

Compute performance is substantial. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate strong general-purpose compute capability. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate to solid rasterization performance for traditional rendering workloads.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's positioning. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2,969. GeekBench OpenCL scores 109,175, and GeekBench Vulkan scores 94,284. The average benchmark score of 68,809 places the Arc A770 at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX with an average score of 69,000 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68,562 (0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69,870 (1.5% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69,986 (1.7% ahead). The Arc A770 clusters closely with these professional and mining-focused cards, showing it performs at the upper tier of GPU compute.

The 16 GB VRAM is particularly notable. At the 90th percentile, this card offers memory capacity that exceeds many contemporaries, which benefits texture-heavy games, 3D rendering, and AI inference workloads. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures the shading units and ray tracing cores have sufficient data throughput. The dual-slot design with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provides modern display connectivity. The card's production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, but the launch MSRP of 329 USD positions it as a mid-range option at release.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform for the Ultra 5 225T represents Intel's current desktop ecosystem. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides significant expansion bandwidth. The 65 W TDP means the CPU is not power-hungry, allowing for a wide range of cooling solutions.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 550 W, combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, means a system with this pairing has modest power requirements. The GPU uses 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which are widely supported by modern power supplies. A sensible upgrade path would involve increasing memory capacity or speed, as the DDR5 platform benefits from higher bandwidth configurations.

For the GPU, the Arc A770's end-of-life status suggests the successor Battlemage architecture will eventually offer an upgrade path. However, the current card's 90th percentile performance and 16 GB VRAM remain competitive. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and future GPU upgrades will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

Platform considerations include the absence of ECC memory support, which limits use in mission-critical server applications but is standard for consumer desktop builds. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU active. The locked multiplier prevents CPU overclocking, so performance gains must come from memory tuning or platform features rather than core clock increases.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T achieves an average benchmark score of 30,468, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc A770 achieves an average benchmark score of 68,809, placing it at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Combined, this system sits at the 86th percentile overall, indicating a well-balanced pairing with the GPU providing a slight edge in relative performance.

The CPU's benchmark suite shows consistent strength across rendering workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21,971 and single-core of 3,101 represent the most widely cited results. The R20 scores of 9,227 and 1,302, and R15 scores of 2,214 and 312, show proportional scaling across benchmark generations. PassMark multi-thread of 25,358 and single-thread of 4,348 align with the Cinebench results, confirming the CPU's balanced design.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is the primary gaming-oriented benchmark. The GeekBench OpenCL score of 109,175 and Vulkan score of 94,284 indicate strong compute performance across different APIs. The closeness of the OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggests consistent performance regardless of the compute interface used.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU relative to their respective peers. The CPU's 82nd percentile versus the GPU's 90th percentile means the GPU is the stronger component, and the overall 86th percentile reflects this balance. For workloads that leverage both components — such as gaming with physics simulation, or rendering with GPU acceleration — the system performs cohesively without a dominant bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 90th percentile ranking and the CPU's 82nd percentile, this system is expected to deliver smooth gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample resources for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS suggests strong rasterization performance for current-generation titles.

The CPU's single-core performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101, should handle game logic and physics adequately. The PassMark physics score of 2,053 is modest, which may result in lower frame rates in physics-heavy games or simulations. However, the strong multi-thread score of 25,358 ensures that background tasks and streaming workloads do not interfere with gaming performance.

At 1080p, where CPU performance often becomes the limiting factor, the Ultra 5 225T's single-thread scores should support high frame rates in most titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary determinant, and the Arc A770's 90th percentile performance is well-suited for these resolutions. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the performance impact will vary by title.

The lack of measured data means these expectations carry uncertainty. The benchmark scores suggest a capable gaming system, but actual frame rates depend on specific game optimizations, driver maturity, and system configuration. Games that favor Intel GPUs may perform better than the percentile ranking suggests, while titles with poor Intel GPU optimization may underperform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. It does not support hyper-threading, so the thread count equals the core count.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A770 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 225 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is end-of-life production status. Its successor is listed as Battlemage.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What display outputs does the GPU offer?

A: The GPU has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and Intel Arc A770. The CPU is an Arrow Lake architecture processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, producing 10 cores and 10 threads with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an Alchemist generation card with 16 GB of VRAM and a 225 W TDP.

The system achieves an 86th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile. This places the build in the upper tier of desktop systems, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The all-Intel configuration means both components share a common software ecosystem, which can simplify driver and software compatibility.

The CPU's production status is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. The GPU's launch MSRP of 329 USD positions it as a mid-range card at its release, though current pricing may differ. The overall system is suitable for a desktop workstation or gaming rig that prioritizes GPU performance while maintaining solid CPU throughput.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong GPU compute with substantial memory capacity. The Arc A770's 16 GB VRAM and 90th percentile performance make it suitable for content creators working with large textures, 3D artists rendering scenes, and developers running GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's strong multi-thread performance — Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21,971 and PassMark multi-thread of 25,358 — supports compilation, rendering, and data processing tasks.

Gamers at 1440p resolution will benefit most from this build, as the GPU's performance percentile indicates strong frame rates at this resolution while the CPU's single-thread scores of 4,348 in PassMark handle game logic adequately. For 1080p gaming, the system is also capable, though the CPU may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound titles.

Students and small business users requiring a workstation for programming, data analysis, or media creation will find the CPU's data compression score of 233,998 and floating point math score of 82,751 useful. The system's 86th overall percentile places it above most mainstream desktops, making it a capable tool for demanding applications without requiring enterprise-class hardware.

Developers targeting modern APIs will appreciate the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support. The 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing for developers working on graphics applications. The system's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future expansion options remain viable, even as the GPU reaches end-of-life status.