SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

30,468 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc A580: A Desktop Pairing with Strong Synthetic Fundamentals

This build pairs Intel's 10-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with the Intel Arc A580 graphics card, creating a desktop system that sits at the 85th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed in real-world testing. The CPU and GPU each hold strong standalone positions — the processor ranks at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs — suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, meaning the frame rate expectations below are derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The Arc A580's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 indicate a graphics card that should handle 1080p gaming comfortably at high settings, with 1440p gaming being viable but requiring some settings adjustments for demanding titles. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest strong rasterization throughput for traditional game rendering workloads.

At 1080p, this pairing should deliver smooth frame rates in most competitive and mainstream titles, given that the Arc A580 outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.6% and the Intel Arc A570M by 0.8% in average benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3101 and PassMark single-thread score of 4348 — ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in CPU-bound gaming scenarios at this resolution. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates will scale downward from 1080p results, though the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 256-bit bus width provide ample data throughput for higher-resolution textures.

For 4K gaming, this pairing would struggle with demanding modern titles, as the 8 GB VRAM capacity and mid-range compute performance limit high-resolution rendering. The GPU's 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate provides a theoretical ceiling for fill-rate-bound scenarios, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest compared to high-end competitors. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations — the synthetic benchmark scores suggest the GPU's performance tier, but actual game performance depends heavily on driver optimization and title-specific workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz, and its memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool is connected via a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a figure that positions it well for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming workloads.

The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 24 ray tracing cores. The RT hardware supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, though the modest RT core count suggests ray-traced effects will require reduced settings or lower resolutions to maintain playable frame rates. The lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; however, the GPU supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6, providing broad API compatibility.

The benchmark results place the Arc A580 at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57756. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, 0.7% lower), and the Intel Arc A570M (58239, 0.8% higher). The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 indicate strong compute performance for its class, which translates to capable rendering performance in GPU-accelerated applications. The 175 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU rating make this a moderately power-hungry card that fits into typical desktop builds without requiring exotic power delivery.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark portfolio shows a well-rounded processor with both strong single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 21971 multi-core and 3101 single-core, while in Cinebench R20 it achieves 9227 multi-core and 1302 single-core, and in Cinebench R15 it records 2214 multi-core and 312 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals specific workload strengths: multithread score of 25358, single-thread score of 4348, integer math at 59543, floating-point math at 82751, and data compression at 233998.

The GPU's benchmark scores complement the CPU's performance profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 demonstrate solid compute and graphics API performance. The combined percentile of 85 places this pairing above the vast majority of desktop systems, reflecting the balanced nature of the CPU and GPU selection.

The CPU holds the 82nd percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30468. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30422 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30390 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 (0.3% higher). This tight grouping indicates the Ultra 5 225T performs at the level of previous-generation high-end mobile processors and current mid-range mobile chips, which is notable for a desktop part with a 65 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a generally balanced pairing with workload-specific bottleneck shifts. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile are close enough that neither component dramatically limits the other in most scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (233998 PassMark score) and encryption (18289 PassMark score), the processor leads the performance equation, while in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering and high-resolution gaming, the Arc A580 takes the lead role.

The FPS scaling expectations support this balance: at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4348 PassMark single-thread score) should keep frame rates high in CPU-limited scenarios, while at 1440p and above, the GPU's compute resources become the limiting factor. The 0.2% to 0.3% performance deltas against the CPU's nearest rivals suggest that swapping in any of those processors would produce nearly identical results, indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck in this system.

The memory bandwidth situation deserves attention: the CPU's 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is ample for general computing but could become a constraint in memory-intensive workloads, while the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is generous for its class. The 20 MB shared L3 cache on the CPU helps mitigate memory latency in many workloads, but the 10-core, 10-thread configuration (no hyperthreading) means multi-threaded performance is limited by physical core count rather than logical thread count.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and connects to the platform via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for a 10-core desktop processor, and the 3 nm process node contributes to this power efficiency. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 EU provides basic display output and light graphics acceleration, though the discrete Arc A580 GPU handles all demanding graphics workloads. The processor's "T" suffix typically indicates a power-optimized variant, which aligns with the 65 W TDP and the efficiency-focused design.

Benchmark results show strong single-threaded performance (3101 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4348 in PassMark single-thread) that rivals much higher-TDP processors, while multi-threaded performance (21971 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) is competitive for the core count. The PassMark physics score of 2053 and find prime numbers score of 284 indicate reasonable computational throughput, though these are not standout figures. The extended instructions score of 20083 and random string sorting score of 28774 round out a versatile performance profile suitable for diverse workloads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who need balanced performance across gaming and productivity tasks without requiring top-tier enthusiast hardware. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A580's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming in competitive titles, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures responsive gameplay. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core Cinebench scores (21971 in R23 multi-core) and the GPU's OpenCL compute capability (91657 Geekbench OpenCL score).

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 233998 and floating-point math score of 82751, which indicate strong performance in compilation and numerical computing tasks. Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity will find the 10-core processor with 20 MB L3 cache capable of handling office applications, web browsing, and light content creation simultaneously. The 65 W CPU TDP and 175 W GPU TDP make this a build that can be cooled with standard desktop components, though the GPU's dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors require appropriate case space and PSU capacity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 4348 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU's 2229 3DMark Steel Nomad score combine to support frame rates well above 60 FPS in most competitive titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 physical cores handle encoding overhead alongside gaming, with the 233998 data compression score indicating strong throughput for stream encoding, while the GPU's Vulkan performance (79381) supports capture and rendering simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's 21971 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides solid timeline performance, while the GPU's 91657 OpenCL score accelerates effects rendering and export encoding, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit working with very high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance handle GPU-accelerated renders, while the CPU's 82751 floating-point math score supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks.

Software development: The CPU's 59543 integer math score and 20083 extended instructions score indicate strong compilation performance, while the 20 MB L3 cache and DDR5 memory bandwidth reduce build times for large codebases.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP processor with integrated graphics provides an efficient baseline for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web-based applications, with the discrete GPU available for occasional graphics acceleration when needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 85th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations, with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile individually.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 30468 places it 0.2% above the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, and 0.3% below the Intel Core i5-13600H.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and the GPU provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the Arc A580 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest RT core count will require settings adjustments for playable frame rates.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, the GPU has a 175 W TDP, and the suggested PSU rating for the system is 450 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures available for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for platform connectivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T processor with the Intel Arc A580 graphics card. The CPU is a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 card based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combined 85th percentile ranking places this system above the vast majority of desktop configurations, with the GPU's 87th percentile slightly outpacing the CPU's 82nd percentile.

The pairing represents a balanced mid-range desktop configuration suitable for 1080p gaming and general productivity. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP create a system that is power-efficient relative to high-end alternatives, while the 450 W suggested PSU keeps the power delivery requirements manageable. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU and 20 MB L3 cache on the CPU define the system's performance ceiling, making it well-suited for mainstream workloads rather than extreme enthusiast use cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and the 20 MB L3 cache provide a solid foundation for future upgrades within the same socket generation.

The GPU's 450 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for component upgrades, and the 2x 8-pin power connectors support the card's 175 W TDP. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a higher-tier Arc GPU with more VRAM or increased compute performance, as the 8 GB memory capacity is the primary limitation for higher-resolution gaming. On the CPU side, upgrading to a higher-core-count Arrow Lake processor within Socket 1851 would improve multi-threaded performance without requiring a platform change, though the 65 W TDP class suggests the current processor is already power-optimized. The DDR5 memory support allows for future capacity and speed upgrades, and the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes provide bandwidth headroom for next-generation storage and expansion cards.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225T + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds