SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the Intel Arc B770 presents a desktop build where the balance of responsibilities shifts noticeably depending on the workload type. The CPU, sitting at the 85th percentile among all processors, is a strong performer in its class, while the GPU, at the 50th percentile, is a more modest contender relative to the broader graphics card market. This disparity in percentile rankings is the first clear signal that the system's overall ceiling in many tasks will be set by the graphics card, particularly in scenarios that are heavily GPU-bound.

Looking at the CPU's own benchmark data, the multi-threaded performance is robust but not overwhelming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891 points places it in a competitive position, with its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, showing a delta of 0% in average benchmark score. This suggests a near-parity in overall compute throughput with that specific competitor. However, the single-threaded score of 3655 in Cinebench R23 is a standout figure, indicating that the CPU's architecture is particularly well-suited for tasks that rely on high-frequency, low-latency execution. The Passmark single-thread score of 4412 reinforces this, suggesting that the processor is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck in everyday responsive tasks or in games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

The bottleneck analysis hinges on the interaction between these two components. In a typical gaming scenario at high resolutions, the Arc B770's 50th percentile standing means it will likely be the limiting factor. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are ample for modern textures, but its raw compute throughput, measured at 19.66 TFLOPS FP32, is not exceptional. Therefore, in graphically intense scenes, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU's rendering capabilities, with the CPU having ample headroom to feed it data. The data suggests the CPU will not be the constraint; it is the GPU that will determine the upper limit of graphical performance.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios such as data compression or encryption, the roles reverse. The Passmark data compression score of 302811 is a high figure, demonstrating the CPU's efficiency in handling these specialized instructions. The data encryption score of 22285 further confirms this. Here, the GPU is largely idle, and the system's performance is entirely dependent on the CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads. The lack of hyper-threading, evidenced by the equal core and thread count, is a notable architectural choice that can impact heavily threaded workloads, but the high clock speeds of 3.30 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost help to mitigate this in many real-world applications.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact pair, can be inferred from the component scores. Since the GPU is the weaker link in the chain for gaming, we can expect that lowering graphical settings or resolution will yield significant frame rate gains, as the GPU's load is reduced and the CPU's high single-thread performance can push frames more easily. Conversely, increasing resolution or graphical fidelity will place more strain on the GPU, and the frame rate will drop proportionally to the GPU's performance limits, not the CPU's. This creates a system where the user must be mindful of the GPU's limitations when targeting high-refresh-rate gaming, as the CPU is more than capable of supporting high frame rates if the GPU can deliver them.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the Battlemage generation, and utilizes the BMG-G31 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process. This is a desktop-class graphics card with a dual-slot design, requiring a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup. The card's thermal design power is 225 W, and Intel suggests a 550 W power supply for the system, indicating a moderate power draw that is manageable for most mid-range builds.

In terms of memory, the Arc B770 is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This configuration is a significant asset for modern games and creative applications that require large texture pools and high-resolution assets. The memory clock is listed as 2000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps. This bandwidth figure is crucial for avoiding bottlenecks in high-resolution rendering, and the 16 GB capacity ensures that the card will not run out of memory in most current and near-future titles at 1440p or even 4K with adjusted settings.

The compute capabilities are defined by 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The card also features 32 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate to a raw processing power of 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 operations, indicating a 2:1 ratio for the latter. This suggests that the card has headroom for workloads that can utilize reduced precision, though its primary gaming performance will be dictated by the FP32 throughput. The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that this is a mid-range performer, not a flagship, and its benchmark scores will reflect a capable but not class-leading rendering ability.

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs. The presence of 32 ray tracing cores means the hardware is capable of accelerating ray-traced effects, though the overall performance in such scenarios will be limited by the card's mid-range compute power. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports, allowing for multiple high-resolution monitors. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a mature standard that provides sufficient bandwidth for this card's data transfer needs.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this CPU+GPU combination is derived from the individual component scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 36938, which places it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 225 outperforms a significant majority of processors on the market. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 with a delta of -0.4%. This tight grouping suggests the Core Ultra 5 225 is right at the top of its performance tier, trading blows with these comparable AMD offerings.

Specific CPU benchmark scores reveal its strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891 is a solid result for a 10-core processor. The single-core score of 3655 is more impressive, showing a high level of per-thread performance that is beneficial for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The Passmark suite provides further insight: a multithread score of 30459, a single-thread score of 4412, and specialized scores for data compression (302811), encryption (22285), and floating-point math (92038). The integer math score of 65345 and the extended instructions score of 27162 round out the CPU's computational profile, showing balanced capabilities across different types of workloads.

The GPU, on the other hand, has no benchmark scores listed in the data pack, but its percentile ranking of 50th among all GPUs gives a clear picture of its standing. It is an average performer, neither excelling nor underperforming in the broader market context. The combined percentile for this build is 68, which is a reasonable overall tier, suggesting that the system as a whole is above average, but not at the top echelon. The CPU is the clear star of the show in terms of relative performance, while the GPU is a more workmanlike component that provides solid, if not spectacular, graphical capabilities. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and can handle modern gaming, but the gaming experience will be capped by the GPU's mid-range performance level.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This build is a capable, but not ideal, choice for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655) is excellent for driving high frame rates in esports titles. However, the GPU's 50th percentile standing and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will likely be the limiting factor in achieving very high frame rates (e.g., 144+ FPS) in more demanding AAA games. Users can expect solid performance at 1080p, but will need to lower settings to reach the highest refresh rates.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 5 225's 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with its high Passmark multithread score of 30459, provide a good foundation for streaming. The CPU can handle the encoding workload while maintaining playable frame rates in most games, especially given the GPU's dedicated hardware for rendering. However, the lack of hyper-threading might be a minor constraint when running both a game and a streaming encoder simultaneously on the CPU, so using the GPU's encoder (if supported) would be a more efficient path.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4412) will make timeline scrubbing and effects application responsive. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are excellent for handling high-resolution video layers and GPU-accelerated effects. The FP32 compute of 19.66 TFLOPS is sufficient for most editing tasks, though it won't be the fastest for complex 3D rendering within the editor.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, this system performs well. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891 shows that the CPU can handle complex scenes, though it is not a top-tier workstation processor. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 16 GB of VRAM will provide a decent performance level, but its 50th percentile ranking means it will be slower than many dedicated rendering cards. This is a usable, but not professional-grade, option for 3D work.

Software Development: The CPU's balanced performance is well-suited for software development. The Passmark integer math score of 65345 and data compression score of 302811 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing tasks. The high single-thread speed ensures quick response times in IDEs and for single-threaded build steps. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 16 GB of VRAM could be useful for developers working on graphics-related projects.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks, but that is not a negative. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers will run flawlessly. The GPU's capabilities are largely unused in this scenario, but the system will be highly responsive and future-proof for any more demanding tasks a student might encounter, such as light photo editing or CAD work, where the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM would be an asset.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S). It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a die size of 243 mm². This advanced process node contributes to its efficiency and performance characteristics. The CPU has 10 cores and 10 threads, which is a notable configuration as it omits hyper-threading, meaning each core handles a single thread. The base clock is 3.30 GHz, which can boost up to 4.90 GHz, providing strong single-thread responsiveness.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 20 MB shared L3 cache. This large cache structure helps to feed the cores with data quickly, reducing latency and improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. For expansion, it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a modern standard for high-speed peripherals and graphics cards.

The benchmark scores reflect a processor that is strong in both single and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 scores of 3655 (single-core) and 25891 (multi-core) are indicative of a well-balanced chip. The Passmark single-thread score of 4412 is particularly high, placing it in the upper echelon for per-core performance. The data compression score of 302811 and the floating-point math score of 92038 show that the CPU is efficient at both integer and floating-point operations, making it versatile for a range of applications from office work to content creation. The 85th percentile ranking confirms its position as a high-performing mid-range CPU, with its nearest rivals being AMD's Ryzen 5 series, indicating it is a direct competitor in this segment. The processor has a 65 W TDP, making it an energy-efficient choice that is easy to cool. It is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not officially supported.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data pack. Therefore, the following frame rate expectations are estimated qualitatively based on the individual benchmark scores of the Core Ultra 5 225 and the Arc B770. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4412) is a strong indicator that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. This is crucial for achieving high and stable frame rates, especially in games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

Given the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its raw compute power of 19.66 TFLOPS FP32, we can estimate that the Arc B770 will deliver playable performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most modern titles. At 1080p with high settings, users can expect frame rates in the range of 60-100 FPS for demanding AAA games, and potentially higher for less demanding or esports titles. The CPU's strength will be most evident here, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential without being held back.

At 1440p, the GPU will become the primary limiting factor. Frame rates will likely drop to the 50-80 FPS range for demanding games, requiring some settings adjustments to maintain a smooth 60 FPS experience. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage here, as it allows for high-resolution textures without memory capacity issues, even at higher resolutions. At 4K, the Arc B770 will struggle to maintain high frame rates in the most demanding titles, and users would need to significantly lower graphical settings to achieve a playable experience. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient, but the compute throughput is not high enough for consistent 4K high-refresh gaming.

Overall, the gaming performance is expected to be solid for a mid-range system. The CPU ensures that frame pacing is consistent and that the system is responsive, while the GPU provides a competent, though not exceptional, level of graphical fidelity. Users targeting 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings will find this pairing to be a good match, while those seeking 4K or maximum refresh rates will need to consider a more powerful GPU. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is built for the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is a modern socket designed for the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, as evidenced by the CPU's memory support. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking interface for high-speed storage and graphics. This means the platform is not immediately obsolete and offers a clear path for future upgrades.

The GPU, the Intel Arc B770, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. While the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5, the GPU's Gen 4 interface is not a bottleneck in practice, as the bandwidth provided by PCIe 4.0 x16 is more than sufficient for this class of graphics card. The system's power requirements are moderate, with the GPU's TDP at 225 W and the CPU's TDP at 65 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which is a common wattage for mid-range builds and leaves some headroom for additional components like storage drives and fans.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be to replace the GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it has significant performance headroom, and it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for a more powerful graphics card. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would provide a substantial boost in gaming performance, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread performance and modern platform features would support such an upgrade well. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (upgrading from the base configuration) could benefit memory-sensitive applications, though the dual-channel 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already a solid foundation. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 also means that future high-speed NVMe SSDs can be installed without changing the motherboard, making storage upgrades a straightforward and effective way to improve system responsiveness.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225?

A: The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 36938, placing it in the upper mid-range tier. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, has a delta of 0% in average score.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B770 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Arc B770 is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 5 225 a good choice for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: The CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655) is excellent for high-refresh gaming. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it will likely be the limiting factor, so achieving very high frame rates in demanding games will require lower settings.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Core Ultra 5 225 is not multiplier-unlocked, so official overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the memory type supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Intel Arc B770?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc B770 is 550 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data pack. All frame rate expectations are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This build is a strong fit for a user who prioritizes CPU performance and needs a capable, all-around system. Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p resolution with high settings will find this pairing to be a good match. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that games run smoothly, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM provides ample memory for modern textures. Those who play less demanding or esports titles will be able to take advantage of the CPU's speed to achieve high frame rates.

Content creators, particularly those focused on video editing, will appreciate the combination of the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891) and the GPU's large memory pool. The system can handle 4K video timelines and GPU-accelerated effects without major issues. For 3D rendering, the CPU is a capable workhorse, and the GPU offers a usable, though not top-tier, level of acceleration.

Software developers will find the CPU's balanced performance, with a high Passmark integer math score of 65345, to be well-suited for compilation and data processing tasks. The high single-thread speed ensures a responsive development environment. Students and small business users will find this system to be highly capable for all standard office tasks, with more than enough performance headroom for future, more demanding applications. The 65 W CPU TDP also makes it an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs for long periods. The overall tier of this build, at the 68th percentile, indicates it is a solid, above-average system that is not aimed at the extreme high-end, but rather at users who want a reliable and powerful machine for a wide range of tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with the Intel Arc B770, creating a desktop system that is anchored by a high-performing CPU. The Core Ultra 5 225, with its 10 cores and 10 threads, is a modern Arrow Lake processor that excels in single-threaded tasks and holds its own in multi-threaded workloads, as shown by its 85th percentile ranking. The Arc B770, based on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, is a mid-range graphics card with a substantial 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, but its overall compute performance places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this system is 68, indicating that it is a solidly above-average desktop configuration. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, and it provides a significant amount of performance headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The system is well-balanced for a range of tasks, from gaming at 1080p and 1440p to content creation and software development. It is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it represents a sensible and capable pairing for a user who values CPU performance and wants a reliable, versatile machine for work and play. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated, but the component scores suggest a competent gaming experience that is limited by the GPU's mid-range compute power.