SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange of the benchmark database. The CPU, based on the Arrow Lake architecture and built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, offers a modern foundation with 10 cores and 10 threads. The GPU, an Alchemist-generation part, provides a substantial amount of graphics horsepower. The data indicates a balanced system where the CPU's strong single-thread performance complements the GPU's compute capabilities, though the combination has specific strengths and limitations that define its best use cases.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture. It operates on a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 3.30 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP. This is a locked multiplier part, so it is not intended for overclocking, but its stock performance is substantial for its class.

The cache hierarchy is notable: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB of L3 cache. This layout provides fast access to frequently used data, which is beneficial for both productivity and gaming workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature for storage and expansion. The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG with 16 execution units, is present for basic display output, but the dedicated GPU will handle all demanding graphics tasks.

Benchmark results show a CPU that excels in single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 3655, while the multi-core score is 25891. The ratio between these scores indicates that while multi-threaded performance is solid, the processor's single-core strength is its standout feature. This is reinforced by the PassMark single-thread score of 4412. In integer math, the score is 65345, and in floating-point math, it reaches 92038, showing strong arithmetic capabilities. The PassMark multithread score is 30459.

The CPU's overall average benchmark score is 36938, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average score of 36945, which is a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093, a delta of -0.4%, and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112, a delta of -0.5%. This means the Core Ultra 5 225 is effectively tied with these competitors, trading blows within a margin of less than 1%. For real workloads, this means a user would not perceive a performance difference between these chips in most applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark picture is one of strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2609, with a single-core score of 368. The R20 results show 6317 multi-core and 891 single-core. The R23 multi-core score of 25891 indicates the processor can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, though it is not a top-tier workstation part. The PassMark data compression score of 302811 is a very strong result, suggesting fast file archiving and decompression. Data encryption scores 22285, and extended instructions score 27162. The physics score in PassMark is 2342, which is a moderate result for a desktop chip.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A750, delivers its own set of benchmark numbers. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2612. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 98554, and Vulkan score is 85631. The PassMark G3D score is 12534, which places the GPU in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The PassMark GPU compute score is 5368. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 65, 72, and 70 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 181. The 2D graphics score is 732.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582. Its nearest rivals are also extremely close. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, a delta of 0.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a delta of -0.4%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a delta of 0.5%. This puts the Arc A750 in a performance tier where it is essentially equivalent to these cards, despite their different architectures and market positions.

The combined picture shows a system in the 76th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, but the combined system percentile reflects a balance where both components are capable. The data shows that the CPU is a stronger relative performer than the GPU, but the pairing is not severely imbalanced.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates that the CPU and GPU are relatively well matched, but the CPU holds a slight edge in its respective percentile ranking. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests that in many workloads, the GPU may be the limiting factor, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. However, the CPU's strong single-thread performance means it is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios where frame rates are often limited by the graphics card.

In CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and integer math, the processor is the clear driver. The PassMark data compression score of 302811 and integer math score of 65345 highlight its ability to handle heavy computational loads. For content creation tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's multi-core score of 25891 in Cinebench R23 will be a significant contributor, but the GPU's compute capabilities will also factor into the final render times.

For gaming, the balance shifts. The GPU's performance, represented by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and PassMark G3D score of 12534, will be the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions and detail settings. The CPU's single-core score of 3655 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can keep up with game logic and physics calculations without holding the GPU back in most scenarios. However, in very CPU-intensive games or at lower resolutions, the GPU's 66th percentile ranking could become the bottleneck, limiting the frame rate despite the CPU's headroom.

The FPS scaling in this pairing is not directly measured, but the data suggests that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's performance tier, comparable to the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc B570, is the more likely constraint at 1440p or 4K resolutions. At 1080p with high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread strength will be more important, and the balance may be closer.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data is marked as not measured, so the following figures are qualitative expectations rather than precise results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12534 and its 66th percentile ranking, the Arc A750 is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming card. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU should handle most modern titles with playable frame rates, likely in the 60-100 FPS range depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3655, will ensure that game engines are fed with data efficiently, avoiding stutters or frame drops in CPU-bound scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary limiter. The Arc A750's performance, comparable to the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc B570, suggests that it can handle 1440p with some settings adjustments. Expect frame rates in the 50-80 FPS range on ultra settings, with the possibility of higher rates if settings are lowered to high or medium. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p textures, but may be a limiting factor in some newer titles with larger asset requirements.

At 4K, this pairing will struggle to maintain high frame rates on ultra settings. The GPU's performance tier is not designed for 4K gaming at maximum detail. Users would need to significantly reduce settings to achieve playable frame rates, or they should consider a higher-tier GPU for 4K. The CPU would not be the bottleneck at 4K, as the GPU's load increases and the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for the lower frame rates typical of 4K gaming.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for a user who wants a balanced desktop system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as productive work. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance make it an excellent choice for gamers who prioritize high frame rates in esports titles or games that are sensitive to CPU performance. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking ensures that the system can handle modern AAA titles at 1080p and 1440p with reasonable settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and PassMark multithread score of 30459 indicate that the processor can handle rendering tasks, though it is not a top-tier workstation chip. The GPU's compute performance, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 5368, can assist in GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread performance for compilation tasks and its support for modern instruction sets, as evidenced by the PassMark extended instructions score of 27162. The processor's 10 cores and 10 threads are sufficient for parallel builds and testing. Students and small business users will find this system capable for office work, data analysis, and general productivity, with the data compression score of 302811 indicating fast file operations.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 36938, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, -0.2% delta), and Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, -0.5% delta). Performance differences are negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582 and is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with the Intel Arc B570 (20556, 0.1% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.2% delta).

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU's performance tier is not suited for 4K gaming at ultra settings. The Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12534 suggests it is best for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring significant settings reductions.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance like?

A: The CPU has a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4412. This is a strong result, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs and making it excellent for gaming and lightly-threaded tasks.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the Core Ultra 5 225 is not intended for overclocking. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the maximum frequency the processor will achieve under load.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for the processor's workload and pairs well with the GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 76, indicating it outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the database, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to the GPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has a transistor count of 21,700 million on a 406 mm² die. The GPU chip is DG2-512, and it is part of the Alchemist generation. The card has a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective, on an 8 GB GDDR6 memory bus with a width of 256 bit. This provides a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. It also features 28 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 34.41 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. This compute capability makes the card suitable for GPU-accelerated tasks beyond gaming.

The card has a TDP of 225 W and requires a dual-slot cooler with a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and applications.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 85631. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that the card is a solid mid-range performer, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. Its nearest rivals, the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile, have nearly identical average scores, confirming this performance tier. The GPU's compute score of 5368 in PassMark suggests it can handle some compute workloads, though it is not a top-tier rendering card.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with the Intel Arc A750 in a desktop configuration. The CPU, a 10-core Arrow Lake part, is a modern, efficient processor with strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 85th percentile ranking. The GPU, an Alchemist-generation Arc A750, is a mid-range card with 8 GB of VRAM and a 66th percentile ranking. Together, they form a system in the 76th combined percentile of all desktop pairings.

The data shows that this is a balanced pairing for mainstream use. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is adequate but not exceptional. This means the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like productivity, content creation, and esports gaming, while being capable but not outstanding in GPU-bound tasks like AAA gaming at high resolutions. The overall tier is upper-midrange, suitable for a wide range of users who do not require top-tier performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: For esports and competitive titles, this pairing is excellent. The CPU's single-thread score of 3655 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4412 ensure high frame rates are achievable. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12534 is sufficient for 1080p high-refresh gaming, and the CPU will not bottleneck the graphics card in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with its 85th percentile ranking, provide enough headroom for game capture and encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 30459 indicates the CPU can handle the extra load, though the GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware may require using CPU-based encoding, which will impact game performance.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 will handle timeline editing and rendering well. The GPU's compute score of 5368 can accelerate effects and exports, though it is not a top-tier workstation card. This is a capable system for 1080p and light 4K video editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance is the main driver here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 will render CPU-based scenes efficiently. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport and GPU-accelerated render engines, but its 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not exceptional, so this is a mid-tier rendering system.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4412, is ideal for compilation and code execution. The PassMark extended instructions score of 27162 shows support for modern instruction sets. This is a fast, responsive system for development work.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this system is overkill. The CPU's data compression score of 302811 ensures fast file operations, and the 10-core design handles multitasking with ease. The integrated graphics are sufficient for basic display, but the dedicated GPU will not be used for typical office tasks.

Small business workstation: The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and the system's 76th combined percentile make it a solid choice for small business workstations. It can handle financial modeling, data analysis, and light content creation without issue, and the GPU provides additional compute acceleration for compatible applications.