SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

36,938 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc A350 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific, modest performance tier. The CPU is a modern 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It operates at a 3.30 GHz base clock and boosts up to 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU, meanwhile, is an end-of-life Alchemist-generation part with a 25 W TDP, 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows a CPU that sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits exactly at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all discussion of frame rates here is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor, meaning there is no hyper-threading to double the thread count. This is a straight 10-core design. The architecture is Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and it belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The process node is 3 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The cache hierarchy shows a 192 KB L1 per core, a 3 MB L2 per core, and a 20 MB shared L3 cache. This is a substantial amount of L3, which helps with workloads that benefit from shared data access across cores.

In single-threaded performance, the chip scores 4,412 in Passmark single-thread tests, and 3,655 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These numbers place it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs for lightly-threaded tasks. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is a key contributor here. For multi-threaded work, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 25,891, and the Passmark multithread score is 30,459. The data shows that this CPU's average benchmark score is 36,938, which puts it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F at 36,945 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D at 37,018 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37,093 (-0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37,112 (-0.5% delta). This indicates that the Core Ultra 5 225 is essentially tied with these parts in overall CPU performance, despite differences in core counts and architectures.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units, which is a basic iGPU for display output rather than gaming. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option. The launch MSRP is $246. This CPU is aimed at mainstream desktop users who need strong single-thread performance and respectable multi-thread capability without the high power draw of flagship parts.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 225 delivers a broad set of benchmark results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,609 multicore and 368 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 6,317 multicore and 891 single-core. The R23 scores are 25,891 multicore and 3,655 single-core. The Passmark suite shows 302,811 for data compression, 22,285 for data encryption, 27,162 for extended instructions, 358 for finding prime numbers, 92,038 for floating point math, 65,345 for integer math, 30,459 for multithread, 2,342 for physics, 36,590 for random string sorting, and 4,412 for single-thread. The average benchmark score is 36,938.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking across all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Compared to its nearest rivals, the delta percentages are all within 0.5%, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 225 is statistically indistinguishable in aggregate performance from the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and the Intel Core i9-12900T. This is a crowded performance tier, and the choice between these parts will come down to platform features and price rather than raw speed.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A350 has no benchmark entries in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile rank among all GPUs is 50, which places it in the exact middle of the GPU performance distribution. The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 68. The data shows that this system is not balanced toward the GPU; the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. For gaming, the estimated FPS will be constrained by the GPU's mid-pack performance. For CPU-heavy tasks like software compilation or data processing, the system will feel much stronger.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350's 50th percentile ranking means it delivers average frame rates at best. With 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, the estimated FPS at 1080p will be moderate but not sufficient for high refresh rates in demanding titles. The CPU's 4,412 Passmark single-thread score ensures that the processor will not be the bottleneck at lower resolutions, but the GPU will cap the experience.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 20 MB of L3 cache provide enough headroom for encoding overhead. The Passmark multithread score of 30,459 suggests that simultaneous gaming and streaming is feasible, especially if the game is not CPU-intensive. However, the GPU's mid-pack performance means the game side will suffer if encoding is offloaded to the GPU without dedicated hardware.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance is solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,891. This handles timeline scrubbing and export tasks with ease. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate can accelerate effects and rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of projects that can be manipulated in real time.

3D rendering: The CPU will carry the workload in CPU-based renderers, with the 25,891 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicating capable performance for moderate scenes. The GPU can assist in GPU-accelerated renderers, but its 50th percentile standing and 4 GB memory limit its usefulness for high-poly scenes. Expect render times to be acceptable for hobbyist work, not professional production.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 4,412 and the strong Passmark integer math score of 65,345 are excellent for compilation and code processing. The 85th percentile CPU ranking means the system will feel snappy during builds and testing. The GPU is irrelevant here, so the system is well-suited for developers who need a fast CPU without a gaming-grade GPU.

Student and office work: The CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP make this a low-power system. The Passmark physics score of 2,342 and data encryption score of 22,285 indicate it handles spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU can drive displays, meaning the discrete GPU is not even necessary for basic office tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap texture quality and resolution. The CPU's high single-thread performance will keep up with the GPU's output, so the bottleneck is squarely on the GPU side. In CPU-intensive tasks like rendering or compilation, the GPU's role diminishes, and the system performs close to what the CPU's 85th percentile suggests.

The combined percentile of 68 is a weighted average that reflects this mismatch. The estimated FPS, based on the GPU's mid-pack performance, will be lower than what the CPU alone suggests is possible. If a user upgrades the GPU later, the CPU has enough headroom to support a much faster graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU ensures that bandwidth will not be a limitation for future GPUs. For now, the system is a CPU-first build where the GPU is adequate for light gaming and basic acceleration but not for high-end 3D work or high-refresh gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 36,938, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU good for gaming?

A: The GPU is at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating average performance. With 4 GB VRAM, it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but high-refresh or high-detail gaming will be limited.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 4,412 in Passmark single-thread and 3,655 in Cinebench R23 single-core, placing it at the 85th percentile overall.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, reflecting the CPU's strong 85th percentile and the GPU's weaker 50th percentile.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with modest settings will find the Arc A350 sufficient, but they should expect average frame rates given its 50th percentile standing. Content creators who work with video editing or software development will benefit most from the CPU's 85th percentile ranking and its 25,891 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Students and office workers will appreciate the low power draw of 65 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP, making this a quiet and efficient workstation. Small business workstations handling data processing or compilation will see strong performance in integer math (65,345 Passmark) and data compression (302,811 Passmark). The system is not ideal for 3D rendering professionals or high-refresh gamers, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 50th percentile performance will be the limiting factor. The CPU's launch MSRP of $246 indicates a mainstream positioning, and its performance rivals more expensive parts from previous generations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1851, which is the socket for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and the memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for current and future expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 200 W, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a modest power supply is adequate. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile performance has significant headroom. The CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and 10 cores will not bottleneck a faster GPU in most scenarios. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is fine for consumer workloads. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available; users seeking that feature would need a different CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The CPU is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, and the GPU is the Intel Arc A350. The combined percentile is 68, which places this system above the median but below the high-performance tier. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, making it a strong processor for its class, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile, making it an average graphics solution. The overall tier is that of a capable productivity machine with mild gaming capability. The data shows that this is a CPU-centric build where the GPU is a secondary consideration. Users who prioritize the CPU for work tasks and need a basic GPU for display output or light gaming will find this an appropriate pairing. Those who expect high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering will be disappointed by the GPU's performance ceiling.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is based on the DG2-128 chip, using the Xe-HPG architecture, and belongs to the Alchemist generation, specifically Arc 3. It is built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though the tensor core count is null in the data. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz. The memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective and a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 25 W, and the slot width is single-slot. It has no display outputs, meaning it requires the CPU's integrated graphics or another GPU for display. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics, and its successor is Battlemage. The GPU is end-of-life and has no benchmark scores in the data, so its 50th percentile ranking is based on other factors. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 4 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy workloads. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the overall performance is average, as reflected in its 50th percentile standing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds