SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135U + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

22,618 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U and Intel Arc A530M pairing represents a highly capable mobile platform, placing in the 81st percentile of all benchmarked system combinations. The CPU performs on par with last-generation H-series processors, while the GPU delivers a significant advantage in graphics workloads, making this a well-balanced laptop solution for mainstream gaming and content creation.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A530M is a discrete mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically from the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile). The chip, designated DG2-256, is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 42.8M per mm².

Memory configuration is substantial for a mobile part. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. This amount of VRAM and bandwidth positions the card to handle high-resolution textures and modern game assets without immediate capacity constraints.

Clock speeds are modest but effective. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The GPU features 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Pixel rate is rated at 62.40 GPixel/s, while texture rate reaches 124.8 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is clearly defined in the specifications. FP32 throughput is 3.994 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance doubles to 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. For ray tracing, the chip includes 12 dedicated RT cores, which is a meaningful number for hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in supported titles. The API support is fully modern, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results confirm the hardware design. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 49735, while the Vulkan score is 43492. The average benchmark score across these tests is 46614, placing the GPU in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. This is a strong showing, indicating the A530M outperforms the majority of discrete graphics solutions in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Arc A530M is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which has an average score of 46601 and a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46702, which is 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043, putting it 1.2% behind. Interestingly, the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972, which is 1.4% lower. The data shows the A530M sits in a competitive band with these established mobile and workstation GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 3.994 TFLOPS suggests capable handling of real-time graphics, while the 12 RT cores provide hardware support for ray tracing that older or entry-level parts lack. The 8 GB VRAM is particularly relevant for rendering, as it allows larger scenes and more complex materials to reside on the GPU without spilling to system memory.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 81, which places the system firmly in the upper tier of all benchmarked laptop configurations. This is a strong indicator that the pairing is well matched for a wide range of demanding tasks.

The CPU scores are consistent across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1634 and singlecore is 228. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 5934 with a singlecore score of 837. The more demanding Cinebench R23 test yields a multicore score of 9315 and a singlecore score of 1563.

PassMark results show a mix of specialized and general workloads. The multithread score is 17359, while single-thread is 3343. Integer math scores 56864, floating-point math scores 41232, and extended instructions score 11144. Data compression scores 196712, data encryption scores 12195, and random string sorting scores 21620. Physics scores 1122, and find prime numbers scores 64.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22618, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. This is a robust position, indicating the Ultra 5 135U outperforms roughly three-quarters of all processors in the database.

The GPU tells a similar story. With an average benchmark score of 46614, the Arc A530M sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of a 76th-percentile CPU with an 85th-percentile GPU results in an 81st-percentile overall system, suggesting the GPU is the stronger component relative to the broader market.

The combined picture is one of balance with a slight GPU bias. The CPU is competitive with recent mainstream mobile processors, while the GPU punches above its weight class, delivering performance that rivals dedicated workstation cards like the RTX A2000. This makes the system more capable in graphics-intensive tasks than in pure compute or multi-threaded CPU workloads, though both are above average.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the Meteor Lake architecture. It is manufactured by Intel on a 7 nm process and uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket. The chip has 12 cores and 14 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores for a balance of power and responsiveness.

Clock speeds are notable for a low-power part. The base clock is 1600.00 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.40 GHz. This wide range allows the processor to idle efficiently while still providing strong single-thread performance when needed. The TDP is 15 watts, which is typical for an ultra-low-power mobile processor designed for thin-and-light laptops.

The cache hierarchy is generous. L1 cache is 112 KB per core, L2 cache is 2 MB per core, and L3 cache is 12 MB shared. This layout supports the heterogeneous core design, ensuring frequently accessed data is close to the execution units.

Memory support includes DDR5 with the caveat that support depends on the motherboard. The memory bus is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic graphics capability independent of the discrete GPU.

Benchmark scores indicate a processor that handles both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads competently. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1563 is respectable for a mobile chip, while the multicore score of 9315 demonstrates the benefit of the 12-core design. The PassMark single-thread score of 3343 confirms strong per-core performance, which translates to snappy application launches and responsive everyday use.

The nearest rivals show the Ultra 5 135U is in a highly competitive segment. The Intel Core i5-12500H has an average score of 22625, with a deltaPct of 0, making it a statistical tie. The Intel Core i7-1270P scores 22502, which is 0.5% lower. The Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22468, 0.7% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22791, which is 0.8% higher. The data shows these processors are essentially interchangeable in overall performance, with differences well within normal variance.

For real workloads, the 15-watt TDP combined with strong boost clocks means the CPU can handle bursty tasks like web browsing, document editing, and light coding without thermal throttling. The PassMark data encryption score of 12195 suggests adequate performance for disk encryption and VPN traffic. The data compression score of 196712 indicates strong file archiving capabilities. The floating-point math score of 41232 supports scientific and engineering applications that rely on numerical computation.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 81, placing the system in the upper tier of all benchmarked laptop configurations. The CPU sits in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ultra 5 135U has an average benchmark score of 22618. It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-12500H which scores 22625. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is 0.8% faster, while the Intel Core i7-1270P is 0.5% slower and the Intel Core i5-13500H is 0.7% slower.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A530M compare to competing GPUs?

A: The Arc A530M has an average benchmark score of 46614. It is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M which scores 46601. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is 0.2% faster, while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.2% slower and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 1.4% slower.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A530M includes 12 dedicated RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, both of which include ray tracing APIs.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U has 12 cores and 14 threads. It has a base clock of 1600.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: What is the release date of these components?

A: The CPU was released on December 13, 2023, and the GPU was released on July 31, 2023. Both components are currently marked as Active in production status.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 85th-percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM provide a solid foundation for esports titles and moderately demanding games. The CPU's single-thread score of 3343 in PassMark ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited in most scenarios, though the 15-watt TDP may constrain sustained multi-core gaming loads.

Streaming: The CPU's data encryption score of 12195 supports the overhead of encoding and network transmission, while the GPU's dedicated RT cores and 12_2 feature support allow for hardware-accelerated encoding paths. The 14 threads provide headroom for simultaneous game and stream processing, though the low TDP suggests a preference for GPU-based encoding.

Video editing: The GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing. The CPU's multicore Cinebench R23 score of 9315 handles proxy generation and export tasks competently, while the 8 GB VRAM allows for larger preview buffers and more complex color grades.

3D rendering: The 12 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a significant advantage for realistic rendering in supported applications. The GPU's 1536 shading units process complex shaders efficiently, and the CPU's floating-point math score of 41232 contributes to physics simulations and geometry processing.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 14 threads compile code efficiently, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 17359. The data compression score of 196712 speeds up build artifact handling, while the single-thread performance of 3343 ensures fast interaction with IDEs and code analysis tools.

Student and office work: The 15-watt TDP enables long battery life in thin-and-light chassis, while the CPU's 76th-percentile ranking handles spreadsheet calculations, document formatting, and web browsing without strain. The GPU's presence, while not needed for basic office tasks, ensures smooth rendering of presentations and light photo editing.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a mobile professional or enthusiast who needs a laptop capable of both productivity and graphics-intensive work. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 85th-percentile score and 8 GB VRAM suitable for modern titles at high settings, with headroom for ray-traced effects given the 12 dedicated RT cores.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or digital art will benefit from the GPU's FP32 performance of 3.994 TFLOPS and the CPU's balanced multi-threading. The system's 81st-percentile combined rank indicates it can handle a mix of CPU-bound and GPU-bound tasks without a clear weak point.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 14 threads and strong single-core performance, which speeds up both compilation and interactive tooling. The data encryption score of 12195 supports secure development workflows involving encrypted repositories and VPN connections.

Students and small business workstations will find the 15-watt TDP ideal for all-day battery life in lecture halls or meeting rooms. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback for basic display tasks, enhancing reliability. The system's 76th-percentile CPU rank ensures it remains responsive for years of office applications and web-based workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a balanced profile with a slight GPU bias. The GPU's 85th-percentile rank is higher than the CPU's 76th-percentile rank, indicating the graphics card is the stronger component relative to the broader market. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or ray-traced rendering, the Arc A530M will be the primary performance driver, with the CPU providing adequate support.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as video encoding, software compilation, or heavy multitasking, the Ultra 5 135U's 15-watt TDP may become a limiting factor. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz helps with single-threaded tasks, but sustained all-core loads may cause the processor to settle below peak clocks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9315 indicates solid but not exceptional sustained performance.

The memory subsystem is not a likely bottleneck. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient for the processor's needs, and the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for its 128-bit bus and 8 GB of VRAM. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU to communicate with the CPU.

FPS scaling will be influenced by which component is saturated. In lightweight esports titles, the CPU's single-thread performance will set the ceiling. In graphically intensive AAA games, the GPU will be the limiter, and the CPU's 14 threads will likely have headroom. The overall 81st-percentile combined rank suggests the pairing is well matched, with neither component drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the build class field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U, a mobile processor from the Meteor Lake architecture, and the Intel Arc A530M, a discrete mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $332, which is the only pricing detail available.

The system's overall tier is strong, with a combined percentile of 81. The CPU's average benchmark score of 22618 places it at 76th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 46614 places it at 85th percentile. This indicates a system that is well above average for both processing and graphics, suitable for a wide range of demanding applications.

The CPU's 12 cores and 14 threads provide a solid foundation for modern workloads, while the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 12 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and high-resolution gaming. The 15-watt TDP of the CPU allows for efficient operation, while the GPU's 65-watt TDP indicates it will require adequate cooling but is reasonable for a discrete mobile part.

Overall, this build represents a capable mid-to-high-tier mobile platform that balances CPU and GPU performance effectively. The 81st-percentile combined rank confirms it is positioned well above the median laptop, making it a sensible choice for users who need both processing power and graphics capability in a portable form factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps data for this CPU and GPU pairing. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Given the GPU's 85th-percentile rank and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 performance, the Arc A530M is positioned to handle modern games at 1080p with high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures in most current titles. The 12 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the modest FP32 throughput suggests ray tracing should be used selectively rather than at maximum quality.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3343 in PassMark is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming scenarios at 1080p. The 14 threads ensure background tasks and game logic are processed without contention. The 15-watt TDP may limit sustained performance in long gaming sessions, but boost clocks of 4.40 GHz will provide short bursts of high performance when needed.

For esports titles and optimized games, frame rates could be high enough for high-refresh displays, though specific numbers cannot be confirmed. For AAA games with ray tracing enabled, the system will likely require settings adjustments to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's Vulkan score of 43492 and OpenCL score of 49735 suggest strong driver optimization for modern game APIs.

In summary, the estimated gaming performance is competitive with the nearest GPU rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and RX 6550M, as well as the NVIDIA RTX A2000. The system is expected to deliver a smooth experience at 1080p for most titles, with the understanding that these are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than measured FPS data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135U + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds