SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

22,618 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no tested frame rate rows for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U paired with the Intel Arc A370M, so all gaming expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components rather than verified in-game results. The data clearly indicates a laptop platform positioned for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, not a high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming machine.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197 (0.1% ahead), while the AMD Radeon RX 470 sits at 28,996 (0.6% behind). This clustering suggests the Arc A370M delivers frame rates comparable to a desktop-class GPU from several generations ago, which in practical terms means playable 1080p performance in most titles when settings are adjusted appropriately. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor for texture-heavy modern games, likely forcing lower texture quality presets at 1080p.

The CPU side reinforces this estimate. The Core Ultra 5 135U scores 1,563 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 9,315 in multi-core, placing it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. These scores indicate sufficient processing headroom to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios, though the 15 W TDP and mobile-oriented architecture suggest sustained gaming loads will be constrained by thermal and power limits common to ultraportable-class laptop processors. For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the combination should handle 1080p at high refresh rates in many cases, but demanding AAA titles will require medium or low settings to maintain smooth frame pacing.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 135U achieves an average benchmark score of 22,618, placing it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22,625 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-1270P scores 22,502 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Core i5-13500H scores 22,468 (0.7% behind). The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22,791 (0.8% ahead of the Ultra 5). This near-dead-heat positioning means the Ultra 5 135U trades blows with established mid-range mobile processors from both Intel and AMD, with no meaningful performance gap in either direction.

Looking at the individual CPU benchmark results, the multi-core picture is consistent with a 12-core, 14-thread design. Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 5,934, while R23 multi-core reaches 9,315 — both figures indicate solid sustained multi-threaded throughput for a 15 W part. Single-core performance is respectable but not class-leading: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1,563, and PassMark single-thread scores 3,343. PassMark multi-thread scores 17,359, with integer math at 56,864 and floating-point math at 41,232. Data compression scores 196,712, encryption hits 12,195, and extended instructions reach 11,144. These numbers position the CPU as a capable all-rounder that will not bottleneck the GPU in most workloads.

The Arc A370M GPU posts an average benchmark score of 29,175 across Geekbench OpenCL (29,676) and Vulkan (28,673) tests. This places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The deltaPct values against its nearest rivals confirm tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH leads by 0.1%, the AMD FirePro W8000 leads by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M trails by 1% despite being a much larger GPU — suggesting the A370M's architecture punches above its memory subsystem limitations in synthetic tests. Combined, the CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile yield a combined percentile of 75, indicating a balanced pairing that sits comfortably in the mid-range of laptop-class hardware.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip, codenamed DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. This is a compact, power-efficient design with a 35 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops rather than gaming behemoths.

Memory configuration is the most significant constraint: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivers 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in games that stream large textures or in compute workloads with high memory pressure. The memory clock runs at 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective transfer rate. The GPU's 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units provide a raw compute foundation of 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, figures that align with its 64-bit memory interface.

Ray tracing hardware is present with 8 RT cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 1,550 MHz with a boost clock of 2,050 MHz. The PCIe interface is Gen 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for this class of GPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 indicate that the GPU performs consistently across different compute APIs, with Vulkan slightly trailing OpenCL. In rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS positions this GPU for entry-level 3D rendering and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 4 GB memory cap will limit scene complexity in professional applications. The production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-matched pairing where the CPU and GPU occupy similar percentile standings — 76th and 74th respectively — suggesting neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 22,618 versus the GPU's 29,175 indicates that in purely synthetic terms, the GPU has more aggregate compute headroom, but the real bottleneck analysis requires examining workload-specific numbers.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 4 GB memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,563 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive the GPU to its limits in most titles at 1080p, so the bottleneck shifts to the GPU's memory subsystem and shading throughput. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 76th percentile means neither component is drastically holding back the other — the pair is balanced within a narrow performance band. However, the fact that the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% behind in average score) while the CPU's rivals include the Ryzen 5 7535U (0.8% ahead) suggests the CPU has slightly more relative headroom than the GPU in this pairing.

For CPU-bound workloads like data compression (196,712 in PassMark) or encryption (12,195), the GPU plays no role, and the 12-core, 14-thread configuration determines throughput. For GPU-bound tasks like Vulkan rendering (28,673 in Geekbench), the CPU's role is primarily feeding draw calls and physics calculations, where its single-thread performance of 3,343 in PassMark single-thread is adequate. The FPS scaling picture, though unmeasured, would likely show diminishing returns when lowering resolution below 1080p, as the CPU would become the limiting factor at very high frame rates in esports titles — a scenario where the 15 W TDP could cause thermal throttling in sustained loads.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U is a 12-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the Meteor Lake architecture using Intel's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 1,600 MHz and a boost clock of 4,400 MHz, with a 15 W TDP — clearly designed for power-constrained mobile environments. The socket is Intel BGA 2049, confirming it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported.

The cache hierarchy consists of 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This 12 MB L3 is modest for a 12-core design but appropriate for the power envelope. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which could serve as a fallback display adapter or for light GPU tasks when the discrete A370M is not needed. The launch date is December 2023, with a launch MSRP of $332, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches at or slightly above its weight class. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 1,634 with single-core at 228; R20 multi-core hits 5,934 with single-core at 837; R23 multi-core reaches 9,315 with single-core at 1,563. These numbers indicate that the 12-core configuration provides strong multi-threaded performance for a 15 W part, while single-core performance is competitive with mid-range mobile chips from the same era. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread at 17,359, physics at 1,122, and prime numbers at 64. The data compression score of 196,712 is particularly strong, suggesting good integer throughput for archiving and file management tasks. Floating-point math at 41,232 and integer math at 56,864 indicate balanced compute capabilities across different instruction types. Random string sorting at 21,620 completes the picture of a versatile, power-efficient mobile processor.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a laptop that can handle everyday productivity, light content creation, and moderate gaming without demanding desktop-class performance. The 76th percentile CPU ranking and 74th percentile GPU ranking place this build in the upper-midrange of mobile hardware, suitable for students who need a machine for coursework, research, and occasional gaming sessions — particularly at 1080p resolution where the GPU's 4 GB memory is adequate for medium settings in most titles.

Content creators working with photo editing, light video editing, or 3D modeling will find the CPU's 12 cores and 14 threads capable of handling multi-threaded workloads like rendering previews and exporting media. The PassMark data compression score of 196,712 suggests efficient handling of large file archives, while the encryption score of 12,195 indicates reasonable performance for secure file operations. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects in creative software, though the 4 GB memory will limit the complexity of 3D scenes or high-resolution textures.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's balanced single-thread and multi-thread performance, enabling fast compilation of small-to-medium projects and responsive IDE operation. The Vulkan support (1.4) and DirectX 12 Ultimate support make this a viable platform for graphics programming and testing. Small business workstations running office suites, spreadsheet analysis, and database applications will find the CPU's integer math score of 56,864 more than adequate for daily tasks. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the primary gaming audience; those seeking 1440p or high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity will be insufficient for demanding titles at higher presets.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 2049 socket means the CPU is permanently soldered to the motherboard, eliminating any possibility of a CPU upgrade. This is a closed platform in the traditional sense — the user's upgrade path is limited to memory, storage, and peripherals. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, and while the exact capacity is motherboard-dependent, the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation for the CPU and GPU to share data. Upgrading from a single-channel to dual-channel configuration, if not already present, would yield meaningful performance gains in both CPU and GPU workloads, as the integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU GPU and discrete A370M both rely on system memory bandwidth for certain operations.

PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage, and adding or upgrading an SSD is the most impactful user-accessible upgrade. The GPU is also soldered (IGP slot width, portable device dependent display outputs), so there is no discrete GPU upgrade path. The 35 W GPU TDP combined with the 15 W CPU TDP means a modest power supply in the laptop chassis can handle the combined load without issue — the suggested PSU field is null, indicating the integrated power delivery is sufficient for the stock configuration. The most sensible next upgrade for users of this platform is expanding RAM to the maximum supported capacity and installing the fastest PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive available, as these will extend the usable life of the system for memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U CPU with the Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU, from the Core Ultra Series 1 with Meteor Lake architecture, is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is an Arc 3 Mobile part from the Alchemist generation with a 35 W TDP. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-midrange of laptop configurations, competitive with other mobile platforms from the same era.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22,618 and GPU's average of 29,175 indicate a pairing where the GPU has slightly more raw compute headroom, but the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance ensures balanced operation across diverse workloads. The nearest CPU rivals — the Core i5-12500H (0% delta), Core i7-1270P (0.5% behind), Core i5-13500H (0.7% behind), and Ryzen 5 7535U (0.8% ahead) — show that this processor sits in a highly competitive performance band, neither leading nor trailing significantly. The GPU's rivals — the RX Vega M GH (0.1% ahead), FirePro W8000 (0.1% ahead), RX 470 (0.6% behind), and RX 6800M (1% behind) — similarly show tight competition with a wide range of GPU classes. This build is best understood as a balanced, power-efficient mobile solution for users who need one device for work, study, and casual gaming, rather than a specialized workstation or gaming flagship.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, with the CPU at the 76th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U has an average benchmark score of 22,791, which is 0.8% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 135U's 22,618. The Intel Core i5-12500H matches the Ultra 5 at 22,625 (0% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective transfer rate.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities. The GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U has 12 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 1,600 MHz and a boost clock of 4,400 MHz. It has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB L2 per core, and 112 KB L1 per core.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in the future?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard. The GPU is also soldered, so neither component can be upgraded individually.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022. The CPU, by contrast, has a production status of active with a release date of December 2023, and a launch MSRP of $332.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds